Kalliope's Reviews > Schachnovelle

Schachnovelle by Stefan Zweig
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3593962
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: austro-hungary, fiction-german, latam, 2014
Read 2 times. Last read April 18, 2014 to April 21, 2014.





This book is about the workings of the mind.

But before I go into that, let me start by saying that to me the name of Stefan Zweig evokes a feeling of nostalgia. Of course, this is foremost due to the title of his famous memoirs, and because we know that he belonged to a world that was disappearing. And probably because he realized this he decided to depart from it.

But for me it creates an additional longing. It makes me yearn for a world in which I did not yet exist, a world that followed Zweig’s. In particular the beginning of this novel, which starts out in a ship travelling from New York to Buenos Aires, at a time when these two cities, together with Shanghai, were the most cosmopolitan centers in the world, made me think of a few decades later when my parents were young and left their country and boarded on ships that would take them to New York and to Buenos Aires and other places.

Nostalgia is also part of our fantasy.

Zweig’s novella is a meditation on the nature of the mind: how it creates its own reality, how it lives thanks to sensations and perceptions, but also on how it can get trapped and fall prey to circular thinking.

His story makes you think about the heart of imagination, what is the feeling of anticipation and how an inner mental projection can elicit joy. Zweig presents how curiosity provides a pleasure that the mind needs, but if this curiosity is not tamed it can also enslave the mind. Similarly, surprise is conceived as sudden state that gives fresh air to the mind. For the reader it is easy to identify those mental phenomena, because Zweig focuses on the effects that an object, which is both simple and complex, can provide. Such delicious and nourishing food for the mind is brought about by a book.

Through Zweig’s writing we observe the process of thinking and learning and problem solving, and how these constitute the gymnastics of the brain. The mind needs to explore its limits and exert itself. It needs to surmount obstacles and for this some degree of discipline is required. Understanding, creativity, the power of the brain when it concentrates on a single task, the agility and flexibility that it is capable of-- all of these aspects parade through this tale.

We also see that if the mind’s nature is abstract it, however, also has to be able to project outside itself. It needs to record what is in the world and absorb it, and if its space and universe is limited, its locked up habitat will be disastrous. This is what Zweig calls materielle Exterritorialisierung.

By studying what happens to the mind when it is put in a vacuum, in isolation, when it is on a diet of sensory stimuli, which is its vital source of energy, Zweig creates a situation of despair, a monotony that would only sound like a single tone with no rhythm. He presents us the mental existence of Nothingness, in which one can only enslave himself (Der Sklave des Nichts).

Because related to sensory input and the capability to project onto larger space, for the mind, in spite of its cogito abilities it is essential to be able to deal with one of the most abstract concepts: it needs to measure time. If one is deprived of a system of proportions, time just does not exist: it conflates. And the mind is in the void.

It is then that consciousness can split, because the mind has turned against itself, and dichotomies and paradoxes and impossibilities relish in this new schizophrenic self. The poisonous obsessions possess the psyche. Anxiety and patience confront each other like opposing players in a chess game.

Either Nonsense or a new Self emerges.


And of course, all of the above is developed through a gripping plot.


133 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Schachnovelle.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading (Other Paperback Edition)
December 3, 2012 – Shelved (Other Paperback Edition)
December 3, 2012 – Shelved as: austro-hungary (Other Paperback Edition)
December 3, 2012 – Shelved as: fiction-german (Other Paperback Edition)
April 18, 2014 – Started Reading
April 18, 2014 – Shelved
April 19, 2014 –
page 27
24.11%
April 19, 2014 –
0.0% "Spannend."
April 19, 2014 –
page 57
50.89%
April 19, 2014 –
page 67
59.82% "Four months without a book."
April 21, 2014 – Shelved as: austro-hungary
April 21, 2014 – Shelved as: fiction-german
April 21, 2014 – Shelved as: latam
April 21, 2014 – Finished Reading
February 16, 2016 – Shelved as: 2014

Comments Showing 1-50 of 77 (77 new)


Garima It was amazing, right?


message 2: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Yes, I keep thinking about it.


message 3: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm Have you seen Wes Anderson's film, The Grand Budapest Hotel? It is based on Zwieg's work. I thought it had potential but didn't really work in the end.


message 4: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Gary wrote: "Have you seen Wes Anderson's film, The Grand Budapest Hotel? It is based on Zwieg's work. I thought it had potential but didn't really work in the end."

Yes, I did and was disappointed.. a shame.. excellent actors, but they trivialized the work and life of Zweig with such an approach.


message 5: by Elena (last edited Apr 21, 2014 11:41AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Elena Kalliope, your review gets it perfectly. Your analysis really helps a lot with the tough passages. Now I get it when SZ uses an odd locution like "materielle Exterritorialisierung." I puzzled over that one. Something brilliant and beautiful can turn on itself and become self-destructive, a theme in Dr. Faustus as well.


