What do you think?
Rate this book
My Life
An exhaustive, soul-searching memoir, Bill Clinton's My Life is a refreshingly candid look at the former president as a son, brother, teacher, father, husband, and public figure. Clinton painstakingly outlines the history behind his greatest successes and failures, including his dedication to educational and economic reform, his war against a "vast right-wing operation" determined to destroy him, and the "morally indefensible" acts for which he was nearly impeached. My Life is autobiography as therapy--a personal history written by a man trying to face and banish his private demons.
Clinton approaches the story of his youth with gusto, sharing tales of giant watermelons, nine-pound tumors, a charging ram, famous mobsters and jazz musicians, and a BB gun standoff. He offers an equally energetic portrait of American history, pop culture, and the evolving political landscape, covering the historical events that shaped his early years (namely the deaths of Martin Luther King Jr. and JFK) and the events that shaped his presidency (Waco, Bosnia, Somalia). What makes My Life remarkable as a political memoir is how thoroughly it is infused with Clinton's unassuming, charmingly pithy voice:
I learned a lot from the stories my uncle, aunts, and grandparents told me: that no one is perfect but most people are good; that people can't be judged only by their worst or weakest moments; that harsh judgments can make hypocrites of us all; that a lot of life is just showing up and hanging on; that laughter is often the best, and sometimes the only, response to pain.
However, that same voice might tire readers as Clinton applies his penchant for minute details to a distractible laundry list of events, from his youth through the years of his presidency. Not wanting to forget a single detail that might help account for his actions, Clinton overdoes it--do we really need to know the name of his childhood barber? But when Clinton sticks to the meat of his story--recollections about Mother, his abusive stepfather, Hillary, the campaign trail, and Kenneth Starr--the veracity of emotion and Kitchen Confidential-type revelations about "what it is like to be President" make My Life impossible to put down.
To Clinton, "politics is a contact sport," and while he claims that My Life is not intended to make excuses or assign blame, it does portray him as a fighter whose strategy is to "take the first hit, then counterpunch as hard as I could." While My Life is primarily a stroll through Clinton's memories, it is also a scathing rebuke--a retaliation against his detractors, including Kenneth Starr, whose "mindless search for scandal" protected the guilty while "persecuting the innocent" and distracted his Administration from pressing international matters (including strikes on al Qaeda). Counterpunch indeed.
At its core, My Life is a charming and intriguing if flawed book by an equally intriguing and flawed man who had his worst failures and humiliations made public. Ultimately, the man who left office in the shadow of scandal offers an honest and open account of his life, allowing readers to witness his struggle to "drain the most out of every moment" while maintaining the character with which he was raised. It is a remarkably intimate, persuasive look at the boy he was, the President he became, and man he is today. --Daphne Durham
1056 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2004
About the author
Bill Clinton
208 books1,036 followersEconomic expansion and the first balanced federal budget in three decades marked presidency of William Jefferson Clinton, known as Bill, who served forty-second in the United States from 1993 to 2001; the House of Representatives in 1999 impeached him on perjury and obstruction of justice charges, but the Senate acquitted him on both counts.
Born William Jefferson Blythe III, he ranked as the third-youngest president, older only than Theodore Roosevelt and John Fitzgerald Kennedy. People know him the first baby-boomer president at the end of the Cold War. He is the husband of Hillary Rodham Clinton, the junior senator from New York and a Democratic candidate in the election of 2008 in the United States.
People described Clinton as a New Democrat and knew him largely for the Third Way philosophy of governance that came to epitomize his two terms as president. They described his "centrist" policies on issues, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement. Clinton presided over the longest period of peacetime economic expansion in American history, which included a balanced budget and a reported federal surplus. Clinton reported a surplus of $559 billion at the end of his presidency, based on Congressional accounting rules. His presidency was also quickly challenged. On the heels of a failed attempt at health care reform with a Democratic Congress, Republicans won control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years. In his second term he was impeached by the U.S. House for perjury and obstruction of justice, but was subsequently acquitted by the United States Senate and completed his term. Polls of the American electorate taken at this time showed that up to 70% were against pursuing the allegations. (New York Times December 21, 1998).
Clinton left office with a 65% approval rating, the highest end-of-presidency rating of any President who came into office after World War II. Since leaving office, Clinton has been involved in public speaking and humanitarian work. He created the William J. Clinton Foundation to promote and address international causes, such as treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS and global warming. In 2004, he released a personal autobiography, My Life.
Born William Jefferson Blythe III, he ranked as the third-youngest president, older only than Theodore Roosevelt and John Fitzgerald Kennedy. People know him the first baby-boomer president at the end of the Cold War. He is the husband of Hillary Rodham Clinton, the junior senator from New York and a Democratic candidate in the election of 2008 in the United States.
People described Clinton as a New Democrat and knew him largely for the Third Way philosophy of governance that came to epitomize his two terms as president. They described his "centrist" policies on issues, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement. Clinton presided over the longest period of peacetime economic expansion in American history, which included a balanced budget and a reported federal surplus. Clinton reported a surplus of $559 billion at the end of his presidency, based on Congressional accounting rules. His presidency was also quickly challenged. On the heels of a failed attempt at health care reform with a Democratic Congress, Republicans won control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years. In his second term he was impeached by the U.S. House for perjury and obstruction of justice, but was subsequently acquitted by the United States Senate and completed his term. Polls of the American electorate taken at this time showed that up to 70% were against pursuing the allegations. (New York Times December 21, 1998).
Clinton left office with a 65% approval rating, the highest end-of-presidency rating of any President who came into office after World War II. Since leaving office, Clinton has been involved in public speaking and humanitarian work. He created the William J. Clinton Foundation to promote and address international causes, such as treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS and global warming. In 2004, he released a personal autobiography, My Life.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,279 reviews
July 6, 2017
There is much that is good about the book. There is much that is annoying. I most enjoyed his descriptions of dealings with foreign leaders. We get the skinny on who was really in favor of what, who was willing to make serious concessions, who was not. Good stuff. The part of the book about his early life was interesting as well, showing family background and how he got the connections that helped him move up. Interesting. I found it annoying that every person he mentions he seems to feel it necessary to burden with the weight of somehow changing his life, or of having had some lasting positive influence on him. I do wish he’d been more willing to describe more than only one or two evil-doers in negative terms. The persistent sunniness gets grating. One might think that he never had an affair prior to Monica. Of course it would be expecting too much to have him detail all his personal crimes. Even though the conservatives lied relentlessly about his personal failings, I find it difficult to believe that Monica was the first. Still this is an important historical perspective from the man who was in the center of a cyclone.
August 28, 2007
Make sure you are interested in politics if you're going to read this. Don't just read it for the Lewinsky scandal because it's barely mentioned! Clinton is a brilliant political mind and it shows in this book. I learned a lot about the events of his administration, which was interesting for me as I was only ages 9-17 while he was in office. Gave a good perspective to things (though, admittedly, one sided).
August 20, 2017
Whatever opinions people may have of current or past American Presidents, it struck me quite forcibly in reading Bill Clinton’s ‘My Life’ how important are the qualities of sanity and of being grounded in compatible complementary sane friendships, and having associations with smart mainstream geniuses and educated experts, and in hiring experienced managers.
Just saying.
‘My Life’ is the autobiography of President Bill Clinton, who was the 42nd President of the United States. He tells readers at length many intricate details about his childhood, education, family and friends, as well as how he became obsessed with politics (I think he was a natural) and how he became determined to work towards being a professional politician since childhood. He fully airs out and describes his (known) mistaken judgements and his character flaws (I think with reluctance, but he knows it is all out there and a part of the public record). Those errors he feels he can defend, he does.
For better or worse, Clinton gives us his insider viewpoint on why he is who he is, how his life played out, and what being President of the United States is like and what a President does every day. Most of the book is so detailed I felt he must have used personal diaries, published interviews and other public records, recorded minutes of meetings and personal notes, and his own appointment diaries.
I was alive and an adult throughout his Presidency, so I am familiar with many of the events he describes. The book fills in a lot more information beyond what was in newspaper stories, of course, and Clinton gives us his emotional and mental thoughts as well. I am not naive about autobiographies, especially political ones, but I was very fascinated. It seemed as truthful as Clinton could be, but it also was careful, especially when referencing other politicians. The sentence ”I liked him” was used most frequently everywhere. Humor was used if Clinton revealed any personal faults of others which could be derogatory, with the exception of discussions about people who were seriously defaming Clinton maliciously. But I must say Clinton also tried to honestly describe his opponents’ views and ideas from where they stood ideologically or because of the constituents who supported them. He also included the variety of beliefs and conclusions advisors gave him when presented with the same set of facts about an issue. The vastly different recommendations of advisors would have had me in a fetal position under the bed, frankly, especially when issues of military force were concerned. Wow.
I found the book to be also a remarkable work record of what decisions, appointments, responsibilities, meetings and travels a President, any President, must handle.
Within a working day, American Presidents may decide to invade and destroy with a huge military force a foreign country - or not, to shut down the funding and stop providing experts for a health program and/or begin a new health program affecting millions of people, attend a baseball game and then a medal award ceremony, dig a shovelful of groundbreaking dirt for photos in opening a new factory, select a federal judge, fire a staff member suspected of media leaks, open up a new finance auditing office, meet-and-greet rich business people to ask for campaign money, discuss and sign thirty bills passed by Congress, meet Congressional staffers and/or cabinet members and world leaders in an economic summit to discuss cellphones and iron imports and toilet-paper exports, attend the opening of a musical play, check out an interior designer’s suggestions for White House curtains and consult with a historian for moving in historical White House furniture, give ten speeches, and close out the day with a televised ceremonial dinner for a Hollywood singer.
Mix in the trading of jokes and answering rude questions with angry and cynical journalists everywhere you are, as well as the constant threat of death from a stalker, terrorist or madman, requiring the never-ending surveillance and presence of law enforcement personnel and the Secret Service, all the while being ready for unexpected close-ups from cameras and recording equipment, and trying to remember anything you say or do can be leaked to everyone in the world to see. Not to mention the books, magazine articles and Internet parodies that will circulate and follow you beyond your death, in fact the stories about you will be told for centuries whether true or not.
Also, a President who is traveling for his own or his party’s members’ campaigns, or to foreign countries, and who can end up visiting five different cities in a day while continuing to competently handle all of the above in between moments of rushing about while being camera ready at all times (however, no taxpayer-paid haircuts costing $500 allowed), needs to be physically and mentally fit, or at least appear to be.
Personally, I would find it surreal to pardon a turkey or roll an Easter egg with jokes for ten minutes with children, and then go in to meet disabled combat veterans for an emotional award ceremony for an hour, then attend a difficult finance meeting with agricultural industrialists to discuss farming policy for two hours, then next hurry out for a newspaper photo-op lunch at a local diner to honor lower-class aspirations and diversity for a half-hour, then rush back to meet with Russian President Putin (or Yeltsin, in Clinton’s case) to sign agreements about military unit placements for an hour, after which attend an arts entertainment show with Hollywood stars who have or will donate campaign money, all of whom want a selfie, for three hours, and then meet with feuding cabinet members who are arguing where they should sit around the table before discussing the latest CIA reports of who has weapons of mass destruction for three hours. Not to mention the spouse complaining about not having talked to me for days or the kids or relatives or aides or associates fighting over being scheduled to go to yet another benefit photo-op representing the administration while I am reading secret security files about activities around the world which could topple governments and start WWIII while brushing my teeth and getting ready to sleep in Abraham Lincoln’s bed.
