User talk:Humus sapiens: Difference between revisions

Four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message would automagically sign and date it.
I believe that the best place for discussions about article's content is at that article's talk page.
Unless asked otherwise, I may respond at your user talk page or at the talk page of the specific article. If the dialog gets interesting, a link to the other half can be added here.
Please follow talk page guidelines and wikiquette.

Democracy

How can you describe my edits as POV? How is a huge wall and the use of human shields a country with civil liberties? --MiddleEastern 21:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know what democracy is, and it doesn't work. Are you Israeli/Jewish? --MiddleEastern 21:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No I mean in reality are you from Israel and/or are you Jewish? It just seems like you must be. Im not personal attacking you--MiddleEastern 21:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise, the link you gave me only shows your edits, please review --MiddleEastern 21:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other half of this talk: [1]. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 00:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Emperors

Thanks for that, it wasn't easy! All those emperors. I debated whether or not to include Byzantine Emperors. I see the name Andronikos doesn't come up...hmmm.--User:Avram Fawcett 6:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your warm and welcoming demeanor, and your over 20,000 wonderful contributions to the project. Thank you. Smee 06:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to post above on your userpage(s), and/or leave on your talk page as you see fit. The part below is not part of the Barnstar itself, just a personal message to you...

It's been quite awhile since we've last interacted here on Wikipedia, and I've learned a bunch since then... Just wanted to take a moment to again thank you for that initial welcome, and for all of your positive contributions in so many ways. Hope you are doing well. Yours, Smee 06:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Re-call

Would you be willing to be recalled as an admin? --MiddleEastern 13:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe Humus lists himself in CAT:AOR - NYC JD (interrogatories) 12:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hamas

Well, it's an anti-semitic organization, but whom does it help to label individual member AS absent specific evidence of animus? If I am a resgistered republican who voted for Bush, does that mean I am "anti-abortion people"? Hamas is not a single issue group, so it's possible to be a member of Hamas and not AS. I think you ought to revert yourself. I will not revert you. Cheers. - NYC JD (interrogatories) 12:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

India-Israel relations

As you have probably noticed there is a discussion pending on the neutrality and adequacy of references on this article. Since I put the tags, 2 quite problematic references have been deleted, by a user who wants to defend the article using very likely sockpuppetry. So, do not blindly reverse well funded doubt abouts the general orientation, lack of neutrality and appropriate references of this article. Everything is being documented in the discussion page there. TwoHorned 12:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Israel Template

Hi Humus, I want to start an article improvement drive in WP Israel, but I don't know the technical stuff behind editing the template to allow for article importance and rating. Could you add the necessary syntax? There is a link to the rating page from the top of WP Israel Talk. Thanks. --יהושועEric 16:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some work on the template. Can you test to see if it works and fix what doesn't? --יהושועEric 03:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you added unverified information?

Hello, Why did you add unverified information to the article here? The tag requesting citation has been left ignored for two months. Is that not enough time for citation? WP:ATT says "Editors should provide attribution for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or it may be removed."

Thus, Wikipedia permits me to remove unsourced material, but does not permit you to add it.Bless sins 21:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stamp_Eliezer_Ben-Yehuda.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stamp_Eliezer_Ben-Yehuda.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yonatan (contribs/talk) 01:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talmud

OK, since you called it a POV fork and removed it from the criticism of judaism- now what? Should I add it to the Talmud article? thestick 10:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since I made it in the most neutral wording possible(considering the viewpoints of the critics and the rebuttals), and provided links to an actual talmud for the chapters that were online, also letting a geocities page stay as a primary source, and you first removed the section saying "fake quotes" and later accuse me of creating a "POV fork" (which is total nonsense, there were no POV's involved, and I don't care who's right), I think you should at least have the courtesy to reply. thestick 18:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suppose I do find a more reliable source than hoffman - should I add it to Talmud or Criticism of Judaism ? thestick 14:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK I've recreated the section and removed the quotes - please let me know if I have attained NPOVation . thestick 10:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good book

I picked up 'A Force upon the Plain' just the other day to add some material to Mark Koernke and some related pages. Tom Harrison ^Talk 22:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you have a look at these articles and their talk?

