Iraq — it somehow seems so long ago; an already forgotten war like Korea, or a mistake-from-the-beginning nightmare like Vietnam that we just wish we Iraq — it somehow seems so long ago; an already forgotten war like Korea, or a mistake-from-the-beginning nightmare like Vietnam that we just wish we could forget. And yet within just hours of finishing this darkly remarkable book, I was informed by my newsfeed that "7 US troops (were) hurt in a raid with Iraqi forces that left 15 suspected militants dead," which then went on to tell me — much to my shocked surprise — that the U.S. still has 2,500 troops in Iraq. Who knew??
I read Abrams' Fobbit — an Iraq War update on "Catch-22" (WWII), "M*A*S*H" (Korea) and "Good Morning Vietnam" (Vietnam, obviously), that also harkens back to Homer's "Odyssey" (the original fucked-up road trip) — almost a decade ago, and so it's hard to compare the two as I don't remember Fobbit in any great detail. However, this one was a helluva novel, both in terms or story and in sheer writing prowess. Focusing on one six-hour trek across Baghdad, Abrams goes into the past lives of each of his characters and bounces between narrative voices (mostly a first-person plural "we,” but occasionally shifting into a second-person "you") in a way that never allows us to identify with any particular protagonist (or even identify just who is the narrator), and so remains a true page-turner until the very end, as you're never sure who will live or die, or even who are the good guys and who are the villains, (spoiler: "everybody" and "nobody" to both).
Strong but seriously bleak story, so be forewarned. I listened to this one, but wasn't really taken with the narrator, so would probably recommend the paper or ebook version....more
Brilliant, subtly beautiful, and massively nerdy not-quite-coffee-table book whose heroes are those scientists, researchers and taxonomists studying tBrilliant, subtly beautiful, and massively nerdy not-quite-coffee-table book whose heroes are those scientists, researchers and taxonomists studying these "evidences of evolution" in labs and basements of natural history museums around the world.* Indeed, "the not-so-simple act of naming is the ground zero of knowledge about nature…as such, taxonomical naming is the first step to take in the effort to save life on Earth." As such, it is a paean to—and convincing argument for—the vast, unseen-by-the-public collections of specimens built up over centuries, especially in light of recent advances in molecular and genetic research, while also asking (if not quite answering) the question "when is enough?"
So…yay, bio-geeks!
[image]
[image] (Recently discovered lizards from Burma, the blue ribbons indicate these are all "holotype specimens," i.e., the original specimen representing a species, against which all others will be compared)
[image]
[image]
So yeah, not "ooh and ahh" beautiful like many such books, but great in its own way—especially for anyone who is a natural (and nature) collector themselves. Far too much here to go into in detail, so strongly recommend anyone interested look for this book themselves, (Amazon has "very good" copies for around $6). But just as an amuse bouche, here's a sample of some of the stuff I learned:
• Butterfly wings are brilliant on top and dull on the bottom, because when they land on plants and trees they fold their wings up, so that the dull undersides serve as camouflage. Meanwhile, moth wings are dull on top, as they DON'T fold their wings and so it is that top surface that hides them at rest.
• Hermaphrodites vs. gynandromorphs—the first just have the sexual organs of both sexes, while the latter have a greater diversity of both male and female characteristics (seen mainly in insects, crustaceans and butterflies).
• Vestigial vs. exapted—i.e., structures like the human appendix and snake legs that were once functional but which through evolution have totally lost their purpose or even disappeared altogether; vs. structures whose original purpose has evolved into something that now fulfills a new role, such as bird feathers (changing from a warming feature to a flight function) or penguin wings (changing from flight to underwater navigation).
• Beavers are the world's second-most “adept adapters,” manipulating their environments and creating entire new ecosystems to levels only surpassed by humans. ALSO, beavers are so well adapted to aquatic life that in the 18th century, they were classified as "fish" and could be eaten by Catholics on fasting days!
• Most insects have four wings, but beetles only have two, as the top wings have evolved into hard protective coverings to allow them to burrow—thereby exploiting a previously ignored ecological niche; ALSO, beetles alone account for 25% of all animals on earth (while all arthropods account for a full 90% of living creatures); ALSO,, insects are the only truly winged animals, as everything else—birds, bats, dinosaurs—evolved wings from other limbs.
• Convergence (kind of knew this before, but better explained here)—how similar traits evolve separately in unrelated species. Examples are how birds, bats, insects, gliding mammals and pterosaurs all independently evolved flight mechanisms; while eels, snakes, earthworms and caecilians (bizarre snakelike mammals—look 'em up) have evolved into whatever the hell they are.
• Sand dollars are WAY cooler than I ever realized, knowing them only as beach relics. However, living sand dollars play a crucial role in ocean maintenance, and are just bizarre little creatures—there are various YouTube videos you can watch, most of which (like much good science, since we grownups have "more important things to think about") are aimed at children.
• And a huge shout-out here to my boy Alfred Russel Wallace, who has always been more of a footnote in the story of evolution, running a close second behind Darwin, (and we rarely focus on who came in second right?). However, as the global biosphere suffers more and more from climate change, habitat loss and invasive species, Wallace is belatedly receiving the full recognition he deserves as the father of 'biogeography," which in its relatively shorter term impacts is becoming more relevant than Darwin's really long term evolutionary changes. Indeed, while Wallace is best known for his Malay Archipelago, it's actually his The Geographical Distribution of Animals that is more important/relevant today.
ALSO, NEW VOCABULARY I LEARNED BUT WILL LET YOU LOOK UP YOURSELVES:
And yes, as some other reviewers have noted, one star off for the super small type printed in gray—but that only brings my rating down from 10 stars to 9. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR ALL THOSE PEOPLE WHO KNOW WHO THEY ARE.
* While the text here is universal, all of Middleton's wonderful photos are of samples in the massive collection found at San Francisco's California Academy of Science. ___________________________________
MY OWN PERSONAL TAXONOMY: I've long had a "nightstand reads" bookshelf for good—if long—books that can be (and are best) read slowly before bedtime, a random chapter or so at a time. However, obsessive-compulsive that I am, I realized I need another shelf for those other books—generally larger and therefore more bloody awkward—that are also best read slowly but definitely NOT in bed, which in my case means early morning with a cup of coffee in our small sunroom. Which I guess is…a warning? In that I'll be tossing some already-reviewed books onto that shelf, which means they'll probably pop up again in my overall feed since I STILL CAN'T FIGURE OUT HOW TO MAKE A SIMPLE CHANGE WITHOUT REBROADCASTING THE ENTIRE REVIEW TO THE WHOLE WORLD. So…apologies in advance....more
Absolutely brilliant book, and an auspicious coincidence that it marks my 2500th book on GR.
