Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 10th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal image from flickr stream. Te750iv (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal image from flickr stream. Te750iv (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht aktuell Simone Solga (talk) 07:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Λανθασμένο Γιάννης Πανδρεμμένος (talk) 11:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Y.haruo. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ειναι λαθος αρθρο Γιάννης Πανδρεμμένος (talk) 11:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Y.haruo. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : April 2018 political event 'advertisements', but primarly, a montage, overtagging an image which is missing EXIF data to verify claimed 'own work', hence, what to do ? Roland zh (talk) 17:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist de:Roger Martin seems to be still alive. There is no evidence that the uploader is Roger Martin himself Eingangskontrolle (talk) 09:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 17:32, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: Out of project scope - --Krdbot 00:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 15:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JGHowes at 22:35, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: failed Flickr review --Krdbot 00:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights: See: Source-YouTube Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 15:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 07:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights: See: Source-YouTube Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 15:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded PNG. Redundant to File:Google 2015 logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied.--KTo288 (talk) 11:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied, insufficient permissions, no commercial use.--KTo288 (talk) 11:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have created UP an meta Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 17:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD U1: User requested deletion in own user space --bjh21 (talk) 22:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably {{PD-no notice}} but outside the project scope. Guanaco (talk) 03:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been published in other places four years ago, like https://sortitoutsi.net/forums/topic/741/request-thread?page=33#comment_94886 so I doubt that this is Otelul2's "own work" under that license. Please elaborate. Malyacko (talk) 22:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:17, 12 Oktober 2017 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - --Krdbot 18:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author don't grant permission to publish this image on Wikipedia common. Solskog (talk) 00:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 00:15, 14 Oktober 2017 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source. Media missing permission as of 6 October 2017 - --Krdbot 06:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author don't grant permission to publish this image on Wikipedia common. Solskog (talk) 00:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 00:15, 14 Oktober 2017 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source. Media missing permission as of 6 October 2017 - --Krdbot 06:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Little Prince illustrations

[edit]

Illustrations by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, who died in 1944. However, French copyright law gives a special 30 years extension of copyright to creative artists declared Mort pour la France over the usual 70 years post mortem. Therefore, all of those drawings will not be in the public domain in its home country until January 1, 2045.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 01:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator. Ariadacapo (talk) 10:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Further lecture of an interesting article on the matter: Johanna Luyssen (June 3rd, 2015). Pourquoi Saint-Exupéry est-il dans le domaine public partout, sauf en France ?. Libération.. Ruthven (msg) 22:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lack of licensing information Mhmrodrigues (talk) 15:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Nipponese dog calvero's self-promotion. --Lanwi1(Talk) 16:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, en:Yu Jie is notable. The photo is big and has EXIF data. Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: No problem if can remove attention seeker. --Lanwi1(Talk) 11:43, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete (revised), we have better images of the notable subject (see Category:Yu Jie) so there's really no need to keep this unused personal photo, even if cropped. The zh-wiki article is here zh:余杰. JGHowes talk - 12:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep within COM:Scope. --MB-one (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See also related DR's:

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   17:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ur1elit0uxX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

appear to be copyrighted screenshots as well as non-educational material. out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soyunanonimofeo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private photos, not used in Wikimedia projects, out of scope.

UAwiki (talk) 00:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable individual, commons is not a webhost Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo only, draft on enwiki declined due to lack of notability. Out of scope here, we have plenty of b&w photographs. Copyright not 100% clear either., Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have the copyright for this file and have submitted to commons - would be happy to add the photo after the page has been approved if that would expedite publishing. (mail?) 09:11, 10 October 2017 (EST)

That doesn't solve the other issues. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have added additional citations, both inline and external, to the article - any recs on what we can do to further establish notability? (mail?) 09:21, 13 October 2017 (EST)

It doesn't seem to be enough, submission decline twice. I don't see any reason why this photo should be on Commons, it would be an improvement of any kind. Just the photograph of an unknown person in black and white. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as "own work" but is clearly satellite imagery from undisclosed source. —JGHowes talk - 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely to be duplicate with the original version. B dash (talk) 02:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per IK. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tcm 2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]
COM:PACKAGING. We need permission from the company which produced these products.

Guanaco (talk) 04:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is unused, so I'd say that it is out of scope.

The licence used, {{PD-Sweden-URL9}}, only applies to text, but this is not text. I can't tell if the image might be below the threshold of originality or not, but as it seems to be out of scope anyway, there's little need to keep it. Stefan4 (talk) 16:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the license.
Diagrams are, if anything, below the threshold of originality. It seems redundant to say that images are not out of scope because they are as yet unused. --Jonund (talk) 20:59, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: THe fact that the image is unused does not show that it is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is unused. It's in bitmap format. And on top of that the data in it is faked so it's not useable for anything really. Thus the file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. // Liftarn (talk) 11:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think the data is faked? --Jonund (talk) 14:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
1) It says so right in the description ("Estimation based on the overrepresentation in 1985-1989") and the source used (Affes statistikblogg) is infamous for faking statistics.[1][2] // Liftarn (talk) 23:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Commons doesn't need to play webhost for racist propaganda. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:47, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est de la pédophilie cette photo !! 24.114.105.18 17:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non. Read the description please. --176.239.64.180 18:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems to fall under https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism.2Fattack (self-promotion) and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Examples ("photos of yourself") hence out of scope for Wikimedia Commons and proposing file for deletion. Malyacko (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems to fall under https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism.2Fattack (self-promotion) and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Examples ("photos of yourself") hence out of scope for Wikimedia Commons and proposing file for deletion. Malyacko (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems to fall under https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism.2Fattack (self-promotion) and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Examples ("photos of yourself") hence out of scope for Wikimedia Commons and proposing file for deletion. Malyacko (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems to fall under https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism.2Fattack (self-promotion) and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Examples ("photos of yourself") hence out of scope for Wikimedia Commons and proposing file for deletion. Malyacko (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems to fall under https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism.2Fattack (self-promotion) and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Examples ("photos of yourself") hence out of scope for Wikimedia Commons and proposing file for deletion. Malyacko (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lafan102 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, unused scribble

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mbmelinamath (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:55, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 10:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Non-free copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 11:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Non-free copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 11:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arun G Nair (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Is this a magazine scan, or something? The poor image quality suggests that.

