Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solomon (unit): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Solomon (unit): redirect |
Shevonsilva (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete''' The source is not sufficiently reliable to be used for novel claims that cannot be verified in other sources. The source appears to have no more than a single row in a table to justify the statements in this article, and there is no encyclopedic information available to make an article beyond a [[WP:NOTDICT|dictionary definition]]. This is part of a big issue; see my comment at [[WP:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calibre(unit)|DRN]]. All the pages should be considered together, rather than having fragmented discussions. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 10:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' The source is not sufficiently reliable to be used for novel claims that cannot be verified in other sources. The source appears to have no more than a single row in a table to justify the statements in this article, and there is no encyclopedic information available to make an article beyond a [[WP:NOTDICT|dictionary definition]]. This is part of a big issue; see my comment at [[WP:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calibre(unit)|DRN]]. All the pages should be considered together, rather than having fragmented discussions. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 10:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Redirect''' to [[Wine bottle]] where the size is already mentioned. [[User:AadaamS|AadaamS]] ([[User talk:AadaamS|talk]]) 12:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Redirect''' to [[Wine bottle]] where the size is already mentioned. [[User:AadaamS|AadaamS]] ([[User talk:AadaamS|talk]]) 12:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
=== Reply From Shevon === |
|||
* '''Not to Delete''': I have provided the link to the wine bottle article too. Conversation factors are too available, so in future this article can be further improved for example by adding suitable pictures etc. |
|||
* '''Keep''': I have provided the link for the wine bottle article too. |
|||
* '''Not to Delete''': Mr. Johnuniq, I always provided you other sources too. This source has its own references and bibliographical list. As you mentioned earlier, you are always referring sample chapters of the book, which is available online and which does not include the referencing list and bibliography list, and consequently providing un-reliable feedbacks. ''Please providing feedback buy the book and pursue it carefully. |
|||
* '''Not to Redirect''': rather redirecting to the sub-article in Wine bottle article, in which variety of sizes are discussed, I have already included a link as a referring page for the wine bottle article |
|||
Revision as of 14:27, 23 December 2014
- Solomon (unit) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a directory or dictionary for non-notable units of measure. — kikichugirl speak up! 08:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete or possibly redirect to Wine bottle#sizes. No need for a separate article. I've added it to Solomon (disambiguation). Clarityfiend (talk) 09:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Wikipedia contains extensive information about weights and measures and so it should, as this is standard encyclopedic content. Merger into wine bottle#sizes, as suggested above, seems a sensible alternative to deletion per our editing policy. Andrew D. (talk) 09:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The source is not sufficiently reliable to be used for novel claims that cannot be verified in other sources. The source appears to have no more than a single row in a table to justify the statements in this article, and there is no encyclopedic information available to make an article beyond a dictionary definition. This is part of a big issue; see my comment at DRN. All the pages should be considered together, rather than having fragmented discussions. Johnuniq (talk) 10:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Wine bottle where the size is already mentioned. AadaamS (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Reply From Shevon
- Not to Delete: I have provided the link to the wine bottle article too. Conversation factors are too available, so in future this article can be further improved for example by adding suitable pictures etc.
- Keep: I have provided the link for the wine bottle article too.
- Not to Delete: Mr. Johnuniq, I always provided you other sources too. This source has its own references and bibliographical list. As you mentioned earlier, you are always referring sample chapters of the book, which is available online and which does not include the referencing list and bibliography list, and consequently providing un-reliable feedbacks. Please providing feedback buy the book and pursue it carefully.
- Not to Redirect: rather redirecting to the sub-article in Wine bottle article, in which variety of sizes are discussed, I have already included a link as a referring page for the wine bottle article