Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marzena Ozarek Szilke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marzena Ozarek Szilke

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An h-index of 2 makes it very unlikely that WP:PROF is met. There was a flurry of media coverage about the discovery of what was claimed to be the first pregnant mummy, but other researchers have published papers stating that it was not pregnant and nor was it the first pregnant mummy either. I can't find any other sources which would merit us having an article. SmartSE (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Archaeology and Poland. SmartSE (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough in-depth coverage outside of flashy (and arguably bogus) preggo mummy research. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 14:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 15:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Egypt. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Weak citation index, with no other sourcing found, not passing PROF. Oaktree b (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It does not meet any of the WP:ACADEMIC criteria. She is known only for one thing - the pregnant mummy.

JamesKH76 (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notabilityNocturnal781 (talk) 17:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All sources focus not on the subject of the article, but projects with which they have been involved - also fails criteria at WP:NACADEMIC. Jguglielmin (talk) 18:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If someone wants to use some of the text from this article to start a page about the Warsaw Mummy Project I'd support a redirect there. pburka (talk) 18:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not appear to meet WP:ACADEMIC. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article subject has insufficient coverage by WP:RS to support any claim to WP:NOTABILITY per WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Shawn Teller (talk) 02:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.