Jump to content

User talk:RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Requesting unblocking of account
Line 1: Line 1:

== Re:Certified.Gangsta's POV pushing ==
== Re:Certified.Gangsta's POV pushing ==


Line 10: Line 9:


Heres what an admin had to say about sockpuppet, ''"According to the official policy, "sockpuppetry in itself, while discouraged, is permitted provided that the streams don't cross."'' at this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/YINever checkuser]. I've seen many cases where users had more than one account but they were not blocked, provided the streams don't cross. Please unblock my accounts. Thanks. --[[User:RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH|RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH]] 06:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Heres what an admin had to say about sockpuppet, ''"According to the official policy, "sockpuppetry in itself, while discouraged, is permitted provided that the streams don't cross."'' at this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/YINever checkuser]. I've seen many cases where users had more than one account but they were not blocked, provided the streams don't cross. Please unblock my accounts. Thanks. --[[User:RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH|RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH]] 06:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
:Surprisingly enough, people who, within one day of editing, engage in stalking and massive edit wars across many pages without productive edits, and are merely reincarnations of earlier problem users, aren't welcome here. Maybe I could have been more accurate in my block log, but I think you are a troll, and I don't use that word lightly. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 06:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:11, 1 November 2006

Re:Certified.Gangsta's POV pushing

I am aware of this user's behaviour, but I don't think that I'm sufficiently removed from the dispute to enact a block without causing controversy. I suggest you approach WP:AN and ask a neutral admin to do the blocking if that's what you would like to see happen. Thanks. enochlau (talk) 04:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What was the reason for blocking my account?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=What was the reason for blocking my account? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=What was the reason for blocking my account? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=What was the reason for blocking my account? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

User:Dmcdevit, I would like to know the reason and the policy behind why my account was blocked. I thought users were allowed to make new accounts just as long as they don't violate the official policy with the account? I haven't violated any policy in tandem with this account or together with any other accounts. In fact, I quit using those other accounts all together. This seems like an unfair and unjustified block. Please state your reason and cite the policy for the blocking of my account.

Heres what an admin had to say about sockpuppet, "According to the official policy, "sockpuppetry in itself, while discouraged, is permitted provided that the streams don't cross." at this checkuser. I've seen many cases where users had more than one account but they were not blocked, provided the streams don't cross. Please unblock my accounts. Thanks. --RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH 06:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Surprisingly enough, people who, within one day of editing, engage in stalking and massive edit wars across many pages without productive edits, and are merely reincarnations of earlier problem users, aren't welcome here. Maybe I could have been more accurate in my block log, but I think you are a troll, and I don't use that word lightly. Dmcdevit·t 06:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]