Unlike most photographic books on the topic, Lindesay didnAbsolutely brilliant book, and an auspicious coincidence that it marks my 2500th book on GR.
Unlike most photographic books on the topic, Lindesay didn't set out to take a bunch of beautiful pictures of the Great Wall* (although many of them certainly are); his goal was one of "rephotography," a relatively new discipline aimed at recreating/rephotographing as closely as possible images from the past, and an important tool in the fields of cultural, historical architectural and landscape preservation. To that end, the author/photographer/adventurer first went about collecting as many photographs of the wall as he could find—and not surprisingly, between the late 19th century introduction of "mobile" photographic equipment (which brought an end to the centuries-old tradition of explorer/illustrators) and then China's messy early 20th century history, there really weren't that many—and then spending several years traveling the length of the Wall and accurately recreating those photos; in the process documenting the many changes—some good, most bad—that have taken place over the past 100+ years. As many of the photos were poorly documented to begin with, and so much of the landscape and Wall itself has changed, actually finding the spots from where those photos were taken—many in the middle of empty deserts or other wilderness areas—often required the combined skills of Sherlock Holmes and Indiana Jones, as Lindesay spent days interviewing nearby inhabitants, hiking from hill/mountain/dune to hill/mountain/dune, taking two steps to the left and then two steps to the right…truly an epic undertaking.
The book is divided into seven major geographic sections, running from Dunhuang in the western Gobi to where the wall ultimately meets the Pacific at Shanhaiguan. Before that, however, Lindesay offers a fascinating overall history of the wall and its construction (or walls and their constructions, as he correctly explains), "discovery" of the wall by the West, appearance and incorporation of the wall in early maps, history of photography in China (including a nice shout-out to "Hartung's Photo Shop" and Hedda Morrison, author/photographer of the fascinating A Photographer in Old Peking), etc. And then scattered throughout the book, he includes brief biographies of those early explorers and photographers of the wall, such as Aurel Stein, William Geil, Robert Clark** and Arthur de Carle Sowerby, Sha Fei and others; (note to self: definitely time to reread Hopkirk's Foreign Devils on the Silk Road). And so while you may originally think you came to this book for the photos, you will ultimately stay for the informative and addictive text.
Anyway…just an overall outstanding enterprise here—both in Lindesay's initial project and the end product—with my only caveat being that since this is a large and horizontal book, the binding is once again too weak for the weight of the pages; and so this is best read flat on a table, rather than propped up on your lap.
PROVENANCE: I can't believe that someone actually surrendered this to "McKay Used Books" - obviously in unread condition—to be resold for just a few bucks; everlasting shame on that idiot, but great for me!
ALL THE STARS. ___________________________________
* There are obviously many picture books available on the wall, although the only one I currently own is the "buy-it-in-the-giftshop-before-you-get-back-on-the-bus- tourist-book" 長城 The Great Wall, which I have reviewed separately.
** SYNCHRONICITY! I love synchronicity: I had never heard of Clark—an heir to the Singer Sewing Machine fortune—before, but literally on the same day I was reading about him here, I also came across his name in Bob Eckstein's Footnotes from the Most Fascinating Museums, where he lists the "Clark Art Institute" in Massachusetts. Apparently, however, that's just another boring painting museum, and not a repository of cool Great Wall artifacts collected on his China trips, much to my disappointment....more
Kudos to DK for branching out from their trademark "Eyewitness" picture books with this new "Big Ideas Simply Explained" series. WhiLONG ONE; SORRY...
Kudos to DK for branching out from their trademark "Eyewitness" picture books with this new "Big Ideas Simply Explained" series. While also featuring attractive, graphics-heavy layouts...
[image]
[image]
[image]
...this (and I assume all the other titles*) is both literally and figuratively heavier** than the usual DK books; offering 300+ content-rich pages that lay out the entire war chronologically, battle-by-battle and political-action-by-political-action; interspersed with topical coverage of such issues as the aerial bombing of civilians, military medicine, aircraft technology and use of mechanized vehicles, etc. It also provides lesser but no less fascinating detail on the smaller campaigns in Africa (both East and West), Italy, the Caucasus, Arabia, Asia (which tied in nicely with an earlier read, The Battle Of Penang), etc.; as well as side-bar portraits of various key figures, including - among many others - Milunka Savić…and HOW HAVE I NEVER HEARD OF MILUNKA SAVIĆ?? This real-life "Mulan" took the place of her tubercular brother and served as a man in the Serbian army until her gender was revealed during treatment for the first of an eventual nine wounds. Anyway - read the below, and check out this short clip (or any of the others) on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBtHf... - to learn more about this amazing woman, considered the "most decorated female combatant in history."
[image]
But back to the book: there is really just so much here that was new and interesting (and generally shocking) to me, it's hard to organize it into a coherent review - so I'll just list a few things I found particularly fascinating and/or just previously hadn't realized:
- The book does a great job highlighting how the war influenced - or was influenced by - other events around the world, including the Armenian Genocide (with 600,000 to a million deaths), the Easter Rising in Ireland, the Great Influenza (usually but erroneously called the "Spanish flu," and which ultimately killed between 50-100 million worldwide), the fight for Arab independence, etc. And while I knew a bit about the Bolshevik Revolution that pulled Russia out of the war, I'd never even heard of the subsequent Russian Civil War, where the "White" Russians fought the "Reds" to the tune of yet another 10 million casualties, most of whom were civilians, (and yes, the numbers throughout this book - whether casualties, length-in-days of specific battles, amount of munitions fired in a given period, or pretty much ANYTHING - are just staggering to the point of becoming almost meaningless).
- Aside from Milunka, there was a whole bunch of other people I had never (or only slightly) heard of before - big names like Ataturk, Haig and Luttendorf; but also "minor" figures like New Zealand's Harold Gillies, the father of modern plastic surgery; Daniel Daly, the Marine most famous for his "come on you bastards, do you want to live forever?" line at Belleau Woods (see page photo above)- but who by that time had already won TWO Medals of Honor for his earlier actions in China and Haiti (and who then received a third nomination for Belleau Woods); and Flora Sandes, a British ambulance driver who rather than return to England also joined the Serbian army, and became the only British female uniformed combatant to serve in WWI.
