|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.37
| 6,203
| Apr 26, 2018
| Nov 01, 2018
|
liked it
| ’It’s not “weird”, Alex. There was a move to close the Children’s Library and Granny was all mixed up with it somehow. Now it’s threatened with clo ’It’s not “weird”, Alex. There was a move to close the Children’s Library and Granny was all mixed up with it somehow. Now it’s threatened with closure again so she’s agreed to speak at an event which they hope might help to keep the library open.’ ‘I don’t see why we need libraries,’ Alex said. ‘You can get anything you want off the internet.’ His sister, who was of an age to enjoy going against a popular tide, sighed audibly and their mother said, ‘Yes, but how do you know what to look for? That’s why libraries are so important. Without the library, Granny might not have become a writer herself.’ ...... I came to this book due to it being chosen by my Book Group which I have resolved to re-attend in 2019 as part of my move back from an online to offline reading experience. The book is the latest by the author of the Apocryphal, Venetian inspired “Miss Garnet’s Angel” - the only other book of hers I have read. It is a book which clearly means a lot to the author - inspired by her own childhood experience of libraries and the librarian who infused her with a life long love of stories. The book is set in a small Wiltshire town East Mole. Sylvia Blackwell moves to the town from Swindon when she is appointed to the library and sets out to reinvigorate the dilapidated children’s library she discovers, in the face of something between apathy and hostility from her boss. She lives in one of a small row of cottages and befriends one of her neighbouring families (with two precocious and interchangeable young twin girls and Sam, an extremely bright 11 year old for whom the Grammar School system seems designed). Her busybody landlady asks her to tutor her quiet and struggling 11 year old granddaughter Lizzie, which she does with Sam’s assistance. Two things upset the equilibrium: Sylvia starts an affair with the local Doctor - Hugh Bell - and his daughter Marigold starts to influence Tom; the neighbour living between Sylvia and Sam’s family starts to complain about Sam’s behaviour and implicates Sylvia with consequences for her and the children’s library. The book in a large part acts as a homage to the books the author herself loved in her childhood and indeed ends with a list of “Recommended Reading from East Mole Library” based around those books, which feature in the main text as Sylvia recommends them to the children and, in some cases, adults of East Mole. There are also the occasional links between the books and children’s reading - although I had perhaps hoped for a more meta-fictional approach (drawing on plot elements from the novels) than eventually materialised. Some examples: When a character fails to match the second identity which seems to have been heavily telegraphed: By rights, Miss Crake should have been the Trustee. If this was a children’s book she would be, she thought crossly. Sylvia and Hugh’s on-off relationship (with Sylvia always seemingly willing to give him one last chance) is finally broken off on her side due to his reaction to a children’s book he claims to have read on her recommendation proving his duplicity towards her. Hugh had lied to her. She knew this as surely as she had ever known anything. He had not bothered to read, or not all through, I Capture the Castle, with its bittersweet ending, where a girl’s love in the end comes to nothing. A childhood fascination with Treasure Island and it’s piratical sense of justice plays a crucial plot role. And at the book’s finale the author, through the older characters looking back reflects on the relationship of Sylvia and Dr Bell and its failure to reach any satisfactory resolution. Elizabeth could see them in her mind’s eye, the slight fair-haired woman with the grey-green eyes with the tall man in horn-rimmed specs, almost as if it was a memory she had forgotten or laid aside. In one of her books they would have found each other, finally, sometime, somewhere. The book has a number of flaws, flaws that the book itself acknowledges but cannot altogether excuse. After what I thought was a promising start I groaned inwardly when I realised the way the predictable plot would develop (rather than the more meta fictional approach I had hoped for). This is madness, she said to herself. I’m involved with a married man. What a cliché ...... The character of Hugh Bell rather preposterous and his philosophical musings tedious Is this too unbearably pompous?’ And the rather overly precocious characters of the eleven year old children don’t seem to ring true or consistent (switching from re-enacting Black Spot to what is effectively an 11 year old psychological love triangle) He’s an unusual child with an unusually well-developed political sense Albeit the author is I think also making a point, albeit not a particularly well argued one, that children, just like children’s literature can offer a sense of insight and perspective, and describe or experience real love. Only fools disregard children’s literature. Clarity of vision is shed with childhood but one can sometimes recover a glimpse of it in the best children’s literature. And that latter book features in perhaps the strangest part of the book a twice visited digression into a theory around Junk DNA and its role in some form of intuition and communication which could perhaps be best described as Junk Science. A modern day section, with grandparents does allow for us to follow the fate of the characters. It also more importantly enables Vickers to tie the book to her own story. Also though and rather rather disappointingly it ties up some loose ends and even some mere hints of plot (for example a sidestory involving a young lock-keeper) whose lack of clear resolution was hitherto the most impressive literary aspect of the book. One thing I found interesting was what I saw as a strong link with Penelope Fitzgerald’s “The Bookshop”, albeit not a link I have seen directly confirmed in any interviews or reviews and not one which can I think be made on the grounds of literary merit, in light of my preceding comments. The authors are linked. Vickers career received a significant career boost when her debut novel “Miss Garnet’s Angel” was described by Fitzgerald as “subtle, unexpected and haunting”. Vickers, herself a psychotherapist before her writing career, picked “The Bookseller” as one of her favourite psychological novels. What I think the books have in common is the sense of an idealistic outsider, motivated by a love of books and desire to spread the joy of reading, being opposed by small minded members of the local small town community (Wiltshire here taking the place of Suffolk) who close ranks against her. Vickers I believe was inspired in revisiting this idea by the events of Brexit. In both books a classic but banned novel (here Henry Miller’s “Tropic of Cancer” taking the place of Nabokov’s “Lolita”) plays a catalytic role in the protagonists downfall. Overall an entertaining if flawed novel but one with an important message. As you can tell, I am a passionate, a passionate, supporter of libraries, especially for children who might otherwise have no access to the resources of children’s literature. Children are the citizens of the future and what they are fed and nourished on will form the destiny of our world and the destiny of our beleaguered planet. We have a duty, a moral duty, to ensure that not only the stomachs of our children are fed but also their imaginations. We do not’ –here she paused and swept a glance around her audience –‘we emphatically do not want to find that we have reached such a state of dearth in our society that we must provide food banks for the imagination as well as, as we so regrettably have to do today, for the physical body. Up and down the country there are local libraries, granaries of rich supplies, potential feasts of nourishment, often gifted, as this library was, by benefactors for the good of children, their children and the future of our children’s children and our children’s future children’s children, which it is sheer wickedness to waste and destroy.’...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 23, 2018
|
Dec 28, 2018
|
Dec 23, 2018
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
0525533346
| 9780525533344
| B07B7C4F9C
| 4.05
| 30,058
| Oct 23, 2018
| Oct 23, 2018
|
liked it
|
• Good introduction to Bullet Journal method * Analogue approach for digital age - Slower speed of handwriting + migration idea encourages reflection > • Good introduction to Bullet Journal method * Analogue approach for digital age - Slower speed of handwriting + migration idea encourages reflection > Adopt in 2019 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 25, 2018
|
Dec 26, 2018
|
Dec 21, 2018
|
ebook
| |||||||||||||||
0340936290
| 9780340936290
| B008YEBSO6
| 4.34
| 161,777
| Oct 18, 1982
| Jan 01, 2007
|
really liked it
| “To write these things now is to state the commonplaces of history. But to find them out in 1942, to have them break upon you from a June sky, was “To write these things now is to state the commonplaces of history. But to find them out in 1942, to have them break upon you from a June sky, was to suffer a fundamental shock, a derangement of that area of the brain in which stable ideas about humankind and its possibilities are kept” I read this book for the 2019 Mookse Madness Tournament, which also gave me the chance to add another Booker winner to my list. I came to this book new – not having seen the film “Schindler’s List” which made this one of only two books to win the Best Picture Oscar/Booker Prize double. Most people I think would be much more familiar than me with the story told, from the film, but it is summarised here. https://www.enotes.com/topics/schindl... This is a very difficult book to review, clearly a vitally important one and also one that is extremely well reseached, unflinching both in its portrayal of the Holocaust, but also in the actions and characters of those involved, including Schindler himself. It is also tightly written. I struggle however to really see it really is fiction – unlike the author’s “Gossip from the Forest” which although based on true events clearly is fictional. The version I read had an excellent Afterword written by the author 30 years after the book’s initial publication – in which he describes some of his motivations for writing Schindler’s story, the most interesting one being that he “saw that at once, as a business man and Abwehr operative, Schindler had contact with every stage of the process of destruction of Jewish Europeans. That is he saw the confiscation of residential and commercial properties … the ghettoisation of the Jews and was part of their exploitation as cheap labour in factories. He saw the unutterably violent liquidation camps, and was a whistle blower as to the existence of .. destruction camps, where death was delivered by industrial gas on a production line scale” Surely the most important winner of the Booker prize. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 18, 2018
|
Dec 19, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0586087397
| 9780586087398
| 0586087397
| 3.75
| 901
| 1976
| Jan 01, 1988
|
liked it
|
I read this book for the 2019 Mookse Madness Tournament. Famously The Prime Minister’s wife blackballed The Doctor’s Wife for the Booker due to the sex I read this book for the 2019 Mookse Madness Tournament. Famously The Prime Minister’s wife blackballed The Doctor’s Wife for the Booker due to the sex scenes. Trying to find out more about Moore the author, and a little underwhelmed with this book, I came across an obituary in The Independent in 1999. I found this passage interesting:
And I found this instructive – one thing that clearly struck me about the book was a man writing seemingly empathetically and sympathetically from a woman’s viewpoint. What I have understood from the obituary and from my Goodreads friends reviews of Moore’s other books – is that this is a skill of Moore – however perhaps not at its strongest here and anyway it was not clear to me why I would not prefer to read a female author doing the same thing with more authenticity. The plot of the novel is relatively simple, if not almost clichéd: a married woman frustrated with her marriage, has an affair with a younger man. In this case – the woman is Sarah Redden, in her late 30s. Once a promising student she married young (against it seems the better judgement of her friends who saw her as having a potential career) to a Doctor – Kevin, dedicated more to his patients than his marriage. They have one son – Danny – an increasingly independent teenager, which only seems to add to Sarah’s sense of drift, as does her loss of any childhood faith she had and the difficulties of her home country of Northern Ireland. Sarah plans for the two of them to revisit their honeymoon hotel in Villefranche on the French Riviera, stopping off first to visit her college friend Peg in Paris (where Sarah had a gap year as a student). The contrast between Peg’s free lifestyle and her own predictability, combined with Kevin’s constant procrastination about when he can fly to the Riviera, snaps something in Sarah who embarks on a overt flirtation with Tom – an American who has just graduated from Dublin – and the flatmate of Peg’s Yugoslavian lover. Tom follows her to Villefranche and the flirtation becomes a full blown affair, the two moving back to Paris where Kevin finds out what is going on, involving her family in his attempts to persuade her back. The book is enjoyable enough – and Moore does seem to write with some sensitivity and insight about Sarah as commented above, as well as about her brother, roped in to an attempt to change her mind and who rather clumsily tries to conflate her behaviour with a susceptibility to mental illness which runs in their family. However the same cannot be said of the writing about Tom. He remains an unconvincing and sketchy character (simply having characters remark that he is not a typical American is not really an excuse for not even bothering to write him as an America) – and the book is hindered further by an inadvisable foray into the sordid voyeuristic mind of the hotel guest Mr. Balcer. The book has the odd literary flourish, for example: brief mid paragraph first person asides; the device of naming Sarah as Mrs Redden throughout as a way of emphasising the constraints her marriage has placed on her, as well as her husband’s assumption of ownership of her; brief references to the Northern Ireland Troubles mirroring the Troubles of Sarah’s marriage and to a breakdown of faith in religion (among the Catholics) and country (among the Protestants) mirroring Sarah’s lack of faith in the sacrifices of marriage. However none of this lifts the book in my view near what I would consider Booker shortlist territory – and the book contains some clumsy flourishes such as a rather over-the-top behaviour by Kevin when he confronts Sarah and which turns him into a cartoon villain; and some close to unforgivable ones: Kevin saying to Sarah that she is not the heroine of a book. This was my first book by Brian Moore – previously a name I associated with two iconic lines. One of the great song lyrics “Brian Moore’s head looks uncannily like London Planetarium” and one of the great commentaries : “It’s up for grabs now”. The latter words being etched in my memory, which I fear will not be the case for any aspect of this book – as perhaps shown by my only quotes being from elsewhere. I don’t know if Brian Moore felt the Booker was “up for grabs now” when he was shortlisted, but I think this should not have needed a Prime Ministerial Consort’s veto for too much explicit sex, but rather a veto for insufficient literary merit. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 17, 2018
|
Dec 17, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0349111693
| 3.52
| 2,336
| Mar 1998
| 1999
|
really liked it
| “Perhaps chance and destiny are interdependent, in that the latter cannot be fulfilled without the casual intervention of the former. A craggy rock “Perhaps chance and destiny are interdependent, in that the latter cannot be fulfilled without the casual intervention of the former. A craggy rock placed at a distance from the water will never be worn smooth” This book is a special Booker Prize winner – winning the “Best Of Beryl” Prize in 2011 – where the public was asked to choose between the five shortlisted books of the “Booker Bridesmaid”. A detailed plot guide can be found here: http://www.bookrags.com/studyguide-ma... Although a succinct introduction to the characters is contained in the following musings by the geologist Dr Potter, one of our three point of view narrators, when he muses on the events that have thrown the other two point of view characters – the foundling turned favourite turned lover and surrogate mother Myrtle, and the street performer turned photographer’s assistant turned lover Pompey Jones, in orbit around the eponymous surgeon and amateur photographer George Hardy. “Myrtle is an interesting subject – in regard to the question as to whether fate or chance holds the upper hand. The ifs are numerous. If Beartrice had not shown an affection for her, would she not have vanished into the orphanage. What if Pompey Jones’s unfortunate arrangement of the tiger’s head had not ended Annie’s hope of motherhood? If old Mrs Hardy had woken that morning in a cheerful mood, would Myrtle have been required to follow George down to the town. Then there is the matter of his returning to Blackberty Lane by a different route than was usual. If the woman’s screams had echoed unheard in another street, what then” And this passage also introduced one of the key themes of the book – as covered in my opening quote. This is a book which relies on extreme chance and co-incidence but not as a plot device but more as a way of examining the role of chance and coincidence when set alongside fate/destiny. Reading this work I could not help seeing it as a form of literary antecedent of the work of Kate Atkinson – whose early Jackson Brodie detective novels relied heavily (perhaps too heavily) on coincidence as an explicitly acknowledged plot device, but who then went on to examine this theme meta-fictionally in books like “Life After Life”. I also wondered about the influence of this book on Sarah Perry’s “The Essex Serpent”: in the Victorian setting; the fascination with geology and the challenge of the work of Charles Lyell to previously religiously held conceptions and certainties; but also in the way in which all the characters seem drawn to another character, an attraction (including a sexual one from both sexes) that does not convey itself to the reader – with George hear being an even more distant figure than Cora. Photography is another clear theme – the Crimean War was the first to be widely photographed and Bainbridge chooses to have three photographers in the book (George. Pompey and an unnamed war photographer) and to have the six chapters named after and written around six photographic plates (which are dated and described but not shown). This idea captures the nature of the book – built effectively around six set pieces Interestingly whereas these chapters feature some seemingly memorable scenes – for example: the attempts to cover up the nature of Mr Hardy’s death; an operation to remove the cataracts of an ape; a dramatic fight in a theater based on a deceived sense of honour; fire eater at concert amidst squalor and disease; a man caught in a blast who ends with a missing ear but regained memory: some of these scenes actually fade from the memory, a little like the “regrettable tendency” of George’s photographs to fade to black after being taken. Instead what lingers in the memory more is our growing understanding of the complex dynamics between the characters and more importantly the themes of the book. Bainbridge I think is also consciously exploring two related themes here via her photographic plate device: Firstly photography as a medium for capturing reality and contrasting it both implicitly and explicitly with literature and its ability to capture thought and motivation as well as image: “There’s something of black magic in the photographer’s art, in that he stops time ….. I don’t know that I think much of the camera. It appears to hold reality hostage and yet fails to snap thoughts in the head … The lens is powerless to catch the interior turmoil boiling within the skull” And secondly and more widely, the idea of differing perceptions of history, and of myth. As we switch between the three point of view characters we gradually become aware of differences in their interpretations of past events: “I reckon memory is selective ….. I tried to get Potter to discuss what it meant when events were recollected differently. He said he wasn’t in the mood and had enough lapses of his own without fretting over other people’s” As an example, late on Myrtle realises 8 years later that her first glance of Pompey, as an unknown “Duck-boy” carrying out an unheralded “Christian-act” was actually a failed street-scam. Photography itself exposed the true horrors of war and shattered some of its mythical nature. And we also have Dr Potter who increasingly in his horror at the reality of war turns literally to history and myth – taking refuge in allusions to classical history and literature, rather it has to be said to the disdain of our lower class narrators Myrtle and Pompey “his frequent quotations .. first spouted in a dead language and then laboriously translated, become wearisome” . In the same way the concept of war – as celebrated in “nauseating displays of patriotic fervor” by politicians and generals in London and in those who are influenced by them in Istanbul, in Potter’s own words “those buffoons who, by reasons of solely of wealth and title, control both government and army” differs from the horrific reality experienced by working class soldiers, including at the end Pompey. Overall this is an excellent book – a deserved winner of the “Best of Beryl” Booker albeit one which should have rendered that competition unnecessary by defeating “Amsterdam”. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 14, 2018
|
Dec 16, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||||
1787331164
| 9781787331167
| 1787331164
| 3.61
| 7,468
| Dec 06, 2018
| Dec 06, 2018
|
liked it
|
BDP-LHR: David Szalay, who lives in Budapest, was shortlisted for the London based 2014 Booker prize for his book “All That Man Is” – a collection of
BDP-LHR: David Szalay, who lives in Budapest, was shortlisted for the London based 2014 Booker prize for his book “All That Man Is” – a collection of short stories, examining the crisis of masculinity, and which the judges felt to be eligible as a novel and fulfilling the “unified and substantive work” criteria. LHR-LAX: The winner of the Booker Prize that year was “Sellout” – a novel set in Los Angeles and which has been criticised as an attempt at stand up comedy masquerading as a novel. LAX-TLV: A few months later, the 2017 Man Booker International Prize was won by David Grossman for “A Horse Walks into a Bar” – a novel about a stand-up comedian, giving a routine in portentous circumstances, in a small Israeli costal town. TLV-DBV: The Man Booker International Prize was won this year by Olga Tokarczuk for “Flights” which among much, much else both good and bad including a vignette on a Croatian Island, was a linked collection of vignettes, with a focus on travel, particularly 21st Century air travel. DVB-LHR: A little like “Turbulence” by David Szalay. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 13, 2018
