Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![15 File:Antoni Tàpies "Rinzen" (1992-1993). Vista del llit.jpg](#File:Antoni_Tàpies_"Rinzen"_(1992-1993)._Vista_del_llit.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![154 File:"Lovers" by Robert Jessup.png](#File:"Lovers"_by_Robert_Jessup.png){kind=link}
_Tonight._Photographer_Sven_Hagolani.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Appears to be a photo of an unidentified man. Likely out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 22:17, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete 'cause he is wearing sunglasses. Chesdovi (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:18, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
copyvio of http://amannews.in/uploads/thumbs_80_80/20160623121534-576b858e5da79-anurag.jpg 117.192.171.166 19:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Twice deleted before. Why not a third time? 141.196.207.56 06:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Not the same image, but still out of scope. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
well four deletion requests already but still out of scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Today again speedily deleted as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Unidentified person out of scope: unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Unidentified person out of scope: unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Unidentified person; out of scope: unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
I think this is quite a personal album pic. If we had not enough and good enough "khash" pics we could use it but not in this case. The couple look too much as centrepiece in this pic. Sorry... E4024 (talk) 11:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lokeshsoni1001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Lokesh soni Nawalgarh.jpg
- File:Lokesh Soni 1.jpg
- File:Lokesh ssoni.jpg
- File:Lokesh soni.jpg
- File:Lokesh 11.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vikram prajapat sayla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikidata query screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: user requested deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not public domain WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Moheen Reeyad at 06:05, 28 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 12:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
._Vista_del_llit.jpg){kind=link}
._Vista_del_llit.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted artwork. — Racconish ☎ 07:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Oppose: Check to OTRS! The permission comes from the legal copyright owners!ÀlexHinojo (talk) 05:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
![07:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/10/27#c-Racconish-2017-10-27T07:57:00.000Z-File:Antoni_Tàpies_"Rinzen"_(1992-1993)._Vista_del_llit.jpg){kind=link}
![05:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/10/27#c-ÀlexHinojo-2017-10-31T05:08:00.000Z-File:Antoni_Tàpies_"Rinzen"_(1992-1993)._Vista_del_llit.jpg){kind=link}
I withdraw my nomination Agreed, I should have asked first for a check or the OTRS ticket. — Racconish ☎ 07:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
![07:05, 31 October 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/10/27#c-Racconish-2017-10-31T07:05:00.000Z-File:Antoni_Tàpies_"Rinzen"_(1992-1993)._Vista_del_llit.jpg){kind=link}
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Nasilnas 22.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 21.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 12.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 1.jpg
- File:Nasilnassmile.jpg
- File:Nasilnascutecat.jpg
- File:Nasilnasgoogle.jpg
- File:Nasilnasimgur.jpg
- File:Nasilnasflickr.jpg
- File:Nasilnasfacebook.jpg
- File:Nasilnastwitter.jpg
- File:Nasilnasgood.jpg
- File:Nasilnasstye.jpg
- File:Nasilnas serious.jpg
- File:Nasilnasmedia.jpg
- File:Nasilnashot.jpg
- File:Nasilnastop.jpg
- File:Nasilnassweet.jpg
- File:Nasilnashandsome.jpg
- File:Nasilnasboy.jpg
- File:Nasilnas photography.jpg
- File:Nasilnas.jpg
jdx Re: 12:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and spamminess. — Jeff G. ツ 23:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Nasilnas 99.jpg
- File:Nasilnas09.jpg
- File:Google nasilnas.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 04.jpg
- File:DJ6jrZSUEAA8U1v.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 01.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 14.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 22.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 21.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 12.jpg
- File:Nasilnas 1.jpg
- File:Nasilnassmile.jpg
- File:Nasilnascutecat.jpg
- File:Nasilnasgoogle.jpg
- File:Nasilnasimgur.jpg
- File:Nasilnasflickr.jpg
- File:Nasilnasfacebook.jpg
- File:Nasilnastwitter.jpg
- File:Nasilnasgood.jpg
- File:Nasilnasstye.jpg
- File:Nasilnas serious.jpg
- File:Nasilnasmedia.jpg
- File:Nasilnashot.jpg
- File:Nasilnastop.jpg
- File:Nasilnassweet.jpg
- File:Nasilnashandsome.jpg
- File:Nasilnasboy.jpg
- File:Nasilnas photography.jpg
- File:Nasilnas.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- I reiterate my support above. — Jeff G. ツ 12:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the same Roberto Mateos in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aranchitasolis. E4024 (talk) 11:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no exif data, low resolution. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hystrix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on IMDb and unlikely to be own work. Because of the demand on the discussion page and on my disc. page. Hystrix (talk) 14:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. pixelated image from IMDb. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works. I speedy deleted all images that can be found at earlier dates in the web. Except one or two images, almost are small without EXIFs.
Are included logos, or coat of arms, of sports club with unclear copyright status.
- File:Entrada Merkatondoa.jpg
- File:Bus CD Izarra.jpg
- File:Pizarra de Merkatondoa.jpg
- File:Tribuna Merkatondoa.jpg
- File:Club Deportivo Izarra plantilla 2013-14.jpg
- File:Grada Lateral.jpg
- File:C.D. Izarra 1939.jpg
- File:Escudos-Izarra.jpg
- File:Merkatondoa- 2.jpg
- File:Vista de Merkatondoa.jpg
- File:Cd izarra.jpg
- File:Escudo C.D. IZARRA.jpg
- File:Escudo C.D. Izarra.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep File:Bus CD Izarra.jpg and File:Entrada Merkatondoa.jpg and Delete the rest. Zarapuz left a message on my talk page, apologizing for the copyvios but confirming that these are their own works. They're the only two with EXIF data and not found elsewhere on the web. Guanaco (talk) 09:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per Guanaco, kept the two with EXIFs, speedy dlete the others. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
porque era una prueba Fnoelia (talk) 21:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: I doubt that Fnoelia actually intended to request deletion of their own deletion request. While technically this satisfies CSD G7 (original author requesting deletion), I think it would be excessively confusing to apply that here. --bjh21 (talk) 12:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: A DR for a DR?. --JuTa 18:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
por error la subi Carlosmicro (talk) 21:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: If the DR was a mistake then it can be closed "keep". No need to delete the DR. --bjh21 (talk) 12:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: A DR for a DR?. --JuTa 18:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 00:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Дима Г (talk) 00:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Дима Г (talk) 00:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Дима Г (talk) 00:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Дима Г (talk) 00:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Unidentified person out of scope: unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
potentially copyright issues, since (obviously, see moirée) taken from tv/web, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses and/or 'profiling' (see EN-WP), but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 02:27, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Too complex for PD-logo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Logo of an American Company. Commons:Threshold of originality#United States contains many logos that are significantly more complex. -FASTILY 02:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Below the TOO for the United States. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
This is Getty Images rights-controlled photo #131665042 by Ian Gavan. It is quite unlikely that korea.net has the rights necessary to release this photo under a free license. —RP88 (talk) 02:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete again – for the fourth time, is it? —LX (talk, contribs) 05:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
appears to be photo of television (non-free) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
No permission given from Facebook. B dash (talk) 03:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs proper source to prove work is by the Government of the Phillipines. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 03:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and out of scope. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dooste Amin (talk · contribs)
[edit]I'm nominating all the "own work" uploads by this user because I do not trust the authorship claim. There is a variety of cameras used, and the user is an apparent sockpuppet, with deceptive tactics including a false OTRS ticket.
