Emily May's Reviews > The Bone Season

The Bone Season by Samantha    Shannon
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4622890
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: young-adult, arc, 2013, fantasy


I really, really wanted to like this book. It sounds stupid but I actually feel slightly guilty at how disappointed I was with it and I think the main reason is because the author is a British student of the same age as me and, as soon as I learned that, I really wanted her to succeed. I really wanted Shannon to be the next J.K.Rowling, as some are calling her. I really wanted her debut to take me out of this world and leave me desperate to get my hands on the next installment. However, I just didn't think The Bone Season was anything special or original. In my opinion, it shows definite potential for Shannon's future as a writer but the story is a regurgitated version of one that has been told countless times.

The Bone Season is a story I feel like I've read before in various other fantasy-lite novels - the one that first came to mind being Shadow and Bone. The author takes this familiar story and, basically, complicates it. She stirs it in a pot with a bunch of new names for old things ("voyants" for those with clairvoyance, amongst other new terms), slang that left my head spinning even though myself and the author are British (I ended up having to consult my Welsh friend), and world-building that sounds unique and complex because of the fancy terms floating around... but really isn't. What this is, for me, is an example of taking light, easily digestible fantasy fiction that is filled with uncomplicated excitement and romance, and turning it into something long-winded and overly descriptive just so you can attempt to call it original.

There are apparently seven books in this series and I'm betting only three or four will really be needed. This first book felt soooo long because it was so fleshed out with lengthy descriptions and seemingly pointless information. Plus, there is so much tell and so little show. Particularly in the beginning it felt almost as if the protagonist (Paige) was reading me a textbook on the world, people's abilities and Floxy (flavoured oxygen). Huge chunks of this novel are dedicated to info-dumping and the execution of these sections feels really awkward, like a movie cutting off in the middle to bring up a page of text that gives you some background information. It wasn't smoothly incorporated into the story.

The plot follows Paige who is a dreamwalker in the year 2059. Paige, and other types of clairvoyants, commit a crime just by existing. When Paige accidentally uses her abilities and kills someone, she is sent to a voyant prison which is controlled by creatures called Rephaim who want to use the voyants abilities for their own gain. She is assigned to a keeper called simply "Warden", a mysterious and dangerous dude who stares at her from the day she arrives (guess what happens, go on, guess). I feel myself once again comparing this to Shadow and Bone and the way Alina's powers are discovered by the Grisha and she is forced into their world and taught to harness her powers. The glowering looks and sexiness of the Darkling are also present here but his name is Warden instead. The Bone Season isn't terrible but I find it very surprising that words like "original" are being thrown around when it feels like this story and these characters are recycled versions straight out of many other paranormal novels.

This book, in my opinion, is simply a glorified, overcomplicated retelling of any other light, fluffy fantasy. But the descriptions, info-dumping and general wordiness do not make this a deeper and more meaningful read, but rather they made the book dull and tiresome for me. As much as I wanted to like it, it was incredibly easy to find distractions and every time it was a struggle to come back to it. The romance goes down a predictable route, as does most of the book. I feel bad for saying it, but this just wasn't for me at all and I doubt I will read the rest of the series.

Notes on the slang
Paraffin is Kerosene (paraffin lamp, paraffin stove, etc.)
Cokum - Google will probably be useless to you on this one. It means cunning/shrewd.
584 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Bone Season.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

March 2, 2013 – Shelved
May 23, 2013 – Started Reading
June 2, 2013 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 84 (84 new)


Kierra I'm so excited to read this! I really hope it turns out to be good. It seems alot of 2013 books I was looking forward to disappointed me.


Emily May I hope so too! It definitely sounds good and the book trailer is awesome :)


message 3: by Kierra (last edited Jun 04, 2013 02:42PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kierra Emily May wrote: "I hope so too! It definitely sounds good and the book trailer is awesome :)"

I know! I saw it yesterday, and the trailer impressed me, especially for a book trailer. I hope most future book trailers are that amazing! I'll look out for your thoughts on how the book turns out!


Soumi I'm going to start this tonight. lemme know you thoughts :)


David - proud Gleeman in Branwen's adventuring party Great review, Miss May! Sorry the book was a disappointment for you :(


Brandi ACK! Right in the feels Emily! ;)

Maybe I should give Shadow and Bone a shot at some point too.


