Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duck raping
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Completely unreferenced, appears to be a neologism, and without assertion of notability. Speedy delete tag removed by third party. Nyttend 13:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, unless it is sourced and its notability shown. --Blanchardb 13:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete appears to fall under WP:NEO. TonyBallioni 13:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I removed Speed Delete flag as it clearly didn't fall under the criteria. It MAY fall under WP:NEO, however, there is an opportunity to clean up the article with appropriate sources as well as more extensive documentation. It's important to realize that the practice of Duck raping is one that should be documented and addressed for reference. 204.214.90.129 16:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Note that the speedy-delete tag was removed by User:Luminousbit. Nyttend 18:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and call PETA. There are no sources for this. Okay, one. Unverifiable. - Revolving Bugbear (formerly Che Nuevara) 17:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -RiverHockey 19:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. L337 kybldmstr 23:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Doctorfluffy 06:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.