Stefan2 (talk) 12:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diseños-milagro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(1) All of these graphics contain a Facebook metadata string, suggesting they may have been obtained from a Facebook page, meaning that (a) they are not likely the work of the uploader and (b) without an accompanying link it is not possible to verify if a free license statement was available on that Facebook page.

(2) None of the files look to have much chance for educational reuse. This may be to the exception of File:Luz Tv 4.jpg which clearly shows the logo. However, most other images like File:Luz Tv 2.jpg appear to demonstrate the intent to use Commons as an advertising/publicity platform.

seb26 (talk) 12:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:2012 IIFA Awards

[edit]

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted. --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted.

Skr15081997 (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted.

Skr15081997 (talk) 05:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - noe that the cat contains another 60+ images not nominated above, so it cannot be deleted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted. The remaining (returns) files in the category were most probably taken at Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Mumbai, India so they are acceptable.

Skr15081997 (talk) 07:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Skewed low-res image with no EXIF data. Doubtful own work. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I close my business. Resumethaipro (talk) 09:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. P 1 9 9   18:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope SeveroPastor (talk) 09:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the 2 kids posing are not so prominent in the image. If and when a non-personal alternative becomes available, this image can be renominated. P 1 9 9   18:19, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dontlieloss (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading a photo about herself, which is used only in the sandbox. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this panoramio uploads seems wrong: it is a (probably copyrighted) brochure.-- Transatlantifa (talk) 10:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. P 1 9 9   18:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No context, no indication of educational use, and apparently random title and description. Waldir talk 10:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Depicted person is non-notable. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is unused, so I'd say that it is out of scope.

The licence used, {{PD-Sweden-URL9}}, only applies to text, but this is not text. I can't tell if the image might be below the threshold of originality or not, but as it seems to be out of scope anyway, there's little need to keep it. Stefan4 (talk) 16:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the license.
Diagrams are, if anything, below the threshold of originality. It seems redundant to say that images are not out of scope because they are as yet unused. --Jonund (talk) 20:59, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: THe fact that it is not used does not prove that it is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is unused. It's in bitmap format. And on top of that the data in it is faked so it's not useable for anything really. Thus the file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. // Liftarn (talk) 11:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think the data is faked? --Jonund (talk) 14:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
1) It says so right in the description ("Estimation based on the overrepresentation in 1985-1989") and the source used (Affes statistikblogg) is infamous for faking statistics.[3][4] // Liftarn (talk) 23:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, also probably copyvio. jdx Re: 11:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless with the current amount of information. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 13:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep per Fæ. The photo illustrates wildfires on a mountain slope as seen from a distance at night. So it can be used for educational purposes which puts it in the scope of Commons. De728631 (talk) 13:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, in scope. P 1 9 9   18:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless daf Imedaa (talk) 13:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   18:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfportrait by uploader who only tried making one edit to a userpage on ptwiki and nothing else. Outside project scope. DS (talk) 14:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneducational image and therefore out of project scope. Commons is not your personal webhost. De728631 (talk) 14:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable company, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fathi300 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal files, out of scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:30, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

web-quality images, no metadata. Also seems to be a lot of self-promotional material.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom + not really in scope. Kathisma (talk) 16:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:30, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promo, out of scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moderadordil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal images.

Cjp24 (talk) 14:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anirban sengupta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bzodi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal files, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry to be of educational value Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mustafa.bialwy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please don't upload your personal photos. Wikimedia Commons is not your free web hosting. Please see project scope

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please don't upload your personal photos. Wikimedia Commons is not your free web hosting. Please see project scope

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:37, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevin Medirs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please don't upload your personal photos. Wikimedia Commons is not your free web hosting. Please see project scope

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:38, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avo18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please don't upload your personal photos. Wikimedia Commons is not your free web hosting. Please see project scope

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:07, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arjun Dan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please don't upload your personal photos. Wikimedia Commons is not your free web hosting. Please see project scope

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arjun Dan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of project scope, not in use.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shamzz Pdahkasiej (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please don't upload your personal photos. Wikimedia Commons is not your free web hosting. Please see project scope

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krishnabusal16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please don't upload your personal photos. Wikimedia Commons is not your free web hosting. Please see project scope

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krishnabusal16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This horrific series of images appears to be taken from Facebook and is of questionable scope without file descriptions.

