User talk:Hubertl

Was ihr den Geist der Zeiten heißt,
Das ist im Grund der Herren eigner Geist,
In dem die Zeiten sich bespiegeln. (Faust I: 575-577)

 Gerhard, a close friend and Wikipedian since 2004, has gone on January 22, 2016.

Hello Hubertl, I am currently submitting the "Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum East Court" in the Featured picture candidates. One of the criticisms that you and others have made is that my photograph needs perspective correction. I have now updated the photograph and done perspective correction.

QI - Diskussion

Danke für die Info. Ich wusse nicht, dass man eigene Bilder in die Diskussion schicken kann. Dass ginge dann ja immer, wenn man mit einem Decline nicht einverstanden ist. Kann man so auch eine Entscheidung erzwingen, wenn ein Bild partout blau umrandet bleibt, weil sich keiner festlegen mag? --Milseburg (talk) 10:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Ja, Milseburg, das Consensual Review ist praktisch die Erweiterung der Entscheidung auf einen mehrköpfigen Senat. Tatsache ist aber, der Nominator hat keine eigene Stimme, die einer ablehnenden Stimme gleichwertig gegenübergestellt werden kann. Das CR kann aber auch zu einer Nichtentscheidung mit dem Vorteil einer späteren Wiedernominierung führen, eine ehemals abgelehnte Nominierung muss deutlich begründet bzw. das Bild verbessert werden. --Hubertl 11:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Ich muss widersprechen: Es wurde in früheren Diskussionen allerdings deutlich gemacht, dass CR lediglich ein Instrument ist, eine Entscheidung anzufechten. Eine Verschiebung einer Nominierung ohne Review ins CR ist ein Missbrauch dieses Instruments. Es steht jedem frei, eine nicht bewertete Nominierung erneut mit dem Zusatzz "previously not assessed" erneut einzustellen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Das habe ich aber damit auch ausgedrückt, Uwe. Der Nominierende, wie auch jeder andere, kann eine Einzelentscheidung anfechten. Der Unterschied liegt nur darin, dass der Nominierende damit die Entscheidung des Erstablehners nicht aufheben kann, das können nur andere mit ihrer Stimme. Auch, dass bei einer Nichtbeurteilung eine Verschiebung durch den Nominierenden in den CR sinnlos ist (aus Zeitgründen) habe ich angeführt. Aber es ist richtig, eine Nichtbewertung im regulären Prozess sollte nicht durch den Nominierenden angefasst und in den CR gestellt werden. Ich kann mich aber nicht erinnern, dass das im letzten Jahr irgendwann einmal stattgefunden hätte.--Hubertl 12:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Ich weiss, dass Du es richtig gemeint hast. Dein "Ja" auf die Frage von Milseburg liess halt den Schluss zu, dass man blau umrandete Bilder ins CR stellen kann. Das wollte ich damit klarstellen . --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna 8913-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 figure at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 9047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, sharp photo, good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 23:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Roof figures at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8966-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen, Hofmann von Aspernburg, southwest side-5281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büsten im Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 12:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but maybe the need to be indetified? --C messier 11:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), Nr. 70 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Roof figures at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8928-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-8988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Exner (Nr. 57) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)