Shovelmonkey1's Reviews > Everything Is Illuminated
Everything Is Illuminated
by
Jonathan Safran Foer has magical powers.
No, really he does.
Look I'll prove it.
He can make anyone who reads his books spontaneously vomit adjectives in great abundance.
Proof?
The cover of Everything is Illuminated.
Let's examine the evidence:
Gripping, entertaining, dazzling - The Evening Standard
Outrageous, extraordinary - Financial Times
Hilarious, exhilarating, moving - Jewish Chronicle
Serious, funny - Herald
Powerful, shocking, harsh, sincere - List
Spectacular, funny, brilliant, moving - Observer
Showy, smart - Susan Sontag
Startling, original, comic, tragic - Nicci Gerard
Extraordinary, brilliant, shattering - San Francisco Chronicle
Glittering - Mark Lawson
Bold, exuberant - Daily Mail
Subtle, profound, fantastic, bold, imaginative - Boston Globe
Funny, brilliant - Esquire
Effervescent, reckless, vibrant, playful - TLS
Astonishing, shattering - Independent
See, the covers are spattered, inside and out, with a veritable adjective pebble-dash. Proof, Mr Safran Foer that you are not the only person in possession of a Thesaurus and that even the people at Esquire and the Daily Mail have one too.
Jon-fen is searching for a woman who saved his Grandfather during World War II. To find her, he has travelled from America to the Ukraine. He has only a photograph and a name. He had a map but that was eaten by the bitch. He is helped, and hindered in equal measure by Alex and his Grandfather who is responsible for the bitch. The bitch is a seeing-eye dog called Sammy Davis Jr, Jr. The inclusion of the dog is for humorous purposes. Jonathan is in the Ukraine to uncover a part of his family history, however his presence forces Alex's grandfather to examine his own past too. Alex acts as interpreter and guide and puts his own inimitable spin on the English language. Told in three parts with three separate voices, sadly none of which belong to the bitch, the tone of the book alternates between melancholy, mirth and malapropisms.
This book is difficult to categorise and many people have tried to cram it into the box marked holocaust. Others have said, no it belongs in the box called love. Or family. Or remembering. Or war. Or semi-autobiographical. Or biographical. Or atonement. Or lost. Or old country.
Does it really need to go in a box? Lets just put it on top of the box and see what happens.
by
Jonathan Safran Foer has magical powers.
No, really he does.
Look I'll prove it.
He can make anyone who reads his books spontaneously vomit adjectives in great abundance.
Proof?
The cover of Everything is Illuminated.
Let's examine the evidence:
Gripping, entertaining, dazzling - The Evening Standard
Outrageous, extraordinary - Financial Times
Hilarious, exhilarating, moving - Jewish Chronicle
Serious, funny - Herald
Powerful, shocking, harsh, sincere - List
Spectacular, funny, brilliant, moving - Observer
Showy, smart - Susan Sontag
Startling, original, comic, tragic - Nicci Gerard
Extraordinary, brilliant, shattering - San Francisco Chronicle
Glittering - Mark Lawson
Bold, exuberant - Daily Mail
Subtle, profound, fantastic, bold, imaginative - Boston Globe
Funny, brilliant - Esquire
Effervescent, reckless, vibrant, playful - TLS
Astonishing, shattering - Independent
See, the covers are spattered, inside and out, with a veritable adjective pebble-dash. Proof, Mr Safran Foer that you are not the only person in possession of a Thesaurus and that even the people at Esquire and the Daily Mail have one too.
Jon-fen is searching for a woman who saved his Grandfather during World War II. To find her, he has travelled from America to the Ukraine. He has only a photograph and a name. He had a map but that was eaten by the bitch. He is helped, and hindered in equal measure by Alex and his Grandfather who is responsible for the bitch. The bitch is a seeing-eye dog called Sammy Davis Jr, Jr. The inclusion of the dog is for humorous purposes. Jonathan is in the Ukraine to uncover a part of his family history, however his presence forces Alex's grandfather to examine his own past too. Alex acts as interpreter and guide and puts his own inimitable spin on the English language. Told in three parts with three separate voices, sadly none of which belong to the bitch, the tone of the book alternates between melancholy, mirth and malapropisms.
This book is difficult to categorise and many people have tried to cram it into the box marked holocaust. Others have said, no it belongs in the box called love. Or family. Or remembering. Or war. Or semi-autobiographical. Or biographical. Or atonement. Or lost. Or old country.
Does it really need to go in a box? Lets just put it on top of the box and see what happens.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Everything Is Illuminated.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 26, 2010
– Shelved
May 6, 2012
–
Started Reading
May 6, 2012
– Shelved as:
1001-books
May 6, 2012
– Shelved as:
read-in-2012
May 7, 2012
–
43.48%
"began this with a sceptical raised eye brow but am now quite loving it. it's a grower!"
page
120
May 8, 2012
–
84.42%
"I've been watching this moment head towards me for a long time. But it was almost worth waiting for."
page
233
May 8, 2012
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Manny
(new)
May 09, 2012 05:26AM
I'm not sure I'd take that as proof. Speaking from personal experience, it's easy to quote selectively from reviews and get whatever result you want.
reply
|
flag
That's true. But I didn't say that I was proving that all the adjectives were good, merely that there were many adjectives present regardless of positive or negative implications ;)
I think this just proves that the person who designed the cover liked adjectives! Occam's Razor, you know :)
Well there were other words in the reviews, but I just cherry picked out all the adjectives because they generally constituted the greater part of the review. There were other words too like often and and, and with and to and at...
Anyway I think I proved your point with that last statement so we'll leave it at that.
Anyway I think I proved your point with that last statement so we'll leave it at that.
Oh, I really think you should provide conjunction/preposition/pronoun-based extracts for comparison purposes! Artist's impression:
But... but... but - The Evening Standard
In... and out - Financial Times
Not... it - Jewish Chronicle
But... but... but - The Evening Standard
In... and out - Financial Times
Not... it - Jewish Chronicle
Ok here goes....
... no it really just is adjectives for the Evening Standard quote.
.... and the FT
...often... Jewish Chronicle
yet... Herald
...and...with...and emotion List
at time very... Observer
Enough?
ps I think MJs quote for the Dante/Pooh review was the best.
... no it really just is adjectives for the Evening Standard quote.
.... and the FT
...often... Jewish Chronicle
yet... Herald
...and...with...and emotion List
at time very... Observer
Enough?
ps I think MJs quote for the Dante/Pooh review was the best.
I must admit you're right - adjectives are punchier.
I also thought MJ's quote on Pooh/Dante was very fine! He has a cruel pen :)
I also thought MJ's quote on Pooh/Dante was very fine! He has a cruel pen :)
Magical, great, veritable, only, equal, humorous, inimitable, semi-autobiographical, biographical, lost - Shovelmonkey1
Heh. thanks Ian, i only just noticed this comment as I don't seem to get the full compliment of updates these days!
I really like the last line of your review :) fantastic!