- Fun with terminology: WWI saw the first stormtroopers ("Sturmtruppen" - and why are Germans the best at coming up with new words: this one, "blitzkrieg," "schadenfreude…"?), as well as the first tanks - so called because they were nicknamed "water tanks" during development, so as to keep them a secret from the enemy, (their original, official name at the time was the totally lame "landships;" also, early tanks were considered "male" or "female," based on whether they were armed with a full-sized cannon or just a machine gun).
- Speaking of tanks: The war not only saw the world's final large cavalry charges, but the spring of 1918 saw the first tank-on-tank combat, which later played such a big role in WWII. The same period also saw the introduction of the Paris Gun, an absolute beast of a cannon (256 tons, 69 ft. barrel) that shelled Paris from a full 35 miles away, launching 234-lb. shells so high (26 miles) that they had to take the spin of the earth into account when plotting their trajectory; and which being fired from so far away fell silently if inaccurately on an unsuspecting Paris, causing more psychological than physical damage.
- Underground warfare: Endless miles of tunnels were dug by both sides, largely for mining purposes; not only did many collapsed, but they occasionally dug into enemy shafts where they engaged in hand-to-hand underground combat - pretty much the worse thing a claustrophobe like me can imagine.
The book starts with a nice overview of pre-war conditions (German and Italian frustration with their relative lack of overseas colonies, 50 years of pretty much unbroken smaller wars on the continent, etc.); and then concludes with a similar review of post-war issues (the continuing Spanish Flu; impact of the lack of marriage-age men across Europe; the sad fate of the millions or war widows, who received little support and general condemnation if they even considered remarrying; and finally the ominous rise of Hitler and Mussolini).
Towards the end, the book starts to lose steam - or at least exhaustion sets in - as it becomes a seemingly endless slog of battle after battle, covering and recovering the same terrain…but then that was the war itself. Overall, though, this was a riveting read, although it took me about two months to get through, a couple pages at a time. Highly recommended for anyone who wants a comprehensive but non-textbook overview of the Great War - although I have to question the "Big Ideas Simply Explained" tagline, since a lot of this was fairly dense, at least for my old brain.
FINAL NOTE: And okay, I'm sorry to get all political again - but intentional or otherwise (the book was just published this year), this chart on the rise of Fascism is one of the best descriptions I've seen on the "MAGAmerican" rise of Donald Trump:
[image]
Anyway - this book? All the stars. ____________________________________
* Sadly, while I really enjoyed this book, with the exception of the similar "World War II" book, I have ZERO interest in any of the other titles in this series, which sound much more academic than popular - Astronomy, Biology, Black History, Economics, Feminism, Islam, Law, LGBTQ+ History, Math, Philosophy, Politics…I mean, like, NO interest; it sounds like those nightmares where I'm back in high school.
** ONLY complaint is that the binding is too weak to support the weight of this large book - and so it's best read flat on a table, since at least with this fairly new library copy, the front cover had almost completely separated by the time I was finished....more
Pretty much a direct sequel to Eyewitness World War I (if we skip over the Great Depression), although this book surprisingly has only 10 GR ratings vPretty much a direct sequel to Eyewitness World War I (if we skip over the Great Depression), although this book surprisingly has only 10 GR ratings vs. the other's 330 - no idea why that would be. Much like that book; with all the medals, weapons, vehicles, political cartoons, and other physical survivors of the war, reading this book is much like touring a good museum, with a similar impact - highly informative but lacking the emotional depth of actually understanding what the war was like; for that, you're better off just watching something like "Band of Brothers," "The Pacific," or "Saving Private Ryan."
And also as with the WWI book, despite how much you think you already know there's a lot to learn here. In my case, such things as how barrage balloons were used; the vast variety and creativity of spy gadgets; the various cypher machines besides the "Enigma;" how children survived - or in a surprising number of cases, participated in - the war; and numerous others. The book also does a good job of highlighting the "other" and often forgotten theaters of the war - Burma, North Africa, and both the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans.
One minor criticism I have with a LOT of these books is the odd, silly or downright dumb captions added to many of the photos. Example, it's ridiculous to the point of insulting to point out where the trigger and grip are on this submachine gun:
[image]
…when what we really want is an explanation of the doodads on this anti-tank rifle on the very next page:
[image]
Anyway - and otherwise - another great book in the Eyewitness series. Next up - "The Vietnam War"!...more
Each photo includes a brief caption (printed too small and in a hard-to-read gray - but really, the only flaw in an otherwise perfect book, and including such gems as "highland guides entertained by the fact they were about to shoot their arrows within centimetres of my head as a joke") and map showing where it was taken. And while the text is minimal, the visuals are stunning enough to send me to Google to look up the differencce between Huli wigmen and Asaro mudmen, as well as Melanesia, Polynesia and Micronesia.*
As this was printed in Australia, I have no idea how it ended up in a used book store in Virginia, (indeed, this wasn't even listed on Goodreads, so had to add it myself) - but good news for my Down Unda friends who may be able to find it locally. (You can also see more of Kirkland's work at www.kirklandphotos.com.)
* So Melanesia is basically PNG, Fiji and Vanuatu; Polynesia is the more easterly islands of Hawaii, Samoa, Easter Island and (oddly, at least to me) New Zealand; and Micronesia contains the scattered smaller islands of Palau, Nauru and the Marshalls (hence the "micro")....more
While previous editions of this book were already excellent, this 2020 revised edition is even better, as it came out shortly after the major, multi-yWhile previous editions of this book were already excellent, this 2020 revised edition is even better, as it came out shortly after the major, multi-year renovation of the Fossil Hall - right before the 2019 opening and then immediate closing due to COVID.
While the book could have used more dinosaurs (you can never have too many dinosaurs), it's a truly complete, hall-by-hall overview of one of the world's premiere natural history museums - right up there with the American in New York. Can't wait to revisit!!
Highly recommended addition to the bookshelf of any natural history nerd (they're a thing, right?) - especially if you can find it for under $3, as I did at Manassas' famous "McKay Used Books" this weekend. An afternoon very well spent :)...more
Wow, this one was heavy - both literally and figuratively.
I continue to marvel at "Corey's" intricate plotting, especially as we approach the conclusiWow, this one was heavy - both literally and figuratively.
I continue to marvel at "Corey's" intricate plotting, especially as we approach the conclusion to the overall Expanse saga; no idea how he/they have managed to keep everything straight, but this was an absolute - if somewhat convoluted - barn-burner and page-turner.
