User talk:SevcoFraudsters

SevcoFraudsters, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SevcoFraudsters! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks + invitation

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

A page you started (Katie Fraine) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Katie Fraine, SevcoFraudsters!

Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good article

To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cork City W.F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Boot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Sheffield FC.svg

Hi SevcoFraudsters. File:Sheffield FC.svg was removed from all articles except Sheffield F.C. as a result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 December 2#File:Sheffield FC.svg. Peripitus was the administrator who closed that discussion and they were the editor who initially removed the file from all of the other articles and the non-free rationales for these usages from the file's page. If you disagree with Peripitus' close, then you can and should discuss it with them. The FFD discussion was open for almost two months before it was closed and no arguments were provided in favor of any usage other than "Sheffield F.C.", but admins do have some discretion when it comes to their closes so perhaps Peripitus will reconsider theirs if you can make a convincing case. Regardless, I do not think simply re-adding the file to the article without discussing it with the closing admin is the way to go, and could possibly be considered edit warring. For reference, I asked Periptus about this at User talk:Peripitus#Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 December 2#File:Sheffield FC.svg. I pinged you in that discussion, but am posting here just in case the ping didn't work. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

The women's team have just as much right to that emblem as the men's team. The problem with your tedious monomania is chiefly one of sexism: you're quickly corrected/reverted at the articles for male sports teams, but women's teams generally have fewer watchers so the articles stay in their defaced state for longer. Perhaps in your universe this is you "winning"? I don't know - don't care. You clearly have some sort of morbid psychological disorder which I'll leave to the specialists, with a shudder! But hey, to each his own. For my part I'll keep repairing the damage wherever I come across it. Yours etc. SevcoFraudsters (talk) 22:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)