At least, if I was like the 44 Presidents who have taken the job seriously, I definitely would have many moments of exhausted unreality, worry and considerable consternation. Being human, I would hope people would have a little charity and have forgiveness for my mistakes or foolishness, and that perhaps history might laud me in the weighing of my accomplishments against my stupid failures.
I think I can safely conclude Bill Clinton did his best based on what other biographers of his life have written, as have all the Presidents of the United States before him, and this autobiography supports my thinking.
But what if a President comes along who is not like any of the previous 44 Presidents?
What if I, for argument's sake, was a slightly demented, uneducated rich person who couldn’t care less about the higher-calling aspirations of being the President of the United States and I believed the average person was lazy ignorant trailer trash by nature and not nurture? What if I was delighted instead at the chance to prove my negative ideas about the values of the American public and my opinion of the utter inconsequential utility of the existence of the government of the United States to ordinary people and the world. I might jump at the chance to prove that Americans are all ignorant lowlifes, and that that lifestyle is more enticing to people than trying to be the best they can be. I would demonstrate how promises of making vulgar culture and predatory business practices and identity politics the conversation will seduce and divert people from being their better selves. I would wall out all of the more noble yearnings, endeavors and passions of a country by an avalanche of vulgar twitterings. I might believe people should be left to indulge their vices and live fast die young in ignorance, rather than have the support of a government that gives society tools and leadership to help people become empowered to build communities that work together and to build a productive future for themselves and have happy healthy children.
If such a short-sighted, morally-depraved, narcissistic, secretly self-hating insecure man became President, he might feel he needed revenge on elite Yale- and Harvard-educated political science graduates full of workable governance theories and hopes of doing public good because they are better, smarter people than he ever will be. He might also want revenge on the self-important conservative political establishment pretending publicly to a dedication to democratic values and religious faith while lining their pockets and sneering secretly at scammed voters and vulgar lascivious people such as himself. Such a limited small-minded self-centered intelligence, twisted by personal demons and public slights, might feel the Presidency should be an opportunity to destroy enemies, wipe out past accomplishments and hose conventional morality down into the sewers. He would give people permission to act out their worst instincts, especially himself, instead of working for the common good. Such a person sees only the darkness in people, not the light.
Gee whiz, wouldn’t such man be horrible as President of the United States? Good thing the men who made it to the Oval Office, whatever their faults and ideological party, have always wanted to make the world a better place, not worse, and have always worked hard to allow a space for people to be the person their pet dogs and children believe them to be, right?
The book was fact-checked by the publisher. Clinton also had a professional editor. An assistant researched and examined historical documents, diaries, memoirs and notebooks by Clinton and hundreds of others. An index and pictures are included.
Just saying.
‘My Life’ is the autobiography of President Bill Clinton, who was the 42nd President of the United States. He tells readers at length many intricate details about his childhood, education, family and friends, as well as how he became obsessed with politics (I think he was a natural) and how he became determined to work towards being a professional politician since childhood. He fully airs out and describes his (known) mistaken judgements and his character flaws (I think with reluctance, but he knows it is all out there and a part of the public record). Those errors he feels he can defend, he does.
For better or worse, Clinton gives us his insider viewpoint on why he is who he is, how his life played out, and what being President of the United States is like and what a President does every day. Most of the book is so detailed I felt he must have used personal diaries, published interviews and other public records, recorded minutes of meetings and personal notes, and his own appointment diaries.
I was alive and an adult throughout his Presidency, so I am familiar with many of the events he describes. The book fills in a lot more information beyond what was in newspaper stories, of course, and Clinton gives us his emotional and mental thoughts as well. I am not naive about autobiographies, especially political ones, but I was very fascinated. It seemed as truthful as Clinton could be, but it also was careful, especially when referencing other politicians. The sentence ”I liked him” was used most frequently everywhere. Humor was used if Clinton revealed any personal faults of others which could be derogatory, with the exception of discussions about people who were seriously defaming Clinton maliciously. But I must say Clinton also tried to honestly describe his opponents’ views and ideas from where they stood ideologically or because of the constituents who supported them. He also included the variety of beliefs and conclusions advisors gave him when presented with the same set of facts about an issue. The vastly different recommendations of advisors would have had me in a fetal position under the bed, frankly, especially when issues of military force were concerned. Wow.
I found the book to be also a remarkable work record of what decisions, appointments, responsibilities, meetings and travels a President, any President, must handle.
Within a working day, American Presidents may decide to invade and destroy with a huge military force a foreign country - or not, to shut down the funding and stop providing experts for a health program and/or begin a new health program affecting millions of people, attend a baseball game and then a medal award ceremony, dig a shovelful of groundbreaking dirt for photos in opening a new factory, select a federal judge, fire a staff member suspected of media leaks, open up a new finance auditing office, meet-and-greet rich business people to ask for campaign money, discuss and sign thirty bills passed by Congress, meet Congressional staffers and/or cabinet members and world leaders in an economic summit to discuss cellphones and iron imports and toilet-paper exports, attend the opening of a musical play, check out an interior designer’s suggestions for White House curtains and consult with a historian for moving in historical White House furniture, give ten speeches, and close out the day with a televised ceremonial dinner for a Hollywood singer.
Mix in the trading of jokes and answering rude questions with angry and cynical journalists everywhere you are, as well as the constant threat of death from a stalker, terrorist or madman, requiring the never-ending surveillance and presence of law enforcement personnel and the Secret Service, all the while being ready for unexpected close-ups from cameras and recording equipment, and trying to remember anything you say or do can be leaked to everyone in the world to see. Not to mention the books, magazine articles and Internet parodies that will circulate and follow you beyond your death, in fact the stories about you will be told for centuries whether true or not.
Also, a President who is traveling for his own or his party’s members’ campaigns, or to foreign countries, and who can end up visiting five different cities in a day while continuing to competently handle all of the above in between moments of rushing about while being camera ready at all times (however, no taxpayer-paid haircuts costing $500 allowed), needs to be physically and mentally fit, or at least appear to be.
Personally, I would find it surreal to pardon a turkey or roll an Easter egg with jokes for ten minutes with children, and then go in to meet disabled combat veterans for an emotional award ceremony for an hour, then attend a difficult finance meeting with agricultural industrialists to discuss farming policy for two hours, then next hurry out for a newspaper photo-op lunch at a local diner to honor lower-class aspirations and diversity for a half-hour, then rush back to meet with Russian President Putin (or Yeltsin, in Clinton’s case) to sign agreements about military unit placements for an hour, after which attend an arts entertainment show with Hollywood stars who have or will donate campaign money, all of whom want a selfie, for three hours, and then meet with feuding cabinet members who are arguing where they should sit around the table before discussing the latest CIA reports of who has weapons of mass destruction for three hours. Not to mention the spouse complaining about not having talked to me for days or the kids or relatives or aides or associates fighting over being scheduled to go to yet another benefit photo-op representing the administration while I am reading secret security files about activities around the world which could topple governments and start WWIII while brushing my teeth and getting ready to sleep in Abraham Lincoln’s bed.
At least, if I was like the 44 Presidents who have taken the job seriously, I definitely would have many moments of exhausted unreality, worry and considerable consternation. Being human, I would hope people would have a little charity and have forgiveness for my mistakes or foolishness, and that perhaps history might laud me in the weighing of my accomplishments against my stupid failures.
I think I can safely conclude Bill Clinton did his best based on what other biographers of his life have written, as have all the Presidents of the United States before him, and this autobiography supports my thinking.
But what if a President comes along who is not like any of the previous 44 Presidents?
What if I, for argument's sake, was a slightly demented, uneducated rich person who couldn’t care less about the higher-calling aspirations of being the President of the United States and I believed the average person was lazy ignorant trailer trash by nature and not nurture? What if I was delighted instead at the chance to prove my negative ideas about the values of the American public and my opinion of the utter inconsequential utility of the existence of the government of the United States to ordinary people and the world. I might jump at the chance to prove that Americans are all ignorant lowlifes, and that that lifestyle is more enticing to people than trying to be the best they can be. I would demonstrate how promises of making vulgar culture and predatory business practices and identity politics the conversation will seduce and divert people from being their better selves. I would wall out all of the more noble yearnings, endeavors and passions of a country by an avalanche of vulgar twitterings. I might believe people should be left to indulge their vices and live fast die young in ignorance, rather than have the support of a government that gives society tools and leadership to help people become empowered to build communities that work together and to build a productive future for themselves and have happy healthy children.
If such a short-sighted, morally-depraved, narcissistic, secretly self-hating insecure man became President, he might feel he needed revenge on elite Yale- and Harvard-educated political science graduates full of workable governance theories and hopes of doing public good because they are better, smarter people than he ever will be. He might also want revenge on the self-important conservative political establishment pretending publicly to a dedication to democratic values and religious faith while lining their pockets and sneering secretly at scammed voters and vulgar lascivious people such as himself. Such a limited small-minded self-centered intelligence, twisted by personal demons and public slights, might feel the Presidency should be an opportunity to destroy enemies, wipe out past accomplishments and hose conventional morality down into the sewers. He would give people permission to act out their worst instincts, especially himself, instead of working for the common good. Such a person sees only the darkness in people, not the light.
Gee whiz, wouldn’t such man be horrible as President of the United States? Good thing the men who made it to the Oval Office, whatever their faults and ideological party, have always wanted to make the world a better place, not worse, and have always worked hard to allow a space for people to be the person their pet dogs and children believe them to be, right?
The book was fact-checked by the publisher. Clinton also had a professional editor. An assistant researched and examined historical documents, diaries, memoirs and notebooks by Clinton and hundreds of others. An index and pictures are included.
July 1, 2023
No matter what anyone might think about President Clinton, he was a charismatic individual.
People easily gravitated to him.
The book is large (957 pages) - and he covers a lot, whether you want to know it or not - but, while you are reading, you almost feel like you are right there with him. Like he is just talking directly to you telling his story because you want to hear it, and he wants you to know it.
Has he always seemed folksy and conversational? Maybe so.
I don't need to go into the details of what this book says - or why it meant anything to me. Or why I chose to take time to read it when I did (years ago). (I'm playing catch-up getting all these read books of mine onto Goodreads.)
I just know that this was one that I took my time with because I felt like we were sitting together having a conversation - or he was conversing to me about his life, and I enjoyed listening to his story.
Maybe you will, too.
People easily gravitated to him.
The book is large (957 pages) - and he covers a lot, whether you want to know it or not - but, while you are reading, you almost feel like you are right there with him. Like he is just talking directly to you telling his story because you want to hear it, and he wants you to know it.
Has he always seemed folksy and conversational? Maybe so.
I don't need to go into the details of what this book says - or why it meant anything to me. Or why I chose to take time to read it when I did (years ago). (I'm playing catch-up getting all these read books of mine onto Goodreads.)
I just know that this was one that I took my time with because I felt like we were sitting together having a conversation - or he was conversing to me about his life, and I enjoyed listening to his story.
Maybe you will, too.