What with the increasing weirdness of the protomolecule, there were an increasing number of "blink-of-an-eye" moments that changed everything, and a surprising number of high-profile casualties - including both humans and spacecraft, many of which have been with us from the very beginning. (Not a spoiler per se, but I found it ironic that the one major crewmember who dies in the TV series (view spoiler)[ - Alex - (hide spoiler)] is one of the ones who actually makes it to the end.)
Plotting aside, the authors remain masters at dialogue - each main character has such a distinct voice that you can almost always tell who's talking even without actual identification. And then both plotting and dialogue further aside, there's also some really tasty descriptive writing here as well:
"Done," Jillian said, the single syllable sharp and hard as a thrown rock.
…followed just two sentences later with:
Her crew were being pressed back into their couches like God had his palm on their chests.
And okay, maybe the final set piece is just a little too "Rogue One," but that's a minor complaint.
Am already mourning the fact that there's only one more book to go - but then our library just got in the first book of Corey's new trilogy, The Mercy of Gods, which I'm just praying is even half as good....more
Read this together with The World War I Book, another DK book in their new and so-far-interesting series of "Big Ideas Simply Explained," (which I'll Read this together with The World War I Book, another DK book in their new and so-far-interesting series of "Big Ideas Simply Explained," (which I'll review separately when finished*). However, as that one is considerably longer (it's a wordy "grown-up" book, vs. these EYEWITNESS books which are much more graphic/pictorial and so probably aimed at young readers, although I also really like 'em), I got through this one much faster. In fact, this book was pretty much like spending an afternoon looking at the exhibits and reading the signs in a very well-done war museum, like any of the excellent WWI museums in Belgium, or any of the major Civil War museums not far from where I live now.
So five stars for the book itself, as I'm a sucker for both the DK style and anything WWI. However…this has got to be at least the third if not fourth major redesign of the EYEWITNESS books since I starting reading them in the early '90s, and must say I'm not really enamored of the new design. But like all such print makeovers - magazines, newspapers, etc. - it usually takes a while to get used to the changes, and so I'm sure I'll eventually like this new format as well. Still, a jarring change from the earlier cover.
*Meanwhile, just two of the astonishingly horrific facts I learned in this book: during just the first day of the battle of the Somme, Germany killed or injured two British soldiers along every 3 feet of the 16-mile front; and by mid-1917, the British were firing over a million artillery shells PER DAY. And this was just the FIRST world war; since then we’ve obviously had a second, and I increasingly worry that we’re on the brink of a third - i.e., final - one…...more
Probably the two most discouraging - yet frequently used - words to describe the illegal trade in endangered species: "Chinese demand." Demand for shaProbably the two most discouraging - yet frequently used - words to describe the illegal trade in endangered species: "Chinese demand." Demand for shark fin, tiger bones, seahorses, etc., etc...and now (although surprisingly for neither the dining table nor medicine cabinet), the arowana, which has become a much sought-after lucky charm and status symbol in Chinese communities around the world. Even my wife's otherwise favorite uncle kept a huge silver arowana in a small, barren tank just inside the front door of his Taipei apartment (where the fung shui was strongest, obviously).
Yet despite the ultimately depressing subject matter, I just loved this book, as it hit so many of my personal sweet spots: Southeast Asia (Taiwan/Singapore/Borneo/Burma), wildlife, jungles, rivers, even Alfred Russel Wallace.
Aside from following the author's single-minded (if at times frankly hard to understand) global search for the wild arowana, Voigt also goes off on delightful and/or informative tangents on such subjects as the history of domesticated animals, biogeography, overlooked/"ripped off" scientists (not just Wallace as he was basically screwed by Darwin; but also Peter Artedi, who was not only plagiarized by Carl Linnaeus - he of "order, genus, species" fame - but [many suspect] may have even been murdered by him), Burmese politics, rain forest devastation and a host of other topics - all of which made for fascinating and informative reading. She also introduces a delightful cast of supporting characters, including the indestructible (and thoroughly unreliable) explorer/collector Heiko Bleher, “dragon whisperer” Alex Chang, Singapore's “Kenny the Fish” and Burma’s Tin Win, as well as historical oddball Ida Pfeiffer, who circled the globe twice in the mid-1800s, wrote two best-selling books - both of which are available from the Gutenberg Project (yay!) - and apparently hated everybody everywhere, (and I will definitely read more about her).
My only complaint - and it is a BIG one - is that while I appreciated the scattered maps which were essential in following her travels through such remote regions as Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo), Tenasserim (the "tail" of Burma), and the Putumayo (Colombian river which feeds into the Amazon); this is after all a book about tropical fish…so where the hell are the photographs? Voigt goes to great lengths describing the calligraphic-like patterning of the newly discovered "batik" arowana (in which she played a small role)…so SHOW US! But no; aside from the moody/artsy photo on the cover - cool as it is - there's just nothing other than a couple of B&W naturalists' sketches, (also from the mid-1800s). Frankly unforgiveable, and almost knocked a whole star off my rating.
But - just couldn't do it, as everything else was just that good. While lacking the humor of Redmond O'Hanlon (Into the Heart of Borneo), Voigt writes with the journalistic chops and "put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is" adventurous spirit of Carl Hoffman (The Last Wild Men of Borneo; Savage Harvest), which is no faint praise. Sadly, while this book came out back in 2016, the internet shows no indication that Voigt has been working on anything since then...which is a shame, as I would definitely love to see what she comes up with - and where she goes - next....more
Title says it all - delightful, comprehensive overview of the past 130 years of graphic design, which is just about as long as it's been an actual thiTitle says it all - delightful, comprehensive overview of the past 130 years of graphic design, which is just about as long as it's been an actual thing. Obviously, huge changes at the beginning, and you can really see a decade-by-decade evolution in typography, layout, illustration, etc. But then once you hit the 1960s, things start to level out a little bit - particularly in the area of logo design, with so many logos from back then are still around today, either in their original or updated form, (such as Paul Rand's 1967 makeover of his original 1956 IBM logo - bottom right):*
[image]
(WARNING - MAJOR DIGRESSION) And so it seems - to me at least - like certain aspects of graphic design have become like certain aspects of rock music: they've both reached a level of maturity (or IMHO, "perfection") where further evolution has been minimized, or at least slowed down. I mean sure, there's rap now, and dance and techno and stuff; but at the same time there's still ROCK - two guitars, singer and drums - with groups like Foo Fighters and Green Day (and okay, I get that I'm already dating myself), sounding are pretty damn close to things like "Master of Puppets" (nearly 40 years old) and "Who's Next" (over 50) - and yet my kids still listen to them both. But go back a half century before that? Ragtime and big bands, trombones and the Charleston.