I feel the articles are extremely well sourced and balanced. I'd like somebody else to remove the tags. Please look at my last versions, because I have run up against somebody from the evolution/creation universe who wants to troll around for lehakholis (Aramaic word, you might be able to guess what it means). --Metzenberg 03:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Israel Assessment

Hey Humus, I got the template setup. I have done almost everything, but I don't know anything about adding categories and dealing with that. I found this: Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Using_the_bot And need to add the Israel page here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Israel/Assessment/Statistics To this category: Category:Wikipedia_1.0_assessments

It will probably only take a minute, but I can't figure it out. Thanks. --יהושועEric 20:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have everything working except for the article importance categories. I am not sure why that isn't working. Please look if you get a chance. I think I have like 50 edits today on Israel stuff, LOL. Oy, I should be studying. Anyways, thanks for the help. --יהושועEric 21:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the recognition. I am glad to see you like what I did. --יהושועEric 21:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing articles

Hi Humus. When you're creating and expanding articles, could you please take care to ensure that they're sourced? -- ChrisO 20:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should have been more specific. I just added a {{unreferenced}} template to Useful Jew, which I see you started. It's a pretty good article, but we need to ensure that what we add is properly referenced. -- ChrisO 21:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sorting this out - nice work! -- ChrisO 08:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting a site for art, music and culture in Jerusalem?!

Moved this section to Talk:Jerusalem#Deleting a site for art, music and culture in Jerusalem?!. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 07:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Havlagah bus in Palestine during Great Arab revolt.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Havlagah bus in Palestine during Great Arab revolt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 18:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Israel

The IUSSP is cited in Wikipedia many times [2]. So much for WP:OR and reliable sources. Besides, there are many sections in Wikipedia that contain OR and are tagged, not deleted. Same goes for POV disputes. As it goes for jewish settlers being socialist or refugees, they settled in a new land. So, they were settlers. Feel free to dispute if it's colonialism or not, but political ideology does not exempt one from being contradictory. Socialism doesn't make the jewish settlers there any better or worse - you are just appealing to the no true Scotsman fallacy. Palestinians left because the 1948 Arab-Israeli War was instigated by arabs... so next time the russian army attacks Chechenya I'll say it's every single russian's fault. There was no national military organization in the Arab Palestinian community at the time of the war, and the war efforts were mainly done by other arab countries. Then again, don't insert your POV claiming that since some arabs started a war, other arabs deserve to be displaced - that's a hasty generalization. --Teh Original Mr. Orange (Orange juice?) 23:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rabbis for Human Rights

I started a criticism section here but can't find much info from reliable sources actually criticizing the sympathizers of terrorism.Baka man 23:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Administratorship

Hi Humus sapiens,

I would like to request you to seek the community support for your adminship again. I am not saying you don't have the support but that I only have some small concerns. Thanks very much --Aminz 11:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Humus sapiens, I would like to ask you to re-gain the community support. It is not a matter of personal grievances. I believe Admins are no different from usual editors except that they have the community's support. Some editors believe that admins should re-new this support for every now and then. As such I would like to request you to re-new your adminship.--Aminz 11:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have not seen any other admin who generally engages in edit warring as you do.