May 23, 2007
I put this book under the fiction bookshelf for a reason. I read this book for a class on Bill Clinton's foreign policy (ok, most of the book. I skipped over all the personal stuff because frankly, I don't care about Monica Lewinsky). Anyway, due to the class and the fact that I lived through his presidency, I was fully aware of what his foreign policy actually was during his time in office (for a better, and more accurate understanding of his foreign policy read David Halberstam's War in a Time of Peace). I'm sure Clinton was fully aware of it too, but you'd never get that from reading the book. Yes, Clinton admits to his foreign policy mishaps, but at the same time that he accepts the blame for his mistakes, he also blames other people. Usually this happens WITHIN THE SAME SENTENCE. Honestly, it gets really annoying after a little while.
It doesn't matter if you think Clinton was a good president or a horrible one. It doesn't matter if you recognize that his foreign policy was a disaster or if you're not informed about it. Anyone who can comprehend more than one thought at a time should be able to see the ridiculous amounts of double talk that goes on in this book. I don't know if there is a written equivalent to talking out of both sides of your mouth, but Bill Clinton somehow manages to do it. The fact that neither him nor his own editors realized these blatant errors is astonishing.
Anyway, there have been plenty of other books written about the Clinton Presidency. Almost all of them are better than this excuse to grow a bigger ego.
It doesn't matter if you think Clinton was a good president or a horrible one. It doesn't matter if you recognize that his foreign policy was a disaster or if you're not informed about it. Anyone who can comprehend more than one thought at a time should be able to see the ridiculous amounts of double talk that goes on in this book. I don't know if there is a written equivalent to talking out of both sides of your mouth, but Bill Clinton somehow manages to do it. The fact that neither him nor his own editors realized these blatant errors is astonishing.
Anyway, there have been plenty of other books written about the Clinton Presidency. Almost all of them are better than this excuse to grow a bigger ego.
May 25, 2012
I don't particularly like Bill Clinton ....
I don't particularly like Bill Clinton on many levels. I have read many Presidential biographies and autobiographies and so I felt I should read this one, and suspend judgement.
I'm glad I did.
Whether you like Bill Clinton politically or personally is beside the point. He was President of the United States for 8 years. He has left a mark on History and what he has to say about it and the information he provides is worth the time to digest.
Unfortunately, today's commercial market demands instant gratification and so, in responding to that demand the most obvious criticism I can offer is that this book was written too soon. It takes time to digest the events and thinking of a presidency, and if anything, I believe this book would have benefited from some time passing and Clinton himself being able to digest and think through the events and policy of his presidency.
As it is, not suprisingly, Clinton spends a great deal of time and effort in this work defending himself and attacking his detractors. In that regard it reads like a current political campaign work, rather than a Statesman reflecting on his time in power. There could have been a lot more accomplished in this work had he avoided the temptation to use this platform to form a response to his contemporary political foes. I don't doubt that 50 years from now as people removed from the events read this work, they will be less concerned with Clinton's major investment of time and space to paint Ken Starr's investigation of himself as a witch-hunt and will want to know a little more about his actual thoughts and actions while working with policy and foreign relations.
Regardless of what you think about Bill Clinton, if you are able to set aside the need to attack him or extol him, you have to objectively admit that he is a remarkably intelligent and politically savvy person. While it is probably too soon to write a final assessment on the impact of his Presidency and policies upon History, he presided over a time of tremendous economic growth, technological change and a change in political climate and tactics. Whether his leadership was causitive or reactive to these factors, he will no doubt command attention in the years ahead as all that happened to and around him is digested and no doubt, over time additional information, yet unknown will come to light and factor in as well.
The book is long. It is thorough. It uses a consistent formula of presentation that seeks to take the issue or event addressed and put a human face. In that regard it reads like a summary of a State of the Union address and not a deeply reflective biography.
There is a ton of factual information, but it becomes somewhat shallow in tying that information together into a cohesive explanation as to the rationale for actions taken, positions espoused.
Nevertheless, regardless of what passions you may hold or not hold with regard to Clinton himself, the book is a reasonably well written work that the committed reader can work their way through it and hopefully come out with a better understanding of the life and times of this important contemporary and soon to be historical figure. I hope time is kind enough to President Clinton that he will take the time to suppliment this work and preserve some more of his thinking as times passes and he is able to better assimilate much of which remains to be addressed within his presidency.
I don't particularly like Bill Clinton on many levels. I have read many Presidential biographies and autobiographies and so I felt I should read this one, and suspend judgement.
I'm glad I did.
Whether you like Bill Clinton politically or personally is beside the point. He was President of the United States for 8 years. He has left a mark on History and what he has to say about it and the information he provides is worth the time to digest.
Unfortunately, today's commercial market demands instant gratification and so, in responding to that demand the most obvious criticism I can offer is that this book was written too soon. It takes time to digest the events and thinking of a presidency, and if anything, I believe this book would have benefited from some time passing and Clinton himself being able to digest and think through the events and policy of his presidency.
As it is, not suprisingly, Clinton spends a great deal of time and effort in this work defending himself and attacking his detractors. In that regard it reads like a current political campaign work, rather than a Statesman reflecting on his time in power. There could have been a lot more accomplished in this work had he avoided the temptation to use this platform to form a response to his contemporary political foes. I don't doubt that 50 years from now as people removed from the events read this work, they will be less concerned with Clinton's major investment of time and space to paint Ken Starr's investigation of himself as a witch-hunt and will want to know a little more about his actual thoughts and actions while working with policy and foreign relations.
Regardless of what you think about Bill Clinton, if you are able to set aside the need to attack him or extol him, you have to objectively admit that he is a remarkably intelligent and politically savvy person. While it is probably too soon to write a final assessment on the impact of his Presidency and policies upon History, he presided over a time of tremendous economic growth, technological change and a change in political climate and tactics. Whether his leadership was causitive or reactive to these factors, he will no doubt command attention in the years ahead as all that happened to and around him is digested and no doubt, over time additional information, yet unknown will come to light and factor in as well.
The book is long. It is thorough. It uses a consistent formula of presentation that seeks to take the issue or event addressed and put a human face. In that regard it reads like a summary of a State of the Union address and not a deeply reflective biography.
There is a ton of factual information, but it becomes somewhat shallow in tying that information together into a cohesive explanation as to the rationale for actions taken, positions espoused.
Nevertheless, regardless of what passions you may hold or not hold with regard to Clinton himself, the book is a reasonably well written work that the committed reader can work their way through it and hopefully come out with a better understanding of the life and times of this important contemporary and soon to be historical figure. I hope time is kind enough to President Clinton that he will take the time to suppliment this work and preserve some more of his thinking as times passes and he is able to better assimilate much of which remains to be addressed within his presidency.
September 5, 2007
I listened to this abridged audio but I liked it so much, I'm thinking of reading the much longer unabridged book! Bill Clinton was awesome, despite his brushing over his welfare reform, which was the worst thing he did while in office. Also, I'm all about Hilary now, I'd totally vote for her. People who just hate Bill Clinton for some reason or other should really read this book. I think it really humanizes him and shows just how many powerful people were working against him, going to any lengths to vilify and destroy him. I really liked the part at the end when he talks about how close he came to brokering a two-state solution to the problem of Palestine and Israel, but how Arafat -- who was getting older and, we later found out, very close to death -- turned it down despite everyone encouraging him to take the deal. Arafat tells Clinton that he is "a great man" and Clinton responds, "No, I'm a failure, and you have made me one." That gives me chills, for some reason. Oh, if only things had turned out differently!! And if only George Bush hadn't stolen that election, Al Gore was so rad. It fills me with longing and regret to hear about the Clinton years. It's really important to vote Democrat. They're really good at running government but not very good at politics and electioneering -- just the opposite of the Republicans. Sure, they've got their faults, but they'd be able to accomplish a lot more if progressive people would support them instead of falling victim to the aggressive propagandizing by people who would do anything to destroy them.
Read
February 4, 2020Clinton reportedly was paid $15million for writing his memoir. 1,008 pages,in two volumes. I'll borrow from Janet's review," this book is long.It's very very long."
The first volume,isn't even about the presidency. One way of reading it is to skip the hundreds of pages,about his early life,and to start from the presidential years. But,that still won't make it any easier. He takes his own sweet time,and rambles on and on,about things the reader would find of little interest.
Granted,he was a far better President,than what came after. But as far as books go,I'd rather read one about George W. Bush's Bushisms,or the ones authored by Donald Trump. Those are far more amusing than Clinton's yawn inducing book.
The first volume,isn't even about the presidency. One way of reading it is to skip the hundreds of pages,about his early life,and to start from the presidential years. But,that still won't make it any easier. He takes his own sweet time,and rambles on and on,about things the reader would find of little interest.
Granted,he was a far better President,than what came after. But as far as books go,I'd rather read one about George W. Bush's Bushisms,or the ones authored by Donald Trump. Those are far more amusing than Clinton's yawn inducing book.
September 16, 2011
William Jefferson Clinton is my first president. Well, not really, I was born on July 3, 1981 so my first president was actually Ronald Reagan. The first presidential election that I remember is the 1988 election of George H.W. Bush. However, in many ways, Clinton is my first president. The presidential election of 1992 was the first national election I ever cared about. Coming from a family of Democrats excited for the first chance in sixteen years to capture the White House, Clinton was very much a favorite that year. I was one of only two kids in 5th grade class the wanted to see Clinton elected. I was excited because on our state reports for class that year, I was the student who randomly picked Arkansas much to the shock of my friend. President Clinton was president when I first became interested in the history of our nation and the presidency itself. It was interesting to have someone in the White House who was also a major presidential history buff.
Born William Jefferson Blythe III, his father William Jefferson Blythe, Jr. was a con artist who had multiple families at the same time. However, the elder William would not know the son who shared his name, because he died in a car accident before Clinton was born. His mother, Virginia, would later remarry this time to a man named Roger Clinton. The Clintons would have another son together, Roger C. Clinton, and the future president would legally change his name to match the rest of his family. Nevertheless, his family life was terrible, the elder Roger Clinton was a drunk and abuser; Clinton often would have to defend his mother and little brother.
Despite (or maybe, because of) his horrible family life, Clinton excelled both academically in school and socially with peers. Clinton would ultimately become a Rhodes scholar and with that travel abroad. He would during this point of his life have his famous `I didn't inhale' episode, and he would, although legally, dodge the draft. When he was a student at Yale, he would meet and later marry a young law student named Hillary Rodham. Ultimately, he would end up becoming a lawyer and end up as a professor at the University of Arkansas.
The most fascinating elements of the book are the way he discusses the ups and downs of his own political career. His frustrating loss at a run for a seat in the United States House of Representatives in 1974, when it seemed like every other Democrat won big in the wake of Watergate. Later, he becomes Arkansas' Attorney General, which would act as a stepping-stone for the Governor's seat in 1978. At the age of thirty-two, he was the youngest governor in the nation. Unfortunately, for him, the same year his daughter Chelsea was born, 1980, he was turned out of office. He would joke that he became as he called it `the youngest ex-governor in the nation's history.
"These problems were aggravated by my own lack of experience and my youth. I looked even younger then my thirty-two years. When I became attorney general, George Fisher, the talented cartoonist for the Arkansas Gazette, drew me in a baby carriage. When I became governor he promoted my to a tricycle. It wasn't until I became President that he took me off the tricycle and put me in pick up truck. And he was a supporter. It should have set off an alarm bell, but it didn't." p.267
His biggest mistake as governor had been to increase the people of Arkansas' car tags. Alternatively, as we call them in Maine `excise tax'. It made him many enemies but after awhile he was able to rebuild his popularity and mount a comeback. In time, his political career recovered and skyrocketed all the way the top. He regained the governorship in 1982 and would hold it for the next ten years. From that platform in 19998, he would mount his campaign for the presidency.
