Kathrina's Reviews > Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue: The Untold History of English

Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue by John McWhorter
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2569242
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: bn-concept-group

Well, apparently there's a lot more to John McWhorter than that he just happens to be the guy that wrote this book. I guess once you've created a reputation as an esteemed, literate, intellectual African-American schooled in serious linguistics research, people will start throwing you in front of a camera and asking what you think about Obama and what your politics are (social conservatism). Of course I had to watch a few, and couldn't get beyond the fact that his upper lip absolutely does not move, creating a slight lisp that is kind of charming and very distracting. But see how tv makes me superficial? I want to talk about the book, which was very good.
Reading the last chapter, when you realize that all of his hypotheses are being presented here, instead of some obscure linguistics journal, available for little old laymen like me to pick up and peruse for our entertainment, the information kind of took on a holy-grail aura. Well, duh, all you fuddy-duddies, McWhorter has just made the whole linguistic field comprehensible for everyone; what are YOU doing? His writing does, at times, get a bit repetitive, and he takes some real liberties with his metaphors, maybe a bit too cute, but he sure is persuasive. If you're looking for specifics as to what McWhorter discusses, I recommend goodreads member Manny's review. (I dunno how to link him, but he comes up first)
4 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 6, 2010 – Started Reading
September 6, 2010 – Shelved
September 6, 2010 – Shelved as: bn-concept-group
September 8, 2010 –
page 144
62.88% "I'm perturbed by McWhorter's whole debunking of Whorf's thesis that language limits the way we perceive the world. I want to believe that there are concepts we can't understand because we don't have the language to define them. Because we denote time in terms of past, present, and future, does that mean those are the only delineations of time? Can a form of time exist without having the proper language to define it?"
September 8, 2010 – Finished Reading

No comments have been added yet.