|
Dec 14, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0340431040
| 9780340431047
| 0340431040
| 3.57
| 231
| Jan 01, 1975
| Jan 01, 1988
|
really liked it
|
I read this book as part of the 2019 Mookse Madness tournament. The book is an imagined account of the signing of the Armisitice which ended the Great I read this book as part of the 2019 Mookse Madness tournament. The book is an imagined account of the signing of the Armisitice which ended the Great War on 11th November 1918. I have read many excellent books in 2014 on the events leading up to the outbreak of that war – not least Christopher Clark’s “The Sleepwalkers”, most of which – but have not found any books this year on the Armistice, so it was a pleasant surprise to come across this non-fictional treatment. The book concentrates on a retelling of the signing itself – and those that signed the deal. Written in the third person there are really three main point of view protagonists, the main one being Matthias Erzberger, the whose civilian politician lead of the German delegation, under final instructions and authority from the newly appointed Social Democrat Chancellor Ebert, was shortly after distorted into the “stab-in-the back” idea that was tragically for human history the foundational myth of Nazi-ism. The others are the British admiral Wemyss and the French General (and Allied Supreme Commander) Foch. Erzberger struggles with the fore-knowledge that he will be blamed and hated for his role in the armistice (unpopular already with Conservative politicians due to his criticism of German colonial misdeeds in Africa. Ultimately he signs the terms while protesting at their unreasonableness and urging his government to push for urgent peace negotiations, with the crucial inclusion of the Americans and Wilson’s Fourteen Points. Wemyss’s main determination is that the French will not concede Britain’s unequivocal naval terms. As the interactions progress he tries to understand if the Germans are bluffing over the threat of Bolshevism and starvation due to overly harsh terms. Foch is presented unsympathetically as a rigid and unbending, Napoleonic character, sure of his Catholic faith, military doctrine and the justice of the terms – and of the weight of destiny behind the events: when both French politicians and the German delegates panic that the rapidly changing and deteriorating political circumstances in Germany mean that those delegates no longer have any authority, Foch is unwavering in his belief that the Armistice can and will be signed. Both the English and French reject the, in their view, naïve level of balance in Wilson’s Fourteen Points, as being inappropriate to the devastation and death caused by the German hostilities and the reality of their military defeat. In one of my favourite lines: At the mention of that remote platonist of the prairies, a film fell on the eyes of the French generals and British admirals. They looked like man who has been unexpectedly reminder that at the age of fourteen they had learned physics or history from a scholarly man of endearing naïvety. I found this a powerful, enlightening and entertaining book – achieving a great synthesis of factual accuracy and fictional imagining. Some closing comments: One of my fellow Mookse and Gripes forum members has commented that everyone (authors as well as forum members who are champions of books) assume that their book/favourite was a narrow runner up in the Booker. Interestingly this is the only book that can genuinely lay claim to the title of Booker runner-up, as it was part of the shortest every shortlist in Booker history. I found it interesting that the events in this Book lead by a tragedy of history to those in the author’s more famous and Booker prize winning book. Some criticisms: I also found the opening Epigraph a rather gratuitous dig at the French and a possible explanation of the apparent skew in the book against that nation; I found the opening of the book weak with too many portentous dreams. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 11, 2018
|
Dec 13, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0141188316
| 3.91
| 17,171
| 1987
| Apr 27, 2006
|
really liked it
| “… crying not in grief but in wonder that nothing is ever lost, that everything can be retrieved, that a lifetime is not linear but instant. That, “… crying not in grief but in wonder that nothing is ever lost, that everything can be retrieved, that a lifetime is not linear but instant. That, inside the head, everything happens at once” I came to this book as a result of its inclusion as part of the 2019 Mookse Madness tournament – but it was also an opportunity to add a Booker prize winner to the list I have read (I think this is my 22nd) and one which was generally seen as a surprise pick to represent the 1980s for the Golden Man Booker (surprise as it was picked ahead of Midnight’s Children – which has twice been awarded a Best of the Booker/Booker of Bookers prize I believe). The plot of the book is summarised here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_Tiger) albeit that does not capture the process of memory and of different perspectives on events which drives the book – as the opening quote implies. Overall I thought this was an excellent book – much stronger than I was expecting. Comparisons with “English Patient” are inevitable and I think it’s a close run thing: Ondaatje’s descriptive writing and command of language gives him an early lead in my view: but Lively I think creates a more memorable and rounded character in Claudia, and is so much better at observing the nuances social interactions (a struggle for social supremacy between Claudia and Japser’s ageing ex-lothario father Sasha for instance, is brilliantly conveyed in a few lines). And this book’s ending, while inevitable, does not mar the story like “English Patient”. What I really enjoyed in this book was its examination of memory and history: individual memory and how perspective alters over time and varies between different individuals; the contrast and interaction between collective historical narrative and individual experiences. I had two main criticisms of the book: The relationship between Claudia and Gordon at first intriguing in its narcissistic exclusionary nature, I think veers too far when it becomes incestuous. The character of Laszlo seemed to me simply a device to allow Claudia’s life history to encompass not just the World Wars but the events of 1956 (Suez and the decay of British influence being an obvious one given her history in Egypt, but the link to Budapest seeming to me unnecessary). But overall I found this an excellent read and an unexpected delight. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 04, 2018
|
Dec 05, 2018
|
Dec 01, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||||
1844082482
| 9781844082483
| 1844082482
| 3.78
| 4,690
| May 22, 1981
| Apr 05, 2007
|
really liked it
|
I read this book due to its inclusion in the 2019 Mookes Madness tournament. A book that was shortlisted for the 1981 Booker Prize - a prize of course I read this book due to its inclusion in the 2019 Mookes Madness tournament. A book that was shortlisted for the 1981 Booker Prize - a prize of course won by the Booker of Bookers Midnights Children. An entertaining and cleverly written book – which I would best categorise as a very deliberate mash up of 1950s farce, and early 1980s meta-fictional conceit. The book serves as an interesting examination of two related creative processes: (Auto)biography and memior – with Spark simultaneously (among many other ideas): having characters who whose whole connection is their interest in writing their own memoirs; examining in detail two autobiographies – Benvenuto Cellini’s “The Life of Benvenuto Cellini” and Henry Newman’s “Apologia” as well as alluding to Proust; looking at the idea of ghostwritten autobiographies; examining the importance of the mass-autobiographical Who’s Who in determining so much of English culture and class hierarchy for much of the 20th Century (Auto) fiction – of course something which is more topical now than when this was written (given a year in which Cusk/Knausgaard finished their series); Spark examines the flow of a novel – what it means for a novel to draw from real life, how that very act of writing what one observes can impact on the attitudes of those around the writer, what we mean by the concept of art imitating life and, more to the point, when we say that life seems to be imitating art or for art to turn out to be foreshadowing the future (again something which can seem more topical than ever in an age of Trump/Brexit). A final comment – the version I read has a really excellent introduction from Mark Lawson and a very bizarre orange, cartoon cover. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 03, 2018
|
Dec 03, 2018
|
Dec 01, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0099468387
| 9780099468387
| 0099468387
| 3.54
| 32,838
| 1978
| Aug 05, 2004
|
liked it
|
The author’s debut novel – in fact more of a novella, I read this book due it being included in the 2019 Mookse Madness tournament. The plot of the boo The author’s debut novel – in fact more of a novella, I read this book due it being included in the 2019 Mookse Madness tournament. The plot of the book is discussed elsewhere and best summarised by Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cem... My brief observations ..... I found it difficult to relate the book to McEwen’s later writing which can, in my view, range from the brilliant (Atonement) to the far too frequently annoying (less any particular book than aspects of his writing). Probably the two most annoying aspects are entirely missing here: The insistence on reproducing his research and/or interests in extensive detail – contrast for example the interminable squash game in Saturday with the snooker game here, which does not even make sense with a break of reds and blacks scoring 49. The prepopenderance of upper middle class, successful, characters living in nice London houses. Here by contrast we have an almost feral set of children living in squalor. Albeit admittedly in what is still a large house (can he write about small houses I wonder) but the last undemolished house in an urban wasteland. However I found what was also missing was any real credibility to the story line – one which in the key aspect of its unlikeliness reminded me a lot of this year’s Booker longlisted “Snap”. I also had the curious sense that it was literally misplaced and would have worked better in a rural American Twilight zone style setting – one I think McEwen was trying to reproduce in the seeming decay of late 1970’s England. Overall I now understand why the author was once nicknamed Ian Macabre. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 03, 2018
|
Dec 03, 2018
|
Dec 01, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
3.64
| 3,319
| 1963
| 2000
|
it was ok
|