Brandi Litchick wrote: "OMFG YOU HAVEN'T READ THAT BRANDI??? FOR SHAME! GET ON IT! THE SECOND ONE COMES OUT SOON!

Oh, and great review Emily, like always ;)"


Yes'm!


message 8: by Tatiana (new)

Tatiana Your review confirms yet again my reluctance to read books written by authors younger than 30. I am yet to find one that is actually worth reading. Writers need to mature to produce something original and plain good.


Kierra I do agree with Tatiana that most of my favorite books usually are writers who are usually age 35-40. Seraphina is a good example for that.


message 10: by Bethany (new) - added it

Bethany Shocking! The advanced press on this is unbelievable.


Emily May @Brandi Yeah, I also think you'll like Shadow & Bone. Even though I only gave it 3 stars, it's entertaining and probably more your thing than mine anyway :)

@Tatiana The more I read, the more this does seem to be true. I never actually noticed this until you pointed it out (I think it was a discussion about Kody Keplinger) but I'm struggling to recall an author under 30 that has impressed me.

@Bethany It's not that surprising to me because this is the very definition of marketable in the traditional publishing world: bit of magic, a heroine they can label "strong", forbidden love, an author who's age can be played upon...


message 12: by Rhys (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rhys This is so disappointing ugh :(
{great review, though}


Emily May Thanks, Rhys.


message 14: by Tokies (new)

Tokies i just came from the Forbes piece on her.. it sounds kinda close to plagiarism? just shy of it at least


Brandi Can you link that Tokies?


Claire Tokies: Perhaps you should read the book before throwing around accusations like that.


message 18: by Tokies (last edited Jul 12, 2013 12:08AM) (new)

Tokies C.J. wrote: "Tokies: Perhaps you should read the book before throwing around accusations like that."

hence the question mark about it.. asking how close to the other book it gets.. im kinda asking how close.. to the other book is it.. cos i hate reading two books when i could just read one.. personally lots of books sound like other books.. hints of tolkin are in TONS of big books.. as well hints of harry potter in tons of books tomy question is how close r we talking about to the S&B.. am i getting a fresh take..is it worth my time cos it's like what 480 pages

but you are right.. plagiarism is a heavy word i should have said how "heavily influence"


Claire I really think you need to reread the article. Nowhere does it draw any comparisons between Harry Potter and The Bone Season. All it says is Shannon read Harry Potter when she was younger.

I didn't feel like I was reading anything remotely Potterish when I read The Bone Season. Nor, for that matter, was it Hunger Gamesish or 50SoGish, which the book is actually compared to in the article.


message 20: by Yael (new) - rated it 1 star

Yael Itamar I didn't think of the SHADOW AND BONE connection until you mentioned it, but you're absolutely right. This book was basically S&B with nonsensical and poorly-thought out worldbuilding, ridiculous villains, and a protagonist who is so inconsistent that I'm not convinced she's a single person. (One chapter she is appropriately enraged at the L.I. The next she is telling him intimate secrets about her dreamscape. WTF?) Granted, I didn't actually finish the book. I was bored and frustrated and put it aside after 150 pages.


Emily May @C.J. You're right, it wasn't anything like those books you mentioned. However, it was quite a bit like Shadow and Bone.

@Yael It's interesting to see it isn't just me who notices those glaring similarities. I'm very surprised this is being called "original" above all else.


message 22: by Yael (new) - rated it 1 star

Yael Itamar Not to mention that in S&B, I didn't feel like I was forced to side with the protagonist. But in TBS, the villains were so muah-ha-ha evil that I couldn't even take it seriously.


message 23: by Jason (new) - rated it 1 star

Jason Oh. I did not like Shadow & Bone and was majorly let down after so many loved it. The sequel was no better. Maybe I'll like this better, but it might just be that Daughter of Smoke & Bone is the only YA series for me to obsess about.