Agnieszka Kalliope wrote: "Gary wrote: "Have you seen Wes Anderson's film, The Grand Budapest Hotel? It is based on Zwieg's work. I thought it had potential but didn't really work in the end."

Yes, I did and was disappointe..."


:( I wanted to see that one.


message 7: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Agnieszka wrote: "
Yes, I did an..."


Go and watch it, Agnieszka, it is still worth watching.. Excellent actors, and very creative.. It is just that for me the main attraction was its relation with Stefan Zweig.


message 8: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Elena wrote: "Kalliope, your review gets it perfectly. Your analysis really helps a lot with the tough passages. Now I get it when SZ uses an odd locution like "materielle Exterritorialisierung." I puzzled over ..."

Thank you, Elena.

It is a wonderful work. I actually read it two times, since it can be read in two sittings, and I thought that I wanted to think about it.. The first read is captivated by the story, and in the second I realized how Zweig is really exploring the mind.


Manny I love your analysis, but unfortunately the magic doesn't work for people who know chess... it is too obvious that it could never happen. For me, the story would be much more convincing if mathematics replaced chess - mathematicians really do this kind of thing occasionally, or close enough.

Non-chessplayers do not realize the extent to which chess is a sport and not an intellectual pursuit. It is a pity that the game cannot live up to its reputation...


message 10: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Manny wrote: "I love your analysis, but unfortunately the magic doesn't work for people who know chess... it is too obvious that it could never happen. For me, the story would be much more convincing if mathemat..."

That is very interesting - the different projections of chase and mathematics... do you know the story? - I mean about the imprisonment of one of the characters?.

I think Zweig was a chess "aficionado" but I ignore how good he was.


Elena My father won a few chess trophies. One of the highlights of his life was winning against a chess master in a simultaneous game. Like Dr. B., he always understated his abilities, and he said it was bad form to turn down a request for a rematch. Unlike Dr. B. he always played with a poker face because of the psychological bluffing involved. Maybe one of the many things SZ is saying is that humanists risk losing out to fascists when they let their emotions affect the moves they make. Once my father gave me some advice for a workplace situation, "Elena, win, lose or draw--no tears."


message 12: by Manny (last edited Apr 21, 2014 12:57PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Manny I think almost all chessplayers have read Zweig, and been disappointed the way I was. You would so like it to be true!

The current world chess champion, Magnus Carlsen, is an interesting person to think about in the context of this story. There was an interview last year which has already become classic. The interviewer asked Carlsen what animal he would like to be. Carlsen thought a moment and said a crocodile. He would just lie there most of the time, not doing anything, but when someone came too close he would fasten his jaws on them and there would be nothing they could do. It is a striking image and an accurate description of his unpoetic playing style.


message 13: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Manny wrote: "
The current world chess champion, Magnus Carlsen, is an interesting person to..."


I see your point...

Charming, this Magnus Carlsen... do these people make a lot of money?


Manny Magnus is only 23, but has already made a lot of money. As well as playing chess, he does some modeling. He is a superstar in his native Norway.

Not everyone likes him, but the general feeling in the chess world is that he's good for the game. He's an interesting person.


message 15: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Elena wrote: "My father won a few chess trophies. One of the highlights of his life was winning against a chess master in a simultaneous game. Like Dr. B., he always understated his abilities, and he said it was..."

Yes, the political side, and how his chess playing by himself, helped him in his interrogations, was another interesting aspect.


message 16: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Manny wrote: "Magnus is only 23, but has already made a lot of money. As well as playing chess, he does some modeling. He is a superstar in his native Norway.

Not everyone likes him, but the general feeling in ..."


I had to google him... may be his dream was realized..




Manny So you are not impressed with the trademark Magnus Scowl? :)


Stian Liked your review, Kalliope. I should probably re-read this little novella.

Speaking of Carlsen's superstar status in Norway: we've actually started airing chess tournaments live on tv now! Every major tournament he has been in since (and including) the world championship has been televised.


message 19: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Stian wrote: "Liked your review, Kalliope. I should probably re-read this little novella.

Speaking of Carlsen's superstar status in Norway: we've actually started airing chess tournaments live on tv now! Every..."


That will also encourage many youngsters to engage in chess... a good thing..


message 20: by Rand (new) - added it

Rand An enchanting exploration of what sounds like a charming book, Kalliope.
Will have to look for this one.