Also, your recent edits to Arab and Antisemitism article was restoring material sourced to primary sources (violation of WP:RS and WP:NOR) [3], [4]. Additionally, you do not join the talk page either. --Aminz 23:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Set aside the POV issue. It is written without mentioning the story of the other side, i.e. accusions of treason. The fate of Jews outside Arabian Pensilania should not be mixed with that of those inside that region. Just to show how easy it is to write of a period showing everything perfect please see the following Lewis's quote says: "Some even among the Christians of Syria and Egypt preffered the rule of Islam to that of Byzantines. A Jewish apocalyptic writing of the early Islamic period makes an angel say to a rabbinic seer: 'Do not fear, Ben Yohay; the Creater, blessed be He, has only brought the Kingdom of Ishmael in order to save you from this wickedness [i.e. Byzantium]...the Holy one, blessed be He, will raise up for them a Prophet according to His will, and conquer the land for them, and they will come and restore it...' We may compare with this the words of a later Syric Christian historian: 'Therefore the God of vengeance delivered us out of the hand of the Romans by means of the Arabs...It profited us not a little to be saved from the cruelty of the Romans and their bitter hatred towards us' The people of the conquered provinces did not confine themselves to simply accepting the new regime, but in some cases actively assisted in its establishment. In Palestine the Samaritans, according to tradition, gave such effective aid to the Arab invaders that they were for some time exempted from certain taxes, and there are many other reports in the early chronicles of local Jewish and Christian assistance."

All these examples show the POV issue further. --Aminz 23:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is my personal belief that you do not have the support of 70% of the community as a neutral-enough editor to be an admin. I have some concerns about your familiarity with the wikipedia policies. --Aminz 00:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Humus sapiens, I don't want to go through the official process. I just wanted to express my concerns. If you indeed have the community support, then there should be no problem with re-newing that. I believe such re-nominations is generally very beneficial to the encyclopedia and a sign of good faith and being faithful to the essential purposes of wikipedia. I think all admins who belong to the category of Administrators open to recall, would somehow agree that the continuity of community support is important. --Aminz 00:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, re your comment: "Looks like you are trying to get rid of an opponent in content dispute", please note that normal editors are no different from Admins. My concerns is about your neutrality in matters requiring admin action, and your familiarity with the wikipedia policies. If you indeed have the community support, then there should be no problem with re-newing that. --Aminz 00:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other half of this conversation: [5]. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 01:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second Aminz. If anything, requesting any sort of feeback from the community will give you suggestions on how to improve yourself (we all need improvement). I hope you don't take my comments as "harassment". It is only a suggestion, that would be helpful for all of us. Please do consider it. Have a nice day.Bless sins 20:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you, gentlemen, can point out my admin action in question, I will consider reporting you for harassment. Intimidation won't work here. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 00:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would actually appreciate it if a larger number of community could have a look at this case. They can see this personal attack by Eric(calling two editors anti-Israel and anti-Semites), and also the not so civil response of H.S. in response to criticisms. --Aminz 00:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this about any particular administrative action on Humus sapiens' part, or just an expression of frustration related to the ongoing multi-article Islam and antisemitism dispute?Proabivouac 00:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is about my concerns about insufficiency of familiarity of H.S. about wikipedia policies as expected from admins and required in their possible admin action. Examples include edit warring over usage of primary sources (hadith) here [6] (3 edit in a day, no edit on the section I opened on the talk page). I eventually ended up neutralizing an original research through reliable sources [7]. --Aminz 00:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. I don't see any relevance of a content dispute to my adminship: I try to keep the two functions separate, let me know if I failed. Aminz, after months of your POV pushing you lost my good faith. Your childish outbursts should not be taken seriously. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 01:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, after downplaying the personal attack of Eric, now you make your language more uncivil. Please do me a favor and take my " childish outbursts" seriously and expose this thread to a larger section of the community. --Aminz 02:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel a need to file a request, by all means do it. But don't tell me what to do. I'll be back in a day. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 02:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No surprise it is two Muslims (probably anti-Israel and anti-Semites) discussing this. If you need it, I will support you and the hard work you have put in to a vast number of articles you have worked on. --יהושועEric 00:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erik, thank you but let's not jump to conclusions and name calling. Aminz, if there is a "case", let me know about it. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 00:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Now, personal attacks are considered simply "jumping to conclusions and name calling".... --Aminz 00:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aminz, please stop harassing Humus sapiens. Beit Or 19:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rather, one can call Aminz's bluff, its not like the community sympathizes with the sympathizzers of BhaiSaab.Baka man 22:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's really sad to see all the false accusations (anti-Semites, harassing, sympathizzers of BhaiSaab) being hurled at Aminz and I here. Can anyone point out the relevent clause in Wikipedia:Harassment that applies to our actions here?Bless sins 15:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bless sins, I did not see your post, and therefore did not accuse you of being sympathetic to bhaisaab. For aminz OTOH, the allegation I made is quite correct, and links between the two abound.Baka man 23:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Israel Shahak poll

