User talk:67.164.224.243

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:CZmarlin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 22:49, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User:CZmarlin. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:CZmarlin. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 22:52, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

A friendly note

Regarding your edits to the Renault Alliance article, please take a look at the Wikipedia Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle. You can be bold and make a change, another editor may disagree and revert you edits. At that point you should take the issue to the talk page and discuss the proposed edit with this and possibly other edits. Please also take a look at WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. You other edits are on he short path to having yuryour editing privileges revoked. We would prefer that you contg not continue in this manner. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 23:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

I would prefer if you could bother to spell - me—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.224.243 (talk) Revision as of 20:04, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

It's not that I can't spell - I just can't type. Better now? The advice of taking the issue to the articles' talk pages still stands. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring notice

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.