Guanaco (talk) 12:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+ also likely some pruvacy rights issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krishnabusal16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:K.16.B.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Krishna Busal16.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Krishnabusal16 ,doubtful claimed own work since missing EXIF data to verify origin,

Roland zh (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Concerning these 4 remaining images:
    •  Delete File:Krishna Busal16.png, but
    •  Keep the other three, showing vegetable patches. These still need to be categorized properly, but it is clearly a matter of PRP/AGF to accept that these photos of hazy horticulture are likely the uploader’s own snapshots, in a way that snazzy logos and celebrity snapshots are clearly noy. Furthermore the former are, for us, in scope, much more than the latter.
-- Tuválkin 05:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - the 3 vegetable pictures come from Facebook (per Exif). --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaik Abu Talib (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please don't upload your personal photos. Wikimedia Commons is not your free web hosting. Please see project scope

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No meaningful contributions from this user, not an active participant. P 1 9 9   18:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope??? Fry1989 eh? 16:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Somebody picked up an Iphone and took of a photo of this black and white print photo of athlete Elan Buller. Uploader has previsously claimed material from Youtube as "own work". Thuresson (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9   18:47, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:scope 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:47, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter profile photo 176.239.64.180 18:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:48, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not using it anymore on my user page JGab12 (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:48, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 19:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Pinterest 176.239.64.180 19:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete it's also a copyvio ! Pippobuono (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornographic and shows up when children search swimming for a hobby. 207.165.194.2 20:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Clearly in scope. I ask all the time how to this anonymous IP´s always find images of nudity when they are "not" searching it and the in a epiphany nominate this images for deletion.

The mere depiction of a nude woman swimming is pornographic, i.e. the explicit and graphic portrail of sexual relationships? Only her breasts and pubic hair is showing, like the painting La maja desnuda by Goya and that is not pornographic, except to some religious fundamentalists and moral crusaders. Please read or listen to the 44 years old Miller v. California. Also the old, tired and repetitive of Think of the children is getting used with the mere purpose of censorship of mere nudity. If the person behind this IP is ashamed - or merely pudic- of it´s body so be it, it is his values, but trying to impose their moral crusade to other people is called censhorship. Wont someone think of the children is the mantra of those that want to create a fake moral panic and have no other arguments and try to use this "argument" to close discussions. Tm (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   18:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This comes up on a student device search of "swimming." This is not an appropriate image for students in a classrom to view. 209.129.247.244 20:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; COM:NOTCENSORED. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nudity showing in student google search results for "swimming" 205.196.190.8 20:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Time for a SPI? -- (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Repeating my argumentation of the first DR. Clearly in scope. I ask all the time how to this anonymous IP´s always find images of nudity when they are "not" searching it and the in a epiphany nominate this images for deletion.

The mere depiction of a nude woman swimming is pornographic, i.e. the explicit and graphic portrail of sexual relationships? Only her breasts and pubic hair is showing, like the painting La maja desnuda by Goya and that is not pornographic, except to some religious fundamentalists and moral crusaders. Please read or listen to the 44 years old Miller v. California. Also the old, tired and repetitive of Think of the children is getting used with the mere purpose of censorship of mere nudity. If the person behind this IP is ashamed - or merely pudic- of it´s body so be it, it is his values, but trying to impose their moral crusade to other people is called censhorship. Wont someone think of the children is the mantra of those that want to create a fake moral panic and have no other arguments and try to use this "argument" to close discussions.

Adding to the arguments, i find this DR´s interesting. The 3 IP´s are associated with schools and Universities. 207.165.194.2 is associated with the Heartland Area Education Agency 11 of Johnston, Iowa; 209.129.247.244 with the California State University, Office of the Chancellor; and 205.196.190.8 with the Humble Independent School District of Kingwood, Texas. In this three school districts and universities (where the majority of students are adults, by the way) doesn't anyone control what the students are doing? No one in this schools ever heard of Content-control software? It must be easier to do nothing and expect other sites to do your work. Tm (talk) 02:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Quick Kept per previous discussions. Please do not renominate without additional reasons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • the original file is taken on the year 2010,and has been put on the site of my friend's blog[6] by herself,and i asked her that can i put it on wiki to describe her school,and his answer was YES. so i dont think there's any dispute about the copyright.--Wuchernchau (talk) 13:58, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • すみません。中国では写真のライセンスという概念がありませんので、原作者に連絡し転載の許可を得るしかないです。原作者とのチャット履歴とかで証明できますか?英語が下手で日本語で打ちましたが、すみません。--Wuchernchau (talk) 13:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • (sorry Japanese lang only) ベルヌ条約パリ改正条約に加盟している中国(PRC)が画像の著作物を保護の対象外というのは考えにくいのですが, 保護していないとの資料を提示することはできますか。また, 著作権者から許可を受けた場合にはC:OTRSの手続きをご利用ください。 --eien20 (talk) 16:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • かしこまりました。C:OTRSの手続きは面倒ですから、その学校は家の近所にありますので、自分でもあそこの建物の写真を撮ったことがあります。見つけたら、改めてアップロードいたします。この写真を削除してください。ご迷惑をかけまして申し訳ございません。--Wuchernchau (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy delete he/she want to delete this photos. --eien20 (talk) 00:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of an unimportant company or personal business Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 21:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, spam. P 1 9 9   18:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht erlaubtes foto Simone Solga (talk) 07:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio Karsten11 (talk) 20:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bronze by living architect Raffaele Bonente. Unfortunately there is no FOP in Italy. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cdo2017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CS_Bihorul_Beiu%C8%99_logo.jpg implies that this is copyrighted and hence should not be on Commons. Please elaborate. Malyacko (talk) 22:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Football is not simple. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yasaq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Contemporary art: either own work by uploader (non-notable) or by someone else without permission.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yasaq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paintings without permission.