- File:Name of Cambyses in Egyptian hieroglyphs and Old Persian cuneiform.svg
- File:Travertine mine in Nimvar (2).JPG
- File:Travertine mine in Nimver (1).JPG
- File:Jasb District.JPG
- File:A plain in Shazand County.jpg
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (107).jpg
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (6).jpg
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (37).jpg
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (36).jpg
- File:Interance of Chāl-Nakhjir Cave.jpg
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (76).JPG
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (48).JPG
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (69).JPG
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (22).jpg
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (17).jpg
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (24).jpg
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (51).JPG
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (16).jpg
- File:Chāl-Nakhjir Cave (120).jpg
- File:Noor missile in Holly Defence Exhibition (2).JPG
- File:Noor missile in Holly Defence Exhibition (3).JPG
- File:Noor missile in Holly Defence Exhibition (1).JPG
- File:Natural environment of Central District of Tafresh County.JPG
- File:Natural environment of Kharqan District of Zarandieh County.JPG
- File:Qaemiyeh Mosque.JPG
- File:Tabresi square.JPG
- File:Tafresh Mosalla 2.JPG
- File:Tafresh Mosalla.JPG
- File:Arak to Tafresh Road.JPG
- File:A Grevestone in Arak Cemetery.JPG
- File:Hessaby square.JPG
- File:Amir Kabir square of Farmahin.JPG
- File:Delaram village.JPG
- File:Mausoleum of Mahmoud Hessaby 3.JPG
- File:Mausoleum of Mahmoud Hessaby 4.JPG
- File:Mausoleum of Mahmoud Hessaby 1.JPG
- File:Mausoleum of Mahmoud Hessaby 2.JPG
- File:Mashhad Metro 2.jpg
- File:Mashhad Metro 3.jpg
- File:Mashhad Metro 4.jpg
- File:Mashhad Metro 5.jpg
- File:Mashhad Metro 6.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Guanaco (talk) 07:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dooste Amin (talk · contribs)
[edit]License review failed: 404 at the stated source link. The uploader has engaged in deceptive practices including a false OTRS ticket.
- File:Ali Sayyad Shirazi's corpse.jpg
- File:Ali Sayyad Shirazi in a Bell 205 of IRIAA.jpg
- File:Mehdi Chamran and Ali Sayyad Shirazi.jpg
- File:Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and general Hassan Firouzabadi.jpg
- File:Funeral prayer for Sayyad Shirazi.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 07:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no confidence that this user is the copyright holder for any of these photos. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Nanang hasani (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:27, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Press photo from her Facebook page; unless the uploader is the actual photographer (which there is no evidence of), this is not CC 4.0 Drown Soda (talk) 07:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SaMin SAmIN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images not own work of uploader, but taken by "Copyright holder Reza Salsany:" according to metadata. Each file templeate contains "Source Own work Author SaMin SAmIN, with special thanx to Mr Reza Salsany for gifting his personal collection." These are not own work of uploader and would require OTRS from Mr. Salsany to be retained. "
- File:Siamak Shajarian in Toronto - 2014(1).jpg
- File:Siamak Shajarian in in Toronto - 2014(2).jpg
- File:Keyavash Nourai in Toronto - 2014(2).jpg
- File:Keyavash Nourai and Siamak Shajarian in Toronto - 2014.jpg
- File:Keyavash Nourai in Toronto - 2014(1).jpg
- File:Soleyman Vaseghi in Toronto.jpg
- File:Soleyman Vaseghi & Fateme Habibizad.jpg
- File:Fateme Habibizad in Toronto (8).jpg
- File:Fateme Habibizad in Toronto (7).jpg
- File:Fateme Habibizad in Toronto (6).jpg
- File:Fateme Habibizad in Toronto (5).jpg
- File:Fateme Habibizad in Toronto (4).jpg
- File:Fateme Habibizad in Toronto (3).jpg
- File:Fateme Habibizad in Toronto (2).jpg
- File:Bahareh Moghtadaie playing tombak in Toronto (1).jpg
- File:Bahareh Moghtadaie playing tombak in Toronto (2).jpg
- File:Fateme Habibizad in Toronto (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SaMin SAmIN (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images were uploaded as own work, but we cannot trust them. Between this account and the other sockpuppets of Gire 3pich2005, there have been many "own works" uploaded with many cameras. There is also known deception, including a false OTRS ticket.
- File:Seyyed Hassan Nasrullah signature.svg
- File:Mesbah Ghamsari and his kamancheh.jpg
- File:Mehdi Bagheri and his kamancheh.jpg
- File:Portal of Urmia University.jpg
- File:Ālbāloo polu (1).jpg
- File:Ālbāloo polu (3).jpg
- File:Ālbāloo polu (2).jpg
- File:Tahdig of Ālbāloo polu.jpg
- File:Two children from Saveh, Markazi Province.jpg
- File:Mesuring instruments of a 2010 Renault Tondar 90.jpg
- File:A 2010 Renault Tondar 90 in a gas station in Arak.jpg
- File:2010 Renault Tondar 90 interior.JPG
- File:Sadegh Khalkhali signature.png
- File:Fans of Rohani in Arak.jpg
- File:Thermal power plant of Shazand.JPG
- File:Shazand Refinery (1).JPG
- File:Shazand Refinery (2).JPG
- File:Portal of Shazand Petrochemical (2).JPG
- File:Portal of Shazand Petrochemical (1).JPG
- File:Lotfollah Safi Golpaygani signature.png
- File:Yousef Saanei signature.png
- File:Ahmad Jannati signature.png
- File:Armand River 2.JPG
- File:Armand River 3.JPG
- File:Armand River 1.JPG
- File:Mammoet cranes in Shazand Petrochemical.jpg
- File:Mammoet tranportation vehicle.jpg
- File:Mammoet ring crane in Shazand Petrochemical.jpg
- File:Mammoet crane in Shazand Petrochemical.jpg
- File:Vank Cathedral.jpg
- File:Forests of Gilan province (42).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (47).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (46).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (43).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (45).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (44).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (41).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (36).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (37).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (38).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (40).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (39).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (48).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (33).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (35).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (34).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (30).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (31).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (32).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (25).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (27).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (28).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (24).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (26).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (29).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (21).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (20).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (22).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (23).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (18).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (19).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (15).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (12).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (14).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (13).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (16).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (17).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (49).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (9).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (7).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (11).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (10).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (8).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (6).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (3).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (4).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (1).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (5).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (2).JPG
- File:Forests of Gilan province (50).JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Guanaco (talk) 07:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Missing files from the list:
Meisam (talk) 11:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no confidence that uploader is indeed the copyright holder. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
unused photo of an unidentified person Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Very poor quality. Lots of better pictures available, e.g. at Category:Schlossplatz Stuttgart. Zinnmann (talk) 08:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
The photo is very blurry. In my opinion it is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small photo without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Although these don;t show up in Google, they are all small, with no EXIF. Used only for an out of scope spam gallery on Commons.
- File:Longjoin building in Zhejiang province.jpg
- File:Longjoin's fabrication2.jpg
- File:Longjoin building in Zhejiang province1.jpg
- File:Longjoin's certificates.png
- File:Long-join(branch in ZheJiang).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
While we allow an active contributing user to have one or two user page images, "active" and "Contributing" must come first. This user has made no contributions to Commons.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
The same as RevningeKertemindeegnensFriskole.jpg Beethoven9 (talk) 09:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
This is not a selfie. Copyright holder is the unnamed show company, who must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Also see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alice Ciara .jpg. --E4024 (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
small size, no metadata, found in Interten in more size. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo with unclear notability. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 12:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be made by 3rd party. Some also Commons:Derivative works from book cover.
- File:Entrevista 01.jpg
- File:Cuenta cuentos 01.jpg
- File:Cuenta cuentos 02.jpg
- File:Talía Lund Paz 06.jpg
- File:Talía Lund Paz 05.jpg
- File:Talía Lund Paz 04.jpg
- File:Talía Lund Paz 02.jpg
- File:Talía Lund Paz 03.jpg
- File:Talía Lund Paz 01.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Steelmills (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Promotional/advertising, out of scope. Probably copyright issues as well.