"As I walked back to my car, I ran into an elderly man in overalls. He said, `Aren't you Bill Clinton?' When I said I was and shook his hand, he couldn't wait to tell me he had voted against me. `I'm one of those who helped beat you. I cost you eleven votes--me, my wife, my two boys, and their wives, and my five friends. We just leveled you.' I asked him why and I got the predictable reply: `I had to. You raised my car tags.' I pointed to a spot on the highway not far from where we were standing and said, `Remember that ice storm we had when I took office? That piece of road over there buckled and cars were stuck in a ditch. I had to get the National Guard to pull them out. There were pictures of it in all the papers. Those roads had to be fixed.' He replied, `I don't care. I still didn't want to pay it.' For some reason, after all he said, I blurted out, `Let me ask you something. If I ran for governor again, would you consider voting for me?' He smiled and said, `Sure I would. We're even now.' I went right to the payphone, called Hillary, told her the story, and said I thought we could win." p.291
One most interesting things about Clinton's book is how he discusses how all the political and historical events that had occurred in his own life. Meeting President John F. Kennedy when he was 17, and commenting on that famous photo. He talks about his feeling on President Johnson and how shocked he was when Johnson decided not to run for president in 1968. The president comments on the disastrous 1972 Democratic Convention that left the party weakened and crushed in that year's election. He often compares what goes on to his own life and career.
"In the summer, I led the Arkansas delegation to the Democratic convention in San Francisco to see Walter Mondale and Geraldine Ferraro nominated and to give a five-minute tribute to Harry Truman. We were in trouble to start with, and it was all over when Mondale said he would purpose a hefty tax increase to reduce the budget deficit. It was a remarkable act of candor, but he might as well have purposed a federal car-tag fee." p.316
When discussing his presidency, he mentions that his brutal upbringing allowed him to compartmentalize. As president, he was able to focus on doing his job despite the immense assault on him and the very institution of the presidency. As one can imagine he tires to gloss over his martial indiscretions. He calls his affair with Monica Lewinsky `disgusting' and that he did it for the `worst possible of reasons' and that is: he could. However, one cannot fail to be impressed with the way he tries to keep working for the American people both on the domestic and foreign fronts despite being assailed from all sides. However his political enemies keep trying to bring him down, not simple by the legitimate methods of congressional gridlock and elections but by tearing down some of the basic institutions of government in order to get him. It did not matter how hypocritical their methods were, they were going full stop.
"Starr admitted he had talked to the press, on background, a violation of the grand jury secrecy rules. Finally, he dined under oath that his office had tried to get Monica Lewinsky to wear a wire to record our conversations with Vernon Jordan, me, or other people. When confronted with the FBI form proving that he had, he was evasive. The Washington Post reported that `Starr's denials...were shattered by his own FBI reports.
The fact that Starr admitted violating the law on grand jury secrecy and had given false testimony under oath didn't slow him or the committee down a bit. They thought different rules applied to the home team." p.829
Although, far from a perfect human being I feel he was probably the best president we had since Dwight D. Eisenhower left office in 1961. His writing, although a long book (over nine hundred pages), follows smoothly and is an easy read. Anyone interested in modern American politics would enjoy this book.
Born William Jefferson Blythe III, his father William Jefferson Blythe, Jr. was a con artist who had multiple families at the same time. However, the elder William would not know the son who shared his name, because he died in a car accident before Clinton was born. His mother, Virginia, would later remarry this time to a man named Roger Clinton. The Clintons would have another son together, Roger C. Clinton, and the future president would legally change his name to match the rest of his family. Nevertheless, his family life was terrible, the elder Roger Clinton was a drunk and abuser; Clinton often would have to defend his mother and little brother.
Despite (or maybe, because of) his horrible family life, Clinton excelled both academically in school and socially with peers. Clinton would ultimately become a Rhodes scholar and with that travel abroad. He would during this point of his life have his famous `I didn't inhale' episode, and he would, although legally, dodge the draft. When he was a student at Yale, he would meet and later marry a young law student named Hillary Rodham. Ultimately, he would end up becoming a lawyer and end up as a professor at the University of Arkansas.
The most fascinating elements of the book are the way he discusses the ups and downs of his own political career. His frustrating loss at a run for a seat in the United States House of Representatives in 1974, when it seemed like every other Democrat won big in the wake of Watergate. Later, he becomes Arkansas' Attorney General, which would act as a stepping-stone for the Governor's seat in 1978. At the age of thirty-two, he was the youngest governor in the nation. Unfortunately, for him, the same year his daughter Chelsea was born, 1980, he was turned out of office. He would joke that he became as he called it `the youngest ex-governor in the nation's history.
"These problems were aggravated by my own lack of experience and my youth. I looked even younger then my thirty-two years. When I became attorney general, George Fisher, the talented cartoonist for the Arkansas Gazette, drew me in a baby carriage. When I became governor he promoted my to a tricycle. It wasn't until I became President that he took me off the tricycle and put me in pick up truck. And he was a supporter. It should have set off an alarm bell, but it didn't." p.267
His biggest mistake as governor had been to increase the people of Arkansas' car tags. Alternatively, as we call them in Maine `excise tax'. It made him many enemies but after awhile he was able to rebuild his popularity and mount a comeback. In time, his political career recovered and skyrocketed all the way the top. He regained the governorship in 1982 and would hold it for the next ten years. From that platform in 19998, he would mount his campaign for the presidency.
"As I walked back to my car, I ran into an elderly man in overalls. He said, `Aren't you Bill Clinton?' When I said I was and shook his hand, he couldn't wait to tell me he had voted against me. `I'm one of those who helped beat you. I cost you eleven votes--me, my wife, my two boys, and their wives, and my five friends. We just leveled you.' I asked him why and I got the predictable reply: `I had to. You raised my car tags.' I pointed to a spot on the highway not far from where we were standing and said, `Remember that ice storm we had when I took office? That piece of road over there buckled and cars were stuck in a ditch. I had to get the National Guard to pull them out. There were pictures of it in all the papers. Those roads had to be fixed.' He replied, `I don't care. I still didn't want to pay it.' For some reason, after all he said, I blurted out, `Let me ask you something. If I ran for governor again, would you consider voting for me?' He smiled and said, `Sure I would. We're even now.' I went right to the payphone, called Hillary, told her the story, and said I thought we could win." p.291
One most interesting things about Clinton's book is how he discusses how all the political and historical events that had occurred in his own life. Meeting President John F. Kennedy when he was 17, and commenting on that famous photo. He talks about his feeling on President Johnson and how shocked he was when Johnson decided not to run for president in 1968. The president comments on the disastrous 1972 Democratic Convention that left the party weakened and crushed in that year's election. He often compares what goes on to his own life and career.
"In the summer, I led the Arkansas delegation to the Democratic convention in San Francisco to see Walter Mondale and Geraldine Ferraro nominated and to give a five-minute tribute to Harry Truman. We were in trouble to start with, and it was all over when Mondale said he would purpose a hefty tax increase to reduce the budget deficit. It was a remarkable act of candor, but he might as well have purposed a federal car-tag fee." p.316
When discussing his presidency, he mentions that his brutal upbringing allowed him to compartmentalize. As president, he was able to focus on doing his job despite the immense assault on him and the very institution of the presidency. As one can imagine he tires to gloss over his martial indiscretions. He calls his affair with Monica Lewinsky `disgusting' and that he did it for the `worst possible of reasons' and that is: he could. However, one cannot fail to be impressed with the way he tries to keep working for the American people both on the domestic and foreign fronts despite being assailed from all sides. However his political enemies keep trying to bring him down, not simple by the legitimate methods of congressional gridlock and elections but by tearing down some of the basic institutions of government in order to get him. It did not matter how hypocritical their methods were, they were going full stop.
"Starr admitted he had talked to the press, on background, a violation of the grand jury secrecy rules. Finally, he dined under oath that his office had tried to get Monica Lewinsky to wear a wire to record our conversations with Vernon Jordan, me, or other people. When confronted with the FBI form proving that he had, he was evasive. The Washington Post reported that `Starr's denials...were shattered by his own FBI reports.
The fact that Starr admitted violating the law on grand jury secrecy and had given false testimony under oath didn't slow him or the committee down a bit. They thought different rules applied to the home team." p.829
Although, far from a perfect human being I feel he was probably the best president we had since Dwight D. Eisenhower left office in 1961. His writing, although a long book (over nine hundred pages), follows smoothly and is an easy read. Anyone interested in modern American politics would enjoy this book.
September 7, 2007
Okay, first, I have to confess I listened to the abridged audio edition of this book, and that's what I'm basing my review on. I listened to the whole thing on the drive from my home to seminary (6 hours).
That having been said, I am coming to understand that way more of "The West Wing" was based on actual events than I realized. I feel like I just experienced the entire series - the book even ends with the same word on which the series concluded: "Tomorrow."
Not having been politically aware until the 2000 election cycle, I pretty much had no idea what went on during the Clinton years, except for a few BJs. But hearing Bill Clinton (he reads the audiobook) talk about the accomplishments of his two terms was at once inspiring and devastating. Inspiring, because it seems like his administration was the kind I've wanted to see these past eight years. Devastating, because we're living through almost the complete opposite conditions.
I'm not saying I took every word as the gospel truth; I'm sure Clinton remembers things differently than they actually occurred (who among us doesn't?). But the results of his time in office - 20 million new jobs, a projected 4-trillion-dollar surplus - are not things that rely on shaky memories.
I also appreciated his (ostensibly) honest treatment of the whole Monica Lewinsky scandal, and hearing his side of the Whitewater nonsense (which I really believe it was). Almost everyone laughed at the "vast, right-wing conspiracy", but it's hard not to lend the idea some credence, in light of the conflicts of interest and savagely hurtful political game being played.
More than any of that, the book was a fascinating view of the inner workings of the Clinton White House - biased as it may have been - and the triumphs and failures that came during the eight years he spent there. Anyone who enjoys "The West Wing" will appreciate the excitement, intrigue and emotion of Clinton's tale.
That having been said, I am coming to understand that way more of "The West Wing" was based on actual events than I realized. I feel like I just experienced the entire series - the book even ends with the same word on which the series concluded: "Tomorrow."
Not having been politically aware until the 2000 election cycle, I pretty much had no idea what went on during the Clinton years, except for a few BJs. But hearing Bill Clinton (he reads the audiobook) talk about the accomplishments of his two terms was at once inspiring and devastating. Inspiring, because it seems like his administration was the kind I've wanted to see these past eight years. Devastating, because we're living through almost the complete opposite conditions.
I'm not saying I took every word as the gospel truth; I'm sure Clinton remembers things differently than they actually occurred (who among us doesn't?). But the results of his time in office - 20 million new jobs, a projected 4-trillion-dollar surplus - are not things that rely on shaky memories.
I also appreciated his (ostensibly) honest treatment of the whole Monica Lewinsky scandal, and hearing his side of the Whitewater nonsense (which I really believe it was). Almost everyone laughed at the "vast, right-wing conspiracy", but it's hard not to lend the idea some credence, in light of the conflicts of interest and savagely hurtful political game being played.