Kathylill You are so right with what you wrote about the information overload, lengthy descriptions and the integration of information into the story and action. It is not done well. I really felt like "wait what, ..." all the time. You're British but I am German and English is only my third language. I skipped all the time between the Glossary, leo and the kindle ebook in order to understand what she might possibly mean. And sometimes I thought the explanations given were more misleading than really enlightening. 10% into the book I decided I don't care and jus skipped over all the too awkward words or descriptions.


message 25: by Brenda (new)

Brenda You can't be compared to Rowling when she always made the romance the backseat story, not the driver. That's what I loved so much about it and why I tend to get bored with most paranormal now. Your review makes me think I probably wouldn't get too enthused about this either...


Emily May You know, I am truly shocked at the hype surrounding this book. I don't mean that I can't see why some people would like it, but many are calling it the NEXT BIG THING. I just can't see it. At all :/


message 27: by Brenda (new)

Brenda Yeah I get it. That's how I felt about The Fault in Our Stars (sorry I don't know how to do that hyperlink thing). Everyone adores it and bawled and told me how amazing it was and then when I read it it was very....okay. Not great, not really horrible to me either, just kind of there.

I don't know if that's the case here though. :P


Emily May Oh, I completely felt the same as you about The Fault in Our Stars. It was fine but it just didn't seem to deserve the hype. I mean, I've read better books about the same thing.

By the way, you can do the hyperlink thing by clicking "add book/author" above the comment box :)


message 29: by Brenda (new)

Brenda The Fault in Our Stars Look! I learned something! Thanks! haha


message 31: by Jason (new) - added it

Jason this seems like its been on the hype train.. ill wait at least four months to pick it up... i want things to settle down.


message 32: by JK (new) - rated it 1 star

JK I completely agree with your review. It's a formatted plot that is very similar to other dystopian novels that are out there. The only difference is she used clairvoyants. I felt as if this was written specifically with the hopes of having it turned into a movie. I won't be reading any others in the series when they are released. I'm just glad I didn't buy this one.


message 33: by Jason (new) - added it

Jason JK wrote: "I completely agree with your review. It's a formatted plot that is very similar to other dystopian novels that are out there. The only difference is she used clairvoyants. I felt as if this was ..."

ugh that is too bad. i wish authors of this genre would just write for the love of writing.


Danielle. I don't know if you haven't noticed there is a glossary in the back of the book. I had no idea until I read Keertana's review; I was semi-baffled with the terms and slang, but now I understand it all perfectly.


message 35: by Jason (new) - added it

Jason Lady Danielle wrote: "I don't know if you haven't noticed there is a glossary in the back of the book. I had no idea until I read Keertana's review; I was semi-baffled with the terms and slang, but now I understand it a..."

i heard from other reviews that the mass amount of over-creativeness (made up words, etc) clouded the books prose and style. Its good to know that there is an additional portion that can help the writer, but would this make a reader feel disjointed going back and forth from front to back every so often? would this create a disruption in the reading?


Danielle. Jas wrote: "i heard from other reviews that the mass amount of over-creativeness (made up words, etc) clouded the books prose and style. Its good to know that there is an additional portion that..."

I understand where you're coming from, Jas, but I cannot speak for everyone else. However, I can say I'm currently reading The Bone Season right now and I don't feel disjointed at all; neither does it cause a disruption in the reading. I love when an author is creative (though I have to admit Ms Shannon's is a little too creative) and I love being introduced to things that's entirely new. I don't see it as a problem (of course a lot of people would see it as such). It all depends on the reader and his/her patience. I'm enjoying it so far. :)


Brandi I loved this book, but I despise glossaries, and I think that Emily made great points. Even if I haven't read Shadow and Bone yet, if she sees the correlation there I believe her.

I'm glad you're liking it as well, but that doesn't mean Emily is wrong in her opinion. :)


message 38: by Danielle. (last edited Aug 30, 2013 10:31PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Danielle. Oh no, Brandi I've never stated Emily was wrong! I loved her review and her thoughts, they were on point. I do feel the author's prose is more of telling and not showing, as Emily stated.