- File:Royden Mills Sculpture, Beyond a Certain Phrase.jpg
- File:Beyond the Known Substances.jpg
- File:Separation Point 2013.jpg
- File:Want.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal files in Category:Lake Louise
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of scope. Numerous non-personal alternatives available in the category.
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 02.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 03.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 04.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 05.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 06.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 07.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 08.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 10.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 11.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 12.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 13.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 14.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 17.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 18.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 19.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 20.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 21.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 22.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Lake Louise, Alberta - 23.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 17:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
it doesn't seems to be their own work Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
copyvio Karsten11 (talk) 19:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Copywritten photo. L.Halifax001 (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Qweshypedia 141.196.206.101 20:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
porque fue una prueba Fnoelia (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader request. --bjh21 (talk) 11:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Not enough info on the rights of this photo. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
personal foto, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unidentified locations in Karnataka (panoramio uploads), et al, personal files from panoramio, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 23:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unidentified locations in Karnataka (panoramio uploads), et al, personal files from panoramio, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploaded by a copyvio uploader. Seems like a professional shoot. Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation Rampion (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of socpe. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A Yellow Fidget Cube.jpg, Toys are copyrighted Elisfkc (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be collection of promo materials.
- File:RAD Polymer Joint Cap.png
- File:Portrait of Robert Thomas Grotz.png
- File:Grotz invention 9.jpg
- File:32mm Image.png
- File:PastedGraphic-1.pdf
- File:PastedGraphic-3.pdf
- File:PastedGraphic-4.pdf
- File:Kai Braden at Asians on Film Festival.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:48, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000353898060/f8e2cd3b19859a0a36340c1ed2c98071_400x400.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:48, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://gp1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/802892/http_public_production/artists/images/448169/original/hash:1500745537/IMG_3868.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Of course it can be found on other websites, it's on Salome's music album's booklet and it's used on album's promotion. Libertyaddict19:06, 27 October 2017 (ET)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:48, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by -evZeppelin- (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media22.elsiglodetorreon.com.mx/i/2010/02/189203.jpeg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Files continuously uploaded by blocked user. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 15:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Files continuously uploaded by blocked user. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 15:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Files continuously uploaded by blocked user. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: also no evidence of permission for complex logo. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Cross-wiki spam by sockpuppet of globally locked user Parissa Official. Hiàn (talk) 21:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- This logo is my own work and I have all the copyright ChevauxB (talk) 22:06, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- So, what? How does that address the request? Hiàn (talk) 22:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: re-creation of deleted content, please file at COM:UDR. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:25, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
previously deleted. nothing has changed. Quakewoody (talk) 01:47, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted speedily due to long-time abuse. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)}}
Seems unlikely uploader owns the rights to an advert Ytoyoda (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Previously published photo, manipulated: https://data.whicdn.com/images/7328069/original.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Promotional image that is out of scope and of poor quality 67.100.127.12 19:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:26, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Motivo Pessoal Rafael 0806 (talk) 07:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted by Denniss. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Previously published, available at higher res: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/31/30/26/313026f08d50f26afed007fbf0adab63.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, bad scan Hiddenhauser (talk) 19:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- I'm the uploader and I agree--someone made a better version that's now being used on the relevant article (Stella Asling-Riis). This one can go.Penny Richards (talk) 22:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: File:Stella Asling-Riis.png is a better copy of the same picture. --bjh21 (talk) 11:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Pitruleta isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in pt.wiki. Probably the flag is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
This picture, of a known Israeli TV presenter, seems to be taken from Instagram. It has no place in the Commons without an OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 21:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
subida por error Carlosmicro (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted file, not enough info on the rights of this photo. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Not enough info. on the rights of this photo. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
No Com:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
No Com:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hormoz's Soil Carpet
[edit]No FOP in Iran.
- File:Second soil carpet of Hormuz (2).jpg
- File:Third Hormoz's Soil Carpet (2).jpg
- File:Third Hormoz's Soil Carpet.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Guanaco (talk) 07:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
No source or author given; Google image search not pulling up any information. No evidence that the author died more than 70 years ago. Hchc2009 (talk) 07:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No commercial FOP in Iceland Thesupermat (talk) 07:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork. — Racconish ☎ 07:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork. — Racconish ☎ 07:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dubious "own work". Looks like a professional photo and lacks any metadata, most likely a copyrighted photo. Uploader may be the person in the photo, but an OTRS is needed. Flickerd (talk) 12:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:13, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bestproperties, again, advertisements, Roland zh (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
permission by artist not granted kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 21:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Going by the description page this is a scan from a magazine, so the uploader cannot release it in public domain. Underlying lk (talk) 21:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
The description says: "Скан проспекта внешнеторговой организации Элорг. СССР, 1984-й год.". Translate: "A scan of a brochure trading company Elorg. USSR, 1984-th year.". I added the English translation to the description page of the image.
The full booklet can be seen here: https://archive.org/details/AGATSovietAppleIICloneBrochure
It's not a magazine or another author or a commercial publication. It does not contain any information about the availability of copyright to the submitted data. Trading company Elorg at this time defunct. It should be noted that other photo computer Agat-4 acceptable quality do not exist.
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+ it seems a 3d photo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Karnataka
[edit]personal files from panoramio, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons,
- File:Iduvani, Karnataka, India - panoramio.jpg
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio (16).jpg
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Urulagallu, Karnataka, India - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Roland zh (talk) 23:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Karnataka, personal files from panoramio, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons,
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio (19).jpg
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Kanur, Karnataka 581337, India - panoramio.jpg
- File:Urulagallu, Karnataka, India - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Uttara Kannada, Karnataka, India - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Roland zh (talk) 23:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, but there is no FoP in the UAE. Dura lex, sed lex. 84.61.179.231 17:15, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: all possible FOP issues are DM Jcb (talk) 19:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! The World Trade Centre Residence is finished and not free to photograph! Without consent of the architect it is not possible to publish his work under a free licence. {{De minimis}} applies not, the building occupies almost the whole frame and is the only purpose for this image! Ras67 (talk) 00:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo of apparently non-notable website, likely out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Maybe I'm wrong, and the image of the horse doesn't exceed COM:TOO, but I went with a non-free use rationale on en.wiki just in case, since it is a comparatively complex logo. GMGtalk 12:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: above ToO IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Arnaud Courlet de Vregille (b. 1958) Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Arnaud Courlet de Vregille (b. 1958) Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned/replaced by File:Bergman cycloaromatization reaction mechanism v2.svg by the same user. Leyo 14:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A Yellow Fidget Cube.jpg, toys are copyrighted
- File:Kawaii Jumbo Squishy Panda.jpg
- File:Kawaii Jumbo Squishy Peach.jpg
- File:Kawaii Jumbo Squishy Unicorns.jpg
- File:Kawaii Jumbo Squishy Strawberry.jpg
- File:Kawaii Jumbo Squishy Sliced Bread Toast.jpg
- File:Kawaii Jumbo Squishies Assortment.jpg
- File:Kawaii Jumbo Squishy Strawberry Cake Compressed.jpg
- File:Kawaii Jumbo Squishy Strawberry Cake Expanded.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 14:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:László Varvasovszky 'Honki im Schattenland'.jpg
- File:László Varvasovszky Kinderbuch 'Honki im Schattenland'.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
The logo is non-free fair use logo, reduced to very small size did not turn the logo to public domain (should upload to Spanish wiki with fair use tag, but not in common) 106.69.132.46 14:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- The alternative version in English wikipedia, en:File:Cd maldonado.png, may qualify to public domain as simple shape. 106.69.132.46 14:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giselle Chamorro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Viele verschiedene Dateien, viele Gründe. Alle Dateien ohne EXIF-Daten. Neuere Fotos mit geringen Abmessungen, die auch auf anderen Webseiten vorhanden sind. Buchumschläge von neuen Büchern. Viele Logos ohne weitere Angabe der Quellen. Mehrere alte Fotos, teilweise so pixelig, dass es vermutlich Scans aus alten Zeitungen sind, wiederum ohne Angabe der Quellen.