Please vote in the poll for replacing the Praise, Criticism and Accusations sections with a short summary. Your opinion is much valued. Thanks. Itayb 22:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiTalmud

Hi Humus, I just started a new project with a friend that I think you might be interested in. I would love for your imput and help in starting this up. Our goal: An internet wiki database that contains the major Jewish texts and a forum for discussing and arguing halacha. Check it out: WikiTalmud. --יהושועEric 06:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Talk:Black September in Jordan

Please refrain from editing out obscenity in other users' comments (see WP:NOT). --CA387 03:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Sorry, glossed over that exception. Reverted back. CA387 03:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vital articles

Hi, Do you notice to WP:VA. This page does have a problem with being Eurocentric. I proposed some notable persons and other things. But I'm not knowledgeable in the case of Judaism. Also there is a debate about religious leaders and scholars in Wikipedia talk:Vital articles#Religious scholars and leaders. Please participate in the discussions or invite other knowledgeable wikipedians in this case.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 15:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope just knowledgeable wikipedians come come there.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 09:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holocaust Denial Laws in North America

Re your recent edit of The Holocaust, the sections of Holocaust denial: James Keegstra and The Zündel Trials cover the questions of Canadian Laws. United States Laws relating to Holocaust Denial are conspicious by their ommission.--TGC55 12:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think what I did was vandalism

On the page for the 6 day war I adde in the fact that Israel was aided by the USA and Great Britain during the 6 day war and I beleive this is a true statement (correct me if I'm wrong) so could you please put it back or let me put it back? -Llama ruler (talk • contribs) 04:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I know they weren't combatants I put the words "aided by" next to it. The side for the palestinians showed both the combatants and who they were aided by so i thought it would be fair to input the countries who aided israel. -Llama ruler (talk • contribs) (UTC).

Wafa Sultan

It's pretty damn obvious that *you* have a bias. The source given is reputable by Wikipedia's standards and is certainly more credible then MEMRI is. "InFocus was featured in the LA Times, Orange County Register, and Anaheim Bulletin. NPR (KPCC 89.3) has also invited its editor multiple times to speak on issues related to Islam and Muslims in the Southland." I will have a talk with Jimbo about your systematic bias when I see him next. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.150.40.36 (talk) 06:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Say hi for me. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 06:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help in improving the english

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1929_Hebron_massacre&diff=121510975&oldid=121509049 Zeq 20:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: nonsense.

Please keep articles neutral, instead of harassing descent people. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.161.61.43 (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Report made to incident board

Please see:

WP:ANI#Admin Humus sapiens and his personal attacks, insinuations, and defamations. --Timeshifter 22:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Zeq_and_Zero0000 Zeq 15:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request For Mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/David Irving, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Shalom My Friend

Hope all is well! 76.109.163.61

Re: Thank you

A sad day indeed, filled with senselessness and sorrow... It would ease some of the tragedy if the general public had some idea of what lead to this disaster. 76.109.163.61

Is today a better day my friend?

The Liviu Librescu article is evolving...

76.109.163.61

PROBLEM!

