Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth K. Hansraj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Alex Shih ^Talk 04:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth K. Hansraj

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO/WP:NPROF. Most Ghits are him being cited as an "expert" in articles but I couldn't find any coverage of him personally. Possible undisclosed COI by author, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#International_Project_Management_Association. shoy (reactions) 14:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As written, this article fails to satisfy notability criteria. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - However, please comment on content, not contributors. Let the matter of COI be decided in a proper forum. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable as written. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:NPROF and the coverage is not enough to meet WP:GNG. --bonadea contributions talk 12:21, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG as others have pointed out. Seems like a smart guy, but not a notable one. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.