I read this book due to its inclusion in the 2019 Mookes Madness tournament – my first book by Iris Murdoch. The plot of the book is summarised in this I read this book due to its inclusion in the 2019 Mookes Madness tournament – my first book by Iris Murdoch. The plot of the book is summarised in this link in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Uni...) But overall this is a novel which reminded me a little of a going on a lengthy car journey in a vintage car which exhibits clunky changes of gear, and with a driver who likes to share their observations of each stage of the journey. The book starts almost as a satire of a Gothic novel – Murdoch rolls out her descriptive powers at their finest to convey the oppressive and terrifying nature of the (unnamed) Irish countryside and the forbidding sight of “The Gaze” “Not a thing of beauty I’m afraid … Nineteeth Century of course” Marian’s initial stay (or incareration) in the house, before she is drawn into Hannah’s story, then resembles a rather tedious version of a Victorian family drama “Marian was beginning to find the late evenings at Gaze rather hard to live through” Before the revelation of Hannah’s story threatens to turn boring family drama into literally incredible melodrama “This is an insane story ….. I don’t mean I don’t believe you. But it’s all mad …. Why does she put up with it, who doesn’t she just pack up and go away” In what seems a pivotal chapter (chapter 12) a discussion between Max and Effingham seems to get at the heart of what really drove Murdoch to write this novel – to explore using fiction philosophy and Plato over Freud, as well as the medieval, chivalrous, religious and philosophical concepts of beauty, guilt, of sacrifice, of pure love “Plato tells us that of all the things which belong to the spiritual world beauty is the one which is most easily seen here below.” And some rather overt religious symoblism “I know one mustn’t think of her as a legendary creature, a beautiful unicorn – After some drama, including various crossed-wires between the characters about their relations and feelings, the book seems to be resolving itself into a series of resolutions and happy outcomes “It was like a comedy by Shakespeare. All the ends of the story were being bound in a good way” But with the immediate threat to the reader that – unfortunately the story is not over – and will take a different turn “You both feel you are sitting out the end of some tedious film, don’t you, where you already know what is going to happen …. But perhaps you don’t know what is going to happen, perhaps there are surprises, turns of the story … The book feels less like a novel, and more like someone interested in setting out their philosophical interests and religious musings into novel form “Perhaps Hannah is my experiment! I’ve always had a great theoretical knowledge of morals, but practically speaking I’ve never done a hand’s turn” A novel whose real literary merit is immobilized by the excessive use of allusion: “Gerald had no theory about Hannah. Gerald not been paralysed by an allegory” And Gerald as a result has to go and the book seems to return to satire as most of the protagonists are disposed of in a series of incidents, followed by some more, rather obvious allegorical interpretation of the implausible plot: “Hannah had been to him the chaste mother-godess, the Virgin mother. The sin which Hannah was, through her own sinless suffering redeeming him for had been the sin of his own mother’s betrayal of him with her own father …… Because of his unconscious resentment of his own Mother’s sin of sex, he had been, he explained, unable to establish any satisfactory relations with women other than those of Courtly Love” And in case it is not clear to us, a series of quotes signal the ending of the story, its imaginative nature and the return of both our two point-of-view characters (Marian and Effingham) and the reader to normal life “The play is over, the Vampire Play let us call it” Something the reader greets with the same relief as the characters (especially as the book finished with yet another death): “His death rounded the thing off, gave it a tragic completeness which made it all the easier to cut free of it” Overall I felt this was a very disappointing book for two key aspects – the first as I have tried to bring out above: “While you are playing ring-a-roses, others are working the machine” For the reader at play, the other is Murdoch, but unfortunately (perhaps deliberately) the workings of the machine are rather too obviously on display. The second reason is that I at almost no point could identify any of the characters in the book, or their behaviour with anything I have observed in real life – only perhaps at one point as Marian’s ambiguous relationship with Denis develops do we glance something that may give the book some grounding in reality “Her encounter with Denis, for all its surpisingness and oddness, had so much of the feeling of coming into real life ….. this would be the real business which one human being has with another” But this is quickly taken away and I think it’s an indictment of the writing that there was only one passage in the whole book that I highlighted for a positive reason as one which I thought captured something I had seen in real life: Out on the terrace, the golden retriever came rushing up to Effingham, planting its paws upon his waistcoat and then rolling upon its back in a fluffy whirl of smiling mouth and waving paws” I could only conclude that Murdoch at least based on this novel can write of pets, Plato and Philosophy, but not of People. Perhaps behind this all – Murdoch was striving for her more famous and Booker prize winning novel: “There was a roaring sound behind the rain which was perhaps the sea”...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 07, 2018
|
Dec 09, 2018
|
Dec 01, 2018
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
1250158060
| 9781250158062
| 1250158060
| 3.44
| 76,156
| Jan 05, 2018
| Jan 05, 2018
|
it was ok
|
None
|
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 25, 2018
|
Nov 28, 2018
|
Nov 25, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
unknown
| 4.16
| 1,277
| 2018
| 2018
|
it was amazing
|
The biggest highlight by far for me has been my involvement as a judge on two national Book prizes this year: Republic of Consciousness Prize https://ww The biggest highlight by far for me has been my involvement as a judge on two national Book prizes this year: Republic of Consciousness Prize https://www.republicofconsciousness.c... This prize was set up by Neil Griffiths to support small presses (UK and Ireland publishers with less than 5 full time employees) in 2017 and looking for books which were both “hardcore literary fiction and gorgeous prose” I was invited to be one of the readers panel for the second year of the award; originally our collective view was intended to act as a single judge, although in the end our individual views had equal weights to those of the booksellers who made up the rest of the panel. Our longlist was picked in 2017 by vote: but 2018 was the year of the shortlist and winner. The shortlist was picked over a wonderful evening in January when those judges present discussed each of the longlisted books individually and at length (other judges views being shared by email) and by a process somewhere between consenses, vigorous debate and horse trading a shortlist of six books emerged. Influx Press for “Attrib.” by Eley Williams Galley Beggar Press for “We That Are Young” by Preti Taneja Charco Press for “Die My Love” by Ariana Harwicz, Sarah Moses (tr) and Carolina Orloff (tr) Les Fugitives for “Blue Self Portrait” by Noemi Lefebvre and Sophie Lewis (tr) Little Island Press for “Darker With The Lights On” by David Hayden Dostoyevsky Wannabe for “Gaudy Bauble” by Isabel Waidner I was delighted with the shortlist chosen and proud of it. A list which I felt matched the criteria of the prize perfectly and was also very well balanced: two novels, two short stories, two translated novels and a diverse set of authors (and translators). The Guardian Book view was very gratifying: https://www.theguardian.com/books/boo... The shortlist was announced at a very enjoyable event in February – a chance to meet many of the authors and publishers. The winner was annnounced at a reception in March – the winner being my book of 2017 (as per the Guardian article above): Attrib. by Eley Williams. I would also pause to note that subsequent to our shortlisting: Attrib. one one of the UK’s oldest literary prizes – the James Tait Prize- the first short story collection to do so in its many years; “We That Are Young” won the Desmond Elliot Prize; “Die, My Love” was longlisted for the Man Booker International Prize. Guardian Not The Booker Prize My second experience was the Guardian Not The Booker prize. This prize, on the Guardian’s very popular wesbite, and run by Sam Jordison co-owner of Galley Beggar, has four stages. The first is an online (via the Below The Line “BTL” comments) nomination of books – which this year lead to more than 140 nominations. The second allows BTL votes on which of those books should make five of the shortlist of six books: the five public choices this year being three small press books: “Sweet Fruit, Sour Land” by Rebecca Ley (Sandstone Press), “Raising Sparks” by Ariel Kahn (Blue Moose press), “Sealed” by Naomi Booth (Dead Ink Press) and two mainstream crime novels – “Dark Pines” by Will Dean and “The Ruin” by Dervla McTiernan. A sixth novel is then added by the previous year’s judges (which last year included Jackie Law, a fellow RoC prize judge, who succesfully persuaded the other judges to pick Marc Nash’s “Three Dreams In the Key of G” also by Dead Ink). The third stage is then an online review by Sam Jordison of each book (one book reviewed per week) with detailed BTL discussion of the book. From these BTL comments Sam then picks three readers who have made the best contributions as judges for the prize. The fourth stage is then the choice of winner – a public BTL vote counts as two votes for the winning book, with each judge having a vote (and Sam the casting vote in the event of a tie) and with the brief judging discussion being broadcast live on the Guardian’s website. It can be seen that most of the stages are based on online BTL votes – and can end up as a test of social media reach and popularity and the judges were introduced after a few years of the prize to partially counter this. With four books being by small presses, with Sam’s involvement and with the judges choice being a book I had very recently reviewed (after the author approached me directly based on some of my reviews of other books – something which rarely happens, and which when it does I normally turn down so as to not feel compromised, but accepted in this case after reading some excerpts on line and loving the book. I was interested to take part – and after six weeks of BTL comments (an experience I found remarkably refreshing with a very healthy and informed level of debate) I was selected as a judge. That process proved controversial – and I was in the end in the position of deciding whether to back my fellow judges or the public. The decision did lead to some slightly less measured BTL commentary – being accused of being a metropolitian elite or expert overturning the views of the public (many of whom had I think only read one of the shortlist) was, in these times of Brexit, both amusing and topical. I also really enjoyed all six books – Marc Nash’s was my favourite but I also really liked our winner (Rebecca Ley) and both Naomi Booth and Ariel Kahn’s books were excellent too – I would recommend all four. Sweet Fruit, Sour Land https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Three Dreams In The Key of G https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Sealed