Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Yorker Deal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The New Yorker Deal

This is a strategy - it belongs somewhere which discusses Monopoly strategy - possibly even a wikibook, but certainly not on the pedia. This definition of fancruft should be deleted, but debate is welcome. Scapler (talk) 03:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not encyclopedic and unsources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Isn't this nomination faulty? I thought that articles were only supposed to be in one deletion process at a time...
Comment It just so happens that the other editor and I nominated the page for deletion (under different processes) at pretty much the exact same time. Truthfully, the double nomination occurred under complete coincidence. Scapler (talk) 11:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Quite encyclopedic (as part of an article on Monopoly strategy wherever that was located; I know we have it), but totally unverifiable, not even the external links mention it. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added phrase in brackets to comment. -Mgm|^(talk) 00:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:26, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.