User talk:Cunard/Archive 13

edit count | edit summary usage

Good articles:

• Middlesex (novel)
• Have a nice day
• Shiloh (Naylor novel)
• Winmark

Notes

AfD

• tools:~betacommand/reports/afd
• tools:~betacommand/AFD.html
• tools:~snottywong/afdadminstats.html
• tools:~snottywong/afdstats.html

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL · page history · Books Ngram Viewer
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL · toolserver ·
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

• Ask Mathbot (talk · contribs) to refresh Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old by accessing http://toolserver.org/~mathbot/cgi-bin/wp/afd/afd.cgi

Copyvio

• Copyright Violation Detector
• User:CorenSearchBot/manual

Miscellaneous

• http://case-sensitive-search.appspot.com/ – provides case-sensitive filtering of Google searches
• Wikipedia:A Primer for newcomers
• User:Fæ/help/photo and Wikipedia:Contact OTRS
• http://www.ip-adress.com/ip_tracer/
• User:Giraffedata/comprised of
• User:SMcCandlish/Logical quotation
• User:Tony1/How to improve your writing
• Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles
• Wikipedia:Did you know/DYKcheck: javascript:importScript('User:Shubinator/DYKcheck.js'); dykCheck();

Have requested a review of your close

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Obsession with Serpentza

Hi Cunard, are you Associated with Serpentza and his doings? Not sure why you are modifying his biography a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:C000:108:19B:7FCC:4207:48A6 (talk) 08:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

I have no conflict of interest with Winston Sterzel. I am monitoring his article after I participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston Sterzel and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston Sterzel (2nd nomination) because it has been subject to significant vandalism in the past including BLP violations. Cunard (talk) 08:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Are you Andy Cravenho?

You seem to promote Mr. Cravenho a great deal. I suspect you are he. TeddyCruz (talk) 07:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

I am not Andy Cravenho. I have no conflict of interest with Andy Cravenho. I added a negative review to Invoicera so that there is more negative coverage of the software and restored the reliably sourced TechRadar review that you had removed. After restoring the Andy Cravenho review, I have re-removed it since it was written by an Entrepreneur contributor and not an Entrepreneur staff member. Cunard (talk) 07:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

anrfc

Sorry, I didn't realize you already requested rfc closure for Template talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic#RfC on linking to template namespace.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

No worries. I don't think you did anything wrong. It's fine to keep the RfC pinned until the consensus is assessed by an WP:ANRFC closer. Cunard (talk) 04:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...

find sources
... you were recipient no. 2196 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

It's been a year! Thank you for the lovely message, Gerda Arendt (talk · contribs)! You are so kind! Cunard (talk) 05:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of VITAL (machine learning software) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VITAL (machine learning software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VITAL (machine learning software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 08:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop closing RfCs

Your latest closings seem disruptive. Please undo. Thanks.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 07:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi SharabSalam (talk · contribs). You participated in the RfCs I procedurally closed at Talk:Alan Dershowitz#RfC on Menetrez response and Talk:Media coverage of Bernie Sanders#RfC: AOC comment about Politico. Do you want the consensus for these RfCs to be assessed by a closer at WP:ANRFC, or do you think they do not need to be closed and should be archived without closure? Cunard (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Cunard, if they got archived I will restore them. I dont know how to request a closing in WP:ANRFC but I will try. I understand that there is a dispute between you and other editors. I support your position but I dont support your latest closings. They seem WP:Pointy.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 07:59, 22 May 2020 (UTC)