https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Raising Sparks https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... And while no crime fan – both books on this list were extremely entertaining while possessing, in my view, much more literary merit than the crime novel on the main Booker list. Some coverage of the short list (including my real identity) is here: https://www.theguardian.com/books/boo... And the judges meeting here: https://www.theguardian.com/books/boo... I will only conclude by noting that the Booktuber Simon Savidge was a judge on this prize in 2013 (the year when judges were first introduced) and that he was one of the two guest reviewers at this year’s BBC coverage of the Booker winner announcement. There is hope for me yet to go on to better things! Other (perhaps slightly better known) prizes I read the full longlist for the Women’s Prize (for the first time), the Booker (for the third time) and the Goldsmith short/longlist. The Women’s Prize longslist was as broad but strong as ever. The prize seems – I suspect due to the influence of Kate Mosse - to manage a very consistent approach from year to year: mixing in and gain exposure for some fairly cutting edge literary books, while attracting readers with some better known and mainstream books. I particularly loved the shortlist – no less than my top 5 choices from the longlist of 16. My favourite was “Sight” by Jessie Greengrass, however “Home Fire” was a worthy winner. Review of my top 5 (which also made the shortlist): Sight https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... The Idiot https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Home Fire https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... When I Hit You https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Mermaid and Mrs Hancock https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... By contrast the Booker can sometimes feel like a different prize each year. Last year was the year of “picking the best books from other awards and best-of-lists” and as a result I had read 10 of the 11 published books pre longlist announcement. This was I think approrpaite for the UK’s premiuer book prize, but was then slightly marred by what I felt was a weak choice of shortlist, a year later I simply note that those books that were longlisted but not shortlisted have now won pretty well every other major literary prize on both sides of the Atlantic (Costa - twice, Goldsmith, National Book Award, Pulitzer, Dublin Literary award). This year it was of course “the match a book to the judge, redefining what is literary fiction year” – with poetry, crime fiction, graphic novel and steampunk all featuring. Overall though there were some very strong and unexpected books on the longlist (very few of which I had read this year pre announcement), a very good choice of shortlist and, in my view, an outstanding winner in Milkman, albeit one that made it clear that the reading population and my Goodreads friends, just like the general population, has a high proportion of people who are lactose intolerant. Some reviews of my favourite books: Milkman https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... In a Mad and Furious City https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Everything Under https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Normal People https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Warlight https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... The Long Take https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... The Goldsmith had a fascinating shortlist as always: including two of my favourites from The Booker (neither of which I really saw as a conventional – should that be non-conventional – Goldsmith novel). – I particularly enjoyed Murmur (which I had already read but was always intending to revisit) and Cemetery in Barnes. I also had a chance to discuss the books over dinner with a group of fellow Goodreaders – another highlight of the year. Murmur https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... The Cemetery in Barnes https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Small presses Inspired by the Republic of Consciousness Prize, partly to help raise funds for it, and partly as a Christmas present to myself I subscribed myself to six small presses this year – Fitzcarraldo, Galley Beggar, Tilted Axis Press, Charco Press, And Other Stories, Pereine Press. As I said in my review of 2017, much as I love Amazon prime, there is something special about a hand wrapped (often with a personal note), beautifully presented book unexpectedly arriving from a small publisher some time ahead of official publication. And even nicer when (in some cases) your own name is at the back of the book. Getting the book early means there is the rather daunting opportunity to be one of the first people to write a review of the novel (or at least its English translation) and, on Tweeting the review, to interact with the author, publisher and translator. I can only echo what I said in the Guardian’s 2017 readers books of the year: https://www.theguardian.com/books/201... “This year for me has been one of discovering the world of UK and Irish small presses – bravely publishing books at the frontier of literature. Support them, even better subscribe to them – your cultural life and the cultural life of the country will be enriched” Some (of the many) small press highlights of the year – with one book from each the above presses plus Splice, Salt, Les Fugitives, Eye Books, Tramp Press, Stinging Fly, Istros Books, Fairlight and Henningham Press. Tell Them of Battles, Kings and Elephants https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Lucia https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... The Sad Part Was https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... German Room https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Slip of A Fish https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Shadows on The Tundra https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Hang Him When He is Not There https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... How to Be a Kosovan Bride https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Now, Now Louison https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Their Brilliant Careers – The Fantastic Lives of Sixteen ExtraordinaryAsutralian Writers https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Problems https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Sweet Home https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Doppelgänger https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Bottled Goods https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Dedalus https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... Miscellaneous - Missing series 2018 felt like an interim/missing year from many of my favourite series of books: Ali Smith’s seasonal quartet skipping from early Winter 2017 to Spring 2019: Simon Okotie’s Absalon trilogy having its second volume in 2017 and now third promised in 2019; no news on Hilary Mantel’s “The Mirror and the Light” follow up to “Wolf Hall” and “Bring Up The Bodies”; and of course, but most disappointingly of all, no sign at all that Winter is Coming – albeit George Martin alternative publication (a fictional non-fictional history book) was my last big read of the year. Where a trilogy was completed – Rachel’s Cusk’s “Kudos” finishing what she started with “Outline” and “Transit” – its longlisting for the Goldsmith prize seemed a little inappropriate given its inability to really progress the first two novels: it did however give rise to the Goodreads review I most enjoyed writing and the one which has gathered the most positive comments of any I have written. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 2018
|
Dec 29, 2018
|
Nov 24, 2018
| ||||||||||||||||||
9781912545131
| 1912545136
| 3.55
| 497
| 2002
| Oct 15, 2018
|
really liked it
|
Now shortlisted for the 2019 Republic of Consciousness Prize This book is published by the UK small press Istros, from their website … At Istros, weNow shortlisted for the 2019 Republic of Consciousness Prize This book is published by the UK small press Istros, from their website … At Istros, we believe that high-quality literature can transcend national interests and speak to us with the common voice of human experience. Discovering contemporary voices and rediscovering forgotten ones, Istros Books works hard to bring you the best that European literature can offer. After a great deal of thinking about the areas of Europe we wanted to cover and the image we wanted to create, we came up with the name Istros Books. Istros is the old Greek and Thracian name for the lower Danube River, which winds its way down from its source in Germany and flows into the Czech Republic and Slovakia, and goes on to cross many of the countries of South-East Europe: Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria and Romania. Its watershed also extends to other neighbouring countries, with one of the main Danubian tributaries, the Sava, serving Slovenia and Bosnia/Herzegovina, while also feeding the waterways and lakes of Macedonia and Montenegro and Albania. These are the countries of focus for Istros Books, evoking the image of the Danube river flowing carelessly across the borders of Europe and encapsulating the ideal of the free-flow of knowledge and the cultural exchange that books promote Daša Drndić – 1946 to 2018 – is a Croatian author, most famous for Sonnenschein (Trieste in English) and more recently Belladonna - which just won the Warwick Prize for Women in Translation having been shortlisted for the EBRD prize and the Oxford-Weidenfled Translation prize. I have not read either book, but understand them to be dense and complex – with elements of Sebald, Thomas Bernhard and Mathias Enard, described as “collages” and “archival”, with a concentration on the issues of 20th Century European history, and particularly World War II, the Holocaust (both featuring harrowing lists of deportees) and Croatia. From a recent Granta interview (https://granta.com/katharina-bielenbe... ) Drndić has a distinctive style which she expected to be reproduced by her translators. She gave clear indications that the translation of her works into other languages should not stray from her intention, form or style. Dialogue is in italics, always. Inverted commas are reserved for irony, ridicule. Word order is carefully chosen, for stress, and should not be transposed. There should be few commas and even fewer semi-colons. ‘I evade semi-colons when I want my protagonists to speak in a breath – so, comma, comma, comma.’ She often talked about dialogue this way, as a breath. Sentences should not be broken up; she was not in the business of making things easier for the reader: ‘The rhythm and repetition are meant to irritate.’ She abhorred qualifiers which might ‘sweeten’ the text. Her language was not to be sweet, nor soft, nor ornamental, because her subjects were not sweet, and she rarely used ellipses, let alone exclamation marks. Everything should be said, not evaded, and the simpler, the more concise, the better: ‘I weigh words, I respect them, I work with them. Where there are repetitions, they are there for a purpose (rhythm and context). The English translator of her books to date has been Celia Hawkesworth and the publisher MacLehose Press. This book from what I can tell, retains the style and voice of the author – but is otherwise quite different to her two more epic novels – more of a part comic, part grotesque, part absurd combination of two short novellas. From an interview in 2014 https://www.bookaholic.ro/interview-w... this book though is a sentimental favourite of the author’s – partly because it is seen as so different by others Oh, there is one little book (we laugh). Yes, there is one little book that I love and nobody likes it. Well, let’s say that not many people like it. I don’t know why. Of course, it hasn’t been translated. There were good critiques of it, but it is, probably, a disturbing book. It’s called Doppelganger and it’s about two old people who meet on New Year’s Eve. Both are incontinent, they have diapers and, when the New Year’s Eve ends, they have manual sex through these diapers. But, in the background, you have the stories – one was a naval army officer from the Yugoslavian army and the woman was a Jew with some Austrian descendants and she came to live to Croatia – well, the country isn’t specified. While they’re meeting each other, you have, in the background, this police dossier story. It ends with their suicide. It’s grotesque, in a way. They told me it’s reminiscent of Beckett’s characters. These people, the police, the sex, it was all, probably, repulsive for readers. But it’s my favorite, I would really like to push it outside Croatia. Maybe just because not many people like it, as when you have a disabled child, I don’t know. I understand (from the FT) that Drndić gave this book to Susan (SD) Curtis – the founder of Istros - in recognition of her support for literature from the region described above. And rather wonderfully the book has two translators – one for each of its two parts – Susan Curtis for “Artur and Isabella” and Celia Hawkesworth for “Pupi”. The parts, are, appropriately for Drndić’s themes of examining the history of Yugoslavia and the role its establishment played in suppressing the history of its separate republics and the role of its inhabitants in abetting the Holocaust, are set respectively in: Croatia (a coastal resort) in two days as the Millenium ends; and (not actually named but clearly) Serbian Belgrade – ranging over many post War years. “Artur and Isabella” is the part that Drndić describes herself in her comments on the book above – climaxing first in the aforementioned sexual encounter which could only appeal to gerentophiles and a hand-job which runs alphabetically through the horrors of Nazi-ism, and with a second climax of a double suicide. Both characters have an obsession with collecting – Artur fine hats and Isabella, both chocolate balls (think Mozart balls from Salzburg) and a series of garden gnomes, one for each of her family lost in the holocaust. Their tale is interspersed with police surveillance reports. “Pupi” is a longer and more rambling story – Printz, born immediately post War and twice-divorced, lives in Belgrade in the mid-1990s with his father – once a secret service agent, his mother having recently died. His younger, louder and bigger brother and his equally big and demanding family live next door and rather surreally start to merge their two flats and take increasing amounts of living space for themselves (I was not sure if this was an allusion to the Nazi policy of lebensraum or to the interactions between the ex-Yugoslav republics in the Balkan wars). Printz rambles around Belgrade – speaking to himself, the rhinos in the local zoo, and anyone else who will listen (and a number of people who do not really want to) on a range of digressive topics – for example the film “The Night Porter”, funeral rites in different countrie, the French philosopher Althusser, the Hungarian physician Seemelweis. Appropriately given the title of the book – a number of links come up between the two stories: Printz’s experience of caring for his incontinent mother at the end of her life, is similar to the care Artur and Isabella carry out for themselves; Printz and another character discuss various cakes, sweets and tarts named after famous people, which has some overlap with Isabella’s chocolate collection; Printz and the character discuss the deaths of famous people, echoing a discussion between Isabella and Artur on famous epileptics; close to the book’s ending the narrator discusses a number of bizarre suicides; More directly some of the silver that Printz’s family still own from the post war villa they occupied is traced to a family of which Isabella was believed the last survivor. At one stage (in a kind of just reversal of the lists in Drndić’s more famous books) Printz lists famous people who died in the year of his birth – a list which of course includes a large number of executed Nazi’s. Overall this was a fascinating novel – I feel that I have barely scratched the surface of what is there ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Feb 19, 2019
Nov 18, 2018
|
Feb 19, 2019
Nov 21, 2018
|
Nov 14, 2018
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||
B07GBBCVHD
| 4.20
| 1,491
| Nov 01, 2018
| Nov 01, 2018
|
really liked it
|
Easy-reading but insightful partly-ghostwritten first–person account of Thomas’s famous Tour de France win, which includes brief sections by Sara Thom
Easy-reading but insightful partly-ghostwritten first–person account of Thomas’s famous Tour de France win, which includes brief sections by Sara Thomas, Rod Ellingworth, Tim Kerrison and Chris Froome. The book starts briefly with his Olmpic road race crash in 2016 and his double disappointment in 2017 (pulling out of the Giro when he was leader after time loss following a crash caused by a stationary police motorbike, and crashing out of the Tour when second on GC – after having held the yellow jersey for four days). Thereafter it is largely a stage by stage view of the 2018 Tour – as Thomas gradually realises his form is strong, struggles with the clear hierarchy in the team (the TTT instructions are to only wait for Froome; in a small hotel with inadequate air conditioning only Froome is allowed to use a portable unit); the euphoria of his back to back wins in the Alps; the increasing realisation in the Pyrenees that his form was holding much better than his opponents (although his frustration that even with a few days to go, the team was allowing Froome to plan an attack), the worries of those close to him that his bad luck would strike again and his run of crashes continue; the joy of completing the time trial. The final part of the book deals with: the tour after party (and a very insightful anecdote where he jokingly tells his teammates in his speech at the Sky after-Tour party that he is only sharing 1/7th of his winnings with them as they only decided to work for him as leader with three days to go); his homecoming (including a typically wonderful poem by Max Boyce which is reproduced in full). Recommended. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 16, 2018
|
Nov 19, 2018
|
Nov 09, 2018
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
1999859332
| 9781999859336
| 1999859332
| 3.80
| 675
| Mar 2017
| Nov 22, 2018
|
really liked it
| “Maybe the time will come when I want nothing more than to return to Buenos Aires, or maybe it will never happen. I try to imagine the feeling my p “Maybe the time will come when I want nothing more than to return to Buenos Aires, or maybe it will never happen. I try to imagine the feeling my parents must’ve had, the forced decision to stay so far from home. But I don’t have anything keeping me from going back, from picking my life right where I left off. Though the life I had before is impossible now. I stop on the bridge” Charco Press is an exciting new, small UK publisher which “focuses on finding outstanding contemporary Latin American literature and bringing it to new readers in the English-speaking world”. In 2017/early 2018 it published its first set of 5 novels. All of them were by Argentinian authors: “Die, My Love” – which I was, as a judge, delighted to shortlist for the 2017/18 Republic of Consciousness Prize for small presses and which then went on to be longlisted for the 2018 Man Booker International Prize; the deeply allegorical “President’s Room”; the delightfully playful “Fireflies”; and the flamboyant “Slum Virgin”; the short story collection “Southerly”. Its 2018 set of five novels by contrast features authors from five different countries. These include the cynical-realism “Fish Soup” (from Colombia), and three auto-fictional books: a meditation on a relationship with a military, political father “The Distance Between Us” (from Peru); an examination of grief and family relationships “The Older Brother” (from Uruguay) and an exploration of family relationships in exile from dictatorship “Resistance” (from Brazil). This the last of the five books is a return to Charco’s Argentinian roots. The book is set in the German university town of Heidelberg – the birthplace of the first party narrator whose academic Argentinian parents took refuge there in the 1970s from the Argentinian military junta. As an aside the author herself was the daughter of two philosophers who took refuge in Venezuela (where she was born). At the start of the book she has just landed in Germany “with my life in a shambles, without having told anyone in [her home] Buenos Aires what I was doing”. Effectively she is retracing her parents’ steps but in her case fleeing not from a dictatorship but instead seeking refuge from her own life and the seemingly irreversible breakdown of her relationship with her boyfriend (culminating in a big fight after which she slept with someone she met casually). And effectively having seen her plans for her adult life crumble – not just her relationship with her boyfriend but also her desire for a child (the two having tried and failed for two years to have children – something to which she traces the start of the deterioration of their relationship) – the place where she looks to take refuge is her own childhood and in what she describes as a “tiny make-believe” town – she even stays on the University campus despite not being a registered student. At the University she is befriended by a compatriot – Miguel Javier a Tucumano (from the North West) who has just fulfilled a lifetime dream by winning two scholarships to Europe – and by a Japanese student Shanice who left her Japanese university after a number of suicides. Quickly they work out that the narrator is pregnant – and then things take a turn for the slightly sinister and surreal. Shanice herself commits suicide – and her over-intense Mother stays after the funeral, seemingly reluctant to return to Tokyo and seemingly wanting to experience life as she believes Shanice might have lived it in future – so that she too ends up in a state of exile, of refuge from reality and in her case taking refuge in her daughter’s life (rather than her parent’s life). And the narrator befriends from distance Miguel Javier’s sister – who, to his disgust – says she will consult an odd-clairvoyant to ascertain the father of the child. Miguel Javier considers the psychic a dangerous influence and suffers his own dilemma, suddenly realizing that his own embrace of voluntary exile (in his case a hard-earned exile into his own ambition) renders him unable to protect his family from danger. Her stay at the University is facilitated by a chance reunion with a close childhood friend – one of her father’s students Mario – now himself a lecturer – and who has not returned to Argentina since the 1970s, treating exile as a permanent state. He introduces her to Joseph – a Turkish photographer (and it seems Mario’s lover) – whose debut exhibition is on the clash of cultures experienced by Turks living in Germany. The slightly mystical ending of the book, a dream-like encounter the drifting narrator has with Shanice’s mother and with some mysterious mini-bison-like animals reminded me, in a good way, of Murakami (and for example his “Wild Sheep Chase”). The translation is by Frances Riddle – who also translated the very different “Slum Virgin”. Just as with that book, and all of Charco’s titles, although I cannot judge the fidelity to the original (due to my own lack of Spanish) the effect in English is very natural. Overall this is a fascinating examination of exile in its widest sense and a worthy addition to Charco’s very impressive list of publications. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 10, 2018
