Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgio Squarcia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgio Squarcia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unencyclopedic subject, self-written biography, multiple issues, unreliable sources GenoV84 (talk) 21:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From the Talk page: This page has multiple issues that make it an Unencyclopedic subject, especially for being a NAU article.

It's clear that the article was written by Giorgio Squarcia himself disguised as a user, under the nickname of Gaio valerio catullo (msg). He never edited any page other than this.

Furthermore, there isn't any reliable source that could prove the introduction of the "docu-fiction" genre in Italy by him, which makes all this page even more embarassing. Basically, he has written his own biography to promote his curriculum vitae on Wikipedia; by reading it, you can see that Squarcia is promoting a grandiose image of himself and talks about it in a self-promoting fashion (he did the same thing on IMDb). In my opinion, that is the worst part.

In light of the fact, i propose to delete this page due to its unreliability and "ulterior motive" for the writing of it.--GenoV84 (msg) 23:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: The user Indiabongo13 (msg) too was created by Squarcia, and has made only one edit, which served as a praise for Squarcia; in the Talk page he says that Squarcia's biography is "very interesting", and Gaio valerio catullo (Squarcia's main user account) responds to him...self. It's embarassing, and ridiculous... sounds like a joke, someone that thinks "look, how great I Am!" and responds to himself "yes, how great you are!", to promote his curriculum on Wikipedia. I have nothing else to say.--GenoV84 (msg) 14:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:17, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:17, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. J947 Public (talk) 22:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. J947 Public (talk) 22:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: When commenting please stay on topic, cite policy and or guidelines where ;possible and be brief.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 04:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing enough to suggest any sort of notability, except for a lawsuit against him for trying to make a film on a massacre that happened in Italy years ago without the permission from the victims' parents; btw, Squarcia wrote his own biography on it.wikipedia too, and it was deleted for the same reasons i explained above: Wikipedia:Pagine da cancellare/Giorgio John Squarcia.--GenoV84 (msg) 04:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, !dave 09:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.