Jump to content

User talk:Viriditas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 38: Line 38:
This has been a really disappointing discussion, and you should really reflect on how you behaved. --<span style="font-family:lucida sans, sans-serif;">[[User:Jerem43|Jeremy]] <span style="font-size:85%;">([[User talk:Jerem43|blah blah]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jerem43|I did it!]])</span></span> 18:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
This has been a really disappointing discussion, and you should really reflect on how you behaved. --<span style="font-family:lucida sans, sans-serif;">[[User:Jerem43|Jeremy]] <span style="font-size:85%;">([[User talk:Jerem43|blah blah]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jerem43|I did it!]])</span></span> 18:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
:I'm sorry you feel that way, but I completely disagree with you, and I deny I have engaged in any of those things you have described. If you feel you are too close to the topic to be objective because of a conflict of interest, simply say so and withdraw. There's no need for you to engage in false accusations. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas#top|talk]]) 20:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
:I'm sorry you feel that way, but I completely disagree with you, and I deny I have engaged in any of those things you have described. If you feel you are too close to the topic to be objective because of a conflict of interest, simply say so and withdraw. There's no need for you to engage in false accusations. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas#top|talk]]) 20:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
::For your information: you have templates on this page for editwarring and personal attacks. Denying editwarring and PA's is quite useless... [[User:Night of the Big Wind|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Night of the Big Wind</font></font>]] [[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|<font color="maroon"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 20:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:37, 20 May 2012


May 2012

Your recent editing history at Template:American cuisine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Cleanup listing Hawaii

Hi Viriditis. The cleanup template at WP:HAWAII should be replaced. It's linked to defunct Wolterbot, for one thing. If you click on it, it leads to Hawaii/Cleanup listing, page which seems to be a long list of (2 yrs out of date) tedious and manual updating. That whole page should be deleted. The template below goes directly to Toolserver, and is a regularly automated update. It's so easy with the Toolserver. But I do think I should pass to you to decide and implement, rather than just taking it upon myself. Maile66 (talk) 23:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, it sounds like you have it completely under control. Good work! Viriditas (talk) 23:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've taken care of it.Maile66 (talk) 00:17, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Template talk:American cuisine. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Night of the Big Wind talk 16:29, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

Hope you like this symbol of Dutch food. Night of the Big Wind talk 17:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior on Template talk:American cuisine

Hello Viriditas, I want to say that your behavior in this discussion has been below that what is expected from an experienced editor such as yourself. Edit warring, personal attacks and tendentious editing are not the types of actions one would expect from an editor with nearly eight years of experience here on Wikipedia.

This has been a really disappointing discussion, and you should really reflect on how you behaved. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 18:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you feel that way, but I completely disagree with you, and I deny I have engaged in any of those things you have described. If you feel you are too close to the topic to be objective because of a conflict of interest, simply say so and withdraw. There's no need for you to engage in false accusations. Viriditas (talk) 20:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For your information: you have templates on this page for editwarring and personal attacks. Denying editwarring and PA's is quite useless... Night of the Big Wind talk 20:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]