Jump to content

User talk:Widefox: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 3 discussions to User talk:Widefox/Archive 2. (BOT)
Brianhd71 (talk | contribs)
Line 61: Line 61:
I have removed the PROD on this article as you did not provide a rationale; please take to [[WP:AFD]]. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 11:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
I have removed the PROD on this article as you did not provide a rationale; please take to [[WP:AFD]]. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 11:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
:{{done}} <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 12:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
:{{done}} <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 12:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Go fuck yourself WIDEFUX You aren't an editor. Your just some cheap Wiki hack. [[User:Brianhd71|Brianhd71]] ([[User talk:Brianhd71|talk]]) 16:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:51, 18 April 2013

Notice Coming here to ask why I reverted your edit? Please read this page first...

A page, about me, and edits on the English Wikipedia. Talk to me...

COI editor detection (Bitcasa)

Hey there, I noticed that you figured out an editor was formerly called 'Bitcasa'. That's so cool, you're like Wiki CSI or something... How did you figure that out?! I want to learn more about the various tools, etc. Thanks :) Synergee (talk) 03:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I put the details at Talk:Bitcasa. Widefox; talk 23:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Osw1

(moved to Osw1) Widefox; talk 14:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC) (all discussion moved to above place) Widefox; talk 14:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a comment for you on my talk page. Osw1 (talk) 16:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chavez

I'd just like to thank you for referring to the Chavez death article in discussing the Thatcher one, thereby acknowledging my work there. I won't interfere with the 'growth phase' of the latter. Perhaps I will manage the 'consolidation phase' in a few months. Regards, -- Ohconfucius ping / poke 10:06, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! A pleasure to see good work being done. Widefox; talk 10:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from STiki!

The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar

Congratulations, Widefox! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undos to my edits.

How is it constructive to call a political ad an attack ad? Or, to use a partisan news article for a reference? The article on Ashley Judd shows bias against conservative politics and ideas. Anyone seeing the YouTube video of the ad can decide for themselves if it is an attack, or an accurate reference to Ashley Judd's ideology. Redo my edits at once! -- User:Brianhd71

reply at User talk:Brianhd71. Message to the next editor what comes here about undos - read the top notice first. Widefox; talk 10:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Judd Talk Page

So, labeling a political ad is my personal opinion? It is now a fact that American Crossroads launched an attack ad? You are so far left, you can't see straight. Go ahead and block me. I'll remember that come December when you are looking for donations. You, Widefox are the reason scholars can't trust Wikipedia as being credible.Brianhd71 (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianhd71 (talkcontribs)

replied talk Widefox; talk 18:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for all your help at Bitcasa and for everything you do to make WP better! KeithbobTalk 23:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Student Research Training Program

I have removed the PROD on this article as you did not provide a rationale; please take to WP:AFD. GiantSnowman 11:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Widefox; talk 12:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go fuck yourself WIDEFUX You aren't an editor. Your just some cheap Wiki hack. Brianhd71 (talk) 16:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]