Dmitry89 (talk) 22:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image says "Copyright holder: imago sportfotodienst" and http://www.imago-sportfoto.de/homeagb.asp does not state that such use of images is free. Hence this seems to be an incorrect license and a copyright violation. Malyacko (talk) 23:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of copyright in information board. The board is the subject of the image, and COM:FOP doesn't apply to graphic works in the UK. bjh21 (talk) 23:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Church by architect Giovanni Michelucci who died in 1990. Unfortunately there is no FOP in Italy. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Church by architect Giovanni Michelucci who died in 1990. Unfortunately there is no FOP in Italy. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although it is listed as "own work by the uploader" on Commons, it has also been uploaded to w:File:SamWiki.png with source: Nolan Webb, so the authorship claim is questionable. Stefan2 (talk) 18:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF, all other uploads by this user (here and on English Wikipedia) seem to have copyright issues. Stefan2 (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload; low quality with little educational value, many better alternatives available at Category:Ice fishing. P 1 9 9   20:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author claims it's his own work, but in ukwiki this file is published as a non-free media, with a Ukrainian cossack encyclopaedia as its source Piramidion (talk) 06:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author claims it's his own work, but in ukwiki this file is published as a non-free media, with a Ukrainian cossack encyclopaedia as its source Piramidion (talk) 06:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transfered from ukwiki, but no OTRS permission Piramidion (talk) 06:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Also out of scope. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seemingly transfered from ukwiki (with an incorrect source given) but no OTRS permission Piramidion (talk) 06:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of free license GAndy (talk) 09:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. Whpq (talk) 10:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I add for deletion a photo, which is used at moment on a userpage, which is nominated for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 11:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproductions of derivative works of anonymous works above the threshold of originality for which {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} cannot apply as they were published in 1968. Per Commons:Anonymous works#France, they should be undeleted in 2039 if still anonymous then.

— Racconish ☎ 20:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne sais pas pour les autres, mais les fichiers que j'ai uploadé depuis Gallica sont dans le domaine public:
Conditions d’utilisation des contenus de Gallica
1/ Les contenus accessibles sur le site Gallica sont pour la plupart des reproductions numériques d'œuvres tombées dans le domaine public provenant des collections de la BnF. [7]
S'ils disent que « La réutilisation commerciale de ces contenus est payante et fait l'objet d'une licence », c'est juste du fr:Copyfraud, on ne peut pas déclarer des droits sur le domaine public, même si on est la BnF (surtout sur des œuvres anonymes).
Exemple d'affiche désignée comme « domaine public » : [8]
Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ 23:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Trouvé ce matin : la notice BnF de La chienlit c'est lui ! (le bouton est difficilement accessible à cause d'un panneau mal foutu, aussi disponible ici (sous « Informations détaillées ») : [9]):

Titre : [Mai 1968]. La Chienlit c'est lui !, Atelier des Beaux-arts : [affiche] (Epreuve en blanc sur noir) / [non identifié] Éditeur : [s.n.][s.n.] Date d'édition : 1968 Sujet : France -- 1968 (Journées de mai) Sujet : Histoire Type : image fixe Langue : français Langue : français Format : 1 est. : sérigr. ; 43 x 32 cm Format : image/jpeg Format : Nombre total de vues : 1 Description : Affiche Droits : domaine public Identifiant : ark:/12148/btv1b9018186x Source : Bibliothèque nationale de France, ENT QB-1 (1968,7)-FT6 Notice du catalogue : http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb414369523 Provenance : Bibliothèque nationale de France Date de mise en ligne : 14/03/2011

Que faut-il de plus pour prouver que cette œuvre (et toutes celles similaires) appartiennent bien au domaine public ?!. Le site de la BnF n'est il pas digne de confiance, surtout pour un fait aussi évident ? Quelle perte de temps pour rien...
Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ 10:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

 Comment Although some individual artists have so far refrained from claiming authorship on these posters, some of them, such as Gérard Fromanger [10] [11], are well known. Jacques Carelman is known to be the author of CRS à la matraque [12] ; Bernard Rancillac, to be the author of Nous sommes tous des Juifs allemands [13] ; Jean Hillaireau, to be the author of La chienlit c'est lui [14]. Some of these posters, such as On vous intoxique, are collectively signed [15], which led some institutions, such as V&A or the Tate, to assign their authorship to a collective entity such as the Atelier populaire [16] [17] (which does not change anything to the PD calculation as the French copyright law is basically the same for collective works and anonymous works, "70 years from January 1 of the calendar year following that in which the work was published" per article L. 123-3 of the French Intellectual Property Law). In 2005, a French advertising campaign using some of these images raised concern about copyright infringement and the advertising agency stated they had "negotiated the rights" [18] [19]. — Racconish ☎ 16:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. J'ai écrit en français, merci de me répondre en français.
  2. Je parle dans le vide ou quoi ? Quelle partie de domaine public ne comprends-tu pas dans la notice de la BnF ?
  3. Les 70 ans ne concernent pas le domaine public, c'est autre chose...
  4. Marre de ces pertes de temps continuelles causées par des gars qui n'ont rien de mieux à faire que de nuire au travail des autres comme toi Racconish (ce n'est pas une « attaque personnelle », c'est juste mon ressenti concernant tes « contributions »). Amusez-vous bien, je m'en lave les mains.
Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ 19:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
+ 1 --Noelbabar (talk) 21:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Because of the multilingual nature of Commons, it is generally considered more polite to discuss in English, the lingua franca of the project (cf. Commons:For Wikipedians#Cultural differences). You stated on your user page you are fluent in English, therefore I assumed it would not be a problem for you. Nevertheless, if my comment above is not clear for you, I will be happy to translate it in French, si mon commentaire ci-dessus n'est pas clair pour toi, je me ferai un plaisir de le traduire en français. "The image is in the public domain because BNF says so" is not a valid argument on Commons. We have had many cases where we found BNF's assessments, often laxist, to be unsubstantiated or contradicted by facts. In this case, there is no claim by BNF of transfer of copyright to BNF itself, it is only an assessment, not a release in the public domain by the copyright owner, and this assessment is in plain contradiction with French copyright law with no indication of why there would be an exception and it is contradicted by other assessments from other cultural institutions, such as Tate, V&A, Musée Carnavalet, Library of Congress or Beinecke library. Your statement that 70 years do not apply to these images is a mystery to me. It is well documented that the intention of the authors was to remain anonymous, on the basis of a political opinion on the relationship between the individual and the collective authorship [20]. In most cases, these posters originate from Atelier populaire (ENSBA) or Atelier des Arts-décoratifs, and the best practice by cultural institutions is to describe them as anonymous works from such or such workshop. But it would be a mistake to assume that because a work is anonymous it falls in the public domain. — Racconish ☎ 07:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Par ailleurs, certains de ces fichiers pourraient être placés sous cette licence. --Noelbabar (talk) 10:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain
This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD § Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information.


