Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:46, 9 October 2007

Food for thought:
Partial solution to rampant deletionism by Jimbo Wales.	Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism by Larry Sanger.
The Great Failure of Wikipedia by Jason Scott Sadofsky.
"...We make the internet not suck." — Jimbo "POV Pusher" Wales
To do:
Articles to FAC (FLC) / PR: Nothing here for the moment	Articles to beef up: Nothing here for the moment

This user is a part of the Military history WikiProject, which aims to expand Wikipedia's coverage of military history. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This user is member of WikiProject Beer, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to beers and breweries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

ARCHIVED

NASA stuff

I'd be willing to scan just about all of the NASA stuff if it's really only 500 pages or so. Do you want me to send it back when I am done? I was thinking some of the documents might be better OCR'd and converted to wikitext articles, if they are predominantly textual. My scanner can scan up to legal size. For anything larger, I have a hand scanner that scans a path 4 inches wide, can stitch those scans together for larger images. please delete my email address when you are done with it. Pedant 17:54, 2004 Oct 16 (UTC)

pages are in the mail you should recieve them soon. Alkivar 04:18, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The package of NASA material has arrived. It appears to have survived the trip well. I haven't opened it yet, will try to start tonight.Pedant 22:34, 2004 Oct 26 (UTC)

I'm stuck for a bit on scanning, the computer the scanner is connected to has had the RAM removed, I'm waiting to get it back from Kingston. They received it on the 22nd of November, so I expect it back in a matter of days. Pedant 07:23, 2004 Nov 29 (UTC)

OK, I have the scanner running, trying to figure out the OCR thing. I uploaded this one file for test purposes. I'd like to convert this kind of thing to wikitext rather than keep them as jpgs, cause they get pretty big. If you know of any resources to help me figure out optical character recognition, I'd be grateful. Pedant 22:12, 2004 Dec 29 (UTC)

all right, I have worked a bit at it,and looks like I'm started. The front page for the archive, at present is at this page on wikisource Pedant 06:55, 2004 Dec 30 (UTC)

EXCELLENT! Alkivar 01:24, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

You been doing any more with those NASA Facts papers? Sorta curious as I havent heard anything in a while. ALKIVAR™ 01:02, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

yes, I have taken a break on that, I'm working on getting a faster scanner, but I will definitely follow through on the whole pile. I'm really busy these days so faster is really gooder... gotta run, let me know when you get back from your break. Pedant 02:18, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

some of this ... seems to be missing, but I don't know why. They've moved a lot of stuff from wikisource to en.wikisource, but some it is missing. I've been real busy, haven't worked on it in like a year? User:Pedant 05:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A quick note to say thanks

I just wanted to drop you a quick note to thank you for your support in my request for adminship. It was certainly a wild ride, and I really appreciate you taking some time out to contribute. ClockworkSoul 16:26, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on the Jew template

I know it's a bit frustrating now, but in the end I think it's going to be vastly improved, and most of the credit goes to you. Jayjg | (Talk) 02:54, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Nice work, and thanks

I, Clockwork **Soul**, award you this barnstar for your innovation and initiative in the creation of the The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

I just wanted to thank you for coming up with the idea for the The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar, which evolved into the finest (and in my opinion highest) award that we have here at the 'pedia.

Oh, and by the way (for what it's worth) I like your orange sig and the associate image. It adds a bit of flavor to sometimes bland pages. – Clockwork Soul 14:07, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Defender of the Wiki Barnstar citation

Kudos on inventing the Defender of the Wiki Barnstar. Since I think defense of Wikipedia is extremely important, I've edited the DOTWB page to include their citations and supporting evidence. In fact, the only award I can't find supporting evidence for is... um... yours. Could you link it in when you get the chance? Thanks! Alba 00:45, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I dont have one... I never self award. :) ALKIVAR™

01:07, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Steve Dalkowski

Thank you for your FAC support and for updating the table, looks good! Is it Hardcore dance music you're into or that horrible Hardcore Rap stuff they play on MTV? There's very, VERY few of us hardcore dance music fans in the US :) Zerbey 18:39, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Colditz Castle

Impressive work on the Colditz Castle. I enjoyed reading the article. StRay 20:39, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Your quite welcome :) ALKIVAR™

20:41, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Signature

Thanks for voting in my RfA - but please don't use images in signatures! They are unnecessary server load. See [[WP:~~~~]]. r3m0t ^talk June 30, 2005 20:28 (UTC) (reply here)

What are the size restrictions for signatures, anyhow? I've been considering using one myself. —RaD Man (talk) 1 July 2005 01:20 (UTC)

For the record i've had this conversation with the dev's ... the image is on commons, not on the en server. The server load is therefore negligible. Or at least thats the conclusion we came to. As for the other reasons listed, it neither interferes with line height nor blinks... I think you worry too much :) ALKIVAR™

