Ashley's Reviews > A Little Life

A Little Life by Hanya Yanagihara
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1343864
Fuck this book.

And it started out so well! The writing is actually gorgeous. I can see why many, many people like this book. Really, Hanya Yanagihara knows how to use language. Unfortunately, the story she told was not worthy of it. The longer I read this book, the more I dreaded reading it, the worse my feelings got as I read, and the more I hated it for existing. Then I read a bunch of interviews by her and hated the book even more.

The long and short of it is that this book is nothing but misery porn, on purpose. (Here's a Vulture interview where she talks about the inspiration for writing the book to create a book version of ombré cloth, which if you're not familiar, by the time you get to the end is pitch black. Yeah, let's make art that will stain our souls!!!!!)


This book.

Nothing in life is positive, there is only human suffering, true connection is impossible, predators will always find and ruin truly good people, everything is evil, the people who love you are not enough to save you, and your happiness will turn to ashes in your mouth. The End.

Fuck. This. Book.

There is a lot more that I could say about this book but I don't think I have enough time or space. Other people have criticized more articulately the implications of the way Yanagihara treats her gay characters, who exist seemingly only to suffer (while paradoxically others have praised it as the great gay novel). She also stated in several other interviews her desire to write a character so broken he couldn't be fixed, which she accomplishes in her protagonist Jude. Some have called this a melodrama, and that seems accurate. Everything is over the top, but stated in such bald and beautiful prose that it doesn't feel that way at the time. Instead, these larger than life events are made to seem trite and commonplace. Yes, there are bad priests in the Catholic church. Yes, the church covered this up. Do I think it's likely that an *entire abbey* (the whole thing!) full of Franciscans (the most peaceable and loving sect in Catholicism) would not only participate in child molestation, but condone it openly? Hell no*. One more ridiculous thing in this book on top of another. If it's unlikely and causes Jude lots of pain, just put it in this book!

*UPDATE 5/23/24: I am about three condescending comments away from closing my comments on this review altogether, but specifically please stop telling me that systemic abuse exists in the Catholic church, I KNOW IT EXISTS AND IT IS BAD. My point in referencing this is that it was just one more thing on top of everything else ridiculously implausible in this book that is taken way too far, and thus makes any eliciting of emotion impossible for me. I get that people like this book and it's their baby or whatever, but my not liking this book in no way harms you, a person who did like it. Stop condescending to me, thanks!

The real deal breaker for me was when I paused midway through the novel to read an interview where Yanagihara stated her criticism of psychiatry as a way to treat mental illness. The implication that some people are too broken to help and we should just let them die is so, so harmful, and in no way does it help to eradicate the stigma against mental illness in this country. We should not be telling "broken" people it's okay to die. We should be telling them they are not alone in their suffering, and help them find ways to cope with their illnesses and traumas. I will admit I checked out of the book then, and it was only a matter of time before I gave up and spoiled myself on the rest of it, so I wouldn't have to torture myself mentally any further.

Glad I did, because the end of this book is a big rusty nail up the butt.

This one from the London Review of Books is my favorite review of the book I've read so far. Let me quote my favorite part:
"He wishes he too could forget, that he too could choose never to consider Caleb again. Always, he wonders why and how he has let four months – four months increasingly distant from him – so affect him, so alter his life. But then, he might as well ask – as he often does – why he has let the first 15 years of his life so dictate the past 28."

The answer, of course, is that it’s Yanagihara’s design. That’s why it’s good to know that Jude is entirely her concoction, not a figure based on testimony by survivors of child rape, clinical case studies or anything empirical. I found Jude an infuriating object of attention, but resisted blaming the victim. I blame the author.

A Little Life has received some ecstatic reviews. The most intriguing of these is the novelist Garth Greenwell’s in the Atlantic, which argues that it’s the long-awaited ‘great gay novel’: ‘It engages with aesthetic modes long coded as queer: melodrama, sentimental fiction, grand opera,’ he writes. ‘By violating the canons of current literary taste, by embracing melodrama and exaggeration and sentiment, it can access emotional truths denied more modest means of expression.’ Perhaps I’m in thrall to current literary taste, but the only character in A Little Life who seems possessed of anything like ‘emotional truths’ or a sense of irony, the only supporting player in this elaborately ethnically diverse cast who doesn’t seem like a stereotypical middle-class striver plucked out of 1950s cinema, is JB. He’s temporarily ushered out of the narrative after he says to Jude: ‘You like always being the person who gets to learn everyone else’s secrets, without ever telling us a single fucking thing? … Well, it doesn’t fucking work like that, and we’re all fucking sick of you.’ JB’s also the one hooked on crystal meth. What real person trapped in this novel wouldn’t become a drug addict?