 Comment La plupart de ces affiches ne sont pas signées, leurs auteurs ayant voulu volontairement rester anonymes, considérant que leurs créations participaient d'un commun du mouvement collectif et donc implicitement du domaine public. --Noelbabar (talk) 11:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Noelbabar you are making a confusion : an anonymous work does not fall ipso facto in the public domain. These works are protected by copyright even if they are anonymous. As for the threshold of originality, kindly clarify which one of the above would be under it according to you. I have been careful to avoid nominating text only posters. — Racconish ☎ 13:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Les affiches sans maître de mai 68 / La contestation du droit d’auteur faisait partie des slogans de Mai 68. C’est dans cet esprit qu’ont été créées les célèbres affiches de mai 68, au sein de l’Atelier populaire installé dans l’Ecole des Beaux Arts de Paris. Même si on compte certains noms d’artistes célèbres, comme Gérard Fromanger, parmi les fondateurs de l’atelier, les affiches sérigraphiées furent volontairement publiées de manière anonyme, pour indiquer leur caractère d’oeuvres collectives et « sans maître ». -- « Rien n’est à nous ! » : Grandeur et misère du domaine public volontaire, lire en ligne. --Noelbabar (talk) 10:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Reprenons : cette affiche, par exemple. 1 : Elle est ligne sur le site gallica.bnf.fr. 2 : En haut, à gauche de l'écran, Informations détaillées, dans la colonne qui s'affiche Droits : domaine public. Où est le problème ? --Noelbabar (talk) 11:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As explained above, BNF's assessment as PD is not sufficient as it does not clarify why the work would be PD, in a context where such assessments by BNF have often been found unsufficient to establish PD on Commons. If, for example, BNF would claim the copyright has been transferred to itself, then it could release the image in the public domain, but such is not the case here. We can either consider the work is anonymous because the author(s) name has not been released ; or that the work is collectively signed by Atelier populaire, as other institutions such as V&A have done [21] (see also here). The distinction is irrelevant for copyright assessment purpose : the copyright duration is the same for anonymous works and collective works according to article L. 123-3 of the French Code de la propriété intellectuelle : 70 years from January 1 of the year following the publication. In any case the work is not PD yet. Also, the design of the factory and the flag are above the threshold of originality, which is why the derivative vector file File:Paris May 1968 - Lutte prolongée.svg should also be deleted. — Racconish ☎ 11:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Donc, résumons. Vous contestez la pertinence du classement domaine public par la BNF en vous appuyant sur des sources de galeries marchandes... Et que pensez-vous des affiches placées sous la licence Open Clip Art Library dans la rubrique May 1968 Posters ? --Noelbabar (talk) 17:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, BNF itself also reckons the collective attribution to Atelier populaire. As for the Open Clip Art Library, what file other than File:Paris May 1968 - Lutte prolongée.svg are you asking about ? — Racconish ☎ 18:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Cet autre fichier est encore plus éclairant : l'auteur physique et la BNF verse l'affiche dans le domaine public.

Description
Français : Titre : Les Affiches de mai 68 ou l'Imagination graphique : [exposition, Paris, Bibliothèque nationale, 17 février-31 mars 1982] / [catalogue par Charles Perussaux] ; [préface par Alain Gourdon]

Auteur : Perussaux, Charles (1920?-1995) Auteur : Bibliothèque nationale (France) Éditeur : Bibliothèque nationale (Paris) Date d'édition : 1982 Contributeur : Gourdon, Alain (1928-2013). Préfacier Sujet : Affiches politiques -- France -- 1945-1970 -- Catalogues d'exposition Sujet : France -- 1968 (Journées de mai) -- Affiches Type : monographie imprimée Langue : Français Format : [12] p.-70 p. de pl. : couv. ill. ; 22 cm Format : application/pdf Droits : domaine public Identifiant : ark:/12148/bpt6k6532558s Identifiant : ISBN 2717716254 Source : Bibliothèque nationale de France, département Recherche bibliographique, 2006-154060 Relation : http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb34670831w Description : [Exposition. Paris, Bibliothèque nationale. 1982] Provenance : bnf.fr

Date de mise en ligne : 21/06/2013
English: From the catalogue of anexhibition on French May 1968 protest posters: Les Affiches de mai 68 ou l'Imagination graphique. This exhibition was held at the Bibliothèque nationale de France (Paris) from 17 February till 31 March 1982.

Copyright holder of this exhibition catalogue is the Bibliothèque nationale de France itself, which has released this catalogue in the public domain.

