Jump to content

User talk:K12worker: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs)
m Automated archival of 2 sections to User:Danielfolsom/Archive
rm text- evidently the editor is less interested in actually resolving a misunderstanding than being able to show off with snide remarks. I can only appologize for a misunderstanding so many times.
Line 22: Line 22:
Sorry, I reverted your archiving as the discussion there seemed relevant. I am sure you've done it with best intentions, but those issues are tto recent to be archived yet. As for the off-topic discussion, I moved it to my talk where it can be continued if parties have an interest in that. Regards, --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 20:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I reverted your archiving as the discussion there seemed relevant. I am sure you've done it with best intentions, but those issues are tto recent to be archived yet. As for the off-topic discussion, I moved it to my talk where it can be continued if parties have an interest in that. Regards, --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 20:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


==ER==
Hey, I'm not really sure why you chose the editor review to place your comments, however I did respond to them--<small>[[User:Danielfolsom|<span style="color: #CCFF99; background: #003300">daniel]][[User_talk:Danielfolsom|<span style="color:#FFCCCC; background:#660000">folsom]]</span></span></small> 20:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


:That was because I was under the impression that you requested review in order to benefit from neutral users's views about how you come across in your editing and in your interchange with others. From your response, I guess I was wrong. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 21:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC).

::Sorry that you misunderstood - what I'm saying is that just because an ER is going on doesn't mean all comments should be directed there - typically you just bring up those comments on a talk page, as you did tell me that the comment wasn't actually a review.--<small>[[User:Danielfolsom|<span style="color: #CCFF99; background: #003300">daniel]][[User_talk:Danielfolsom|<span style="color:#FFCCCC; background:#660000">folsom]]</span></span></small> 22:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

:::How ironic that Rockpocket advises you above to not argue with people who take the time to offer you advice... Anyway, you're "sorry that I misunderstood" ? That's a very good [[Non-apology apology]]. Please click on the link and read, it's a quite eye-opening article IMO. I'm moving this conversation to your page, I'd rather not have it on mine. (P.S.: No, I didn't tell you mine wasn't a review, I told you it wasn't an ''overall'' review. Don't you read the complete version of ''anything''? ) [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 22:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC).


=Archive - WRITE ABOVE THIS=
=Archive - WRITE ABOVE THIS=

Revision as of 02:19, 7 August 2007

User:Danielfolsom/HOPESTART


Smile

FYI re Mao

The name of the department that Mao headed in the second KMT executive was called the 宣传部 - the Propaganda Department. It's not a controversial translation, as any Chinese-English dictionary or reasonable reference on Mao would tell you. I do appreciate your concern about sources. I am restoring the edit pending sources, which I will introduce as soon as I can find it. In the interim, check the zh.wiki article and any other standard biography of Mao if you want to be sure that the fact is commonly reported and widely known. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 02:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have added a source (the People's Daily, so horse's mouth, pretty much) and some other events missing from article. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 02:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Review

Hello Daniel. An editor review can often be helpful, though its important that you take any criticism in the right spirit (and don't argue with anyone that takes the time to offer advice!) I think it is certainly useful if you would be interested in becoming an admin one day (and I certainly think you have all the attributes to do so). Rockpocket 19:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving the History of Russia's talk

Sorry, I reverted your archiving as the discussion there seemed relevant. I am sure you've done it with best intentions, but those issues are tto recent to be archived yet. As for the off-topic discussion, I moved it to my talk where it can be continued if parties have an interest in that. Regards, --Irpen 20:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Archive - WRITE ABOVE THIS

User:Danielfolsom/Archive |}

IRC cloak request

I am danielfolsom on freenode and I would like the cloak wikimedia/danielfolsom. Thanks. --danielfolsom