I think what makes the most angry about this book is that I do see flashes of brilliance in it. Images I loved, earned emotions. Early on in the novel, one character muses about being a guest in his own life. Another talks about photography in terms that made me stop in my tracks and pause the audiobook just so I think about what she'd written. Later, the relationship between Jude and his adoptive father and the love his adoptive father has for him made me cry. But all of that doesn't matter, when the end result is what we're given.

What it comes down to the fact that pain was the only point, and I think that is reprehensible.
5909 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read A Little Life.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 13, 2015 – Shelved
December 13, 2015 – Shelved as: to-read
December 13, 2015 – Shelved as: read-for-book-club
March 24, 2016 – Shelved as: audiobooks
March 24, 2016 –
1.0% "I'm scared."
March 26, 2016 –
4.0% "I was worried that this would be another literary borefest where middle aged white guys whine about middle aged white guy problems, but not at all! Should've figured, it's written by a woman. So far, it's mostly about friendship. And being poor in NYC."
March 26, 2016 –
6.0% "Am going to have to think more on this idea of being a guest in your own life."
April 2, 2016 –
11.0% "So I'm going to admit to you right now that I have completely spoiled myself for the rest of this book. And Sweet baby Jesus, I'm glad I did. I'm going to need to prepare myself for that shit!"
April 2, 2016 –
15.0% "Jude is going to murder me, isn't he."
April 2, 2016 –
19.0% "What the fuck."
April 3, 2016 –
22.0% "Random first person point of view from Howard. A letter to Willem?"
April 6, 2016 –
23.0% "You know, JB is an asshat, but it's sure not helping, Jude, if you're not telling him WHY you're so upset. None of them know! You are so self-destructive you can't even protect yourself properly!!! UGH IT'S SO FRUSTRATING."
April 6, 2016 –
26.0% "Oh my god this book can't even do happy without making it heartbreaking."
April 6, 2016 –
29.0% "I just read an interview with the author that really pissed me off, and now it's going to color this whole book. Ugh."
April 7, 2016 –
37.0% "It is becoming increasingly unlikely that I will finish this book in time for my book club on Sunday. It's not that I don't have time to listen to the remaining 22 hours of audiobook, just that I can't listen to it like I would most audiobooks, for hours on end. It's just not possible with this one. It's too draining. I need to take breaks, like, every thirty minutes. Sometimes loooong ones."
April 8, 2016 –
42.0% "Ugh I never want to listen to this. I started listening to Locke & Key instead and now I REALLY don't want to listen to this."
April 19, 2016 –
55.0% "I am crawling through this book like I am 1,000 years old."
May 3, 2016 –
58.0% "At this point literally the only reason I have not DNFed this book is pride. I finish books. It's what I do. But uggggghhhh I just want to be done."
Started Reading
May 27, 2016 – Finished Reading
May 31, 2016 – Shelved as: class-gender-race
May 31, 2016 – Shelved as: fiction
May 31, 2016 – Shelved as: lit-fic
May 31, 2016 – Shelved as: manly-men-and-their-manparts
May 31, 2016 – Shelved as: orphalins
May 31, 2016 – Shelved as: romantical-tragical
May 31, 2016 – Shelved as: you-wrote-about-what-now
May 31, 2016 – Shelved as: award-winners
January 24, 2017 – Shelved as: lgbtqia

Comments Showing 1-50 of 486 (486 new)


message 1: by Megan (new) - added it

Megan Mitchell this is how I think it'll go for me... that's why I haven't tried yet :( lol


Iona Oh no! Its sitting on my shelf waiting to be read....


Perry O yes!


Perry This damned manipulative manic overly wrought book that everyone "must" like for fear they be seen as not intelligent and PC. I hated this book too. Thanks for your review!