- Ergänzung: Nachdem ich den Löschantrag gestellt hatte, erhielt ich auf meiner Diskussionsseite vom Hochlader oder von der Hochladerin folgende, wirklich sehr nette und aufschlussreiche Mitteilung: „Buenas tardes, estas imágenes las he seleccionado de Google y están relacionadas con el contenido de cada texto. Quedo a su disposición.“ Hystrix (talk) 02:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- File:Consecuencias-de-ser-fumador-pasivo.jpg
- File:Poster baby 300 es.jpg
- File:Cartl tabaco 2010.gif
- File:AMA fotooo.jpg
- File:Logos AMA.jpg
- File:Logo sacper 2008.jpg
- File:Scpba.jpg
- File:Csm nt15-40 1f8e35ed70.jpg
- File:Frank Netter.jpg
- File:Marco-vitruvio-polic3b3n.jpg
- File:INCATIV.jpg
- File:SR-John-Montgomery-1-300x238.jpg
- File:Descargas33.jpg
- File:Barnet.jpg
- File:Gertrude Elion 1991 foto.jpg
- File:Foto George Hitchings.jpg
- File:16burchenal 184.jpg
- File:Yellapragada SubbaRow.jpg
- File:Sidney-farber-at-microscope.jpg
- File:Alfred Gilman foto.jpg
- File:Ajaxp.jpg
- File:41719O8PaqL. SX333 BO1,204,203,200 .jpg
- File:Terminologia.jpg
- File:Centro Oncológico en Gonnet, La Plata.jpg
- File:Dr. José María Mainetti en sus últimos años.jpg
- File:Hipogrifo.jpg
- File:Apollo belvedere.jpg
- File:Libación griega.jpg
- File:Oráculo en la Antigua Grecia.jpg
- File:Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Costa Rica (UCR), sede fundacional del SILAT.jpg
- File:Sanatorio Británico, ciudad de Rosario, provincia de Santa Fé.jpg
- File:Dr. Favaloro en la Fundación.jpg
- File:Helen Taussig atendiendo a un niño.jpg
- File:Sanatorio Podestá.jpg
- File:Ricardo Finochietto con Eva Duarte y Juan Domingo Perón .jpg
- File:Hermanos Finochietto operando- Enrique cirujano (con frontolux) y Ricardo ayudante.jpg
- File:Hospital Rawson, Ciudad de Buenos Aires.jpg
- File:Miguel Coronatto Paz.jpg
- File:A.P.A-SILAT.png
- File:APA-SILAT.jpg
- File:Logo SILAT.jpg
- File:Edición del libro de terminología anatómica realizado por la IFAA.jpg
- File:Dr Rolando Cruz 53 abr 10.jpg
- File:Logo de SILAT.jpg
- File:Didio2.png.png
- File:APA-PAA.jpg
- File:El hígado de Babilonia.png
- File:Prof. Dr. Néstor Maquieira.png
- File:7386209 orig.png
- File:Prof Dr Benaim-218x300.jpg
- File:Reconstrucción mamaria con colgajo abdominal horizontal (músculo recto abdominal).jpg
- File:Reconstrucción mamaria.jpg
- File:Art59 f5.jpg
- File:Projection-of-the-silicone-prosthesis-on-the-soft-tissues-of-the-chin-Proyeccion-de-la.jpg
- File:Mamografía con infiltrado por silicona líquida..jpg
- File:Alfonso Roque Albanese.jpg
- File:Sergey Fedoroff.jpg
,_sede_fundacional_del_SILAT.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_y_Ricardo_ayudante.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hystrix (talk) 14:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giselle Chamorro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Wie schon zuvor.
- File:AAADSGFGD.jpg
- File:Ricardo Finochietto.jpg
- File:Envejecimiento activo.jpg
- File:Envejecimiento humano.jpg
- File:Envejecimiento.png
- File:Convenio mARCO.jpg
- File:Convenio-Marco-OMS-Tabaco-460x300.jpg
Hystrix (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Multiple issues: broken JPEG and screenshot of copyrighted, non-free website featuring non-free Google content. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Reprint without permission from https:// www.google.com/amp/s/www.hotpepper.jp/strJ000195612/amp/ -OKcricket (talk) 00:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC) ←Begin on a new line (spam filter)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:56, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Photos from chanmin1008.tistory.com
[edit]
I'm not convinced that these photos belong the blog owner of chanmin1008.tistory.com. To begin with, these images are all watermarked by "tiramisu". Additionally, the source page shows that these photos were edited into one giant file (500 × 4993 pixels). Lastly, similar images can be found elsewhere in larger resolutions, like in this post. This is likely a case of license laundering. ℯxplicit 01:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Firudin Əliyev Ali oğlu.jpg
Depicted person died in 1983. Own work is under doubt, probably real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:58, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Non-stylized version appears here: https://www.facebook.com/sakhnin.fc/photos/a.10150594190723953.386037.24831608952/10155742088113953/?type=1&theater Image likely owned by club, not uploader Ytoyoda (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be Alexandre Premat, who is supposedly in the photograph as well. Other uploads were obvious copyvios. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Broken JPEG. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: File:PHS (2).jpg suits the needs anyway. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Lanphuongnguyen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://a9.vietbao.vn/images/vn901/xa-hoi/11247902-ong-Linh.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This seems to be out of COM:SCOPE as there is no clue what it goes with, and appears to be a photographic copy of images/words from National Museum of Iran. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely authorship claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Professional foto, small standard size, no exif and can be found published elsewere earlier: 04.03.2016. Most likely copyvio. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- also file:Pinchuki2.jpg
Author en:Louise Arner Boyd died in 1972 and the photos are protected with copyright until 2043 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 20:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
as Robert Jessup is still alive his work should be assumed to still be in copyright WereSpielChequers (talk) 20:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
![20:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/10/27#c-WereSpielChequers-2017-10-27T20:40:00.000Z-File:"Lovers"_by_Robert_Jessup.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
![15:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/10/27#c-Jon_Kolbert-2017-11-03T15:05:00.000Z-File:"Lovers"_by_Robert_Jessup.png){kind=link}
Maps of unclear copyright statuts.
- File:Подільське воєводство у XVII столітті.jpg
- File:Українська радянська соціалістична республіка на політичній карті Європи (1919).jpg
- File:Адміністративна карта Української Радянської Соціялістичної Республіки (1937).jpg
- File:Королівство Русі за правління Данила Галицького (1253-1264).jpg
- File:Королівство Русі за правління Юрія ІІ Болеслава (1323-1340).jpg
- File:Королівство Русі за правління Любарта-Дмитра (1349-1383).jpg
- File:Королівство Русі за правління Любарта-Дмитра (1340-1349).jpg
- File:Королівство Русі за правління Шварна Даниловича (1264-1269).jpg
- File:Королівство Русі за правління Юрія І Львовича та Андрія Юрійовича (1301-1323).jpg
- File:Королівство Русі за правління Лева І Даниловича (1292-1301).jpg
- File:Королівство Русі в останній період свого існування (1323-1387).jpg
- File:Подільське князівство (1393).jpg
- File:Велике князівство Руське (1432-1435).jpg
- File:Гетьманщина (1667-1687).jpg
- File:Гетьманщина XVII століття.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative copyvio, scanned paper maps. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Likely false authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, watermarks, previous publications found elsewhere, the uploader's history, and the nature of several of the images. Some of the images may be old enough for the copyright to have expired, but truthful source, authorship and publication details are required to determine that.