More than any of that, the book was a fascinating view of the inner workings of the Clinton White House - biased as it may have been - and the triumphs and failures that came during the eight years he spent there. Anyone who enjoys "The West Wing" will appreciate the excitement, intrigue and emotion of Clinton's tale.
August 28, 2020
The first autobiography I've included in my walk through the presidents, I prepared myself to read a skewed and incomplete story of President #42. It was certainly from a favorable perspective, but I did not feel misled in any way. Clinton tells his story as he sees it, and I enjoyed the view.
The book was surprisingly more thorough than I expected, including more detail from Clinton's youth than I've read in anyone else's biography. I'm not sure how reliable all the details are, but nevertheless it's an impressive amount of recall and inclusion in the story. The only way the coverage may have been lacking is toward the end, during Clinton's last few years in office, where the book moved at a faster pace than it did during his pre-presidential life and his first term in the White House.
I actually learned something new about the Lewinsky affair (maybe I had not wanted to know at the time), without being presented with any messy details. I came away wanting to read Monica's book. After having read through the extramarital relations and near-misses of many of the presidents prior to Clinton, I have a new appreciation for the cruelty and unfairness of what he went through as president, after an investigation of an obscure land deal in Arkansas ended in punishment for a forbidden encounter in the Oval Office.
Name-dropping was constant throughout, but not difficult to process, only a little tiring. In the acknowledgments, Clinton says his editor cut out a lot of names, and I can't imagine how much more taxing this would have been had those cuts not been made. Clinton has an outstanding memory and a desire to please everyone, but those traits can work against him at times.
My Life was a terrific revisit of what I'll admit has been my favorite president in my lifetime. I wish it had covered a little more of his post-presidency, as it was published in 2004 and left room for other topics. Aside from 9/11, the start of Hillary's term as Senator, and passing mention of the Clinton Foundation, there wasn't much there.
Overall, I loved it, and will read it again someday (when I have five reading weeks free).
The book was surprisingly more thorough than I expected, including more detail from Clinton's youth than I've read in anyone else's biography. I'm not sure how reliable all the details are, but nevertheless it's an impressive amount of recall and inclusion in the story. The only way the coverage may have been lacking is toward the end, during Clinton's last few years in office, where the book moved at a faster pace than it did during his pre-presidential life and his first term in the White House.
I actually learned something new about the Lewinsky affair (maybe I had not wanted to know at the time), without being presented with any messy details. I came away wanting to read Monica's book. After having read through the extramarital relations and near-misses of many of the presidents prior to Clinton, I have a new appreciation for the cruelty and unfairness of what he went through as president, after an investigation of an obscure land deal in Arkansas ended in punishment for a forbidden encounter in the Oval Office.
Name-dropping was constant throughout, but not difficult to process, only a little tiring. In the acknowledgments, Clinton says his editor cut out a lot of names, and I can't imagine how much more taxing this would have been had those cuts not been made. Clinton has an outstanding memory and a desire to please everyone, but those traits can work against him at times.
My Life was a terrific revisit of what I'll admit has been my favorite president in my lifetime. I wish it had covered a little more of his post-presidency, as it was published in 2004 and left room for other topics. Aside from 9/11, the start of Hillary's term as Senator, and passing mention of the Clinton Foundation, there wasn't much there.
Overall, I loved it, and will read it again someday (when I have five reading weeks free).
February 13, 2013
At nearly 1,000 pages, this book is a monster to read, but boy, am I glad I did! First of all, I love Bill Clinton, I've got to be honest. He was, is, and will always be my favorite president. That said, I was curious how he would describe his life and is on goings in the White House and before.
He starts with his childhood and writes an exhaustive account of his life up until Bush takes over for him. He spends a great deal of time early on discussing religion and his spirituality, both of which seem extremely important to him. (He's Methodist.) He also spends a lot of time on the Vietnam War and his not going over to fight. He explains that he really struggled with that decision, and although I already knew this, he acknowledges that he joined the ROTC to fulfill his military duty before backing out to finish out his Fulbright scholarship at Oxford. He was plainly torn.
His description of meeting and courting Hillary is truly interesting, and it seems clear to me that he really does love her very much, as well as Chelsea. Both women are mentioned extensively in this book.
Clinton could have taken a lot of pot shots at the jerks who consistently attacked him and tried to ruin his life ever since he was elected governor of Arkansas, but he's a bit of a gentleman and goes easy on most. He does display his scorn for Kenneth Starr, who in my opinion, is one of the most evil men of the twentieth century and who should burn in hell for the suffering he caused countless people. What a vindictive asshole! Clinton also does have some hard words to say about the hard Right, with whom he was constantly at war for the last six years of his presidency. It's amazing to me still how much he was able to accomplish with all of the attacks on his character and presidency.
If you're after juicy gossip, though, you won't find it here. He denies any role with Flowers or Paula Jones and while admitting to the Monica disaster, he limits its inclusion in the book while apologizing to all for his poor decisions.
There are a couple of passages that really stood out for me. The first one reads,
"Although I would always regret what I had done wrong, I will go to my grave being proud of what I had fought for in the impeachment battle, my last great showdown with the forces I had opposed all of my life -- those who defended the old order of racial discrimination and segregation in the South and played on the insecurities and fears of the white working class in which I grew up; who had opposed the women's movement, the environmental movement, the gay-rights movement, and other efforts to expand our national community as assaults on the natural order; who believed government should be run for the benefit of powerful entrenched interests and favored tax cuts for the wealthy over health care and better education for children."
Wow! Fast forward to 2013 and it doesn't sound like much as changed, does it? The Republicans are still trying to oppose the very same things and advance the very same tired agenda.
Later, he writes about some of the things I loved about his presidency in writing about his 1999 State of the Union Address.
"My last State of the Union address was a joy to deliver. We had more then twenty million new jobs, the lowest unemployment rate and smallest welfare rolls in thirty years, the lowest crime rate in twenty-five years, the lowest poverty rate in twenty years, the smallest federal workforce in forty years, the first back-to-back surpluses in forty-two years, seven years of declining teen pregnancies and a 30 percent increase in adoptions, and 150,000 young people who had served in AmericCorps. Within a month we would have the longest economic expansion in American history, and by the end of the year we would have three consecutive surpluses for the first time in more than fifty years."
Again, wow! And why did people hate such a wonderful president? Of course, the real tragedy is Bush came in and decimated everything, rolling back social expansions, international friendships, and financial gains and starting a three TRILLION dollar war in Iraq (I'm reading on a book on this right now) we couldn't pay for and had to borrow to finance, thus practically bankrupting the country for years to come. Bush needs to be tried for crimes against humanity for what he did to hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq in his deceitful and failed attempts to establish democracy and control oil. If only Clinton were back in office. Obama is better than having the far right Republicans in office, certainly, but he's no Clinton. Perhaps Hillary will save us in 2016. One can only hope. This was a fascinating book to read and if you're not too frightened by its size and want to learn about American politics in the 1990s, it's a great book to read. I strongly recommend it.
He starts with his childhood and writes an exhaustive account of his life up until Bush takes over for him. He spends a great deal of time early on discussing religion and his spirituality, both of which seem extremely important to him. (He's Methodist.) He also spends a lot of time on the Vietnam War and his not going over to fight. He explains that he really struggled with that decision, and although I already knew this, he acknowledges that he joined the ROTC to fulfill his military duty before backing out to finish out his Fulbright scholarship at Oxford. He was plainly torn.
His description of meeting and courting Hillary is truly interesting, and it seems clear to me that he really does love her very much, as well as Chelsea. Both women are mentioned extensively in this book.
Clinton could have taken a lot of pot shots at the jerks who consistently attacked him and tried to ruin his life ever since he was elected governor of Arkansas, but he's a bit of a gentleman and goes easy on most. He does display his scorn for Kenneth Starr, who in my opinion, is one of the most evil men of the twentieth century and who should burn in hell for the suffering he caused countless people. What a vindictive asshole! Clinton also does have some hard words to say about the hard Right, with whom he was constantly at war for the last six years of his presidency. It's amazing to me still how much he was able to accomplish with all of the attacks on his character and presidency.
If you're after juicy gossip, though, you won't find it here. He denies any role with Flowers or Paula Jones and while admitting to the Monica disaster, he limits its inclusion in the book while apologizing to all for his poor decisions.
There are a couple of passages that really stood out for me. The first one reads,
"Although I would always regret what I had done wrong, I will go to my grave being proud of what I had fought for in the impeachment battle, my last great showdown with the forces I had opposed all of my life -- those who defended the old order of racial discrimination and segregation in the South and played on the insecurities and fears of the white working class in which I grew up; who had opposed the women's movement, the environmental movement, the gay-rights movement, and other efforts to expand our national community as assaults on the natural order; who believed government should be run for the benefit of powerful entrenched interests and favored tax cuts for the wealthy over health care and better education for children."
Wow! Fast forward to 2013 and it doesn't sound like much as changed, does it? The Republicans are still trying to oppose the very same things and advance the very same tired agenda.
Later, he writes about some of the things I loved about his presidency in writing about his 1999 State of the Union Address.
"My last State of the Union address was a joy to deliver. We had more then twenty million new jobs, the lowest unemployment rate and smallest welfare rolls in thirty years, the lowest crime rate in twenty-five years, the lowest poverty rate in twenty years, the smallest federal workforce in forty years, the first back-to-back surpluses in forty-two years, seven years of declining teen pregnancies and a 30 percent increase in adoptions, and 150,000 young people who had served in AmericCorps. Within a month we would have the longest economic expansion in American history, and by the end of the year we would have three consecutive surpluses for the first time in more than fifty years."
Again, wow! And why did people hate such a wonderful president? Of course, the real tragedy is Bush came in and decimated everything, rolling back social expansions, international friendships, and financial gains and starting a three TRILLION dollar war in Iraq (I'm reading on a book on this right now) we couldn't pay for and had to borrow to finance, thus practically bankrupting the country for years to come. Bush needs to be tried for crimes against humanity for what he did to hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq in his deceitful and failed attempts to establish democracy and control oil. If only Clinton were back in office. Obama is better than having the far right Republicans in office, certainly, but he's no Clinton. Perhaps Hillary will save us in 2016. One can only hope. This was a fascinating book to read and if you're not too frightened by its size and want to learn about American politics in the 1990s, it's a great book to read. I strongly recommend it.
September 1, 2016
Ok. Three hundred and fifty-five pages in. I'm done. I think I got up to 1989. I'm done with this. I've read a lot of books much shorter than this that came to a much more satisfying conclusion, with far fewer characters, conflicts, and more likeable protagonists. I don't know if it's counter to GoodReads etiquette, but hell, I read this, and didn't even reach his presidency.
I remember reading "A Feast for Crows" by George R.R. Martin. There's a character in that book named "Shitmouth." I kid you not. This guy shows up briefly as a blacksmith who tells Jaime Lannister all the crazy things that have been happening in his part of the world since Jaime was there last. Shitmouth earned his name because he was incredibly foul mouthed. He shows up for less than a few pages (if that) and yet I know so much about him. Another character, I'm pretty sure never even appears in the books: Baelor Butthole. That's not his real name, but I think Jaime calls him that because he's a stuck-up religious zealot. Baelor loved the former Targaryen Queen, Rhaenys. But since he was too low-born and the Targaryens had the habit of marrying brother and sister together, he was resigned to bachelorhood for the rest of his life. These are fictional people.