Permalink to the full scanned catalogue: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6532558s/f10.image
Date
Source http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6532558s/f10.image
Author Charles Perussaux (1920?-1995) & Bibliothèque nationale (Paris)

--Noelbabar (talk) 22:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both Alain Gourdon and Charles Perussaux are curators of BNF, i.e. employees of BNF. It is a standard practice in France to have stipulations in work contracts saying that the copyright of works done by employees as such are transferred to their employers. This may apply to their own work, the text they produced for this catalog. But this possible transfer of copyright to BNF does not imply a transfer of copyright on the posters to which the catalog refers. Gourdon and Perussaux are not the authors of these posters and cannot transfer to BNF the related copyright. Now concerning File:Paris May 1968 - La lutte continue.svg, it is a derivative of File:Imagination Graphique 13 Lutte Continue.jpg which is itself above the threshold of originality. The collective authorship of this file is claimed here by Atelier populaire (see also here). — Racconish ☎ 09:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
« Copyright holder of this exhibition catalogue is the Bibliothèque nationale de France itself, which has released this catalogue in the public domain. » --Noelbabar (talk) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a circular reasoning, attempting to comfort an argument of authority, PD because BNF says so, by the same argument of authority, BNF because says so. You don't address the issue : why should we have here an exception to the French copyright law on anonymous or collective works ? — Racconish ☎ 13:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- Anonymous works have a copyright for 70 years after creation. Collective works have the same copyright. If the authors are known, the right runs for 70 years after the death of the last author. While the new material in the catalogue may be free of copyright, there is no evidence that the posters themselves are. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous work published in 1968, not PD yet, above the threshold of originality.

— Racconish ☎ 05:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous work published in 1968, not PD yet, above the threshold of originality.

— Racconish ☎ 06:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous work published in 1968, not PD yet, above the threshold of originality.

— Racconish ☎ 06:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous work from 1968 will nter the public domain in 2039, unless their authorship is claimed before.

— Racconish💬 15:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note Restored. It's impossible that no-FOP can apply here, as it's impossible that the work of art can be in any meaningful way copied from here. The quality of the photo hardly allows for the statue to be properly seen, though the photos are still useful. Restored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarwIn (talk • contribs)
Note 2 2014 Angola copyright law makes it clear that FoP is allowed (Artº 51º, c)).-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is by August Vannas (1886–1964) per http://www.ra.ee/fotis/index.php?type=2&id=224884, so copyright hasn't expired. 90.191.76.154 09:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is by Parikas brothers as per this archive database entry. So copyright not expired and no evidence of permission. 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:DD91:E883:C93:BC8E 10:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work. The uploader is not the author as he claims. — Racconish ☎ 11:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Public domain
This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD § Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information.

--Noelbabar (talk) 11:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely to be duplicate to this version. B dash (talk) 11:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free art from a commercial manga series published by Shueisha, written and drawn by Hirohiko Araki. IDV (talk) 12:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: OTRS permission needed by Hirohiko Araki. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free art from a commercial manga series published by Shueisha, written and drawn by Hirohiko Araki. IDV (talk) 12:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: authorization from Hirohiko Araki needed. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free art from a commercial manga series published by Shueisha, written and drawn by Hirohiko Araki. IDV (talk) 12:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: authorization from Hirohiko Araki needed. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 12:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 12:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Non-free material. Batholith (talk) 12:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie dodane, bez wiedzy osoby fotografowanej. Wykorzystywane, by w złym świetle pokazać prezydenta Jacka Majchrowskiego. 89.68.164.132 17:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose "Photo added, without the photographer's knowledge. Used to show President Jack Majchrowski in a bad light.", you said. This is still available on the photographer's Flickr page and is properly licenced. it may not be flattering to its subject, but we are not here to flatter people. No reason to delete. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Rodhullandemu. Ruthven (msg) 15:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was speedily deleted by Shizhao. Marcus Cyron and J. Patrick Fischer requested undeletion, because the file was in use. My only concern with this image is that this is a photo of an identifiable person, who may not consent to such a use. I don't believe this violated legal personality rights, but it should at least be discussed. Guanaco (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see no problem like this. ;-) --JPF (talk) 18:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely to be screenahots. 219.79.97.245 23:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: screenshot of a PD image. Ruthven (msg) 15:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per editors request, accidentally uploaded wrong version of this image. This contains faint hints of copyrighted content. Please delete ASAP SecretName101 (talk) 07:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   04:14, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work". Unsure about PD-text eligible since it clearly displays a logo. In any case, this is out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   04:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of authorship. Obvious reproduction from print. — Racconish ☎ 11:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, dubious source and author. P 1 9 9   04:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user is only using commons as a webhost, only edits are to userpage. personal files that are out of scope.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no meaningful contributions. P 1 9 9   04:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request (crop intended for portrait use, but unused) LookLook36 (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   04:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious own work 176.239.64.180 20:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: see File:Codex Borgia page 18.jpg. P 1 9 9   04:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious own work 176.239.64.180 20:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: see File:Codex Borgia page 21.jpg. P 1 9 9   04:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious own work 176.239.64.180 20:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep not a valid reason + clearly extracted from File:Codex Borgia page 18.jpg. Kathisma (talk) 16:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Kathisma. P 1 9 9   04:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Book cover from Taiwan with copyrighted photo. Solomon203 (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El autor considera necesario retitarlo debido a errores en el mismo archivo Erick FloENES (talk) 05:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 19:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Igis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Краснодар- горы.jpg and File:Роторный Двигатель.png - author or source is watermarked and no permission. Other files are reprints (scans) from books without permission.

Dmitry89 (talk) 09:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Igis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional/advertising images

Mitte27 (talk) 07:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Albert Pasche died in 1964. No freedom of panorama in France.