- File:Ікона Спаса Нерукотворного церкви Різдва Богородиці с. Терло (XV ст.).jpg
- File:Вівтар Терлівської Церкви Різдва Пресвятої Богородиці (1872).jpg – grabbed from http://decerkva.org.ua/terlo.html. Clearly watermarked.
- File:Церква Різдва Пресвятої Богородиці (1872).jpg – as above.
- File:Терло на карті королівства Галичини і Лодомерії.png
- File:Зустрічаючи Кука, туземці падали навколішки.jpg
- File:Дерево, під яким капітан Кук спостерігав за проходженням Венери.jpg
- File:Туземний жрець дарує капітану Куку порося.jpg
- File:Смерть капітана Кука.jpg
- File:Адміністративна карта Української Радянської Соціялістичної Республіки (1933).jpg
- File:Адміністративна карта Української Радянської Соціялістичної Республіки (1927).jpg
- File:Свідоцтво про закінчення курсу української мови у Козятинській вищій початковій хлопьячій залізничній школі (12 червня 1918 року) .jpg
- File:Карикатура на селянську реформу 1861 р. в українському сатиричному журналі “Шершень” (1906).jpg
- File:Мясоєдов Г.Г. Читання маніфесту 19 лютого 1861 року. (1873).jpg
- File:Шляхетська садиба (XVI століття).jpg
- File:Озаринецький замок (1928).jpg
- File:Карта Брацлавського воєводства (1670).jpg
- File:Географічна карта Брацлавського воєводства (1790).jpg
- File:Журбинці на Географічній карті Брацлавського воєводства (1790).jpg
- File:План Озаринецького замку.jpg
- File:Озаринецька каплиця Святої Богоматері (1901).jpg
- File:Озаринецька синагога. 18 століття..jpg – grabbed from https://goo.gl/maps/4StTzrHdqBN2
- File:Озаринецький костел Воздвищення Хреста Господнього (1741).jpg – grabbed from http://www.ozaryntsi.com/foto-istoriy.htm
- File:Костел Воздвиження Хреста Господнього (1741). Озаринці.jpg
- File:Свято-Успенська церква (1910). Озаринці.jpg – grabbed from http://demarcos.livejournal.com/214213.html
- File:Храм Пресвятої Богородиці. Озаринці. 1868.jpg – grabbed from http://www.ozaryntsi.com/foto-istoriy.htm
- File:Озаринці. Фото. 1975 рік..jpg
- File:Сучасна панорама Озаринець. .jpg
- File:Фото Озаринець. 1905 рік..jpg
- File:Озаринці на карті України. Гійом Лавасер де Боплан. 1650 рік..jpg
- File:Озаринці на карті України. 1741 рік..jpg
- File:Озаринці на карті України. 1681 рік..jpg
- File:Озаринці в складі Подільського воєводства. 1665 рік..jpg
- File:Подільське воєводство станом на 1670 рік.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%9E%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%9E%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect (see details). In addition, not drawn according to MOS:CHEM. Leyo 16:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 20:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
This map is a nonsense. What does it mean "International recognition of Catalonia"? Recognition of independent Catalonia, or recognition of Spanish Catalonia? Anyway, it's unsourced. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I think this was jumped on way too early, it got AFDed after 9 minutes of creation! There will be further developments on this with regular updates coming through as each nation states they do/don't recognise it and the souces will come. I think it is clear that it means the declared Catalan republic. The C of E (talk) 17:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Useful map. --Lingveno (talk) 17:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The map is very useful to check how Catalan independence recognition/unrecognition evolves. As per sources, they're all over here. Impru20 (talk) 17:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The map is very useful to check how Catalan independence recognition/unrecognition evolves. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Sources will appear, map is useful. Alex Khimich (talk) 18:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the explanations above --Ca7apult (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep People expect to be able to find a quick map showing what countries have or have not recognized Catalonia. I don't think there's much ambiguity. TheZcuber (talk) 19:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: COM:INUSE. Maybe it should have {{Current}}, though. --bjh21 (talk) 20:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep For reasons stated above --Ethanmayersweet (talk) 20:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The map is useful. --Foghe (talk) 20:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per above, but should probably be superseded by a SVG version if possible. Mélencron (talk) 20:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Snow Keep - The only un-sourced entity is The Gambia which has been reverted. See: [1] for sourcing on the other countries. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Snow keep per what everyone else has said. This map is useful and has sources. Chessrat (talk) 20:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Enough reasons given already. PPP (talk) 23:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Few people will regard it as the recognition of "Catalonia Autonomous community". Also, map is useful. /没多少人认为这个是对“加泰罗尼亚自治区”的国际承认，且图片并非无用。Bxxiaolin (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the reasons stated above, it is clear that it means the declared Catalan republic, map is useful. Jirka.h23 (talk) 06:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete If Catalonia is not recognised by any country in the world, what is the point in having a map to demonstrate the obvious? Seriously! What is encyclopaedic about it? Also please see WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:TOOSOON. The countries coloured in red, grey and blue all have the same stance - they do not recognise the independence of Catalonia. Why use three different colours to indicate/ illustrate the same diplomatic positions? Some countries currently in grey will have issued similar statements to the countries currently coloured in red, meaning that this map will not be up-to-date. Not to mention that this map is ENTIRELY based upon WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. The countries coloured in red at the moment could easily change their position in the future when new governments come to power. How do people realistically propose keep this map up to date? We had this issue on the International recognition of Kosovo article. When new governments come to power, how do we know for sure (without assumptions) that the new government has taken the same position as their predecessor? This next issue really irritates me. Why do we have a map showing every single administrative region in the world? If people insist on having a useless map, can't we just show countries? Why are we using a map which shows sub-divisions in Greenland? What are we trying to achieve here? Do we really need to show the borders of every Russian oblast? Ultra high detail SVG maps like this are extremely pointless. Do you really want me to rant about Antarctica being on the map? For record, I'm not opposed to having a recognition map (if Catalonia ever receives diplomatic recognition). I however believe that such a map should have two colours, one colour for countries which don't recognise Catalonia and one colour for countries which do recognise Catalonia. A map showing which countries have issued statements serves no encyclopaedic value. IJA (talk) 10:30, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - despite the flood of keep votes. This file is not in use and it's indeed original research. And as long as Catalunya is obviously de facto not independent, it doesn't seem useful to create such a map in which the few clownish small countries that do recognize this non-existing country are hard to find. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Not own work as stated by the uploader, no proof of authenticity. The use of the word Charnegos is from 1950s and 1960s, and the alleged organization that was to issuing this image dissapeared in 1920s, and the clothing of the people in the image doesn't fit as 1920s, the logo and name of the organisation doesn't fit, and the typo isn's 1920s. It's a easy-to-know fake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panotxa (talk • contribs) 20:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: This seems to be a modern creation: the photo and the text are precisely aligned with the pixel grid. If it's not a fake, then {{Own}} is unlikely to be correct and it should be deleted as a copyright violation. --bjh21 (talk) 20:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment: I just notified the picture's uploader of this deletion request. It appears that Panotxa forgot to do so. The request should perhaps be left open a couple of days longer than usual as a result. --bjh21 (talk) 11:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)- Agreed if decided here: No issue deleting it for copyright reasons. Ill do it myself. But its not a fake image, that image is even present in Catalan history books. The organization disappeared in 2014, its one of their most infamous political propaganda posters from the early 21st century. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonrisas1 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Not PD-ineligible. Jcb (talk) 17:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
No es el actual escudo del municipio 147.75.127.75 14:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
NO pertenece al municipio de cachipay Julian1200 (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
No Pertenence al municpio de cachipay Julian1200 (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
No Pertenece al municipio de cachipay Julian1200 (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
NO pertenence al municipio de cachipay Julian1200 (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