And yet, I know so SO much more about them than anyone in Clinton's fucking book. Clinton has a habit of introducing random people who he claims were his friends who helped him politically or personally. He seems to introduce them pretty much only when they die and he has to attend their funerals. To be honest, I'm not sure why these are details even worth MENTIONING in the books. No one mentions a funeral in any other kind of book unless something profound or life-changing happens there. Bill just seems to have felt sentimental. I get this weird feeling of sitting at my grandparents' dinner table as they open up a box of mostly chronologically ordered photos from before their birth to the present day and going over the details of each photo, and describing each person's life in vague and sweeping detail.
Then there's weird, WEIRD, moments. Like the page where Bill decides to describe a college football game in excruciating detail. Nothing really important happens in that game. Clinton didn't play in it. But... he... for some reason... has to write it?
Why?
I have the sneaking suspicion that Clinton didn't edit this even a little bit. If only he had an editor to step in and say, "Look, Bill, I know this guy was important to you, but... is there some place else we can put in how important he was to you? Like... this is just random. Oh, and this page about the football game... can we just cut it? I mean, we don't need it. Like at all."
In a Podcast about Lyndon Johnson, Daniel O'Brien (author of "How to Fight Presidents") discussed how "You need to have a special kind of mental illness to become President." And I'm totally convinced that Clinton has that same mental illness that led Johnson to get on the phone and talk about his ballsfor five minutes. Because I can't fathom how Clinton:
A. Remembered all of this, or
B. Decided it was worth writing down at the time.
Which leads me to believe that he has some kind of bizarre memory (and when you combine the fallibility of human memories with the aversion of politicians from facts, logic, and truth, well... draw your own conclusions) or is just making this shit up as he goes along and hoping no one calls him on it.
My coworker saw me reading the book and said (several times), "Does it say if he slept with Monica Lewinsky?" And I responded, "I don't know, I just started." (200 pages in) And, well, I only got up to his speech at the Dukakis nomination. So I never really came close to the pages that concern his affair. Just looking at the length, and how from Page 2 he starts rambling how the mentally challenged girl he knew as a child later inspired him to work on some future Welfare Bill to help the disabled, I really get the sense that Clinton wanted to try and adjust his image for posterity as not just the President who got impeached for sleeping with the intern. And while, obviously, a lot happened in the eight years that he was President, no amount of Alabama metaphors, winding career paths in the Democratic Party, or random friends that helped him with such and such, are going to change the fact that he is The President Who Slept with an Intern.
Sorry, Mr. President (/First Gentleman).
Next time I'm interested in his tenure, I'm just going to look up the Wikipedia page.
I remember reading "A Feast for Crows" by George R.R. Martin. There's a character in that book named "Shitmouth." I kid you not. This guy shows up briefly as a blacksmith who tells Jaime Lannister all the crazy things that have been happening in his part of the world since Jaime was there last. Shitmouth earned his name because he was incredibly foul mouthed. He shows up for less than a few pages (if that) and yet I know so much about him. Another character, I'm pretty sure never even appears in the books: Baelor Butthole. That's not his real name, but I think Jaime calls him that because he's a stuck-up religious zealot. Baelor loved the former Targaryen Queen, Rhaenys. But since he was too low-born and the Targaryens had the habit of marrying brother and sister together, he was resigned to bachelorhood for the rest of his life. These are fictional people.
And yet, I know so SO much more about them than anyone in Clinton's fucking book. Clinton has a habit of introducing random people who he claims were his friends who helped him politically or personally. He seems to introduce them pretty much only when they die and he has to attend their funerals. To be honest, I'm not sure why these are details even worth MENTIONING in the books. No one mentions a funeral in any other kind of book unless something profound or life-changing happens there. Bill just seems to have felt sentimental. I get this weird feeling of sitting at my grandparents' dinner table as they open up a box of mostly chronologically ordered photos from before their birth to the present day and going over the details of each photo, and describing each person's life in vague and sweeping detail.
Then there's weird, WEIRD, moments. Like the page where Bill decides to describe a college football game in excruciating detail. Nothing really important happens in that game. Clinton didn't play in it. But... he... for some reason... has to write it?
Why?
I have the sneaking suspicion that Clinton didn't edit this even a little bit. If only he had an editor to step in and say, "Look, Bill, I know this guy was important to you, but... is there some place else we can put in how important he was to you? Like... this is just random. Oh, and this page about the football game... can we just cut it? I mean, we don't need it. Like at all."
In a Podcast about Lyndon Johnson, Daniel O'Brien (author of "How to Fight Presidents") discussed how "You need to have a special kind of mental illness to become President." And I'm totally convinced that Clinton has that same mental illness that led Johnson to get on the phone and talk about his ballsfor five minutes. Because I can't fathom how Clinton:
A. Remembered all of this, or
B. Decided it was worth writing down at the time.
Which leads me to believe that he has some kind of bizarre memory (and when you combine the fallibility of human memories with the aversion of politicians from facts, logic, and truth, well... draw your own conclusions) or is just making this shit up as he goes along and hoping no one calls him on it.
My coworker saw me reading the book and said (several times), "Does it say if he slept with Monica Lewinsky?" And I responded, "I don't know, I just started." (200 pages in) And, well, I only got up to his speech at the Dukakis nomination. So I never really came close to the pages that concern his affair. Just looking at the length, and how from Page 2 he starts rambling how the mentally challenged girl he knew as a child later inspired him to work on some future Welfare Bill to help the disabled, I really get the sense that Clinton wanted to try and adjust his image for posterity as not just the President who got impeached for sleeping with the intern. And while, obviously, a lot happened in the eight years that he was President, no amount of Alabama metaphors, winding career paths in the Democratic Party, or random friends that helped him with such and such, are going to change the fact that he is The President Who Slept with an Intern.
Sorry, Mr. President (/First Gentleman).
Next time I'm interested in his tenure, I'm just going to look up the Wikipedia page.
November 12, 2007
At nearly 1000 pages, this book is not for the faint of heart. The beginning is slow, as it seems that Clinton is mentioning every single person that passed through his childhood and adolescence. The book finally gets interesting when Clinton enters politics. As someone who lived through the Clinton years, I enjoyed reading Clinton's perspective on events during that time. His views on the Middle East talks were particularly interesting and enlightening. His insider's view of politics during that time is also very fascinating, especially as we head into an election year. I would highly recommend this book to all - it is a fascinating book about a fascinating man.
October 14, 2007
I was already a Bill Clinton fan, but his memoir just solidified my reasons. Very moving account of his life, especially his childhood/young adulthood. He is such an intelligent, self-made man. His detractors would do well to read this, too. Granted it is looooong. I initially purchased the book for my husband who enjoyed reading it, but I had trouble getting through all 900-plus pages and bought the audio CD instead. Listened to it on a long vacation drive. (Made my then 12-year-old son listen to it as well! He's also a fan!)
September 28, 2019
Fascinating read. Very happy to be making progressing on my goal of reading biographies of all the presidents in the order in which they served although I shall not reading anything on the current inhabitant of the WH as for myself personally I do not consider him my president.
November 15, 2019
Read this years ago and thought it was mostly name-dropping by a professional narcissist. Pretty much lived up to my predictions...
March 2, 2023
I see people, not political parties or celebrities. I like Bill, Hilary, and Chelsea’s intelligent, compassionate demeanours. I bought two CD sets for charity with recognizable narrators, the other being Bill Shatner. This is my first audio book!
Right off the bat, I was stunned by the tragedy of a car accident killing his Dad, with his pregnant Mom awaiting William Blythe Jr at their new home. Virginia married Roger Clinton, after whom William Jefferson Blythe III was renamed. Bill understood the trauma of addiction in the family and adored his Grandparents.
I knew he worked his way up by serving Arkansas and met Hilary in university. “My Life”, enlightened those details but apparently many audio books are abridged, which is annoying. We buy CDs. Dial-up can’t download much. I see the advantage of CDs, letting information wash over me in repose, not needing to follow pages. Election statistics that were irrelevant to me floated by. Breezing through audio books needs only a bedside stereo or discman, no worries about the right position or light.
The great thing about writing our autobiographies is setting straight misperceptions. It was clear for example, that Bill was assigned to a military recruiter, ready to enlist after finishing university. When he graduated, the draft did not choose him. I am glad his Mom lived to see him as president but they lost her young, the next year.
I give four appreciative stars. There were few personal elements following his graduation, perhaps cut from the abridgement. Their famous cat Socks and dog were only named once but I am glad Bill & Chelsea put a frog back into the wild. This was published in 2004, just before surviving a heart attack. The world exhaled when he rescued Laura & Euna, hostages in China in 2009.
Right off the bat, I was stunned by the tragedy of a car accident killing his Dad, with his pregnant Mom awaiting William Blythe Jr at their new home. Virginia married Roger Clinton, after whom William Jefferson Blythe III was renamed. Bill understood the trauma of addiction in the family and adored his Grandparents.
I knew he worked his way up by serving Arkansas and met Hilary in university. “My Life”, enlightened those details but apparently many audio books are abridged, which is annoying. We buy CDs. Dial-up can’t download much. I see the advantage of CDs, letting information wash over me in repose, not needing to follow pages. Election statistics that were irrelevant to me floated by. Breezing through audio books needs only a bedside stereo or discman, no worries about the right position or light.
The great thing about writing our autobiographies is setting straight misperceptions. It was clear for example, that Bill was assigned to a military recruiter, ready to enlist after finishing university. When he graduated, the draft did not choose him. I am glad his Mom lived to see him as president but they lost her young, the next year.
I give four appreciative stars. There were few personal elements following his graduation, perhaps cut from the abridgement. Their famous cat Socks and dog were only named once but I am glad Bill & Chelsea put a frog back into the wild. This was published in 2004, just before surviving a heart attack. The world exhaled when he rescued Laura & Euna, hostages in China in 2009.
November 15, 2010
استغرقني من الوقت الكثير حتى اكمل هذه السيرة الروائية الذاتية لحاكم اكبر دولة في العالم ..الكتاب ممل في معظم اوقاته والسيرة تتضمن امور تافهة لا تهمنا في شيئ وان كان لا بد منها فهي خلت من عنصر التشويق كما انني لم اجد في اسلوب الترجمة اي اشادة تذكر...حياة بيل كلنتون رتيبة ومملة كما أن شخصيته تشعرك بانه لو إمتهن اي مهنة غير السياسة لكان افضل له ...لم يمتعني الكتاب واخذ من وقتي الكثير وقد قرات الكتاب علي فترات متقطعة غير مشدود له .
December 14, 2008
Clinton's autobiography is long but well worth the read if you want to get the slightest clue about the dirty tricks he faced in D.C. while trying to keep his campaign promises.
July 16, 2014
I am a Russian and I love reading biographies of people whom I, if not admire, then at least look up to in one way or another. Add to that the fact that I am not a political buff and during my conscious years on Earth, the U.S. presidents in office were George Dubya and Barack Obama - yet, I would not share a room with their autobiographies, much less read them. This is my way of saying that in my opinion, even though based on extremely limited knowledge of the subject, I believe Bill Clinton to be the best president the United States had in the last few decades.
