Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia McCaffrey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia McCaffrey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:N at it's present state. Feickus (talk) 04:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks like a WP:SINGLEEVENT to me. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is an example of why Wikipedia needs to consistently apply not news. Just because someone makes the news cycle does not mean they are pemanently significant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:42, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:18, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable person. SL93 (talk) 01:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.