No Pertenence al municipio de cachipay Julian1200 (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Escudo No es de municipio Es un Error Y Ya Se Subio El Corregido Julian1200 (talk) 15:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, seems correct from the heraldry point of view. Ruthven (msg) 08:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
este escudo debe de ser borrado de la wikipedia ya que genera conflicto con la entidad del municipio de cachipay por que este no es el escudo oficial del municipio y debe de ser cambiado ya este escudo debe desaparecer JulianJtm (talk) 21:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
debe de ser borrado ya que no hace parte del escudo municipal ya esta subido el actualizado y real que es Escudo-cachipay-2017.png el cual si debe de ser el oficial de uso solicito su rapida pronta eliminacion JulianJtm (talk) 21:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Available online as part of this montage so OTRS confrimation needed that uploader is copyright holder Nthep (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Violación de derechos de autor MONUMENTA (talk) 13:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Si, por favor, borra esta foto. La subi por error. Gracias --Turista Inglesa (talk) 13:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Violación de derechos de autor MONUMENTA (talk) 13:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Si, por favor, borra esta foto. La subi por error. Gracias --Turista Inglesa (talk) 13:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Violación de derechos de autor MONUMENTA (talk) 13:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Si, por favor, borra esta foto. La subi por error. Gracias --Turista Inglesa (talk) 13:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Image claims a source of Flickr without providing a URL for license verification. Even with a URL, I would be very leery of flickrwashing the license. See en:file:Hugh Gusterson professional portrait.jpg on the English Wikipedia where the photo was declared to have been provided by email and the name of the file implies a professional photographer took the photo. OTRS tag indicates that the provided permission is not sufficient. Whpq (talk) 14:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information (only for Coats of Arms commissioned before 1983). --Y.haruo (talk) 21:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
A duplicate of File:Robespierre.jpg Russian Rocky (talk) 17:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
[[Category:Այս հոդվածը կուրսային աշխատանքիս գուխներից է: Ժամանակիս սղության առումով հաճախակի խմբագրել չի ստացվում: Այս թեմայով հայերեն նյութ չկա համացանցում այդ իսկ պատճառով ես այս հոդվածը դրեցի Վիքիպեդիայում: Հեղինակային խախտումները ժամանակի ընթացքում կվերանան:]]
Deleted: duplicate and not the uploader's own work. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Vista villa marina, falcon.JPG
Out of project scope due to bad quality. The other photos about the bird in this set are better. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Crop of a news photo, originally uploaded by a seemingly problematic en-wiki contributor: http://www.aek365.com/a-488313/aek-rethumno-live.htm Ytoyoda (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Claire Cunningham and Jess Curtis in publicity shot for The Way You Look (at me) Tonight. Photographer Sven Hagolani.jpg
[edit]_Tonight._Photographer_Sven_Hagolani.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tonight._Photographer_Sven_Hagolani.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- also file:Claire Cunningham and Jess Curtis Photographer Sven Hagolani (cropped).jpg
OTRS-permission from photographer Sven Hagolani is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
porque era una prueba Carlosmicro (talk) 21:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Not eligible for courtesy deletion, since it was uploaded several months ago. --bjh21 (talk) 12:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Also, we have very few pictures of Monte Caseros. --bjh21 (talk) 12:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
go to garbeg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.131.33 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21, as realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Professional photos with no exif info, uploaded by a new user who has not uploaded to Commons before. Highly unlikely that these are own work
- File:DG BI Sugeng.jpg
- File:DG BI PerryWarjiyo.jpg
- File:DGS BI MirzaAdityaswara.jpg
- File:DG BI Rosmaya Hadi.jpg
- File:DG Erwin Rijanto.jpg
- File:Agus DW Martowardojo.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Peter Navarro, Director of the White House National Trade Council, Addresses in the Oval Office before U.S. President Donald Trump Signs Executive Orders Regarding Trade on March 31, 2017 4.jpg
[edit]
A screenshot from Youtube. Although it is under PD-USGov, there is no permission given by Youtube. B dash (talk) 11:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: There is no doubt that this video is produced by the White House. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the file kept on wiki commons is surely legal and reasonable. --Wildcursive (talk) 19:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per -Wildcursive. Ruthven (msg) 15:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Too complex for PD-logo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a close call, but there's too many different things going on in this logo (e.g. circular logo surrounded with text, vertical stripes, big letter "A" in uncommon typeface, two-tone colors used to create depth) that it probably possesses "at least some minimal degree of creativity" (wording from Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.). -IagoQnsi (talk) 21:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Edit warring over "no source" tag. Discuss it here at the DR instead of reverting. Guanaco (talk) 07:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete User Lmmnhn contend that File:Yukio Edano 201210 (2).jpg is from Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet. But image uploaded by user Lmmnhn is not the same as that site's image, I think. And user Lmmnhn did not explain where he/she got "revised" image in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Revision deletion request, and only he/she try to remove the tag in file's history. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 09:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- All we want is an answer. Lmmnhn, did you retouch this image yourself, based on File:Yukio Edano 201210.jpg? If not, where exactly did you find it? Guanaco (talk) 21:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It seems pretty clear that it was a retouch of File:Yukio Edano 201210.jpg OR [2]. Either way, that leaves no copyright problem. I don't think we normally need to keep (near) duplicates, but if someone wants to use one version and someone else another, keeping both is an easy (and almost cost-free) solution. However, if this ends up being unused, it could be deleted later as a unused (near) duplicate. whym (talk) 14:55, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
Deleted: Unused copy of existing file at 1/2 the size is not needed. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Bhakta Receives Blessing From Sadhvi - Gangasagar Fair Transit Camp - Kolkata 2016-01-09 8483.JPG
[edit]
This photograph was taken without the permission and knowledge of the person in the photograph and who considers it to be an infringement in his personal spiritual pursuit, that should not be made public without permission. Sougatobose (talk) 12:29, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
I agree to the deletion proposal since such photographs being floated on Wikimedia without permission is intrusion in privacy and violates decency not to speak of legalities.
Deleted: Personal photo. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Request the deletion of this photograph as this was taken without prior information or permission of one of the subjects, who considers it to be a very personal spiritual journey not to be made public. Sougatobose (talk) 12:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Request the deletion of this photograph as this was taken without prior information or permission of one of the subjects, who considers it to be a very personal spiritual journey not to be made public. Sougatobose (talk) 12:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Google Chrome is non-free software subject to EULA. Even though it is based on BSD-licensed source code, this screenshot is from a non-free binary, and there have been deletion discussions in favour of deletion of images not generated only from Chromium project. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Chrome elements in this screenshot are PD-Simple, and the same image could be made using Chromium. No point, really. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Google Chrome is non-free software subject to EULA. Even though it is based on BSD-licensed source code, this screenshot is from a non-free binary, and there have been deletion discussions in favour of deletion of images not generated only from Chromium project. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Chrome elements in this screenshot are PD-Simple, and the same image could be made using Chromium. No point, really. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:55, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of permisson for the audio Ronhjones (Talk) 19:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Music: Bumba Crossing by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
What is wrong with this licence?