Chassipress (talk) 13:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published photo, appears here: http://throwersuniteworldwide.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Alexander-Rose-Rio-Olympics-Discus-Throw.jpg and on the subject's Twitter profile. Appears to be a news photo, needs more complete source info Ytoyoda (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran + out of COM:scope 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristinac77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This group of images includes book covers, photos of model airplane, first day cover, postage stamps, framed photographs, identity cards, museum exhibits as well as photos from scrap books and photo albums, newspaper clippings, images from approximately 1940s to the present, all labled as own work and quite clearly not own work. Some of these might be able to be kept if accurate source/author data were provided. One is a painting, but again own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:13, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristinac77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are derivative works (scans or photos) uploaded under CC-by-sa tag by the owner of the photograph (not the original author thus). I reckon that several (if not all) those files are in fact copyvio. The only doubt is about (real) anonymous EU works that should be correctly tagged.

Ruthven (msg) 13:17, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at a couple of these images, File:National Parks Airways, 1936.jpg also appears on this Flickr page as a 2013 upload, for which the uploader marks it as "Photo by Kent Moser" (who, according to this unrelated photo by the same Flickr user, was an aircraft mechanic for TWA). File:L'areoporto di Pocatello (Idaho, USA) sede della Compagnia Aerea National Parks Airways.png appears on this page, and was present there as early as November 2007 (archive.org link). The same photo, in a less cropped form, can also be seen as the second image on this page from the Ed Coates collection; Ed Coates got the photo from Western Airlines, which he worked for at one time. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 04:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but without further information, we cannot establish whether the photographers have died 70 years ago or are still alive. Even with this information, the files should be deleted for the COM:PRP --Ruthven (msg) 17:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I wasn't trying to argue against their deletion; quite the contrary, I was just adding some information on two images which I thought you might find helpful, trying to make clear that they seem to have been misrepresented here by the uploader. (True, I had edited one of those images in the past, but at that time I was taking the uploader at their word. In fact, it was your deletion nomination which led me to research their actual origins.) By all means, feel free to proceed. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 23:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete all: even in case there wasn't a copyright issue, the informative content is too low to suggest further investigation. The potentially useful ones are watermarked or too small, but even in these few cases copyright doubts are too strong. These pictures were probably shot in Italy (some details reveal an Italian home-banking tool on the table), but aren't covered by the Italian law: the photographed pictures were taken in many countries but Italy. --g (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of an anonymous work not PD yet. — Racconish ☎ 08:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Photo prise par moi-même d'un affichage public sur le plateau du Larzac. --LAGRIC (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]
But you are not the author of the artwork you photographed. — Racconish ☎ 14:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of an anonymous work not PD yet. — Racconish ☎ 08:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyrighted works. In any case, couldn't be used to accurately depict the character Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:37, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal file, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:37, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jousseaume-v (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jousseaume-v (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist/heir(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. We need permisison from the heirs of the painter. Ruthven (msg) 08:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jousseaume-v (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical maps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per PA, chenged the source accordingly. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Droits d'auteurs non possédés Anne-Catherine Loisier (talk) 15:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the front cover of a book, which certainly copyrighted, despite the photo on the cover may be in public domain Matthew hk (talk) 03:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of authorship — Racconish ☎ 06:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from Twitter Xgeorg (talk) 07:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copy availableFile:Yercaud 42 flowershow-2-yercaud-salem-India.jpg --Info-farmer (talk) 08:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no source (No source since) Though a source is provided, it is not the correct source, thus the copyright status is unknown. B dash (talk) 09:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright: © Victoria and Albert Museum, London 2017. All Rights Reserved. Ruthven (msg) 20:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no source (No source since) Though a source is provided, it is not the correct source, thus the copyright status is unknown. B dash (talk) 09:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright: © Victoria and Albert Museum, London 2017. All Rights Reserved. Ruthven (msg) 20:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a picture of another Rozalin, not the one located in gmina Nadarzyn. 95.49.151.172 09:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is by Parikas per http://www.ra.ee/fotis/index.php?type=2&id=224498. It's isn't known that Parikas brothers were employed by Bundesarchiv and it's unlikely that German archive acquired economic rights for an individual image from Estonian photographers. So authors' copyright hasn't expired and archive's copyright claim is dubious. 90.191.76.154 09:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A picture from within the red carpet, part of a series of pictures (see http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/bradley-james/images/33405207/title/nta-2013-photo ) uploaded by an anonymous user whose other uploads all have been deleted because of copyvio. The one who made the picture has to be a professional, the one who uploaded it definitely is not. 88.75.29.24 09:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2017 held in New York. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted.