Robin "A big rusty nail up the butt"--- brilliant and oh so true! "Misery porn"--- yes! "Reprehensible"--- completely. Worst read ever, probably. I wanted to wash my brain when I was done with it. Fantastic and accurate review. Can we be friends??


message 6: by Joe (new)

Joe Great review, Ashley. This novel is neck and neck with the one about the girl on a train as far as mass popularity on Goodreads at the moment. I don't believe I'm the demographic for it. I enjoy storytelling. Language, not so much. Thank you for the warning. Would you say there's a bleak novel that you liked?


Bianca I agree with Fuck This Book!
Unlike you, I didn't find the writing that exquisite.


message 8: by MichelleG (new)

MichelleG Great review! Although now I am questioning my purchase. I have audiobook ready downloaded to my phone :(


message 9: by Philip (new)

Philip I had this on my hold list at the library and took it off as soon as I realized it would make me want to gouge my brain out. I feel justified after reading this review.


Suanne Laqueur LOL, I love reading reviews for A.L.L. It's either "Oh my God, this book was amazing" or "FUCK THIS BOOK!"

My own review went from a resounding "FUCK THIS BOOK" 2-star to a grudging "OK, I confess..." 3-star a year later. It was such an extreme read. Even the writing was extreme, meaning I was either totally engrossed, or skimming. And I hated the story. The amount of shit she heaped on Jude was nauseating, overkill, over the top. It approached tragedy porn and when Willem (view spoiler) I threw the goddamn book across the room like ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME!?!? FUCK THIS BOOK.

But a year later, I was still thinking about it. Thinking about Jude and thinking about the engrossing parts. Thinking about the sweet moments in midst of the horror story and I just felt I had to acknowledge that. So I gave it another star.

But fuck this book.


message 11: by Perry (last edited Jul 07, 2016 09:07PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Perry Joe wrote: "Great review, Ashley. This novel is neck and neck with the one about the girl on a train as far as mass popularity on Goodreads at the moment. I don't believe I'm the demographic for it. I enjoy st..."

I know I shouldnt reply to a question to the reviewer, but Joe raises a valid point. My problems with this book arent with the bleakness, it is with the author who there can be no other conclusion than that she intentionally wrote this fucking book in a way to inflict the MOST EMOTIONAL PAIN SHE COULD ON THE READER without offering any hope within, nothing to, as Faulkner said in accepting the Nobel, "lift the human spirit." Nada. Zero. The more I think about this book and how many people gave it 5 stars because it is the great gay novel, the more pissed I get. Garth greenwell sold gays way short. This is a faux tragedy because the writing isnt veridical. I can go through my favorites and find high tragedies that are real. Anna K, The Great Gatsby, The Remains of the Day, The End of the Affair, The Sound and the Fury, each speaking truth and offering something in each to lift the human spirit.

Okay. I have had my rant that comes about once a quarter. See you in October.


message 12: by Ashley (last edited Jul 07, 2016 09:10PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Ashley Wow, guys, that's a lot of responses! Maybe I should one-star books more often. I promise I will answer all of you but my brain is too fried right now to do so coherently. Probably some time tomorrow!


message 13: by Caro (new) - rated it 1 star

Caro the Helmet Lady Great review, Ashley! Thank you!


Ashley @Megan and Ioana: Oh no! I mean, lots of people loved it, so maybe you will, too!

@Perry: I don't know anything about PC and people judging me (I haven't felt any pressure), but I agree that the book is manipulative. Part of what turned me off about it is that all the while she's using her lovely words to make you care for these characters, she's also purposefully carving away at their lives in search of what seems to me a detached artistic purpose. Reading interviews from her I get the same feeling, and it's that detachment that really turns me off. She absolutely piles on the misery to Jude until he's beaten into the ground, for seemingly no reason except an artistic experiment, as far as I can tell. I could find no larger meaning in it, and that is NOT my thing.


Ashley @Robin: Hahahah, thanks!

