User talk:Hubertl: Difference between revisions
FPC promotion of File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg |
Bot: Notify user of promoted Quality Image(s) |
||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
== FP Promotion == |
== FP Promotion == |
||
{{FPpromotion|File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg}} /[[User:FPCBot|FPCBot]] ([[User talk:FPCBot|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC) |
{{FPpromotion|File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg}} /[[User:FPCBot|FPCBot]] ([[User talk:FPCBot|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
==Quality Image Promotion== |
|||
{{QICpromoted|File:Julius_von_Wiesner_(1838-1916),_Nr._71_basrelief_(bronce)_in_the_Arkadenhof_of_the_University_of_Vienna-1305.jpg|Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --[[User:Hubertl|Hubertl]] 21:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)|Good quality. --[[User:Poco a poco|Poco a poco]] 22:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{QICpromoted|File:Heinrich_von_Bamberger_(1822-1888),_Nr._70_bust_(marble)_in_the_Arkadenhof_of_the_University_of_Vienna-1291.jpg|Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --[[User:Hubertl|Hubertl]] 21:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)|Good quality. --[[User:Poco a poco|Poco a poco]] 22:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{QICpromoted|File:Otto_Benndorf_(1838-1907),_bust_(marble)_in_the_Arkadenhof_of_the_University_of_Vienna_(Nr._67)-1266.jpg|Otto Benndorf (1838-1907), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --[[User:Hubertl|Hubertl]] 21:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)|Good quality.--[[User:PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ|PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ]] 21:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{QICpromoted|File:AT_70028_Cavary_Heiligenkreuz,_Lower_Austria_1763.jpg|Calvary in Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria --[[User:Hubertl|Hubertl]] 22:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)|Good quality. --[[User:Johann Jaritz|Johann Jaritz]] 05:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)}} |
|||
--[[User:QICbot|QICbot]] ([[User talk:QICbot|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:21, 16 February 2016
Was ihr den Geist der Zeiten heißt,
Das ist im Grund der Herren eigner Geist,
In dem die Zeiten sich bespiegeln.
(Faust I: 575-577)
Gerhard, a close friend and Wikipedian since 2004, has gone on January 22, 2016.
Hello Hubertl, I am currently submitting the "Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum East Court" in the Featured picture candidates. One of the criticisms that you and others have made is that my photograph needs perspective correction. I have now updated the photograph and done perspective correction.
QI - Diskussion
Danke für die Info. Ich wusse nicht, dass man eigene Bilder in die Diskussion schicken kann. Dass ginge dann ja immer, wenn man mit einem Decline nicht einverstanden ist. Kann man so auch eine Entscheidung erzwingen, wenn ein Bild partout blau umrandet bleibt, weil sich keiner festlegen mag? --Milseburg (talk) 10:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ja, Milseburg, das Consensual Review ist praktisch die Erweiterung der Entscheidung auf einen mehrköpfigen Senat. Tatsache ist aber, der Nominator hat keine eigene Stimme, die einer ablehnenden Stimme gleichwertig gegenübergestellt werden kann. Das CR kann aber auch zu einer Nichtentscheidung mit dem Vorteil einer späteren Wiedernominierung führen, eine ehemals abgelehnte Nominierung muss deutlich begründet bzw. das Bild verbessert werden. --Hubertl 11:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ich muss widersprechen: Es wurde in früheren Diskussionen allerdings deutlich gemacht, dass CR lediglich ein Instrument ist, eine Entscheidung anzufechten. Eine Verschiebung einer Nominierung ohne Review ins CR ist ein Missbrauch dieses Instruments. Es steht jedem frei, eine nicht bewertete Nominierung erneut mit dem Zusatzz "previously not assessed" erneut einzustellen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Das habe ich aber damit auch ausgedrückt, Uwe. Der Nominierende, wie auch jeder andere, kann eine Einzelentscheidung anfechten. Der Unterschied liegt nur darin, dass der Nominierende damit die Entscheidung des Erstablehners nicht aufheben kann, das können nur andere mit ihrer Stimme. Auch, dass bei einer Nichtbeurteilung eine Verschiebung durch den Nominierenden in den CR sinnlos ist (aus Zeitgründen) habe ich angeführt. Aber es ist richtig, eine Nichtbewertung im regulären Prozess sollte nicht durch den Nominierenden angefasst und in den CR gestellt werden. Ich kann mich aber nicht erinnern, dass das im letzten Jahr irgendwann einmal stattgefunden hätte.--Hubertl 12:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ich weiss, dass Du es richtig gemeint hast. Dein "Ja" auf die Frage von Milseburg liess halt den Schluss zu, dass man blau umrandete Bilder ins CR stellen kann. Das wollte ich damit klarstellen . --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Das habe ich aber damit auch ausgedrückt, Uwe. Der Nominierende, wie auch jeder andere, kann eine Einzelentscheidung anfechten. Der Unterschied liegt nur darin, dass der Nominierende damit die Entscheidung des Erstablehners nicht aufheben kann, das können nur andere mit ihrer Stimme. Auch, dass bei einer Nichtbeurteilung eine Verschiebung durch den Nominierenden in den CR sinnlos ist (aus Zeitgründen) habe ich angeführt. Aber es ist richtig, eine Nichtbewertung im regulären Prozess sollte nicht durch den Nominierenden angefasst und in den CR gestellt werden. Ich kann mich aber nicht erinnern, dass das im letzten Jahr irgendwann einmal stattgefunden hätte.--Hubertl 12:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ich muss widersprechen: Es wurde in früheren Diskussionen allerdings deutlich gemacht, dass CR lediglich ein Instrument ist, eine Entscheidung anzufechten. Eine Verschiebung einer Nominierung ohne Review ins CR ist ein Missbrauch dieses Instruments. Es steht jedem frei, eine nicht bewertete Nominierung erneut mit dem Zusatzz "previously not assessed" erneut einzustellen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 13766 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna 8913-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 13766 figure at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 9047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 13766 Roof figures at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8966-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 20143 Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen, Hofmann von Aspernburg, southwest side-5281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Büsten im Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), Nr. 70 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 13766 Roof figures at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8928-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-8988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Franz Exner (Nr. 57) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von der Westseite des KHM-9853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 13766 Roof figures at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8936-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leo Graf Thun und Hohenstein (Nr. 58) Statue in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Eingangsbereich der Ruhmeshalle, HGM, Wien 0400 1 2 3 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eingangsbereich der Ruhmeshalle, HGM, Wien 0400 1 2 3 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von der Westseite des KHM-9845-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Südosttabernakel Poseidon-9970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Athene, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Wien-9825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Attikalbalustrade, Viktorien J.Benk-9976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Nordwesttabernakel-9793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Nordwesttabernakel-9900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-71-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von Museumsquartier-9892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Kuppel - Blick von Südwesten 9849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Südwesttabernakel-9862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von der Westseite des KHM-0004-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 basrelief (bronce) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1600-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 basrelief (bronce) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), Nr. 70 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Otto Benndorf (1838-1907), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna (Nr. 67)-1266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|