Skr15081997 (talk) 14:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Historyfactss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: almost all are PD. Ruthven (msg) 20:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be uploader's own work, possible copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be uploader's own work, possible copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cake may be considered a work of 3D art. If so, this is a FOP violation, as there is no FOP in the US Elisfkc (talk) 15:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (it's not a matter of FOP btw). Ruthven (msg) 20:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copied from anywehre else, thou google nor tineye has hits for it. JuTa 15:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted music content Ата (talk) 17:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure this one is ok for commons ; I can read on the source "Todas las fotografías aquí expuestas son propiedad de su autor y enCancha.com exclusivamente. Si deseas utilizar alguna de estas fotos para tu blog personal, rígete por esta licencia Creative Commons. Si por el contrario deseas incluirla en noticias de una web, debes ponerte en contacto con nosotros para recibir el permiso adecuado que no vulnere la propiedad intelectual de la foto. << Volver a la portada de enCancha.com. Fotos exclusivas de baloncesto en enCancha.com" (I can't read spanish) El Funcionario (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: released under CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 ES. Ruthven (msg) 20:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a great trace, otherwise unused. superseded by other files in the SVG barnstars category Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file and other file uploads by user Gokebakan (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gokebakan ) state "Own work" but seem to be direct copies from images embedded in http://iransys.ir/articles/112-مواد-مرکب-کامپوزیت/540-مواد-همسانگرد-و-ناهمسانگرد.html , namely http://iransys.ir/images/article/composite/Hamsangard/No.1.jpg Malyacko (talk) 23:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: numbers and letters are not copyrightable. Ruthven (msg) 20:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded under a verifiably false copyright claim of Creative Commons; it's not an original photograph, but a scan of a magazine cover, and thus copyright belongs to the magazine and not to the uploader. Bearcat (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Bueller? Bearcat (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is somebody going to actually deal with this sometime before the arrival of the Jewish messiah? Bearcat (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 12:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from muis.ee

[edit]

Copyright not (know to be) expired; CC0 only applys to metadata, not the images themseleves, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ants Lauter.jpg.

Given author whose copyright hasn't expired:

Less than 70 years old, hence copyright can't be expired even if the author is anonymous:

Not enough data (date published/author) given to judge on whether copyright has expired or not:

--2001:7D0:88C2:F401:B822:DD6F:A1D9:BE04 10:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)c[reply]

After looking the link which goes to the other site which links to the other discussion, I think that I finally understand the issue. The original copyright notice is really unclear and makes confusion, and if any copyright violation occurred, it is unintentional from my side made in the good faith that CC0 1.0 aapplies. I have a comment on File:Kohtla-Järve oil plant.png. On the front of that image, one could see trolleys loaded by oil shale. That kind of trolleys were in use during 1920-1930s, so it is reasonable to expect that the 70-years limit has expired for this image. Beagel (talk) 12:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Could we use this image under {{Anonymous-EU}} license to replace File:Kohtla mine and oil plant (1924).png? Beagel (talk) 15:29, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly. Other than muis.ee you may find images, though with poor resolution, from the national archives, e.g. here by Creator:Carl Sarap, whose copyright has expired. 193.40.10.180 16:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PLease remember that the 70 years begins with the death of the author, so a 1920-1930 image is very much too recent to assume that the author died before 1945. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from muis.ee (2)

[edit]

More images where CC0 does not apply (see above) and that are less than 70 years old, so copyright hasn't expired:

Older than 70 years, known author, copyright not (known to be) expired:

Might be less than 70 years old per source page, copyright not known to be expired:

--62.65.58.165 07:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the picture has to be more than 70 years old? Or why the copyright has to be expired? On muis.ee site, they state that all contents are under CC0 1.0 licence (http://muis.ee/help/Autorioigused). And the licence description says nothing about 70-years-policy. Meryli (talk) 09:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And if the CC0 isn't the correct licence, which one should I use? Meryli (talk) 09:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This copyright page is confusing, but it must be read in a way that CC0 1.0 license applys only to metadata. Otherwise commercial use for images couldn't be prohibited (CC0 permits all kinds of use), as it says, and otherwise it would be irrelevant to refer to AutÕS § 20.
For copyrighted images it's correct to use a license that actual copyright holder (likely not the museum) agrees with. In this case any free license, including CC0 1.0, is fine on Wikimedia Commons. However, you might not manage to find out who the copyright holder (usually the author) is, and then image cannot be published under free license.
It is also possible that museum is the copyright holder. For instance, for a photograph of an item from museum's collection it's likely that it was taken by a museum employee in execution of duties of employment. In this case economic rights presumably transfer to employer. But since muis.ee makes no distinction between images that museums might own copyright for, and images that museums most likely don't own copyright for, then it's necessary to make an enquiry. Museum needs to confirm that they own rights for certain images, and that they agree with certain free license. Licensing permissions are proceeded via COM:OTRS, Estonian-language permissions can be forwarded to permissions-et@wikimedia.org. 62.65.58.165 10:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 06:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from muis.ee (3)

[edit]

As above: cc-zero license applys only to metadata. Muis.ee has updated its copyright page lately, probably in order to make it more clear. It says that images "can be freely used" if they "are not copyrighted" (this probably means copyright has expired), and for other images "permission for use should be obtained from the owner of the copyright". Database entries however generally make no distinction between images that are copyrighted and those that are not.

Following images are old, copyright could be expired, but there's no evidence on neither anonymous/pseudonymous publication over 70 years ago nor 70 years p.m.a term passing. Per collection description for Viljandi Museum most images are by known authors, whose copyright hasn't expired, though web database apparently omits author data for most images.

For following images muis.ee provides the author. Jaan Riet's copyright hasn't expired, and likely neither for Märt Teng, whose death year seems to be unknown though.

-- 90.191.76.154 16:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ship was built in 2001 --Mef.ellingen (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Wrong request, as far as I can see. Even the Danish Wikipedia says the ship was commissioned in 2000, and also according www.navalhistory.dk and here --Stunteltje (talk) 06:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The ship was commissioned at the end of November 2000 according to this article in a local newspaper. --Pugilist (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this information, i get my information from German Wikipedia. So we should rename all the pictures and delete my category with 2001? --Mef.ellingen (talk) 09:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mef.ellingen: The first part would be prudent. I've put a cat redirect at Category:MHV 817 Partisan (ship, 2000) to Category:MHV 817 Partisan (ship, 2001).   — Jeff G. ツ 23:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. Category:MHV 817 Partisan (ship, 2001) redirects. --Achim (talk) 21:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]