Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Anderson & Associates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Anderson & Associates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its unusual that I find myself persuaded to stay my hand in a contested csd by comments on the talk page, however this one makes an interesting case that this is notable for its role in ghostwriting, therefore on the strength of that argument I have elected to put this up at afd to get feedback on whether or not this should be deleted, merged, redirected, or draft-ified. TomStar81 (Talk) 17:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks non-trivial support for the company. Although uses recognized authors, the author's works are their own work product (granted it is not acknowledged as such, but neither is it acknowledged as the company's) and the author's notability is not inherited by the company. reddogsix (talk) 18:31, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as completely damned as an advertisement, from the advertising information which cares to state clients and published PR, to the said published and republished PR, there is literally nothing close to an acceptable article here and certainly nothing suggesting anyone has cared to fix it since the one account is an advertising-only one. SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional PR content. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.