|
Nov 10, 2018
|
Nov 08, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0007164629
| 9780007164622
| 0007164629
| 3.30
| 482
| Aug 01, 2007
| Jan 01, 2008
|
really liked it
|
In the week of Anna Burns much deserved win in the 2018 Booker prize – I attended an event at London’s most famous bookshop – Foyles, where the Man Bo
In the week of Anna Burns much deserved win in the 2018 Booker prize – I attended an event at London’s most famous bookshop – Foyles, where the Man Booker winner gave a reading and was interviewed by the literary editor of the New Statesman. In the New Statesman, simplified write up what was a key interview she is quoted as saying “In my first book, No Bones, the critics seemed to think I was writing about a dysfunctional family to show up the dysfunctional society, but it was actually the other way round. The Troubles was the backdrop and the family stuff felt more important and urgent. I think it’s because I’ve resolved something about family issues that I can now do the “bigger” issue – which actually, for me, is the lesser issue.” My own recollection is that her answer was more complex. I recall her saying that her first book "No Bones" was dealing with her issues as an individual; her second “Little Constructions” with her issues with the family unit; and that finally now in her third book “Milkman” she was able to consider her issues with the society in which she grew up. And that fits my views on “No Bones” – which in my review (https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...) I described as examining the long run mental effects of a dysfunctional family (in a dysfunctional society) on an individual. Anna Burns, in a recent interview with The Irish Times, described this her second novel, as “not, for me, about any Northern Irish paramilitary organisation, or about the Troubles, or any government administration of any area . . . for me, it’s about the domestic madness and collusion of the family and associates of the insane leader of a murder gang. That could be any murder gang. What does their consciousness do with what it really knows all along but has to pretend to itself that it doesn’t know?” And again I would agree with this description – the book I feel examines, in its widest sense, dysfunctional (particularly violently so) and abusive families (or communities). Further its real subject is how those families/community units only continue exist due to the fear-induced self-deception and unwillingness to even acknowledge to oneself the abuse (let alone to confront it within the family unit, or to admit it to others outside that unit) that is practiced by other family members, including the victims themselves. She also examines how the winder community can often collude in the violence – far too often (my interpretation) taking the message of the Good Samaritan as being that those that passed by on the other side, avoided personal cost. A more detailed review of the plot of the book is in Paul’s review here – and his comparison to “Martin John” is an interesting one as, just like with that book, I found at times the combination of humour and the subject matter crossed a line for me. I would also nuance slightly Paul’s apparent contrast between the (now famous) lack of names in “Milkman” and the over-abundance of them in “Little Constructions”. Instead I would see this book as a large step away from the standard nomenclature of “No Bones”, towards the techniques that Burns used in her Booker Prize winning book. John Doe (to quote Burns above “the insane leader of a murder gang”) and Jane Doe (whose ultimate fate or even existence forms the limited plot of the novel) as well as variations on the Doe theme - are of course the fictitious names used in British (and more these days) American law, in cases where the person’s real identity is either deliberately being concealed (for anonymity purposes) or is unknown (commonly for example Jane Doe is typically used for unidentified female corpses). The link with that Burns is trying to examine in this book is of course clear – as is the way in which the ploliferation of Doe’s ends up mirrored in the “third-brother-in-law” etc approach of Milkman. We also see the naming of various groups (for example the Ordinary Decent and the Fifth Faction) presaging the similar treatment in “Milkman” and the naming of an imaginary town (Tiptoe Floorboard) as a large step towards the unnamed town of “Milkman”. Overall a fascinating read and even more fascinating step along the literary journey that lead to the best Booker winner for many years. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 09, 2018
|
Nov 10, 2018
|
Oct 31, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0993009387
| 9780993009389
| 0993009387
| 3.92
| 171
| Jan 2016
| Sep 24, 2018
|
really liked it
|
Re-read following its long listing for the 2019 Republic of Consciousness Prize. Replay the major scene; get on top of it. Take your life into yourRe-read following its long listing for the 2019 Republic of Consciousness Prize. Replay the major scene; get on top of it. Take your life into your own hands. Your past belongs to you. Explode the ambient discourse: spit in their soup, which was already pretty murky. Weave your monologue my dear, that’s what I told myself” This book is published by Les Fugitives, a wonderful small publisher “dedicated to publishing short works by award-winning francophone female authors previously unavailable in English”. I was delighted to be one of the judges that shortlisted their Blue Self Portrait by Noemi Lebefevre and Sophie Lewis (translator) for the 2018 Republic of Consciousness Prize. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My knowledge of its subject – the French-American artist Louise Bourgeois (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_...) is extremely limited – I have only previously come across her as someone discussed in Rachel Cusk’s Goldsmith shortlisted “Kudos” in the section when Faye and an interviewer are chatting as a sound check ahead of a television interview, the passage begins: “The artist Louise Bourgeois, for example, was suddenly all the rage in her last years and finally allowed to come out of the closet and be seen, when her male counterparts had been on the public stage all along, entertaining people with their grandiose and self-destructive behaviour. Yet if one looked at the work of Louise Bourgeois, one saw that it concerned the private history of the female body, its suppression and exploitation and transmogrifications, its terrible malleability as a form and its capacity to create other forms …. Interestingly, when Rachel Cusk recently read from her book at the University of Goldsmith for the shortlist readings, it was this passage that she chose to start her reading. I will finish my Goldsmith comments by noting that Olivia Laing in her own shortlisted novel “Crudo”, has her Kathy Acker/I narrator reading a New Yorker article about another author and decrying that author’s concentration on bourgeois lives – that author (with some quick Googling) turning out to be Rachel Cusk. Cusk’s brief concentration on a Bourgeois life was my only real base for exploring this novel. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jean Frémon, the author of this book, by contrast, knew Louise Bourgeois over a period of thirty years. He commissioned her first European exhibition in 1985 – three years after the MoMA retrospective on her work bought her into the art mainstream at the age of 70 (see the first sentence in Rachel Cusk’s passage as well as the Wikipedia entry for details). This book (translated by Cole Swensen) is his imagined life of Louise, written from Frémon’s own memories of her, but written as though told by her in a, mainly second person (but occasionally first person), interior monologue looking back across her life as she lives in New York at the end of it. I feel that the key to what Frémon is attempting is to allow Louise to interpret her own work – and to place it in the context of her life and particularly her upbringing – this self-interpretation is in contrast the French art world who “ignored you for fifty years, and when they finally noticed you existed .. couldn’t wait to tell you what you’d been doing” and the rooting of her work in her upbringing a contrast to the “refreshing” Americans who “see everything as if for the first time” . Frémon, through his interior Bourgeois draws on the image of the hare and the tortoise, and of a contrast between those who are artistically “gifted” (or, my interpretation, who are immediately recognised as such by the arts establishment) and those who are “ungifted” (my interpretation – less immediately recognised) and whose work gains force from the substitution of immediate recognition and instantaneous interpretation with a measured, retrospective examination of their message – something which of course applies in an extreme way to an artist whose work was only really appreciated after her 70th year. “The ungifted tend not to like themselves very much, and they often don’t like their work either. And so they work feverishly in an unconscious attempt to flee success when they glimpse it, unwittingly protecting their work. Their power to touch viewers, to say something, stays more alive by being constantly put off until later. And it’s precisely in this later that their force resides, Later may well never arrive, but it retains a potential that right now quickly exhausts” Frémon via his Louise-interior monologue draws out some of the foundational themes that created Louise’s work: He examines her love of her mother – who died when she was still young (having been unwillingly left by her “mere” Louise took refuge in “la mer” with a failed suicide-by-drowning attempt and then a trip across the sea to America to form a new life). He further discusses her representation of her mother in the form of a spider – for Louise the spider, far from the threatening, sinister representation it has in much of Western art, is instead a symbol of protection (shielding mankind from disease carrying flies), of resourcefulness, of watchfulness and most importantly of maternal care. In terms of Greek mythology, Louise’s interpretation is that Minerva punished Arachne (and turned her into a spider) for “her insolence in accurately depicting the turpitudes of the Olympian Gods” , their “mischief and duplicity” and seduction of nymphs – a role that Louise herself happily embraces – exposing via the figures in her work the hypocrisy of her father, his incessant affairs (particularly that with Louise’s governess), so undermining and denouncing his false claims to authority and the wider issue of patriarchy “all fathers are vain braggarts and vacillators, particularly mine and all presidents of absolutely anything .. are ineffectual and pretentious, strutting about … all Don Quixotes … All .. who flaunt their authority, who hide behind their authority, who constantly convince themselves of the sold basis of their authority are ridiculous balloons that we pop like the plump paunches that constitute their entire catechism” He also looks at her love of mathematics – studying it at the Sorbonne and finding its absolute truth and unarguable worldview acted as a counter to patriarchal systems that seek to reinforce themselves by imposing a subjective worldview as an objective one – this love, particularly of geometry, finding expression in her work: “As an adolescent, you developed a passion for geometry. To be mentally present at the unfurling of a curve, at the turning of a sphere, at the intersection of a plane and a figure filled you with calm. Above all you wanted an abstract character, all affect stripped away, all passions hidden, just geometry. As well as security, with everything predictable, a code that nothing could disrupt, happiness. It’s a domain beyond authority – paternal, professorial, social …” On the back cover, no less a figure than Siri Hustvedt comments “There is something uncanny at play in this small book, something I don’t fully grasp, but I suspect that elusive, haunted excess may be exactly why I love it” I suspect that Siri Hustvedt grasped much more of the book than I did – but it is one that I really enjoyed, and one that made me happy to read or to quote from the book and Louise’s reaction to some art: “It’s a cultivated, refined, intelligent happiness, at that – with references to the history of art and sciences [my note – I would substitute “geometry”] thrown in”...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Feb 21, 2019