1 July 2005 06:45 (UTC)

Well, I trust the devs. OK then. r3m0t ^talk July 1, 2005 07:07 (UTC)

User page improvements

LOL! Thank you for "improving" [1] my user page. — brighterorange (talk) 01:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Van Impe

Your addition of audio to the Jack Van Impe article rocks my world. - Jersyko talk 03:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You have been nominated

You have made a positive impact on Wikipedia, and I firmly believe sysop privileges would only enhance your contribution abilities. If you do not mind, I have taken it upon myself to nominate you for adminship on this hallowed occassion. Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/nominate#What_to_do_if_you_are_nominated: should you wish to accept, as there have been some changes to the RFA process as of late. Best regards, Hall Monitor 22:42, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work!

Hey, dude. Just wanted to say that I really enjoyed reading Don't Copy That Floppy. Nice job, and keep up the good work!--Sean|Bla ck 04:46, 5 November 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Wikimania 2006

Firstly, enjoy your Wikibreak; come back clear-headed and ready to edit! Second, I noticed you live in New England, and are a DJ (awesome!), and wondered if you've heard of Wikimania 2006, which is happening right here in our fair city of Boston. I know it's a few hours' drive from where you are, but if you could participate in IRC chats, or volunteer to help with Wikimania, we'd really appreciate it. I enjoy working with you, and look forward to seeing you in the future. Happy wikibreak, Mys e ku rity 02:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I love the userpage! 02:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

St. John's College High School

Fantastic work on the St. John's College High School article, it looks wonderful! Bahn Mi 21:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Thank you for the additions of pictures of the Bendix and Thompson tropies! KillerChihuahua^?!? 13:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I dispute your unsourced assertion that you ever sit on your "lazy ass"! If you expect such controversial claims to remain unchallenged, you should not use such a recognizable sig! No one even has to check your contribs to see that is a deliberately false and misleading statement. I am deeply disappointed in you for attempting to push this unsupported minority POV. KillerChihuahua^?!? 13:17, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for fixing my ugly user page! I really appreciate it. I had tried to make it look nice, but I just couldn't figure it out! Thanks!Reggaedelgado 19:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ALF, now with added ALF

Here's a barnstar for converting me to ascii and HTML they are fantastic, thanks. I spent three hours this week trying to find just an ascii version, so I am delighted to have these in user space. Big smile on my face now, thanks. --Alf ^melmac 11:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For updating WP:BP to reflect FU an 'unofficial' barnstar --Doc ^ask? 23:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Love Don't Copy That Floppy

Funny shit, I wish I still had one of the posters (the one with a swashbuckling floppy) that they sent out to universities during that campaign so I could up it to commons. Also, excellent work on the many aspects of warez (it's refreshing to see well written articles by people who have a clue). Nice userpage, too, 'cept the whole spiel about being conservative ;-P (at least you aren't a GWB fanboy). --Dragon695 18:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alkivar-003-TWEAKED.jpg

I have a question about the above mentioned picture. You state it was taken by Utopium Photography, yet you claim to be the copyright holder. If this picture was not taken by you, but you are the subject the photographer has to release the copyright to you. Just like wedding photos, the married couple do not hold any copyrights, or infact any rights to the photos. Mike _{(T C)} 23:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude... you have absolutely no idea what the hell your talking about. In the US, works for hire cannot be registered for copyright by the creator. See this pdf:

Under the 1976 Copyright Act as amended (title 17 of the United States Code), a work is protected by copyright from the time it is created in a fixed form. In other words, when a work is written down or otherwise set into tangible form, the copyright immediately becomes the property of the author who created it. Only the author or those deriving their rights from the author can rightfully claim copyright.

Although the general rule is that the person who creates a work is the author of that work, there is an exception to that principle: the copyright law defines a category of works called “works made for hire.” If a work is “made for hire,” the employer, and not the employee, is considered the author. The employer may be a firm, an organization, or an individual.

Note the section in bold. Nuff said. ALKIVAR™

19:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool

Cool userpage you've got! Gerard Foley 01:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must compliment you on your excellent userpage. Kudos to your creativity :) I am inspired. ĐõÇ §αмέЄЯ 06:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Oakenfold

I agree that the way I worded it, it sounded like he mixed his own records. I sat there for a few minutes trying to peice together a sentence that would be both grammatically correct and convey the correct message. "Not only did Oakenfold produce records, but he also mixed them." A few too many modifiers. The words but and also are both redundant but without them the sentence is screwed. Perhaps, "Oakenfold even mixed the records he produced for others" or something of the ilk? drumguy⁸⁸⁰⁰ - speak? 02:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, wonderful userpage. Did you develop it or did you copmod a template? drumguy⁸⁸⁰⁰ - speak? 02:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I subst'd some of the templates... and modified them to match the theme (the GFDL only and the Userpage templates) the rest I developed by hand. I'd be glad to give you any help you need developing one of your own if you'd like. ALKIVAR™

21:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

young orphaned images

I think you were the one who asked a little while ago for a report of young orphaned images? Here it is. Let me know if any tweaks are needed. --Interiot 23:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gorgeous Userpage!

