Jump to content

User talk:Havsjö: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Caution: Formatting, date, language, etc (Manual of style). (TW)
Tag: Reverted
Warning: Three-revert rule on Union of South Africa.
Tags: Twinkle Reverted
Line 1: Line 1:
== September 2020 ==
== September 2020 ==
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]], and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mos2 --> [[User:DrKay|DrKay]] ([[User talk:DrKay|talk]]) 17:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]], and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mos2 --> [[User:DrKay|DrKay]] ([[User talk:DrKay|talk]]) 17:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Union of South Africa]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''Note that you have already performed 3 reverts today as you previously edit-warred over this in May.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:DrKay|DrKay]] ([[User talk:DrKay|talk]]) 17:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:29, 5 September 2020

September 2020

Information icon Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 17:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Union of South Africa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Note that you have already performed 3 reverts today as you previously edit-warred over this in May. DrKay (talk) 17:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]