Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worood Zuhair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 04:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Worood Zuhair

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about person lacking notability, also the article with few or no reliable sources about a living person.

These references are:

2 written by this person
1 personal YouTube video
3 references related to DW channel interview
2 references that I can't verify their reliability.

Arabic article was deleted as it called as Bubble = (People notable for only one event)

--محمود (talk) 15:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:BASIC/WP:GNG, she has received significant, in-depth coverage, including from Deutsche Welle and Deutschlandfunk, and she is not low-profile due to her activism, interviews, public speaking appearances, and book, so WP:BLP1E does not appear to apply. Beccaynr (talk) 23:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this article has significant coverage and reliable source to justify keeping. VocalIndia (talk) 06:51, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. This seems promotional and her book doesn't have any references... but her continued appearances in sources (including an interview in [Bild https://www.bild.de/politik/ausland/politik-ausland/heute-ist-welt-kopftuch-tag-musliminnen-erzaehlen-was-sie-vom-kopftuch-halten-75086008.bild.html] last month) make the argument that she is notable only for one event difficult to sustain. Furius (talk) 19:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for more policy based consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 02:13, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Only known for a single event, so can't see the supposed deep coverage. It all stems from that one event, an attempted honour killing for losing her faith and everything follows from that, the activism, the death threats. There is coverage but it is very passing mentions/very short para in relation to the main context. Where is the core deep references that are needed for a BLP. scope_creep^Talk 10:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The coverage is not trivial because it provides secondary context and analysis, and per WP:GNG Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material; per WP:BASIC, If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability and the coverage has been sustained, including Deutsche Welle: Germany's atheist refugees: When not believing is life-threatening (December 20, 2018), which is not the DW interview referred to in the nom, Deutschlandfunk: Flucht vor Allah (October 10, 2018), and The Arab Weekly: Iraq’s growing community of atheists no longer peripheral (July 20, 2019). She also has not been low-profile after the multiple events for which she is known, including her successful asylum petition, which is a separate event from surviving a brutal assault, because she has been a public speaker, e.g. Richard Dawkins foundation: Die Wurzeln des Islam reichen vom Nahen Osten bis nach Europa (January 2019), The Central Council of Ex-Muslims: Rebellische Frauen im Islam (November 27, 2016), given interviews, including Bild (January 2, 2021), and written a book. Beccaynr (talk) 13:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hopefully, we'll achieve a consensus next round.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, gidonb (talk) 21:09, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.