@Joe: I have enjoyed "bleak" books in the past, as long as there is a larger artistic message to be found that resonates with me. Generally, I don't enjoy books that are *very* dark, that sort of wallow in it, you know, but books with tragic endings have worked for me before. I love Hamlet (and other Shakespearean tragedies). Perry mentions below The Remains of the Day, which is one of my favorite books. It has an unhappy ending (as does Ishiguro's other famous book Never Let Me Go), but there is a purpose to that ending, and the main character's ending is a result of choices he made long ago, unlike in this book where Jude (the MC) is only kind and lovable, and still everything bad that could ever happen to him does, and it is entirely senseless, both for him and us as readers.

@Bianca: I don't know if I would use the word exquisite . . . I don't know if I've ever used that word to describe prose. I prefer language that fades into the background and lets the story take over, and I thought she excelled at that. Her world and characters were entirely real to me, which just made it worse when she used that connection to fuck with my head.


Ashley @MichelleG: You should give it a try! Obviously you were interested enough to buy it. I wouldn't have read it except my book club picked it :)

@Philip: I always feel guilty when people tell me my review made them not read a book!

@Suanne: It really is such a polarizing book. The ending sealed it for me as well. It honestly made the "sweet" moments worse because it was all for nothing.

@Caro: Thanks :)


Suanne Laqueur Someday I'm going to stop looking for the "like" button on a Goodreads comment :-)


message 18: by Philip (new)

Philip @Philip: I always feel guilty when people tell me my review made them not read a book!

Don't worry, I had decided before I read your review that this probably wasn't for me. This was just further confirmation that I probably couldn't handle it.


Ashley Suanne wrote: "Someday I'm going to stop looking for the "like" button on a Goodreads comment :-)"

More evidence that Facebook has ruined us all.


Ashley Philip wrote: "Don't worry, I had decided before I read your review that this probably wasn't for me. This was just further confirmation that I probably couldn't handle it."

I worry for the people who can.


message 21: by Jason (new)

Jason , etc. For the past few years, every time I've gone to Portland and spent a couple days at Powell's (as one does), I've seen this book displayed prominently in all the obvious places and wondered what was making the male model on the cover go all Scarlett O'Hara. Thank you for justifying my life choice related to not giving in to curiosity in this case.


Ashley Would it interest you to know that the name of the photograph gracing the cover of this book is "Orgasmic Man"?

Yeah, I wish I didn't know that either.

I think it's supposed to be a visual double entendre. He could be in pleasure or pain, or both.

Bleeeeech.


Sarahcl I'm glad I am not the only one who found what Yanagihara has said about mental illness and suicide to be offensive and harmful - it's a good thing these messages are not clearly communicated in the book.

The messages in A Little Life itself, about consent and victimisation are equally unpleasant and morally dubious, the whole thing is suspect.

Reading A Little Life made me feel like I had been passed through a meat grinder, and it took a long time for me to work out everything that was so bad about it (I'm afraid any good bits of writing there may be are completely forgotten by now, and most of it was clunkingly awful).

I have written a longer review (which I could only summarize for my Goodreads review, you may find it interesting: https://iamreadingthereforeiam.wordpr...


Ashley (view spoiler)


Sarahcl I think all the 'compensations' were just there to keep him alive longer so he could suffer more.


Michelle Curie Very valid criticism! I am yet to read this book and am looking forward to it, because I have heard so many different (mostly very polarized) opinions about it.


Ashley Michelle wrote: "Very valid criticism! I am yet to read this book and am looking forward to it, because I have heard so many different (mostly very polarized) opinions about it."

It does seem to be one of those books that you LOVE or HATE. I haven't seen many people be neutral about it.


message 28: by Kate (new) - added it

Kate Honestly after hearing such "omg this is the best book I've ever read!!" And "this is one of the worst books ever" reviews I kinda wanna try picking this book up again! I put it down after I noticed the direction it was heading with drugs/alcohol, but now I'm intrigued to see where I stand with it!


Ashley Kate wrote: "Honestly after hearing such "omg this is the best book I've ever read!!" And "this is one of the worst books ever" reviews I kinda wanna try picking this book up again! I put it down after I notice..."

