Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rarri Dream

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rarri Dream

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Can't find any reliable, secondary sources in relation to the subject aside from the Earmilk link, and contains original research with the ASCAP citation. joeyquism (talk page) 04:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Georgia (U.S. state). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have edited this article a couple of times it does include reliable primary and secondary sources though for example 1 2 3 4 5 6 so it passes WP:GNG Firstsail (talk) 13:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC) — Firstsail (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. , — Firstsail (talk · contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Blakegrant1 (talk · contribs). [reply]
The editorial quality of nearly all of these websites is questionable, aside from AllHipHop, which is listen on WP:A/S. Even if they were considered reliable, subject fails WP:SIGCOV, seeing as his name had to be triangulated from ASCAP writer credits. joeyquism (talk page) 15:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep. I created this article because I am a fan of the artist/ subject he is clearly notable with multiple reliable sources I’ve got multiple other subjects included on to Wikipedia and I’ve never had this problem and if sources like Wonderland (magazine) and Notion (magazine) are not reliable then why do they have their own page and he has releases under indie label The Orchard (company) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakegrant1 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Blakegrant1 Having a wiki page for a source doesn't necessarily equate to reliability (see Daily Mail). The contact/info pages for both of these sources do not explicitly offer any information on who's writing and fact-checking these pieces, so I cannot reasonably verify them (if you can find names attached to these sources and link a Muckrack page for them, I might consider withdrawing a little bit more). A lot of this article's important biographical content is unsourced, too (birthday and birthplace are notably not given any citations - a tweet from the artist himself would suffice in this case). I would say that the closest things to resembling decent sources are the AllHipHop article and these sources, which both pass WP:ABOUTSELF but ultimately don't count towards notability IMO; otherwise, I don't see anything that qualifies this for a wiki article. I'm sorry about this; if you have any questions or further concerns, let me know and I'll do my best to help you out a bit more. That being said, I'm still leaving this up here. joeyquism (talk page) 02:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG Babysharkboss2 was here!! ^{Dr. Wu is NOT a Doctor!} 17:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree that this article fails WP:GNG. None of its sources seem reliable. AstridMitch (talk) 01:19, 19 June 2024

Keep: Editors seem to be bias and personal the nom first said that it falls under Fails WP:GNG. Then he said it fails WP:SIGCOV Then he said 2 of the articles were decent sources so i don't get how it doesn't pass WP:GNG if the nom himself said there are some reliabe resources seems undecided, also the nom didn't even transclude this Afd correctly at first — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:960:27F0:2913:E0:D107:656A (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can envision this artist becoming notable at some point, but right now, the sources of significant coverage are simply too sparse. I looked myself and really, the only useful sources are a couple already here; there needs to be more. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.