Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Q

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yung Q

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP about an artist with no claim of notability. The only references are a link to a YouTube video, and a writeup by Atlantic Records about an unrelated artist named "Twista", who had an LP released in 1991, when this artist was 3 years old. A quick web search turned up no coverage, only artist pages, albums for sale, and lyrics. This may actually qualify as a Candidate for Speedy Deletion under A7, but I am listing it here so at least some other editor (besides myself) can have input, with the understanding that the outcome could possibly still be speedy deletion. —Josh3580_talk/hist 18:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note, at this point in time, the page author has removed the AFD template from the article multiple times. —Josh3580_talk/hist 20:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A7 seems fitting as well to me. I don't see much of anything, just a self-made biography on a MTV platform. The only news hits for "Yung Q" are about someone named Quentin, and Twista is another musician entirely. There is also some really bizarre info on the page, like him being up for a apparently major film role and the entire personal life section. From a look at the linked twitter account, the handle "legitballin41" is used by Quesada, and this is also the account here on Wikipedia that created this article. At best this seems WP:TOOSOON. Cannolis (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article about a subject on whom there appears to be no evidence of meeting any WP:MUSICBIO criteria. AllyD (talk) 08:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 11:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable muscician -Fails MUSICBIO & GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 16:48, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.