This is the third time I have uploaded it. Bandwidth here in Africa is slow and expensive. Why do you ask for media from Africa and then mark it for deletion? It would seem everything I do on Wiki is marked for deletion, marked to disable etc etc etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentaylor13413 (talk • contribs) 05:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The author has since added music source information. I've checked the source, it is available under CC-BY-SA on both Incompetech and YouTube. —Dispenser (talk) 03:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep : interesting and beautiful. Anthere (talk)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a colourisation of an old photograph. While the photograph itself is presumably old enough for its copyright to have expired, the colourisation probably isn't. Paul_012 (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also no source despite claim of age,. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses and/or 'profling' (see EN-WP), but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Image is the only contribution of an uploader who only wrote about himself and has contributed nothing else to the project. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Paul 012 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.palaces.thai.net/hrhprincessgalyani/html/preview/20081115233648.jpg.html -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: User:Paul 012 found online an instance of this photo in smaller resolution and devoided of EXIF or other metadata, in a website hosted at
thai.net(instead of the expectedgo.thor.ไทย) and including the puzzling note «ไปเผยแพร่ต่อโดยไม่ได้อ้างแหล่งที่มา». I think that the original licensing and permission from Sippakorn Yamkasikorn’s Fotopedia account is not seriously challenged by this finding. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)- Tuvalkin, that link is a preview. You're supposed to click on the image link to the original file with full exif, which is 3888*2592 pixels. (The Commons file is 1000*667). --Paul_012 (talk) 21:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for warning me; I have no idea how did I miss that obvious feature: it would be the 1st thing to check. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Palaces.thai.net is an official website of the Bureau of the Royal Household (BRH), which it uses to host media it makes available to the public. Some galleries are licensed as CC-BY-NC-ND, such as the one cited in this deletion request from 2007. The gallery for Princess Galyani Vadhana's funeral, from which this image is taken, has no such CC licence, and is explicitly noted as copyrighted. The footer statement "ภาพดิจิทัลจากสำนักพระราชวัง สงวนลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ.๒๕๕๐ ตามพระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ.๒๕๓๗ ห้ามนำข้อมูลของเครือข่ายนี้ ไปเผยแพร่ต่อโดยไม่ได้อ้างแหล่งที่มา" translates as "Digital image(s) from the Bureau of the Royal Household. Copyright B.E. 2550 (2007) under the Copyright Act, B.E. 2537. It is forbidden to propagate the information of this website without attribution." Fotopedia.com is no longer online, so it is not possible to further scrutinise Sippakorn Yamkasikorn's contributions, but of his other photos that have been uploaded here, none are taken with a Canon EOS Kiss Digital X. It is possible that he is the author, and that he donated the photo to the BRH. However, Commons policy demands further confirmation of ownership in such cases, and here it appears that the BRH considers itself to have received transfer of copyright for such donated images. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Paul 012: Thanks for you explanation showing that
palaces.thai.netis not a phishing expedition and for your further research and arguments. However, unless Sippakorn Yamkasikorn is a shameless plagiator, this seems to be a case of a GLAM claiming copyright over everything and anything it has curation duties over. It’s bad enough that they can bully the WMF with frivoulous DMCA takedowns — I will not agree with a wilful deletion on our part, not even with the additional information you provided. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Checking further, I found an archive of the original Fotopedia page on the Wayback Machine.[3] It appears to have been uploaded in 2010 (two years after the event). I've reached out to the author via Facebook for more information. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:36, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Paul 012: Thanks for you explanation showing that
- Comment: I've received confirmation from Sippakorn Yamkasikorn that he is the author of the image. However, he says that he can't remember the exact conditions under which he took the photo, which was nine years ago, and that it's quite probable that the Bureau of the Royal Household actually owns the copyright. He's therefore requested that the image be deleted. A quote of his statement and my translation follows. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:55, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
เรื่องภาพนี้ ผมเป็นผู้ถ่ายเอง แต่เวลาผ่านมานาน จนตัวผมเองไม่สามารถค้นต้นฉบับไฟล์ภาพได้ คาดว่าคงหายไปกับ HD ที่เสียไป
และผมไม่มีความชำนาญที่จะนำภาพนี้ออกจากเวปที่ผมเคยลงเผยแพร่ ด้วยความรู้เท่าไม่ถึงการณ์ จึงอนุฯาติให้ผู้มีความชำนาญ ทำการนำภาพออกจากเวปที่เผยแพร่อยู่ในวณะนี้ได้
ดังนััน ภาพนี้ จีึงเป็นลิขสิทธฺ์ของสำนักพระราชวัง ผมเป็นเพียงผู้ถ่ายภาพเท่านั้นRegarding this photograph, I took it, but it's been a long time and I can no longer locate the original file; it was probably lost with a failed hard drive. I'm not knowledgeable enough to remove the photo from the website to which I incorrectly had it published, and authorise those with the ability to remove the photograph from the website(s) it is currently published in. The copyright of this photograph is owned by the Bureau of the Royal Household; I was only the photographer.
- Thanks for your trouble, Paul 012. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:15, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
DW of modern work, see date in the lower left corner Jcb (talk) 23:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- This work is on the outer side of the church, as seen hereː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Szent_Gy%C3%B6rgy_Szerb_Ortodox_Templom.jpg Freedom of Panorama applies in Hungary. --Elekes Andor (talk) 06:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- FoP normally does not cover reproduction of 2D works. At COM:FOP#Hungary I see no indication that Hungary would be an exception to that. Jcb (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
The Cases of Free Use (Hungary)
68.—(1) Of a fine art, architectural and applied art creation erected with a permanent character outdoors in a public place a view may be made and used without the authorization of the author and paying remuneration to him.
You say ː ::FoP normally does not cover reproduction of 2D works. -- Why not ? Hungarian law have no article like that. You must apply hungarian law. Law is not as you like, law must be followed as it is. This picture is part of the view. Its not a reproduction of a 2D work, rather part of the panorama. Panorama cannot be prohibited in Hungary.--Elekes Andor (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think you are missing the point about the essence of FoP. In principle, all works are copyrighted. FoP formulates an exception to the copyright regulations. In any cause not explicitly dealt with in the FoP exception, normal copyright rules will apply. Jcb (talk) 10:09, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Sure: in principle, all works are copyrighted. But nobody is talking about the copyright here. The author have the copyright in general and in this case too. And I have the possibility of the free use in general in the cases of FoP. Free use is as general in Hungary as copyright is general for the author. Again: you do not have the right to interpret the hungarian law as you like it. The idea of “panorama” means the panorama and parts of the panorama too. By the wayː to prohibit parts of the panorama is contradiction in terms. You cannot have a piece of art partly free to be used, partly prohibited for the audience (for 120 years). This is not an exception, this is the rule. --Elekes Andor (talk) 05:44, 30 October 2017 (UTC) --Elekes Andor (talk) 08:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Of course this nomination is about copyright. I don't think that the Hungarian FoP rule allows this. Different from what you think, I do have the right to state my point of view on the Hungarian law. I do live in a free country, not e.g. in China. Jcb (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
You are sadly confused, what panorama means. The very word „freedom of panorama” comes from the phrase: f r e e. You are f r e e to do something. Free to enjoy the landscape, the church, the artwork on the outer side of the wall of the church. Its for us. To enjoy it, you have to see it. To see it, you have to take a photo. Please do not delete my opinion.--Elekes Andor (talk) 08:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- What a nonsense. Jcb (talk) 17:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Work is dated 2000, COM:OTRS permission of painter is needed, the image depicts nothing but the painting. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized >>webp<< format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - own work seems unlikely, unused too. --Herby talk thyme 14:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
American malacological bulletin 1990-2007
[edit]- Categories within Category:American malacological bulletin, from Category:American malacological bulletin (1990) to Category:American malacological bulletin (2007).
