Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan O'Connor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Megan O'Connor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Most of the sources are primary, and of those that are secondary and reliable (e.g., the Time article), none discuss the subject or are not useful in determining notability (i.e., being on the Forbes 30 for 30 list is not an established claim of notability). No information exists on which to base a WP:BLP, and ostensibly this article is more about the startup of which the subject is part. Kinu ^t/_c 22:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - this article was recently created by new student editor. Please be welcoming and cognizant of WP:BITE. TJMSmith (talk) 02:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GS citations WP:Too soon for WP:Prof#C1. The rest appears to be just corporate puff. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. The subject had a successful PhD, and has one paper that is reasonably highly-cited, though with an especially large number of coauthors. I don't think it's enough for WP:NPROF C1. GNG looks like a better fit, but the only coverage seems to be local interest stories from local papers. She and the company may eventually become notable, for now it looks WP:TOOSOON. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 12:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable enough yet. WP:NPROF Freeranging intellect (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable businesswoman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - unusual accomplishments. Bearian (talk) 03:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What unusual accomplishments? It doesn't link anywhere. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.