Now, having given that man his props, I demand props of my own. Major ones, because this is the single thickest book I have ever [or, will ever, for that matter] read in My Life. *Pun intended.* Heed my warning, you should not kid yourself like I did into believing that two and a half episodes of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart turn you into a political pundit. I fooled myself that this will be an enjoyable read for me, but I overestimated my interest in politics and came "unprepared" to flipping these pages. I did not recognize four out of every five names mentioned in this book and had to read it with my smartphone firm-in-hand so that I could look up people and events using that fancy internetz thingy. But don't get me wrong - the book is extremely well written and edited, each chapter is a lesson in U.S. and international history, considering Bill's hands-on approach to World affairs: I blame only myself for having the mental capacity of a 5-year old and trying to process the information intended for people who can more that tie their shoelaces and chew bubblegum at the same time.
Nevertheless, I read it and, since biographies is my favorite genre, I have this little game I play after closing each book: "Was his life fun?" And I compare the life of the man in question to the lives of others from radically different walks of life. And I have to say that if Bill's autobiography is indicative and applicable to other presidents or political servants, then I would not wish a life like that for myself. His life was not crazy or exciting in a traditional sense of the word - he was a pretty preppy guy and, barring a blowjob here and there, lived a mellow life. Sure, I believe that it was an exciting life to have experience first person, but the excitement doesn't translate into book-form. What I mean is, that if you have the craving to play "Follow the Leader" or have the urge to be The Alpha ingrained in your DNA, then of course there is no drug that would make you higher that being the President of the United States of America. But it all depends on the person. For example, when I'm 80 years old and look back at my life, I understand that it would be more rewarding to reminisce about the days I helped bring peace to the Irish or reduced the national debt, but I would much rather piss my diaper laughing about how I bit off the head off a bat and picked-up rabies or traveled the Globe hitting every bar with a WWE championship around my waist. That is my chimp-like definition of "fun".
Yet I am grateful that the World has people like Bill Clinton - they are a special breed and bring peace and order to our imperfect society, because not everyone can do what they do. Many say that politics shouldn't be perceived as complex as they are made out to be, but they just are: at least for an average guy like me. Case in point, I had the pleasure of reading Arnold Schwarzenegger's autobiography and comparing it to Bill's. Arny is one of my favorite human beings and a source of inspiration, but while reading about his governorship and political battles, you get a sense of a person doing his best, struggling and giving it his all, but failing to reach his goals and succeeding, based on lack of political skill and experience. Then you read something like "My Life" and realize that if Arnold was a green belt in politics, then Bill was a black belt, navigating the political scene like Han Solo. He knew what levers to pull, when to push through and when to concede - recognized situations where the gains outweighed the losses and where to "play ball" with an opposing government while sticking with his agenda.
So I want to tip my hat to the dying breed of U.S. Arithmetics Presidents - those who know what it takes to balance a budget, to have the words "compromise" and "common sense" in their vocabulary.
P.S. Even though I don't live in America, it was such a shame to read "if we stayed on the present course, we would be debt-free by 2010": it is almost heartbreaking to know that this statement was actually legitimate before good ol' Dubya took office. So when you bring slippers to your Chinese overlords in the year 2050, you can think back to the Clinton era, when democratic arithmetics were trying to avoid this in opposition to republican "magic".
Now, having given that man his props, I demand props of my own. Major ones, because this is the single thickest book I have ever [or, will ever, for that matter] read in My Life. *Pun intended.* Heed my warning, you should not kid yourself like I did into believing that two and a half episodes of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart turn you into a political pundit. I fooled myself that this will be an enjoyable read for me, but I overestimated my interest in politics and came "unprepared" to flipping these pages. I did not recognize four out of every five names mentioned in this book and had to read it with my smartphone firm-in-hand so that I could look up people and events using that fancy internetz thingy. But don't get me wrong - the book is extremely well written and edited, each chapter is a lesson in U.S. and international history, considering Bill's hands-on approach to World affairs: I blame only myself for having the mental capacity of a 5-year old and trying to process the information intended for people who can more that tie their shoelaces and chew bubblegum at the same time.
Nevertheless, I read it and, since biographies is my favorite genre, I have this little game I play after closing each book: "Was his life fun?" And I compare the life of the man in question to the lives of others from radically different walks of life. And I have to say that if Bill's autobiography is indicative and applicable to other presidents or political servants, then I would not wish a life like that for myself. His life was not crazy or exciting in a traditional sense of the word - he was a pretty preppy guy and, barring a blowjob here and there, lived a mellow life. Sure, I believe that it was an exciting life to have experience first person, but the excitement doesn't translate into book-form. What I mean is, that if you have the craving to play "Follow the Leader" or have the urge to be The Alpha ingrained in your DNA, then of course there is no drug that would make you higher that being the President of the United States of America. But it all depends on the person. For example, when I'm 80 years old and look back at my life, I understand that it would be more rewarding to reminisce about the days I helped bring peace to the Irish or reduced the national debt, but I would much rather piss my diaper laughing about how I bit off the head off a bat and picked-up rabies or traveled the Globe hitting every bar with a WWE championship around my waist. That is my chimp-like definition of "fun".
Yet I am grateful that the World has people like Bill Clinton - they are a special breed and bring peace and order to our imperfect society, because not everyone can do what they do. Many say that politics shouldn't be perceived as complex as they are made out to be, but they just are: at least for an average guy like me. Case in point, I had the pleasure of reading Arnold Schwarzenegger's autobiography and comparing it to Bill's. Arny is one of my favorite human beings and a source of inspiration, but while reading about his governorship and political battles, you get a sense of a person doing his best, struggling and giving it his all, but failing to reach his goals and succeeding, based on lack of political skill and experience. Then you read something like "My Life" and realize that if Arnold was a green belt in politics, then Bill was a black belt, navigating the political scene like Han Solo. He knew what levers to pull, when to push through and when to concede - recognized situations where the gains outweighed the losses and where to "play ball" with an opposing government while sticking with his agenda.
So I want to tip my hat to the dying breed of U.S. Arithmetics Presidents - those who know what it takes to balance a budget, to have the words "compromise" and "common sense" in their vocabulary.
P.S. Even though I don't live in America, it was such a shame to read "if we stayed on the present course, we would be debt-free by 2010": it is almost heartbreaking to know that this statement was actually legitimate before good ol' Dubya took office. So when you bring slippers to your Chinese overlords in the year 2050, you can think back to the Clinton era, when democratic arithmetics were trying to avoid this in opposition to republican "magic".
June 5, 2012
So I chewed through this book for over a year. Reading a few chapters, a few hundred pages before reading the last 500 in one fell swoop. First off, I like Bill Clinton. I think he's a smart fellow, who though I disagree w/him on the role of the gov't, is thoughtful and not hidebound in his ideology. Moreover, the Lewinsky scandal will be as remembered a hundred years from now as Grover Cleveland's love child is today. For those of you saying Grover Cleveland had a love child! I say precisely.
What's more he's on a short list of living folk that I would be delighted to sit down for dinner and chew the fat. Though now that he's vegan I guess it would be the celery.
That being said his book fails in a number of ways: wonkish to an almost laughable degree. Clinton's penchant for the inside baseball of every policy quirk that has come down the pipe in the last 50 years is on display, and it's boring. Second, and probably more disappointing, is its Bloodless. Yes, Clinton has an affinity for campaigning and really hearing the story of ordinary people but seems to have a lack of same in referencing his own story. Examples abound from his glossing over his father's alcoholism and abuse to the moment when he had to divulge to his daughter that he had an assignation w/an intern just a little older than her.
Finally, Clinton's proclivity to use his early years as homilies that informed his later activism becomes tedious. Relating how he befriended a girl who others thought was odd only to discover she had MS and then to break into how in such an such a year he passed this or that law while remembering her is both pedantic and highlights the book's underlying flaw: Clinton is still a politician guiding his Message and Image and that mission makes for dull reading at best an unintended humor at worst as when for example he relates his rather overeducated take on rap music.
Perhaps, as a more political document this is understandable but it makes for torturous reading at times. Clinton should take a page from Eisenhower who wrote a book late 'Stories I tell my friends' that was filled w/warm anecdotes, comedy, life lessons, and even some favorite soup recipes(there's the vegan problem again though).
What's more he's on a short list of living folk that I would be delighted to sit down for dinner and chew the fat. Though now that he's vegan I guess it would be the celery.
That being said his book fails in a number of ways: wonkish to an almost laughable degree. Clinton's penchant for the inside baseball of every policy quirk that has come down the pipe in the last 50 years is on display, and it's boring. Second, and probably more disappointing, is its Bloodless. Yes, Clinton has an affinity for campaigning and really hearing the story of ordinary people but seems to have a lack of same in referencing his own story. Examples abound from his glossing over his father's alcoholism and abuse to the moment when he had to divulge to his daughter that he had an assignation w/an intern just a little older than her.
Finally, Clinton's proclivity to use his early years as homilies that informed his later activism becomes tedious. Relating how he befriended a girl who others thought was odd only to discover she had MS and then to break into how in such an such a year he passed this or that law while remembering her is both pedantic and highlights the book's underlying flaw: Clinton is still a politician guiding his Message and Image and that mission makes for dull reading at best an unintended humor at worst as when for example he relates his rather overeducated take on rap music.
Perhaps, as a more political document this is understandable but it makes for torturous reading at times. Clinton should take a page from Eisenhower who wrote a book late 'Stories I tell my friends' that was filled w/warm anecdotes, comedy, life lessons, and even some favorite soup recipes(there's the vegan problem again though).
November 15, 2008
This is a poorly written series of justifications. An annoying characteristic of his writing in this 1000-page diary is Pres. Clinton's insistence on classifying every non-white person he has encountered by their ethnic background. My advice: avoid it.
September 3, 2019
This is a ridiculously long book. That being said, he covered some interesting information and managed to not only inform the reader about a lot of history that has already been brushed aside, but also, more than any other presidential memoir I’ve read, leaves the reader with a sense of what it’s like to be in the office of President.
Let me start off by saying that it was during his bid for election that I was first old enough to vote. I did not vote for him. I still wouldn’t, especially based on this book, but My perceptions of him have shifted somewhat as I’ve lived a little bit of this thing we call life now, and also(as with the other memoirs) I’ve come to see him as a human being.
The first half of the book to me was the most honest. His pre political life is deeply interesting. The period of the book that deals with his time as governor is also very interesting. The latter part of the book mostly reminded me of times where I was only beginning to pay attention to and try to understand politics. While I don’t believe everything that he wrote and can even see places where he tries very hard to control the reader’s perception of his opinions, there were also places where I felt he was vulnerable in sharing his remembrances.
Overall it wasn’t a bad book, but it was crazy long. This the three stars. I learned a lot.
Let me start off by saying that it was during his bid for election that I was first old enough to vote. I did not vote for him. I still wouldn’t, especially based on this book, but My perceptions of him have shifted somewhat as I’ve lived a little bit of this thing we call life now, and also(as with the other memoirs) I’ve come to see him as a human being.
The first half of the book to me was the most honest. His pre political life is deeply interesting. The period of the book that deals with his time as governor is also very interesting. The latter part of the book mostly reminded me of times where I was only beginning to pay attention to and try to understand politics. While I don’t believe everything that he wrote and can even see places where he tries very hard to control the reader’s perception of his opinions, there were also places where I felt he was vulnerable in sharing his remembrances.
Overall it wasn’t a bad book, but it was crazy long. This the three stars. I learned a lot.
August 24, 2014
حياتي- الجزء الأول
انها حياة الرئيس الأمريكي الأسبق بل كلنتون والتي صدرت في كتاب من جزئين انتهيت لتوي من قراءة الجزء الأول الذي أسماه: الأيام الأُوَل.
