Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luaswelcom.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
As the flat poster is unquestionably the main objective of the image per the filename this surely is a copyvio is it not? Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:20, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete No freedom of panorama for 2d works per COM:FOP Ireland. -M.nelson (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2021 (UTC)- Delete: obviously not de minimis and no FoP for 2D works. Ww2censor (talk) 09:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment: (as nom). Newever version is non-copyvio but problems remain with older versions which are likely good faith copyvio.
- Djm-leighpark: What "Newever version" are you referring to? Ww2censor (talk) 09:22, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: (Another typo ... I've been sniffing the paint or something. meant "Newer") I've loaded 3 newer versions since today UTC. As I found out with an image at Limerick Junction this doesn't always show through at times due to caches. Those up to date versions resolve copyvio but still link back to the 2004. You should versions at File:Luaswelcom.jpg but if you can't (I think I cleared my Cache for Limerick Junction and ended up stuffing passwords for a week). Nowadays I'd tend to recommend using a different machine or browers to check stuff. But should be visible from the link I've just given which is the same at the top here. May a quick refresh might clear it. Thank. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Djm-leighpark: I did assume it was a typo! Slowing down a bit and proofreading before saving works wonders. Initially I did not understand what you were suggesting as it rquire revisiting the file page to see what you did. You should NOT overwrite the file of this deletion nomination with a different file. Just upload the new version under a different name and let this deletion come to its final conclusion. In that regard, I suggest you get an admin to excise the 3 new uploads and upload under a new name as suggested. Then each file stands on its own merit. Ww2censor (talk) 12:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- @@Ww2censor Phew. Have uploaded File:Luaswelcome20042021.jpg which is a trivial crop of the current latest of File:Luaswelcom.jpg as couldn't get two precisely same files up. I've {{Speedy}}ied to for an admin to review what to do and have given a G7 option to the admin on File:Luaswelcome20042021.jpg which is a trivial crop of the current latest of File:Luaswelcom.jpg which is also g7 eligible on a do one or other but not both basis. Hope that works. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Djm-leighpark: I did assume it was a typo! Slowing down a bit and proofreading before saving works wonders. Initially I did not understand what you were suggesting as it rquire revisiting the file page to see what you did. You should NOT overwrite the file of this deletion nomination with a different file. Just upload the new version under a different name and let this deletion come to its final conclusion. In that regard, I suggest you get an admin to excise the 3 new uploads and upload under a new name as suggested. Then each file stands on its own merit. Ww2censor (talk) 12:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: (Another typo ... I've been sniffing the paint or something. meant "Newer") I've loaded 3 newer versions since today UTC. As I found out with an image at Limerick Junction this doesn't always show through at times due to caches. Those up to date versions resolve copyvio but still link back to the 2004. You should versions at File:Luaswelcom.jpg but if you can't (I think I cleared my Cache for Limerick Junction and ended up stuffing passwords for a week). Nowadays I'd tend to recommend using a different machine or browers to check stuff. But should be visible from the link I've just given which is the same at the top here. May a quick refresh might clear it. Thank. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Djm-leighpark: What "Newever version" are you referring to? Ww2censor (talk) 09:22, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, both. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