It's just when I saw this She stirs it in a pot with a bunch of new names for old things [...], slang that left my head spinning even though myself and the author are British (I ended up having to consult my Welsh friend) I wanted to know if she knew there was a glossary in the back so she wouldn't have to consult her friend or it wouldn't leave her head spinning much. I agree with Emily's review and respect her opinion. :)


message 39: by Jason (new) - added it

Jason Lady Danielle wrote: "Jas wrote: "i heard from other reviews that the mass amount of over-creativeness (made up words, etc) clouded the books prose and style. Its good to know that there is an additional portion that......"

awesome thanks! I just discovered it thanks to you. kindle version doesnt seem to have click references so i have to flying between word and the glossary, so this may be a hindrance for me.


Danielle. Jas wrote: "awesome thanks! I just discovered it thanks to you. kindle version doesnt seem to have click references so i have to flying between word and the glossary, so this may be a hindrance for me. "

No problem! :D


Emily May I'm late to this discussion - sorry! Thanks for letting me know, Danielle, I never found a glossary in the e-ARC I received. I'm not sure if it was added in a later version of the book or if I didn't see it because it was right at the end. Perhaps the author/publisher added it as a response to all the confusion? Either way, it's good to know :)


Brandi Lady Danielle wrote: "Oh no, Brandi I've never stated Emily was wrong! I loved her review and her thoughts, they were on point. I do feel the author's prose is more of telling and not showing, as Emily stated.

It's ju..."


Ah, sorry, I must have misunderstood your post. I shouldn't try to comprehend things when I'm overly tired, lol. ^-^


message 43: by Kris (new) - rated it 2 stars

Kris Irvin I read the Kindle version and had NO idea there was a glossary until I finished the book (and almost chucked my iPad across the room in frustration.) I think needing a glossary is okay in some books, but this one was just absolutely ridiculous and so overdone. Your review hit it spot on.


message 44: by Danielle. (last edited Aug 31, 2013 10:27PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Danielle. @Emily No problem! :) The Bone Season's greatest downfall will be those terms and such, especially when it's on e-book/kindle -- a lot of people will not know of the glossary.

@Brandi It's totally fine. :)


Cazbookmagnet only a quarter of the way through & so far I agree with everything you have said Emily. As a bookseller I have to be on top of "the next big thing" so I can judge which books will be a good fit for different customers. In fact the first I heard from about this book was from customers who told me they had seen the author interviewed etc & that she had been offered a multi-million dollar deal etc. These customers bought the book & I went home to pluck the book proof out of my too read pile to see if it lived up to the hype. Sadly so far I am very disappointed. My picks over this would definitely include Angelfall Divergent & Discovery of Witches. In fact if anything should have been a 7 book deal its DOW by Deborah Harkness. I feel The Bone Season - like the hype over 50shades - does not have the natural flow that grabs you & loses you in it's world. Who know's, I may change my mind by the end but can't see this being on my top 10 fantasy/dystopian lists


message 46: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca Emily, Thanks for your review. I was trying to figure out if this book was worth reading or being overly hyped and am going to trust you and others and skip this one. Your review confirmed my thoughts and concerns that it may not be to my taste. I enjoy YA and sci-fi, but am bored when it isn't done well.


message 47: by Jason (new) - added it

Jason Kris wrote: "I read the Kindle version and had NO idea there was a glossary until I finished the book (and almost chucked my iPad across the room in frustration.) I think needing a glossary is okay in some boo..."

but dontcha think that even with that going back and forth isnt conducive for a even, relaxing read? i dont think there are any links with the word so youcant go back and forth between the two portions.


message 48: by Keir (new) - rated it 3 stars

Keir Thomas Totally agree on the 'too much tell and not enough see' point. Paige describing her fear ("I was scared. I was shaking") etc were particularly bad.


message 49: by Kris (new) - rated it 2 stars

Kris Irvin Jas wrote: "Kris wrote: "I read the Kindle version and had NO idea there was a glossary until I finished the book (and almost chucked my iPad across the room in frustration.) I think needing a glossary is oka..."

Er, that's pretty much what I said?


message 50: by Jason (new) - added it

Jason Kris wrote: "Jas wrote: "Kris wrote: "I read the Kindle version and had NO idea there was a glossary until I finished the book (and almost chucked my iPad across the room in frustration.) I think needing a glo..."

pretty much, just clarifying before i press delete on kindle.


« previous 1
back to top