استطاع كلنتون أن يروى باسلوب جذاب قصة حياته التي بدأت عندما ولد في احدى ولايات الجنوب وهي أركانساس يتيم الأب، وكانت أمه تعمل كممرضة. أسرة عادية للغاية .. مرت بكثير مما تعانيه الأسر الأمريكية المتوسطة الحال. وقد انتهى في روايته في هذا الجزء حتى اللحظات السابقة لحلفانه اليمين كرئيس للولايات المتحدة الأمريكية عام 1992.
تعرفت في هذا الكتاب على كم هائل من المؤسسات الأمريكية التي يكون كل منها جماعة ضغط تساهم في تشكيل الرأي العام واتخاذ القرار.
أعجبني في هذه الرحلة فكرة تكافؤ الفرص التي تتوافر في المجتمع الأمريكي والتي سمحت لشاب من أسرة عادية أن يصل إلى قمة الحكم باجتهاده ومهارته وبعلمه أيضا، فشرف العلم فوق كل شرف.
تجد في هذا الكتاب ما ��دلك ألف مرة على أن هؤلاء أقوام يراعون شعوبهم، أو على الأقل يبرعون في ايهامهم بذلك، ولا يوجد من الساسة من يجرؤ على الاستهانة بناخب أو بمواطن مهما كان نوعه أو عرقه، وإلا خسر الكثير يوم التصويت.. وهو اليوم الذي يصبح المحكوم فيه حاكما. المرشح هناك على استعداد لأن يفعل كل شيء يقنع به الناخبين بنفسه.. حتى أن أحدهم زج به في احدى مسابقات الروديو العنيفة لكي يرى صلابته!
لا أنكر ان قراءة هذا الكتاب في فترة ما بعد التنحي أعطته مذاقا خاصا.. اختلطت حلاوته بمرارته!! حلاوة أن ترى مجتمعا بهذه التجربة القيمة في الديموقراطية.. أما المرارة فكانت نتاج المقارنة. ولا تعليق!
اسلوبه في الكتابة-للحقيقة- مسلي إلا اني أعيب عليه كثرة الإطراء –الذي بدا مبالغا فيه- على زوجته هيلاري، كما لو كان يحاول الاعتذار عما بدا منه في حقها!
ربما بدا مغرقا في المثالية إلى ��د كبير.. فعلى طول رحلته وشراسة المنافسة لا تجده يضيق بأحد إلا فيما ندر! وجدته أمر غريب بعض الشيء!
كنت أتمنى لو غاص أكثر قليلا في وصفه للحظات الانتصار والهزيمة، إلا انه كان يمر عليها بسرعة لينطلق إلى ما بعدها.
أعجبتني بعض العبارات التي صاغها، ومنها:
"تعلمت الكثير من القصص التي رواها لي عمي وخالاتي وأجدادي بأنه لا يوجد انسان كامل، وإنما أغلب الناس طيبون. ومن الظلم أن نحكم على الناس من خلال لحظات ضعفهم وحسب."
"أغلب الأطفال بامكانهم النجاح، ولكن إذا ما توافر لديهم شخص واحد يشعرهم بذلك"
"أمي هي التي علمتني أن أستيقظ كل صباح لكي أواصل. وأن أرى أحسن ما في الناس وإن رأوا هم أسوأ ما فيّ"
"إن حياتك تتشكل من خلال الفرص التي ترفضها وكذلك تلك التي تنتهزها"
"لا يمكنك أن تقود الآخرين دون أن تستمع إليهم"
وأخيرا.. أكثر ما يعجبني فيه كسيرة ذاتية انها كالراوية التي تأخذك في أحداثها بعيدا عن عالمك.. ولكنها في النهاية حقائق.. وليست محض خيال.
انها حياة الرئيس الأمريكي الأسبق بل كلنتون والتي صدرت في كتاب من جزئين انتهيت لتوي من قراءة الجزء الأول الذي أسماه: الأيام الأُوَل.
استطاع كلنتون أن يروى باسلوب جذاب قصة حياته التي بدأت عندما ولد في احدى ولايات الجنوب وهي أركانساس يتيم الأب، وكانت أمه تعمل كممرضة. أسرة عادية للغاية .. مرت بكثير مما تعانيه الأسر الأمريكية المتوسطة الحال. وقد انتهى في روايته في هذا الجزء حتى اللحظات السابقة لحلفانه اليمين كرئيس للولايات المتحدة الأمريكية عام 1992.
تعرفت في هذا الكتاب على كم هائل من المؤسسات الأمريكية التي يكون كل منها جماعة ضغط تساهم في تشكيل الرأي العام واتخاذ القرار.
أعجبني في هذه الرحلة فكرة تكافؤ الفرص التي تتوافر في المجتمع الأمريكي والتي سمحت لشاب من أسرة عادية أن يصل إلى قمة الحكم باجتهاده ومهارته وبعلمه أيضا، فشرف العلم فوق كل شرف.
تجد في هذا الكتاب ما ��دلك ألف مرة على أن هؤلاء أقوام يراعون شعوبهم، أو على الأقل يبرعون في ايهامهم بذلك، ولا يوجد من الساسة من يجرؤ على الاستهانة بناخب أو بمواطن مهما كان نوعه أو عرقه، وإلا خسر الكثير يوم التصويت.. وهو اليوم الذي يصبح المحكوم فيه حاكما. المرشح هناك على استعداد لأن يفعل كل شيء يقنع به الناخبين بنفسه.. حتى أن أحدهم زج به في احدى مسابقات الروديو العنيفة لكي يرى صلابته!
لا أنكر ان قراءة هذا الكتاب في فترة ما بعد التنحي أعطته مذاقا خاصا.. اختلطت حلاوته بمرارته!! حلاوة أن ترى مجتمعا بهذه التجربة القيمة في الديموقراطية.. أما المرارة فكانت نتاج المقارنة. ولا تعليق!
اسلوبه في الكتابة-للحقيقة- مسلي إلا اني أعيب عليه كثرة الإطراء –الذي بدا مبالغا فيه- على زوجته هيلاري، كما لو كان يحاول الاعتذار عما بدا منه في حقها!
ربما بدا مغرقا في المثالية إلى ��د كبير.. فعلى طول رحلته وشراسة المنافسة لا تجده يضيق بأحد إلا فيما ندر! وجدته أمر غريب بعض الشيء!
كنت أتمنى لو غاص أكثر قليلا في وصفه للحظات الانتصار والهزيمة، إلا انه كان يمر عليها بسرعة لينطلق إلى ما بعدها.
أعجبتني بعض العبارات التي صاغها، ومنها:
"تعلمت الكثير من القصص التي رواها لي عمي وخالاتي وأجدادي بأنه لا يوجد انسان كامل، وإنما أغلب الناس طيبون. ومن الظلم أن نحكم على الناس من خلال لحظات ضعفهم وحسب."
"أغلب الأطفال بامكانهم النجاح، ولكن إذا ما توافر لديهم شخص واحد يشعرهم بذلك"
"أمي هي التي علمتني أن أستيقظ كل صباح لكي أواصل. وأن أرى أحسن ما في الناس وإن رأوا هم أسوأ ما فيّ"
"إن حياتك تتشكل من خلال الفرص التي ترفضها وكذلك تلك التي تنتهزها"
"لا يمكنك أن تقود الآخرين دون أن تستمع إليهم"
وأخيرا.. أكثر ما يعجبني فيه كسيرة ذاتية انها كالراوية التي تأخذك في أحداثها بعيدا عن عالمك.. ولكنها في النهاية حقائق.. وليست محض خيال.
November 7, 2019
I feel like I should throw myself a party for finally reading this book- in its entirety- after owning it since July of 2004.
This is a very in-depth autobiography/ memoir of Bill Clinton's life from birth to 2001. At first, I was frustrated that it appeared to mention everyone he ever met and every policy he ever implemented. As I gave in to the detailed nature of the book though I began to appreciate the opportunity of seeing a president's entire story. It was also a good opportunity to relive the important events of 1992-2000, when I was mostly too young to fully appreciate them.
I went to the book signing on July 7, 2004:
You had to go twice, the first time for a bracelet and the second time for the signing. This is me and my friend Julie in 2004 with our copy and our bracelets for the signing.
My copy :
This is a very in-depth autobiography/ memoir of Bill Clinton's life from birth to 2001. At first, I was frustrated that it appeared to mention everyone he ever met and every policy he ever implemented. As I gave in to the detailed nature of the book though I began to appreciate the opportunity of seeing a president's entire story. It was also a good opportunity to relive the important events of 1992-2000, when I was mostly too young to fully appreciate them.
I went to the book signing on July 7, 2004:
You had to go twice, the first time for a bracelet and the second time for the signing. This is me and my friend Julie in 2004 with our copy and our bracelets for the signing.
My copy :
Read
April 6, 2007In his first chapter, Clinton mentions that he once departed from his reading material of choice, fiction, and picked up a sort of self-help book on making goals for the future. As instructed by the book, the college-age Clinton made up a list of short and long term goals, with the top few being to have a family, a successful political career, and to write a great book.
If this was his great book, I'm disappointed. It reads like a long-spinning political yarn with Southern-gentility reticence in which you never get anything like the 'terrible honesty' that Chandler praised in the 1920s American writers. It added a few interesting facts about the Clinton administration, and is a nice study of one person's rise to prominence, but is little else.
If this was his great book, I'm disappointed. It reads like a long-spinning political yarn with Southern-gentility reticence in which you never get anything like the 'terrible honesty' that Chandler praised in the 1920s American writers. It added a few interesting facts about the Clinton administration, and is a nice study of one person's rise to prominence, but is little else.
March 25, 2009
I am a fan of Bill. This book details his life, esp. growing up, becoming governor, and then president. What I dislike most about this book is its defensive tone. He is constantly under attack, so he seems to always be explaining why he is right, or providing an excuse for why he screwed up. I think this book gave a lot of insight into Bill's personal challenges. However, what I would like to know are the insights he had as president, as a world leader setting the stage. I think Bill Clinton's presidency was one of the most successful to date; I want to know how this happened, not why Bill's critics are wrong.
March 27, 2012
Listen to the audio :)
I found Hillary's autobiography to be more interesting and informative, but listening to Bill read his own story was heartwarming and inspiring. I love hearing how political powerhouses get there. And no matter what people say, he had new ideas and really accomplished a lot.
I found Hillary's autobiography to be more interesting and informative, but listening to Bill read his own story was heartwarming and inspiring. I love hearing how political powerhouses get there. And no matter what people say, he had new ideas and really accomplished a lot.
May 24, 2019
A solid 3.5. This is in the top ten list for longest books I’ve ever read, but I’m glad I did. There is a wealth of information here, and it was relevant to someone of my generation — Clinton is the first president I was old enough to vote for — who previously knew little about Mr. Clinton or his presidency besides headlines, rumors, and soundbites.
I was struck by many things, which I’ve mentioned in a longer review on my website, one of which was simply how busy he was. A simple list of all the conferences, summits, speeches, hearings, meetings, etc. would have been a fairly lengthy book, even without commentary.
There are inconsistent style changes throughout, some lame attempts at humor, and a surprising amount of mini-biographies about people he knew or met, so it’s not a perfect book by any means. But the style is usually clear, and easy to read, and the facts typically presented in linear, chronological order.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,279 reviews