Yours is the nicest userpage I've seen, in browsing several hundred. Nice work! Waitak 10:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent User Page Award

Any chance of some help?

I'm a bit disapointed by my photo of a print, it was under glass, no lighting, so the flash is a problem, I tried to photoshop out as much as I could but I wondered if you had a program that could level out the background white as it gets real grey away from the centre. pretty please? :) --Alf ^melmac 22:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did my best to level out the flash, I also corrected the angular distortion so the frame around the sketch looks square now. I also reduced it to greyscale as color needlessly increased the file size for this image. If this is not what you wanted feel free to revert my changes. ALKIVAR™

22:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You run a fast and efficient ship there Alkivar :) I've just been appreciating it high res and zoomed in, that's a great improvement. Thanks. --Alf ^melmac 23:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza User Page Award

Congratulations, Alkivar, you have been nominated for the Esperanza User Page Contest! The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done.

Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 09:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLove!

Here's a chocolate bar for you! Chocolate bars somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others using Template:smile! Happy editing! --TBCΦtalk? 08:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Get it? A chocolate bar for Alkivar? Anyhow, keep up the great work, you've contributed a lot to Wikipedia. :D (another ackward attempt at comedy by TBCΦtalk?)

Thats such a dorky joke... but it made me smile ... thanks for the thought. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 18:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

A well deserved barnstar for you, for your creation of the List of units using the B-26 Marauder during World War II. It helped me get rid of some red links on my own pet project...List of United States Marine Corps aircraft squadrons. Cheers--Looper5920 10:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Been meaning to give you one of these for a while now. I think I have agreed with you on 99% of every Wikipedia discussion we have both participated in, even on the really controversial ones that I am often in the minority of. It's good to know someone else in the project shares my views on so many topics. VegaDark 04:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For doing the right thing

		The Original Barnstar
		For doing the right thing despite the pitchfork wielding mob. ((1 == 2) ? (('Stop') : ('Go')) 14:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are people that talk the talk...

...And there are people that walk the walk. I don't give out Barnstars, I give out this thing, and on rather rare occasions at that. Thank you, for standing up, and for doing the right thing. Good luck. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 10:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Surreal Barnstar

		The Surreal Barnstar
		Without your wildcard act, the BJAODN MfD would never have received enough community input to decide the fate of that seven year old project. As the nominator of that MfD and for playing a significant roll in prompting 113 unique editors to participate in that MfD, I hereby award you The Surreal Barnstar. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 07:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RECENT

Please note: Comments left by anonymous editors may be removed without warning. Please create an account or log in if you wish to engage in a meaningful discussion.

Image:Me & Big Bank Hank (Sugarhill Gang).jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Me & Big Bank Hank (Sugarhill Gang).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 10:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a courtesy

An editor has asked for a deletion review of User:TJ Spyke/PPV Win Percent. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. TJ Spyke 01:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Emerson FAR

I have started a featured article review for Ernest Emerson at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ernest Emerson. Your contribution would be appreciated.--Nydas^(Talk) 17:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Emerson has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ubuntu Christian Edition

Hi, looking at later versions of that article it may pass WP:N. This may be an example where the people arguing for keeping didn't make the right policy-based arguments but the sourcing still exists. Would you consider looking at the sources listed in [2] and see if you think it meets WP:N? JoshuaZ 02:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A blog, A forum post, The projects own website. 60% of the references are utter crap that fails WP:RS. The rest, are nothing more than an "it exists" commentary. Not to mention the article as it stood was a giant conflict of interest as it was almost entirely written by one of the distro's developers. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 02:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I agree with that analysis. Examples that may be acceptable are [3] and [4] both of which are non-trivial independnet reliable sources that discuss a lot more than it exists. The U.S. Catholic reference may also be ok (I don't know since the site is currently down for maintenance). As for the conflict of interest matter, I'd be happy to help stub it down to the verifiable material and keep a watch of it. JoshuaZ 02:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 08:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

"Idiots?"

I've been threatened with blocks for calling people that. Being an admin does not give you any special right to violate civility rules... nor to delete stuff from articles just because you personally don't like it. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 00:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 260: / Line 260: @@
 <small>Delivered by [[User:Grafikbot|grafikbot]] 08:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC) </small>
+== "Idiots?" ==
+I've been threatened with blocks for calling people that. Being an admin does not give you any special right to violate civility rules... nor to delete stuff from articles just because you personally don't like it. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 00:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)