Nov 05, 2018
|
Feb 21, 2019
Nov 06, 2018
|
Oct 31, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1910695696
| 9781910695692
| 1910695696
| 3.86
| 5,049
| Aug 15, 2010
| Nov 01, 2018
|
really liked it
|
This book is published by Fitzcarraldo Editions, This book is published by one of the leading UK small presses, Fitzcarraldo Editions an independent p This book is published by Fitzcarraldo Editions, This book is published by one of the leading UK small presses, Fitzcarraldo Editions an independent publisher (their words) specialising in contemporary fiction and long-form essays ….. it focuses on ambitious, imaginative and innovative writing, both in translation and in the English language . Their novels are (my words) distinctively and beautifully styled, with plain, deep blue covers and a "French-flap" style, and are often complex and dense. Perhaps none more so than “Compass” by Mathias Enard –originally published as “Bousolle” in French in 2015, it was translated by Charlotte Mandell and published by Fitzcarraldo in 2017 and went on to be longlisted for the 2018 Republic of Consciousness Prize and shortlisted for the 2018 Man Booker International Prize. I described that book as “a Sebald-esque meditation on the Middle East (particularly Syria, Iran and Turkey), on Orientalism, and the relationships and interactions of Westerners (archaeologists, writers, musicians, academics) with that area over the last few centuries.”, as “important but ultimately enjoyable” but at times turning into “some form of cultural essay or doctoral thesis.”. This book although only just translated into English, also by Charlotte Mandell, was originally published 5 years before “Bousolle” and, while stylistically very different – an easy to read novella – is thematically very similar and in fact was clearly the literary precursor to the ideas that Enard explored in more (if at times excessive) detail in his later book. The book draws on established historical fact, and some ambiguous archival evidence, to build a speculative fictional tale. In the early 1500s, an out of work Leonardo da Vinci, was in contact with the Court of the Ottoman empire, about a possible job in the court and a number of engineering proposals, including bridge (in the form of a single parabolic arch) across the Golden Horn from Stambul to Pera/Galata. After rejecting da Vinci’s proposed bridge it is then believed that in 1506 the Ottoman Emperor’s court approached da Vinci’s rival Michelangelo for an alternative proposal. Michelangelo was then in dispute with the Pope over payment for his work. The opening of this book deftly sketches out the above – but whereas history tells us that Michelangelo rejected the request due to his Christian faith, the book posits that he did in fact accept and spent a period in Istanbul designing the bridge. There he: is befriended by the (real life) poet Mesihi (who was under the sponsorship of the Grand Vizier); is entranced by both the Byzantine and Ottoman architecture and design that he sees as well as the cosmopolitan nature of the City (where different faiths, races and nations mingle); is besotted with a singer – a refugee from the fall of Grenada and the end of Al-Andalus; frustrated by once again being at the economic mercy of a great and parsimonious ruler; narrowly escapes being killed in a place intrigue. Returning to Italy – an epilogue points out that in 1509 the Constantinople Earthquake would have obliterated the traces of Michelangelo’s bridge and therefore the impression that he made on Istanbul – but the book implicitly argues that the reverse is not true and that his trip to Istanbul made an indelible impression on his future work. The five silver anklets around the slim leg, the dress with its orangery tint, the golden shoulder and the beauty spot and the base of the neck will show up in a corner of the Sistine chapel a few years later. In painting as in architecture, the work of Michelangelo Buonarroti will own much to Istanbul. His gaze is transformed by the city and otherness: scenes, colours, forms will permeate his work for the rest of his life. The cupola of St Peter is inspired by Santa Sophia and Bayezid’s mosque: the library of the Medicis is inspired by the Sultan’s which he visits with Manuel: the statues in the chapel of the Medicis and even the Moises for Julius II bear the imprint of attitudes and characters he met her, in Constantinople. This theme of intermingling of the Orient and the Occidental in art is of course explored in much greater depth in Compass. Interestingly – whereas Compass was, in my view, both too erudite and excessively detailed – I almost felt the opposite with this book. Even from my limited knowledge of historical and present day Istanbul, I felt there were some thematic links which were omitted from the tale. For example I was surprised not to see a reference to events in the Fall of Constantinople in 1453: in particular the notorious sea chain, a crucial part of the Cities defences which was dragged across the entrance to the Golden Horn to prevent sea attack on the Northern shore (the famous land walls protecting against a land attack); how the chain failed in 1453 after the audacious manoeuvre by the Ottoman army to drag their boats across land and down into the Golden Horn; how the first Ottoman "bridge" across the Golden Horn was the pontoon of boats that was built in the final stages of the siege. Also given the author’s key underlying theme – the bridge of East and West – to concentrate on a bridge across the Golden Horn, rather than another of Da Vinci’s proposals (a bridge across the Bosphorus Straits), one even Da Vinci identified as linking Europe and Asia – seems a strange decision, albeit necessary if taking Michelangelo as subject. Nevertheless this was an enjoyable, stimulating and evocative read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 24, 2018
|
Oct 25, 2018
|
Oct 23, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1911284207
| 9781911284208
| 1911284207
| 3.78
| 362
| 2014
| Oct 04, 2018
|
it was ok
|
This book is published by a small UK publisher Tilted Axis who publish “books that might not otherwise make it into English, for the very reasons that
This book is published by a small UK publisher Tilted Axis who publish “books that might not otherwise make it into English, for the very reasons that make them exciting to us – artistic originality, radical vision, the sense that here is something new.” Their name refers to their aim to tilt “the axis of world literature from the centre to the margins ...… where multiple traditions spark new forms and translation plays a crucial role. It was founded by Deborah Smith, the English-Korean translator of Han Kang’s The Vegetarian , winner with her of the 2016 Man Booker International Prize – and shortlisted with her for the 2018 Man Booker International Prize, with the beautiful and haunting The White Book. This book is written by Hwang Jungeun and translated by Emily Wae Yon. An earlier novel by the same author (albeit a different translator) “One Hundred Shadows” – was one of Tilted Axis’s first publications. I refer any potential reader to Paul’s expert review here – which contains an interesting discussion of the skilled translation from Korean, particularly the Romanisation of Korean characters, and some of the wordplay taken from the characters in the protagonists’ names. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... From my own view, I can only really judge the book as an English language book – and I found it disappointing: a rather simple family plot, too many dream sequences, far too much cooking, some fairly simplistic word play (for example the equivalent of a character Eileen – known in abbreviation – and who uses this to speak of herself in abstract in the third person while actually aurally appearing to use the first person - “Ei did this”) and a lack of depth to what I think was the underlying theme of the book – the choice of either a depressed fatalism in the face of adversity or the willingness to (in the English title of the book) go on with life. As an aside I am normally not keen when books have translated titles different to the original – it never seems to inspire confidence in the rest of the translation, but in this case it was justified. The Korean title being a wordplay from a scene which in the translation simply cannot really work and instead comes across like a schoolchild discussion of who likes and does not like Soy Sauce. So overall not a book for me – nevertheless Titled Axis remains an impressive, admirable and valuable addition to the UK literary scene. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 27, 2018
|
Oct 28, 2018
|
Oct 22, 2018
|
Paperback
|
Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer > Books: 2018 (190)
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.37
|
liked it
|
Dec 28, 2018
|
Dec 23, 2018
|
||||||
4.05
|
liked it
|
Dec 26, 2018
|
Dec 21, 2018
|
||||||
4.34
|
really liked it
|
Dec 19, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
||||||
3.75
|
liked it
|
Dec 17, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
||||||
3.52
|
really liked it
|
Dec 16, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
||||||
3.61
|
liked it
|
Dec 14, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
||||||
3.57
|
really liked it
|
Dec 13, 2018
|
Dec 08, 2018
|
||||||
3.91
|
really liked it
|
Dec 05, 2018
|
Dec 01, 2018
|
||||||
3.78
|
really liked it
|
Dec 03, 2018
|
Dec 01, 2018
|
||||||
3.54
|
liked it
|
Dec 03, 2018
|
Dec 01, 2018
|
||||||
3.64
|
it was ok
|
Dec 09, 2018
|
Dec 01, 2018
|
||||||
3.44
|
it was ok
|
Nov 28, 2018
|
Nov 25, 2018
|
||||||
4.16
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 29, 2018
|
Nov 24, 2018
|
||||||
3.55
|
really liked it
|
Feb 19, 2019
Nov 21, 2018
|
Nov 14, 2018
|
||||||
4.20
|
really liked it
|
Nov 19, 2018
|
Nov 09, 2018
|
||||||
3.80
|
really liked it
|
Nov 10, 2018
|
Nov 08, 2018
|
||||||
3.30
|
really liked it
|
Nov 10, 2018
|
Oct 31, 2018
|
||||||
3.92
|
really liked it
|
Feb 21, 2019
Nov 06, 2018
|
Oct 31, 2018
|
||||||
3.86
|
really liked it
|
Oct 25, 2018
|
Oct 23, 2018
|
||||||
3.78
|
it was ok
|
Oct 28, 2018
|
Oct 22, 2018
|