But back to graphics...and just in time, because in fact one big change DID come along in the last decade or so -the widespread use of computer graphics that opened the door to all those cool flying graphics on CNN and other broadcast/internet/digital platforms, as well as the whole new field of 3D logos:
[image]
…which are super cool, but also self-limiting (again, my opinion) in that for many/most of them, there are no longer simple one-color versions.
Anyway...fascinating book with copious illustrations - so one to be slowly savored, (several other reviews note the relative lack of explanatory text, but I personally like the emphasis on the designs themselves). Only possible critizism is that as Taschen is a German publisher, this is perhaps a little too Western/Euro-centric; it certainly could have used more Eastern design, especially Japanese (which was represented by only about 5 pages out of 500). In fact, the only other Asian work I spotted at all was a few English-language pieces from "The Father of Hong Kong Design" Henry Steiner,** who is probably most famous in the U.S. for his work with Hong Kong Shanghai Bank, but who "out there" was/is a genuine legend, (great introductory article on Steiner here: https://zolimacitymag.com/steiner-ser...). ____________________________________
* This makes sense, of course, since logos are designed to last for decades; while packaging, advertisements, posters, magazines, etc., are intentionally designed to be ephemeral, and so are more affected by design/marketing trends and fashions.
** And I also had the pleasure of knowing Steiner (who coincidentally studied under Rand at Yale in the '50s, but was much less frightening in person) when I was a young designer in Taipei and he was the undisputed godhead across East Asia - in fact, we at one point were in discussions about him possibly buying our company or perhaps merging it with "Steiner&Co," until my idiot business partner totally fucked it up.
[image] (Left to right: 40-years-ago me, Steiner, idiot business partner)...more
My only uncle was a U.S. Marine during WWII and Korea, and then later went on to a far longer career with IBM - yet to his dying day, in his heart (anMy only uncle was a U.S. Marine during WWII and Korea, and then later went on to a far longer career with IBM - yet to his dying day, in his heart (and all of our minds) he was first and foremost a Marine. And in a way that's kind of what's happened to me as well; from the mid-'70s to the early '90s, I was a professional graphic designer, until I just…stopped. Life happened, I returned to the U.S. and have had enjoyable second and then third careers elsewhere for the past 30+ year. But in my heart of hearts, I realize I am still a designer, even though my grown children have never known - or thought of - me as such.
And so anyway, this was a near perfect book for me (if - or so I thought - perhaps no one else), bringing back just a ton of memories. Yet as with The Book of Eels: Our Enduring Fascination with the Most Mysterious Creature in the Natural World, the book's cover called this an "international bestseller;" and to my astonishment the GR ratings and reviews seem to back that up - so, I dunno, go figure. But by the end I too was convinced that this is indeed a book for everyone, (or at least everyone who's ever admired a movie poster or even simply used Microsoft Word - although my one coworker told me near-daily that "I can't believe you're reading a book about…typefaces??"), and so am most happy that so many of you similar folks out there also found and enjoyed this wonderful book.
Just My Type hit home on so many levels and in so many places. For someone who already considered himself fairly well-steeped in the minutia of typography, I still managed to learned a helluva lot. History, of course - the backstories of the printing and typesetting processes, the "behind the scenes" stories of particular typefaces and type designers (including superstars like Hermann Zapf, Matthew Carter and Milton Glaser; as well as bad guys like Eric Gill, ultimately as famous for his "interest" in incest and bestiality as he was for his typefaces), but also beautiful trivia about the phrase "mind your p's and q's;" where the terms "uppercase" and "lowercase" come from (aka "majuscule" and "miniscule;" since while we often refer to uppercase as "capital letters" there is no equivalent term for lowercase letters); the evolution of the ampersand and the Interrobang, and the difference between Linotype and Monotype machines.
One needs to read this book with Google handy, so you can check out things like the unique "P" in Palatino, or the subtle differences between Helvetica and Arial, (or, okay, Eric Gill's weird sexual fetishes). The book also includes a number of great quotes, my two favorites being "I love to be a designer, but could we get rid of clients somehow please?,*" and "By all means break the rules, and break them beautifully, deliberately and well. That is one of the ends for which they exist."
But again, best of all were the personal memories it brought back. Childhood memories of Dymo label makers and my mom's old Selectric "golf ball" typewriter, where you could actually change fonts (gasp!!); college memories of California job cases and setting type by hand…and then all the professional memories that followed, many of which focused on the "hardware" of the time (all now long extinct) - rubber cement and waxers; T-squares and triangles; X-acto knives and Dexter mat cutters, French curves and ellipse templates; Rapidograph pens and Letraset dry-transfer sheets (which never gave you enough "e"s) - just great stuff.
_______________________________
* Clients - whaddya gonna do? I can now chuckle - although it was crazy frustrating at the time - when I recall how every single Taiwanese client would ultimately tell us: "I love the design - but could you make it RED?," (red being the "lucky color" in all Chinese cultures). But as you can see from the below sample of typographic logos we designed back in the '80s, it did kind of limit the range of one's portfolio…blue NEWS logo? How did you make it in there?? :) [image]...more
"WE STAND NOW where two roads diverge. But unlike the roads in Robert Frost’s familiar poem, they are not equally fair. The road we have long been tra"WE STAND NOW where two roads diverge. But unlike the roads in Robert Frost’s familiar poem, they are not equally fair. The road we have long been traveling is deceptively easy, a smooth superhighway on which we progress with great speed, but at its end lies disaster. The other fork of the road—the one ‘less traveled by’—offers our last, our only chance to reach a destination that assures the preservation of our earth."
Rachel Carson wrote those words over 60 years ago, but they remain truer - and more frightening - today than ever. At the time, she focused her attention solely on the excessive use of pesticides, herbicides and other chemical "-cides" in the control of insects vis-a-vis agriculture, forestry and public health; which seems almost quaint today in comparison to the far greater list of threats currently facing the planet - animal-spread pandemics, climate change (did you see where Venezuela just became the first country to lose all of its glaciers?), forever chemicals, microplastics, biodiversity loss/mass extinctions, ad f'ing infinitum.