Elena Manny wrote: "I love your analysis, but unfortunately the magic doesn't work for people who know chess... it is too obvious that it could never happen. For me, the story would be much more convincing if mathemat..."So, Manny, do chess masters prefer Nabokov to Zweig?


message 22: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Rand wrote: "An enchanting exploration of what sounds like a charming book, Kalliope.
Will have to look for this one."


Thank you, Rand. I recommend it to everyone with tge exception of chess players.


Rowena Great review! I really enjoyed this book as well.


Manny Elena wrote: "So, Manny, do chess masters prefer Nabokov to Zweig?"

Yes, I found Luzhin's Defence utterly convincing. Poor Luzhin! Sometimes I almost feel I've met him in person...


message 25: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Now I have to read that.


Manny Stian wrote: "Liked your review, Kalliope. I should probably re-read this little novella.

Speaking of Carlsen's superstar status in Norway: we've actually started airing chess tournaments live on tv now! Every..."


So were you watching him beat Nakamura today?

I felt sorry for Naka in the post-match interview. He's usually so tough and positive, but it's hard to project that image when you've just been eaten by a crocodile.


Stian Unfortunately I missed the post-match interview, although I had my TV on. Naka is -9 against him now... That's fast approaching Kasparov vs Shirov level (Kasparov is 14-0 I believe?).

Did you notice how he sat, Manny? The pose of a World Champion!


Nicole~ Wonderful review, Kalliope! Checkmate! I would have loved to sit in on Freud and Zweig having a conversation.


message 29: by Steve (new) - added it

Steve This was actually the first book I read in German, so I will always have a warm feeling for it. I really should read it again after all this time.


message 30: by Garima (last edited Apr 22, 2014 12:29AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Garima Magnificent review, Kall. So glad you loved this book and thank you for writing about it in such a wonderful way.

We also see that if the mind’s nature is abstract it, however, also has to be able to project outside itself. It needs to record what is in the world and absorb it, and if its space and universe is limited, its locked up habitat will be disastrous. This is what Zweig calls materielle Exterritorialisierung.

Excellent. I must read it again someday soon.


message 31: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Nicole~ wrote: "Wonderful review, Kalliope! Checkmate! I would have loved to sit in on Freud and Zweig having a conversation."

Thank you,Nicole.

Yes, that would have been an interesting pair.


message 32: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Henry wrote: "Kalliope, thanks for the wonderful review. This book actually sounds rather interesting, so on the list it goes :)"

Henry, don't miss it. It is an engrossing read and can also be read in a couple of sittings.


Samadrita Excellent review, Kall. I must get to Zweig soon since he seems to be such highly rated by all my GR friends.


Samadrita Manny wrote: "I felt sorry for Naka in the post-match interview. He's usually so tough and positive, but it's hard to project that image when you've just been eaten by a crocodile."

Magnus Carlsen broke all our hearts last year by defeating Viswanathan Anand (in Chennai if I remember correctly) who had been the undisputed world champion for years on a stretch. Carlsen showed us that Vishy is getting old and it's time for the world to hail a new master.


message 35: by Manny (last edited Apr 21, 2014 11:38PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Manny Samadrita wrote: "Magnus Carlsen broke all our hearts last year by defeating Viswanathan Anand (in Chennai if I remember correctly) who had been the undisputed world champion for years on a stretch. Carlsen showed us that Vishy is getting old and it's time for the world to hail a new master."

I was also very disappointed with Anand's showing in last year's encounter. But did you notice that he defied everyone's expectations by winning the Candidates Tournament a few weeks ago to get himself a rematch against the Crocodile? His form seems to have miraculously returned... even though he's clearly the underdog (what chance does a dog have against a croc?), he may surprise us again. I think it will be more interesting than the first match, anyway.


message 36: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Steve wrote: "This was actually the first book I read in German, so I will always have a warm feeling for it. I really should read it again after all this time."

I fully understand the warmth that a first read will later elicit. My first German book was Homo Faber.


Samadrita Manny wrote: "Samadrita wrote: "Magnus Carlsen broke all our hearts last year by defeating Viswanathan Anand (in Chennai if I remember correctly) who had been the undisputed world champion for years on a stretch..."

Yes I am waiting for their rematch as well. Seems like the defeat hit him hard enough to want to take a break from chess. Although every time I look at Carlsen I lose hope. He has this predatory, vicious look about him that is quite intimidating to be frank. The crocodile analogy is apt, perhaps.


Erwin Great review. Just added this to my to-read list.


Manny I know... Carlsen looks unbeatable at the moment. But he has weaknesses, particularly in the opening, and maybe Anand will be able to exploit them.

