Jacek Ambroziak's Reviews > Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future
Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future
by
by
I thoroughly enjoyed the book even if I have found myself in violent disagreement with many of its thoughts. The book opens up with these words.
Initially, I kind of liked this quote. It is indeed hard to imagine a new business to threaten the dominance of Google Search or Facebook's social network. But the fact that Google search dominates is not really a zero-to-one effect, but a decisive improvement over previously existing internet search engines. Facebook was not originally conceived of as a dominant social platform; it so happened that it turned out to be well liked by millions of people beyond the original community of Harvard students. In operating systems we already have Linux and Android (using Linux) which have way more deployments than Windows. So it is not the case that "every moment in business" happens only once, unless in a very literal sense.
Peter discusses "copying" with disdain, but not all "copying" is just copying, a lot of progress happens via semi-continuous improvements. This civilization does not only progress by one-off disruptive inventions. A lot of it is steady improvements. And these improvements occasionally lead to enabling zero-to-one (or dominating) developments.
Peter asks "What company is nobody building?" Like the previous quote, this question has some charm, but I think it too is misleading. Well, maybe nobody is building this "company X" yet, because it is not yet fully enabled. Eg. voice over internet existed in the lab (IBM?) since mid 70's, but Skype made sense only much later when lots of people got access to personal computers and these computers started being connected to the Net all the time.
Bottom line: it is not all "zero to one", nor it can be or should be.
I still give the book 5 stars as I enjoyed its thought provoking character; it was an engaging reading: disagreeing, agreeing, learning new perspectives. Highly recommended but please don't treat it as Gospel :-)
"Every moment in business happens only once.
The next Bill Gates will not build an operating system. The next Larry Page or Sergey Brin won’t make a search engine. And the next Mark Zuckerberg won’t create a social network. If you are copying these guys, you aren’t learning from them.
It’s easier to copy a model than to make something new: doing what we already know how to do takes the world from 1 to n, adding more of something familiar. But every time we create something new, we go from 0 to 1. The act of creation is singular, as is the moment of creation, and the result is something fresh and strange."
Initially, I kind of liked this quote. It is indeed hard to imagine a new business to threaten the dominance of Google Search or Facebook's social network. But the fact that Google search dominates is not really a zero-to-one effect, but a decisive improvement over previously existing internet search engines. Facebook was not originally conceived of as a dominant social platform; it so happened that it turned out to be well liked by millions of people beyond the original community of Harvard students. In operating systems we already have Linux and Android (using Linux) which have way more deployments than Windows. So it is not the case that "every moment in business" happens only once, unless in a very literal sense.
Peter discusses "copying" with disdain, but not all "copying" is just copying, a lot of progress happens via semi-continuous improvements. This civilization does not only progress by one-off disruptive inventions. A lot of it is steady improvements. And these improvements occasionally lead to enabling zero-to-one (or dominating) developments.
Peter asks "What company is nobody building?" Like the previous quote, this question has some charm, but I think it too is misleading. Well, maybe nobody is building this "company X" yet, because it is not yet fully enabled. Eg. voice over internet existed in the lab (IBM?) since mid 70's, but Skype made sense only much later when lots of people got access to personal computers and these computers started being connected to the Net all the time.
Bottom line: it is not all "zero to one", nor it can be or should be.
I still give the book 5 stars as I enjoyed its thought provoking character; it was an engaging reading: disagreeing, agreeing, learning new perspectives. Highly recommended but please don't treat it as Gospel :-)
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Zero to One.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
December 14, 2014
–
Finished Reading
December 20, 2014
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-37 of 37 (37 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Rahul
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Sep 28, 2015 02:59AM
great review
reply
|
flag
Good review but I think you might be misinterpreting parts of the book.Most of the book is about start up business, and in that sense Peter is talking about making sure your idea is either revolutionary or 10x better than the competition.
One of the approaches of achieving success when you don't have a wholly original idea (just a better way to do something) is to focus on a narrow niche and grow from there. This is exactly what most of his examples did, including PayPal itself.
I agree that this book is not the end all, be all of business literature, but there are some really powerful ideas contained within.
One of the approaches of achieving success when you don't have a wholly original idea (just a better way to do something) is to focus on a narrow niche and grow from there. This is exactly what most of his examples did, including PayPal itself.
I agree that this book is not the end all, be all of business literature, but there are some really powerful ideas contained within.
I would agree, and Facebook also had its predecessors; Sixdegrees launched in 1996 and Friendster launched two years before Facebook. Sixdegrees was just before its time. Dialup was slow, and many folks weren't on the Internet, yet. There wasn't even much content to share, which is a big driver of activity on Facebook. Timing is not everything, but it's significant.
Ellie wrote: "I would agree, and Facebook also had its predecessors; Sixdegrees launched in 1996 and Friendster launched two years before Facebook. Sixdegrees was just before its time. Dialup was slow, and many ..."
Timing & flawless/sticky execution (Amazon comes to mind)
Timing & flawless/sticky execution (Amazon comes to mind)
I agree. Peter is an investor so for him the initial idea is clearly very important. But the success of a startup is not all depending on just the idea or the product, it depends even so on superb execution, on your team and the internal innovation process. Chinese companies like Alibaba or Beidu all have copied the business model of westerner successes. Some even started with copied product like Huawie. But they all have undeniably succeeded.
So creating something new is obviously noble and nice but I dare to say every success must create something new and worthwhile. However, it's not necessary a new product or new technology.
So creating something new is obviously noble and nice but I dare to say every success must create something new and worthwhile. However, it's not necessary a new product or new technology.
Your review is really to the point! actually after reading 22 pages i feel like it goes more on Economics but after reading your review i build some courage to face the book again!
I agree with your thoughts, actually those were the lines that tickled me somewhere, made me read the book.
thanks 😊
thanks 😊
Excellent perspective and review -what an investor or entrepreneur considers innovative is really about application and scale on a new level as opposed to just a new idea. I agree that the “copying” perspective was overly simplistic. Steve Jobs did not come up with the “mouse.” Rather, he adapted the idea to a scalable level. Innovation is not just an idea, but rather an adaptive leadership style to modify a new idea on a large and disruptive scale.
Thanks for your comments. I like this book, also agree on Peter's assessments on Tesla. If I read this book earlier, I'll buy more, much more Tesla stocks. The burning question is: what other businesses these days could answer those 7 questions?
The first social network was in 1990s so you are clearly right. I felt exactly what you felt reading this phrase.
Great book.Have made a detailed summary chart of zero to one.The chart by itself is enough or else one can also use it as a great reading aid and save time.check it out at Instagram -summarycharts