But what I found most surprising (and ultimately discouraging) here is that people were actually shocked by her book when it came out, and the government - multiple governments! - actually listened. In large part due to Carson's writings and the nascent environmental movement they helped launch, between 1963 (shortly after publication) and 1974, a combination of both Democrat and Republican administrations managed to pass the Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act, as well as create the Environmental Protection Agency. But can we look forward to anything like that happening today, with our fractious partisan politics and a presidential candidate who is determined to roll back environmental protections completely if reelected? Because the root problems identified by Carson in the 1950s are the same ones we are dealing with today - greedy corporations (staffed by "scientists" and lobbyists who put profits and job security ahead of legitimate problem-solving); an ignorant (if not outright science-denying) populace; and a head-in-the-sand belief that "everything will be okay."
I only read this book as Carson had gotten an extended shout-out in The Book of Eels: Our Enduring Fascination with the Most Mysterious Creature in the Natural World for her work as an oceanographer, which I hadn't known about - mainly because I hadn't really known anything about this amazing woman other than that she had written this particular book, which I then figured it was probably high time I read. But I came to it with limited expectations, expecting a touchy-feely "Walden"-esque vibe - I certainly didn’t expect to be either shocked or angered by some 70-year-old problems that I figured had apparently been largely resolved in the meantime.
But man, was I wrong.
THAT SAID, HOWEVER: Carson was - and surprisingly, still is - not without her detractors. When I searched for this book at our library, it also surfaced something called Silent Spring at 50: The False Crises of Rachel Carson, written and published by the right-wing CATO Institute. Which (because I generally like to hear both sides of any position) I also borrowed; but also which (because I quickly realized that life's too short) I frankly am not going to actually read beyond its jacket blurbs, which disputed most of Carson's findings, basically noting that DDT was/is an apparent Godsend; bird populations in fact thrived at the time; and cancer is, like, no big deal. So since I'm not reading it, I won't properly review it, other than to go ahead and call a resounding "bullshit" on the whole thing.
Some technically beautiful - if generally horrific, in its matter-of-fact depiction of WWII jungle warfare - writing here; not sure why war writing isSome technically beautiful - if generally horrific, in its matter-of-fact depiction of WWII jungle warfare - writing here; not sure why war writing is some of the best out there, but this book (like so many others in the genre) was just excellent:
Joe nailed his man with one shot. It took me three. My target grabbed a rifle and began shooting in the general direction of New Guinea until finally a dum-dum opened him up like an umbrella.
When Japs start getting ambushed by blokes armed with the shocking power of Thompson submachine guns, and then frontally assaulted by belly-wriggling berks while a Vickers or a Bren blasts everything that isn't lizard-flat, suddenly the joy goes out of war. We haven't seen a Jap yet who's laughing.
It had been a useless sort of day. Bluey and Slim were going rotten with ringworm tinea, and Irish had a swollen and infected eye. Possum had dysentery; and now, three feet away, Best was shuddering with another attack of the wog. The world is a dribbling sponge of sodden earth and rain.
Missim is a commissary stuffed with bullets and biscuits and bullamacow, fed from the skies by flocks of aircraft which drop cargo from God for the white massas who wear green. So that they can keep on killing the yellow men who wear brown.
It's like that bloke somewhere in the Guinea who collects Jap ears in a jar of formalin. They say he plans to stick the jar up behind the bar in his hometown pub. But why? Probably illegal anyway. When the Japs do anything there's big palaver in the press and its called Atrocity. People back home may find the sons and brothers they knew so well have changed a bit.
And all of this took place in just a few dozen square miles of New Guinea's towering, forest-covered mountains, as can hopefully be seen in these increasingly-zoomed-out maps:
[image]
[image]
[image]
This was a GR friend recommendation, so many thanks. Same person also recommended Pinney's other travel writing, but unfortunately this is the only one of his works I could find at a reasonable price here in the U.S., (Pinney is an Australian whose books are apparently mainly available Down Unda, much the shame). But will definitely keep an eye out for more. Meanwhile, I also plan to watch (or rewatch) some films like "The Thin Red Line," "Hacksaw Ridge" and HBO's "The Pacific," although these all deal more with the U.S. Army's island-hopping battles up the South Pacific, rather than Australia's protracted jungle fighting just north of Queensland, (for that, I'm looking for the Australian film "Kokoda," but it's hard to find).
THAT SAID: I unintentionally found myself reading this in conjunction with both Eat the Buddha: Life and Death in a Tibetan Town and Only Killers and Thieves, and only later made the connection that all three books deal intimately with man's never-ending inhumanity towards his fellow man (and woman). Especially what we white Westerners see as the human "other" - aboriginal/native peoples, former colonial subjects, our historical condescension towards Asians in general (consider how the Japanese were dehumanized so much more than the Germans in WWII), etc. So, y'know, at least in the short term this is a theme I'm happy to get away from for a while…time now for something LIGHT....more
As hilariously funny as it is surprisingly informative, the von Hoffman brothers provide all you'll ever need to know about the full range of "manly" As hilariously funny as it is surprisingly informative, the von Hoffman brothers provide all you'll ever need to know about the full range of "manly" products, people, sports, services, entertainments, and general trivia. A random sampling includes:
Weber grills; Victor McLaglin; all four verses of the Star Spangled Banner; the history of "Poker Dogs;" Jack Daniel's; Zippo lighters; Punkin Chunkin; spud guns; home of the Bass Pro Shop (Missouri's top tourist attraction); Snyder's Pretzels; Spartacus; Lockheed's Skunk Works; Corry's Slug & Snail Death; Buck knives; Mud Flap Girls; WD-40; Coleman camping gear; the Mustang Ranch; the National Freshwater Fishing Hall of Fame; John Wayne (and there is a LOT of John Wayne)…
And then there are the lists: Top 25 Guy Movies; Best Names for Your Dog, Horse, Boat or Tank; Best Nicknames for Breasts/Your Johnson; Unusual & Painful Job Site/Industrial Accidents; Best Films on the Subject Of…(bullfighting, dogs, craps, swordplay, etc.)…
Probably read a good 90% of the book, since I'm apparently just 80% “real man” - I skipped the hunting/camping/fishing parts; and bad knees as a kid (Osgood Schlatter's Disease - a real thing!) kept me out of team sports, and so never became a fan of any of those. But there is definitely something here for everyone; and a helluva lot for most everybody else - including the following, which is one of the greatest, most bizarre ads of all time:
[image]
And to top it off in terms of overall "sheer manliness," the bottom of every damn page includes a photo of a specific and unique fishing lure:
[image]
[image]
This book definitely has the feel of something you'd find at "Five Below" (U.S. discount chain where all products are $5 or less); but it’s a genuine treasure wherever you find it. Best read over a period of weeks if not months, one page at a time with a glass of good bourbon on ice....more
I really enjoy these oral histories that walk you through the creation of some major movie or series, as described by the various projects' creators aI really enjoy these oral histories that walk you through the creation of some major movie or series, as described by the various projects' creators and actors - have read others on "Fury Road," "Purple Rain," and the "John Wick" films. And of course, half the fun is then - or simultaneously - rewatching the movies, knowing all of this new backstory. Usually, it's just spending a couple hours with a favorite film, (or with "John Wick," probably 9+ hours when you add in "Atomic Blonde" - which you have to do).