A practical problem is that the match will most likely be in Norway, so Carlsen will have the home crowd rooting for him. Anyway, we will see!


message 40: by Warwick (new)

Warwick Interesting to read this and then Manny's review. The way chess is portrayed in films and books often irritates me, but on the other hand it's fascinating to see the different metaphorical uses to which it's put by writers and other artists.

I guess Zweig had grown up in that Paul Morphyish world where very clever laypeople really could peer at a chess board and conceive of logical brilliancies that had so far eluded plodding ‘professional’ players (insofar as such things existed). Whereas today, so much of professional chess skill is built on knowledge of the patterns and statistics of past encounters, and how to turn that knowledge into some kind of deeper understanding of how to manipulate the rhythms of the game. At least that's how it seems to me.


message 41: by Manny (last edited Apr 22, 2014 03:53AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Manny You still occasionally get these amazing natural talents who come seemingly out of nowhere and manage to beat to beat top grandmasters. The first one I think of is Granda Zuniga of Peru, who is widely respected in the chess world. But I am sure that, even if he plays very unorthodox chess, he has acquired a lot of normal experience.

People who haven't seen it might like to check out Einstein versus Oppenheimer, 1933. Einstein turns out to be a reasonable weak amateur player; Oppenheimer is a patzer. Unfortunately, even if you're an uncontested genius, it doesn't help your chess much.


message 42: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Erwin wrote: "Great review. Just added this to my to-read list."

This is a good introduction to Zweig.


message 43: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala I read this quite a few years ago after discovering Zweig through The Post-Office Girl but now that I've read your review, Kalliope, I feel that I've either forgotten or missed completely much of what Zweig was really saying - but I do remember utterly believing in the possibility of someone being able to play imaginary chess games in solitary confinement...


message 44: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Very interesting this world of chess, even if it has now become something different from a pure intellectual quest.

But I wonder if this has not changed from the way it was in the 1930s (another "world" gone). For example, in the world of pianists there has also been a huge change. Now we have the cult of the virtuoso, and the way piano-playing, particularly for kids, is approached in Asia.

For me, though, and I think this is what I tried to show in the review is that even if the plot revolves around chess, the real theme was about what can happen to humans when incarcerated. It is more the humanitarian, humane, and political. The politics are not too explicit. It is Nazi times and practices, it is the Metropole hotel, but with only one reference to a specific event, Hitler's occupation of Bohemia. So, I have also liked Elena's interpretation of a more general "Widerstand" from the Humanists to the Fascists.


message 45: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Fionnuala wrote: "I read this quite a few years ago after discovering Zweig through The Post-Office Girl but now that I've read your review, Kalliope, I feel that I've either forgotten or missed compl..."

Well, I also read this years ago... and this second reading has been completely different....

I plan to read his The Post-Office Girl during this year...


message 46: by Manny (last edited Apr 22, 2014 04:40AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Manny Kalliope wrote: "Very interesting this world of chess, even if it has now become something different from a pure intellectual quest.

But I wonder if this has not changed from the way it was in the 1930s (another "..."


It is true that it was more plausible in the 30s. But even then, hard to believe: Alekhine was world champion, a tough professional player who had decisively beaten the natural talent Capablanca in 1927.

It is of course silly to go into these fine points of chess history when discussing a work of literature! But when you're a chessplayer, it is impossible not to. It is your world, that's the way you see it; ignoring these details is as impossible as ignoring the various changes of regime in 19th century French history when reading a Balzac novel.

Different people read the same text in different ways :)


message 47: by Kalliope (last edited Apr 22, 2014 04:56AM) (new) - added it

Kalliope Manny wrote: "

Different people read the same text in different ways :)
..."


I agree, and now you have made me curious about this other world (my next stop is Nabokov). I am just trying to defend Zweig's novel rather than my interpretation... In a way, the more interpretations the more interesting is the work...


Manny Is there a technical name for the problem of finding it difficult to appreciate a work of literature because you have too much background knowledge? Now that I think about it, I have seen this many times before. For example, Swedish people have trouble enjoying the classic Garbo movie Queen Christina: they know perfectly well that she was nothing like that, and can't suspend disbelief.

The world of chess is quite fascinating...


message 49: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Manny wrote: "Is there a technical name for the problem of finding it difficult to appreciate a work of literature because you have too much background knowledge? Now that I think about it, I have seen this many..."

You should come up with the word... I also have trouble with Hemingway...


message 50: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope Manny wrote: "Is there a technical name for the problem of finding it difficult to appreciate a work of literature because you have too much background knowledge? Now that I think about it, I have seen this many..."

Reading Thomas Mann's Doctor Faustus, I found a passage on Harmonics which I tested on the piano, but since I don't consider myself an expert I sent it to my former teacher (Composer- Juilliard & Yale), and yes, it was gibberish.


« previous 1
back to top