User: DXRAW Nominated the Liviu Librescu article for a speedy deletion. [8] 76.109.163.61

El Al POV

I have a problem with the El Al article. A section named controversy keeps on being entered into the Security section. This is not neutral, not in content but in the fact that its being entered....obvious reasons. I set up a poll on the talk page Talk:El Al#Controversy Section where we had three votes for excluding it, and two for including it. Another vote we had to exclude was scored out by User:Metros232. The article went quiet for a week or so and the section was re-entered this afternoon. Please advise me as to the best action to take. Thanks. Flymeoutofhere 16:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Libby

Sorry to bother you, but was hoping you might weigh in on the never-ending Lewis Libby dispute. If you look at the recent talk page, you can see that a couple of editors are saying that we need to state whether any US policymaker who deals with Israel is Jewish or not. One of the editors also insists on putting in a link to Libby's temple, and has even posted Libby's membership on the temple's page (the only one accorded such a privilege). Another outside voice would be helpful, as would any suggestions you might have in bringing this to a resolution. Thanks. Notmyrealname 18:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LiviuLibrescu.com

Stating that LiviuLibrescu.com is owned by a Conservative fundraising group is not my personal opinion or an attempt to use Liviu Librescu's talk page to promote my own beliefs, it is a fact. --Overlook1977 12:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Lebanon

Hello Humus Sapiens ;-) Could you please tell me what the point is from putting that map of Shi'a-concentration areas in Lebanon on the Lebanon Portal?.. you know, instead of the beautiful Cedars under the snow? :o) Thanks. —Jixavius 16:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Responding here because you dislike fragmented discussions) Sorry, I have no idea what this is about and why you're asking me. AFAIK, I've never edited the page [9] and it's not in my watchlist. Let me know if/how I can help. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 19:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion "widely regarded as"

I'm not implying anything. However, if you refer to the discussion on the page, you will see that as the original 'protocols' which the printed versions descend from are lost, it is impossible to authoritatively call them a forgery.

Seems like we are going a bit far by saying with authority something that can not be known with authority. Sukiari 20:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other half of this talk: [10]. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 21:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for intervention

Thanks for your post on the Libby page. As a result, the user in question posted a nasty message on my talk page. Notmyrealname 22:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For the information on Liviu Librescu. Epson291 04:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shirahadasha RfA thanks

Thanks so much for taking the time to comment on my my RfA, which was successful. I learned a lot from the comments, I appreciate everything that was said, and I'll do my best to deserve the community's trust. Thanks again! And thanks for your kind words and support. --Shirahadasha 04:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halakhic - cap?

I'm trying to determine if the adjective "Halakhic" should be capitalized when not at the beginning of a sentence. Both the Jew and Halakha articles are internally inconsistent on this point.--Steven J. Anderson 23:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbReq/NYScholar

Just to let you know that I filed an Arb/Req over NYScholar's actions [11].Notmyrealname 23:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Jewish descent" versus Jew

See the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#"Jewish descent" versus Jew concerning the problems of using the term "Jewish descent" versus "Jew" as well as the related proposal. Thank you, IZAK 09:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baka's unblocking

Excuse me, but when has any blocked editor been unblocked to respond on ANI? This user just present his case for unblocking, but you unblock him to counter evidence? user:BhaiSaab was not unblocked to comment on WP:CN discussion on banning him - he commented through his talkpage. I don't really want to undo what you did, but I'm afraid I'm gonna have to unless you can explain this. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 23:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 319: / Line 319: @@
 See the discussion at '''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#"Jewish descent" versus Jew]]''' concerning the problems of using the term "Jewish descent" versus "Jew" as well as the related proposal. Thank you, [[User:IZAK|IZAK]] 09:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
+== Baka's unblocking ==
+Excuse me, but when has any blocked editor been unblocked to respond on ANI? This user just present his case for unblocking, but you unblock him to counter evidence? [[user:BhaiSaab]] was not unblocked to comment on [[WP:CN]] discussion on banning him - he commented through his talkpage. I don't really want to undo what you did, but I'm afraid I'm gonna have to unless you can explain this. [[User:Rama's Arrow|<font color="orange">'''Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy)'''</font>]] 23:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Archive ^edit
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10 . . . . 15 . . . . 20 . . . . 25