But rewatching "Game of Thrones"? That's 70+ hours…but over the past seven weeks I somehow pulled it off; and - my wife's exasperation aside - it was SO WORTH IT. Watching a few episodes (and HBO's post-credit "about the episode" extras), then reading the corresponding chapters (the preferred way for me, since if I read first it would spoil the plot - because rewatching this over a decade after it first began airing, I had forgotten A LOT), I got so much more out of this than I did the first time around…although that's usually the case with rewatching or rereading anything; the first time through, you're on the edge of your seat waiting to see what happens next, whereas the second time you can appreciate things with some foreknowledge of what's to come, and so enjoy the "okay, I see what he's setting up here" aspect of things.
So yeah, for me just a thoroughly enjoyable book in itself, but then a second 5 stars just for bringing me back to the show. It really holds up well - the CGI, the battles, the perfect dialogue and complex plotting. And while favorite characters remained favorite characters - Tyrion, Jamie, Brienne, Arya - I'd forgotten just how delightful and complex some of the second-tier roles and performers were - the Hound, Davos, Bronn, Podrick, Tormund, etc., etc.
A few final thoughts:
- Knowing how things turned out, it was interesting to watch Dany from the very beginning and realize so early on that "yup, she is one cold-hearted whackjob - how did everyone NOT see this coming?" And I eventually concluded that part of her problem was that - unlike the ultra-righteous Starks, who were brought up believing that "he who passes the sentence should swing the sword" - she never truly got her hands dirty. She ordered executions, she had her dragons burn people and entire cities - but she never "swung the sword" herself; and maybe that would have made a difference.
- Most heartbreaking relationships in the show (for me) were Tyrion and Shae, Brienne and Jamie, and then Stannis and his daughter. In fact, up until then the character of Stannis came off much better than I remember - he actually might not have made a terrible king. But as a father? Ultimately and absolutely the worst...totally deserved everything that happened from then on.
- And least heartbreaking? A tie between Jon Snow's two loves, as both of them were remorseless killing machines, which is always a red flag. Actually, it's just as well he's sentenced to celibacy at the end, because he just has shite taste in women…
HIGHLY recommended if you enjoyed the show, and ever have 100 hours to spare....more
Ah, my favorite Shaun Tan book (at least so far). Just a charming story that begins:
This is what I learned this summer:
And then goes on to list suAh, my favorite Shaun Tan book (at least so far). Just a charming story that begins:
This is what I learned this summer:
And then goes on to list such things as (among others):
Never eat the last olive at a party. Never drop your jar. Never be late for a parade. Never argue with an umpire. Always bring bolt cutters. Never forget the password. Never wait for an apology. Always know the way home.
Each "rule" is accompanied by just a wonderful full-page painting - including my favorite, which tells such a complete story in one simple picture:
[image]
Never ruin a perfect plan.
(Don't know if you can see it here, but these little Minion-like thieves in their homemade disguises are about to get caught)
Just a sweet callback to innocent summer days, from first page to last....more
One of Tan's best, with his trademark combination of whimsical storytelling and fantastic (in both senses) artwork. The drawings themselves are minor One of Tan's best, with his trademark combination of whimsical storytelling and fantastic (in both senses) artwork. The drawings themselves are minor masterpieces, but the overall layout - and detailed background areas - are also to be slowly savored.
[image]
With his unexpected aliens-among-us world-building, Shaun Tan is like the H.R. Giger for the under-12 set....more
Nice portfolio of drawings and painting by the author/artist of The Arrival, that has to be read at least twice - once just to marvel at his beautifulNice portfolio of drawings and painting by the author/artist of The Arrival, that has to be read at least twice - once just to marvel at his beautiful and whimsical creations, and then a second time in conjunction with the "Artwork Notes" at the end which includes a "when/what/why" blurb for each of the pieces.
Many of the characters here appear in Tan's other stories, including not just early drawings of both Eric and Cicada (who later feature in their own eponymous books), but a "where's Waldo" cast of background characters that pop up throughout his wonderful The Lost Thing. There are also early drafts of many of the final paintings in Rules of Summer, (all of which are worthy of separate readings).
While everything here is great, I personally prefer his earlier, simple pencil or ink sketches, such as the birdlike-creature below (Tan is big on birds):
[image]
….or his "emoticons," featuring his Sendak-like monocular critter who often serves as a stand-in for Tan himself:
[image]
Highly recommend his "storybooks" (such as those mentioned above), which - so far at least - have been universally charming. But equally recommend this collection of non-story works, covering over 15 years of production. Just a delight.
I've read a couple other non-fictions about the whole James Bond thing, but they were largely focused on the every-present spy-tech, or the changing cI've read a couple other non-fictions about the whole James Bond thing, but they were largely focused on the every-present spy-tech, or the changing character of Bond himself in the books or as played by the various actors. But this was my first book that looked at the whole "Bond-nomenon" as a cultural trend - from the original books to films to copycat TV shows to even Austin Powers - and so as such, was much closed to such other "entertainment histories" as The Spice Must Flow (Dune), They Shouldn't Have Killed His Dog (John Wick) and Let's Go Crazy (Purple Rain film/album/tour).
Overall, gotta say this was great fun, as McKay offers up a ton of new facts (which I enjoyed) and even more opinions, SO MANY of which I totally disagreed with. But we obviously share a semi-passion here, so he'd be the perfect guy to have a pint with and argue any of the following points, presented in no particular order (as I've already put far too much time into this):
- Maybe it's an age/generational thing, but McKay largely sees the Bond movies as comedies (although many more broad than others), and so is a staunch Roger Moore fan - probably his most unforgivable sin. As such, while he hated "Thunderball" (which I didn't think was that bad), he finds "Spy Who Loved Me" a high point in the series, and Jaws one of its best villains'…seriously??? I just don't know where to begin on this one…
- …and don't even get me started on Octopussy - absolutely a comedy, and absolutely unfunny. Surprisingly, McKay is even more generous here - even though this is the film that used a Tarzan yell as background to Moore swinging on a vine, and then literally put Sir Roger in both a gorilla suit and clown costume. He even gives the film points for not "browning up" actors to play the various Indian roles; but makes no mention of Louis Jourdan playing an Afghan prince (who I always thought was also Indian; guess this came out before Afghanistan was really on anyone's radar), who was at least "tanned up."