I shall say to you . . . Good luck.


message 30: by Ket (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ket Oh man, thank you for this review. I'm managing both depression and anxiety and it's a lot of frikkin work living with suicidal thoughts. I wanted to pick up this book since it's feels like it's "book of the year" - absolutely everywhere and almost universally adored and queer and written by a woman POC. But it would be NOT HEALTHY for me to pick up a text that in any way suggests it's better off for people struggling with mental illness to just die because their lives cannot be redeemed. (???!!??!?) So, I'll be leaving this one on the shelf. Thanks for the heads up. :)


Ashley Tana wrote: "Oh man, thank you for this review. I'm managing both depression and anxiety and it's a lot of frikkin work living with suicidal thoughts. I wanted to pick up this book since it's feels like it's "b..."

To be fair, the book itself never comes out and says that suicide is the way to go, but it DOES suggest that suicide is an okay option, and everyone in the main characters' life enables his self destructive behavior instead of helping him to learn to cope with it. So I'm glad I could save you the pain.


Sharon Wow, couldn't have had more opposite feelings about this book, but have never enjoyed disagreeing more. Great review! :)


Ashley Sharon wrote: "Wow, couldn't have had more opposite feelings about this book, but have never enjoyed disagreeing more. Great review! :)"

Sorry, must have missed this comment. Thanks!


message 34: by M (new)

M Menendez Your review is spot on, and I appreciate the humor sprinkled in for a well-deserved laugh. I do not need every story to have the Hollywood happy ending, but the author's just cutting us off at the knees ( yes I went there) if it's all pain and nothing else. I started with wanting to reach out and be Jude's best friend that could make it all better and evolved into just wanting him to end it for himself as well as for all of us sucked into this vortex of misery. Once I read a review which mentioned the ending when I still had 7 hours (audiobook) it was time to move on. Done.


Ashley Yes. It was Too Much. I felt for him at the beginning, too, and then I didn't anymore. Ha ha. Samesies.


Eleanor "Misery porn" describes it perfectly!


Carolyn Kirk To me, this says it all. And "misery porn" = brilliant
https://www.bacononthebookshelf.com/2...


Ashley "I came to think Jude’s abject suffering – in fact, every character’s outsized suffering – was there to hide Yanagihara’s basic lack of interest in the substance, in the unglamorous grist, of adult human life."

Thanks for that link. I focused on the melodrama of the bad things that happen, but that review points out it's the same on the other end, too. Sigh. This book.


Jessica I set up an account on Good Reads just to like your review and be able to voice my frustration that I wasted five days reading the damn book. I think that Yanagihara gets a sadistic kick every time a poor reader reaches the last page and reads the last sentence. It's a shame that she has put her eloquent writing ability to such misuse as to indulge herself so heavily in her own words, thus losing both the credibility of the story and the thread of what could have been an amazing tale.


Ashley Hey, you should stick around Goodreads. 'Tis a good place.


message 41: by Christi (new) - added it

Christi omg...the interview you site regarding the author's stance on mental health is frightening! In my own review I wondered directly about this...how she seems to regard therapy as useless and thus never offers Jude a true chance to heal. I wondered what that might say about her feelings/thoughts on mental illness and what she was really trying to say. Niw that I can be certain I think I want to change my review from 3 stars to one. So so harmful for people truly suffering out there.


Ashley As someone mentioned above, at least she doesn't actively denigrate it in the book.


message 43: by Diane (new)

Diane Wallace oh..


Carol Anne Ashley, I so agree with you. Amazing writing but life needs to move on to different emotions and crying is exhausting and makes me depressed. It would have made a truely brilliant shorter book but I can't afford to spend so much time being sad over fiction, life can be depressing enough in these times.


Ashley @Carol No kidding! I can't stomach depressing books right now. I need all the fluff all the time.


message 46: by J (new) - rated it 2 stars

J K so true!!! this is beautifully written awful book!


Ashley "beautifully written awful book!"

That should be a blurb on the cover! Let people know what they're in for :)


Harold You had me laugh. I'm feeling what you wrote. Thank you!


Kaylin (The Re-Read Queen) This review is 💯 and I should have listened to it before starting this awful awful book


message 50: by Ashley (last edited Mar 21, 2018 10:25AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Ashley Kaylin wrote: "This review is 💯 and I should have listened to it before starting this awful awful book"

Well, to be fair, plenty of people are loving it! I just really, really dislike being made to feel so terribly. Some people like that feeling? I guess?

And you didn't even get to the end! OH BOY.


« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
back to top