- One final damning quote on the whole Moore thing: regarding his final role in "A View to a Kill," McKay states: "This was 007 as Keystone Cops…For some, the comedy was off-putting; personally, I think it's wonderful. It's Moore at his charming, engaging best…" 'Nuff said…well, except that McKay also believes that "any bloody fool can play tragedy; it takes a special knack to pull off light comedy successfully." So, y'know, take that Anthony Hopkins!
- Moving on to the Brosnan era, McKay thinks Denise Richards was brilliant as Christmas Jones in "The World Is Not Enough" (although he totally misquotes Bond's awful final line in that movie), and also thinks Toby Stephens was equally brilliant as the ever-sneering Gustav Graves in "Die Another Day"…I just don't know what to say here.
- The book is full of British-isms, so at least I now know what "Received Pronunciation" is, (i.e., it's basically just the standard British accent). However, McKay's most (over)used word is the uber-British "naff" - obviously his favorite (along with "naffness, naffest"), which I totally had to look up, but basically means "unfashionable" or "lacking in taste." Casinos and hotels are all naff, as are shoes, watches, southern France…Indeed, McKay uses it so broadly that it reached a point where I started feeling like Inigo Montoya: "I don't think that word means what you think it means." Seriously - if you made this into a drinking game, you'd probably be pissed (another Britism) by chapter three. (Oh, and apparently in England, they spell "nonetheless" as three words, which to my Yank eyes just looks wrong.)
- While I learned a lot about England here, McKay doesn't seem to know much about the U.S. At one points, he claims that both Scully and Mulder in "The X-Files" worked for the CIA (they were in fact FBI); and in discussing American spy shows from the '60s, he lumps "I Spy" in with "Get Smart" as comedies, (and okay, while still fairly goofy, "I Spy" was certainly more serious than "Man from U.N.C.L.E.," and was one of the first TV shows to actually film on location, bringing much of the world to the rest of the world for the first time). Bizarrely, he also mentioned that the phrase "scaring the living daylights" out of someone "must have seemed utterly cryptic to American audiences…," again - really??
- THE MUSIC: Where to begin? McKay hated Sheena Easton's "For Your Eyes Only" and (rightly) A-Ha's "The Living Daylights," but loved Duran Duran's "View to a Kill;" he mentions a pretty bad Chrissie Hynde song - "If There Was a Man" - that played over the closing credits of "The Living Daylights," but then ignores Patti LaBelle's outstanding "If You Asked Me To" which served the same role in the next film, "License to Kill."* He also rather snidely dismisses the song from Connery's unfortunate "Never Say Never Again" as "a 1970s loungecore cabaret song" sung by "some woman;" and while it truly wasn't great, it was no worse than "All Time High" or "Nobody Does It Better," and was in fact sung by Lani Hall, the original singer with Sérgio Mendes & Brasil '66 and wife of Herb Alpert. (He also somehow manages to sound even older than me in describing the theme song from "Casino Royale" as being "belted out by someone popular with young people called Chris Cornell.")
But to be fair, there were other things he got right:
- McKay does a good job tying the evolving books and movies into world events (and in particular, British politics), even though both Fleming and producers Broccoli and Salzman tried hard to remain apolitical - so points on that score; a lot here I hadn't considered before.
- McKay also points out the importance of Bond re-releases in the days before video - something I'd kinda forgotten. Movies back then appeared in the theaters when they first came out, and then that was it until they (years later) popped up on TV. So the regular theatrical re-release of the movies - usually as double- or even (at all night drive-ins) triple-features was an important way to expose various generations to the entire Bond ouvré as it continued to grow. McKay also points out that of the entire mid-'60s glut of spy movies - some of which were very good - only Bond survived not only into the '70s, but somewhat miraculously up to the present day. Who but the cultist remembers Harry Palmer or Quiller?
- McKay enjoys pointing out many of the goofs and fashion faux pas throughout the series, but his record is incomplete at best. For example, while he rightly slams Connery's terrycloth pool outfit in "Goldfinger:"
[image]
…he fails to mention his nipple-length pink tie (or is it a bib?) in "Diamonds Are Forever:"
[image]
- And on the continuity front, he also overlooks one of the most glaring examples in "Thunderball," where Bond is literally shot in the leg in one scene, then is scuba diving the next day with nary a bandage in sight.
- McKay is also bitingly funny. He memorably notes that Roger Moore is an incredibly awkward kisser who consistenly "sucks his cheeks in, so that it looks as though the woman concerned is sucking all the air out of an old paper bag," (watch any Moore snog and you'll never be able to un-see this); and that Connery's toupee in "Never Again" makes him look like one of the puppets in the old "Thunderbirds" TV show. (He also rightly describes Charles Gray’s Blofeld in “Diamonds are Forever” as having “the aesthetic sensibility of a gay chihuahua.”)
- Finally, full points to McKay for generally calling bullshit on MI6, which in the Bond movies (and others, including all of le Carré's works) is portrayed as far more professional than our own CIA; while in reality the British Secret Service is much like the empire itself these days; a mere shadow of its former glory, more focused on its internal financial problems than the world's, (think more Jackson Lamb than George Smiley).
I could go on - okay; I've already gone on - but despite the above comments (or perhaps because of them), I really did enjoy this. That said, the book is probably best read in chunks. The first third is mainly Connery, next third Moore, and then the rest is, well, the rest; so that's how I read it. Sadly, the book ends with "Quantum of Solace" (which McKay also quite liked, totally ignoring the whole "filmed without a script" thing due to a lengthy writer's strike), so I would love to see him address the rest of the Craig films if this is ever reprinted, since I think that would resolve most of his outstanding issues: "can Bond truly be Bond if approached seriously?" (he can); "will the series survive without 'classic' M, Q and Moneypenny?" (it clearly has). ___________________________________
* Google the original video of this song to see a true diva performance by LaBelle - and I mean that in the best way possible. This song was also written by Diane Warren, who not only has over a dozen Oscar nominations, but has written hits for everyone from Beyonce and Lady Gaga to Cheap Trick and Meatloaf - go ahead and Google her as well. Indeed, Celine Dion took "If You Asked Me To" - while virtually stealing LaBelle's original arrangement - to number one just three years later....more