(I found no copyright notice for volumes 1983-1988, if they are public domain, then the template Template:PD-US-1978-89 should apply to them.) American malacological bulletin is copyrighted. https://archive.org/stream/americanmalac22122007amer/#page/n1/mode/1up There is no indication, that it could have license compatible with Wikipedia. --Snek01 (talk) 22:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Info: It requires a closer look as the metadata grabbed from archive.org are (at least partially) incorrect, see here for example 1983 → 2006. --Achim (talk) 21:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Please individual DRs for he files or a least name them all in one. --JuTa 19:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
See the metadata and the source page: this image is not released under the OGL, it's Crown copyright and uses the MOD News Licence, which is more restrictive. DrKay (talk) 13:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Regardless of the metadata, the image is released on the statued source age under the OGL (we still allow dual licensing, right?), an acceptable open licence. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: The license is acceptable here on WC. See Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses Acceptable licenses. The UK Governmental source (from which this image was uploaded) states this image is compatible with CC BY 3.0 Open Government Licence (OGL) . P.g.champion (talk) 15:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC) P.g.champion (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- That would be true if it was an OGL image, but it is not. DrKay (talk) 19:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 06:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ironically, I came to WC to add content but find I now spend most of my time searching out and deleting Copyvios. However, the UK MOD Crown Copyright 2017 in this instance ( can't comment on other MOD images) has now been superseded by OGL. So is OK on WC. Don't keep saying isn't unless you can come up with justifiable reasons. Please don't distract me (from what little time I have to spare) for searching out and deleting true Copyvios. P.g.champion (talk) 14:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Are you saying it's published with an MOD Crown Copyright 2017 licence? That licence is not compatible with commons. DrKay (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- See:Deletion requests Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial unveiling -jpg.02 P.g.champion (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- That would be true if it was an OGL image, but it is not. DrKay (talk) 19:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The source states "Crown Copyright" this is not the same thing as OGL. --Fæ (talk) 22:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- The source states "All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated". "Crown copyright" does not negate that, since it is a statement of the copyright owner, not its licence (note that "crown copyright" is also stated alongside the OGL release). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- The site terms say "except where otherwise stated", and it is stated, in fact there is no other reason for saying "Crown copyright" as a legend against an image on this particular website, apart from distinguishing it from all the others without legends that obviously are therefore OGL. We cannot presume that by "Crown copyright" the writer means OGL, and the default license does not apply based on the way the website terms are unambiguously stated. The now years long history of all releases of official photographs of the Queen for press reuse, makes it highly credible that the policy behind the scenes is that OGL is not to be used on portraits of the Queen.
- With regard to the words "Crown copyright" not being a licence, this is a weak tangent. The UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act uses the precise words "Crown copyright" without qualification to indicate works "Where a work is made by Her Majesty or by an officer or servant of the Crown in the course of his duties", which makes those words the same a declaring a licence in my book. However IANAL, so if you can find a legal precedent established in the British court system, that would be useful. --Fæ (talk) 12:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- The source states "All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated". "Crown copyright" does not negate that, since it is a statement of the copyright owner, not its licence (note that "crown copyright" is also stated alongside the OGL release). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Source site states crown copyright != OGL. --JuTa 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
See the metadata and the source page: this image is not released under the OGL, it's Crown copyright and uses the MOD News Licence, which is more restrictive. DrKay (talk) 13:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: The license is acceptable here on WC. See Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses Acceptable licenses. The UK Governmental source (from which this image was uploaded) states this image is compatible with CC BY 3.0 Open Government Licence (OGL) . P.g.champion (talk) 15:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- @P.g.champion: See also File:Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial unveiling - 03.jpg, from the same event. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- OGL is an acceptable licence, but this image is not released under the OGL. DrKay (talk) 19:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 06:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Regardless of the metadata, the image is released on the statued source age under the OGL (we still allow dual licensing, right?), an acceptable open licence. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- The source page does not state that. DrKay (talk) 19:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it does. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 06:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- The source page does not state that. DrKay (talk) 19:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- @ DrKay. If you think a UK Government website is wrong, you (even if not a UK tax payer) can bring the issue up at [4]. P.g.champion (talk) 15:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- No, I think the website is correct. That's half of the evidence I'm providing. The other half is the metadata. DrKay (talk) 16:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- What about the metadata? The question posed is whether the image is OK to have on WC. Two of us have given that answer to the affirmative. Also, rather than continue this on your second nomination Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial unveiling (which is in the same vain from the same website), lets keep this discussion on both images here. P.g.champion (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Are you saying here that it's published with an MOD Crown Copyright 2017 licence? DrKay (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- I must say the matadata is excellent and provides a good unequivocal audit trail. So what's the problem? Note also, what I said above about you being able to getting an explanation about OGL direct from [5]. The ball-has-been-in-your-court and still is, to show miss attribution, in defiance of a UK dot Gov website that adheres to OGL. P.g.champion (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- The metadata says "UK MoD Crown copyright This image may be used for current news purposes only. It may not be used, reproduced or transmitted for any other purpose." under "Copyright holder" and "Distributed under the terms and conditions of the MOD News License: http://www.defenceimagery.mod.uk/fotoweb/20130715_Crown_Copyright_MOD_News_Licence_V2.pdf" under "Usage terms". These licences are not compatible with commons. The source website[6] confirms this by labelling the images as "Crown copyright" in the image caption and noting at the bottom of the webpage that OGL does not apply "where otherwise stated". DrKay (talk) 18:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- I must say the matadata is excellent and provides a good unequivocal audit trail. So what's the problem? Note also, what I said above about you being able to getting an explanation about OGL direct from [5]. The ball-has-been-in-your-court and still is, to show miss attribution, in defiance of a UK dot Gov website that adheres to OGL. P.g.champion (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think you should read https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/584237/20170117_MOD_Crown_Copyright_Licensing_Information_Version_v0_1.pdf and https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/224534/20130715_Crown_Copyright_-_MOD_News_Licence_V2.0_-_U.pdf. DrKay (talk) 22:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- You can also see previous discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2011/11#UK Govt. copyrights and Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2012/10#MOD News License and a recent deletion on similar grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prime Minister Theresa May visits Stonehill International School.jpg. DrKay (talk) 23:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Writing as the primary uploader of MOD images, including corresponding with the MOD, this image is published for current news purposes and is not released on OGL. At source, explicitly, the license is "Crown Copyright" and in the image EXIF it says this is for current news only which is the norm for MOD image library for any photograph of Royal Family members. Again, Crown Copyright != OGL. --Fæ (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Crown copyright is a statement of the copyright owner, not a licence. The source page clearly states - also alongside a "crown copyright" logo - "All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Reply to this is on File:Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial unveiling - 03.jpg, I don't want to keep copy and pasting replies to the same discussion on the same collection of photographs. --Fæ (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Crown copyright is a statement of the copyright owner, not a licence. The source page clearly states - also alongside a "crown copyright" logo - "All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep the OGL is clear, conflicting exif should discounted. we should not reward governments that want to profess openness, that is not really open. let the government explain in open court how they have a copyright on open licenced items. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 18:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes OGL is clear. The problem is there is insufficient evidence to verify that this photograph was ever released under OGL. There is no evidence that the Crown (agent) is attempting to change or revoke a license. --Fæ (talk) 18:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- The EXIF doesn't conflict. Both the EXIF and the source webpage say the image is Crown Copyright. DrKay (talk) 19:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, and the EXIF in my images says "copyright Andy Mabbett". Both are statements of copyright ownership, not a licence, and not contrary to the open licence under which they are released. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Gosh, what a fine example of |circulus in probando. If HMSO (Her Majesty's Stationery Office) doesn't like our interpretation, you can bet that they (the emissaries of Queen Elisabeth II) would be down on us like a ton of bricks. Suggest that those editors, that keep questioning multiple OGL's uploads, collectively bring all these up themselves, on some other WC Desk, rather than on each and every individual upload! Be~Cause, it is wasting time that others editors need to spend on copyvios and miss- licensing. P.g.champion (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Source site claimed Crown copyright != OGL. --JuTa 20:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BQUB17-JKober (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chemical diagram. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
The files I uploaded are the structures of the molecule Elovanoid, that our article talks about. The article is a group project for our Biochemistry course in University, so I would like for Wikimedia Commons to not delete the files. They're correct and my own work, I didn't copy it from somewhere else. Thank you!
Kept: unused, uncategorized -> not useable. --JuTa 20:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': potentially personality right isusses and/or potentially 'profiling' (see EN-WP), hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: found no reason to doubt own work claim. --JuTa 20:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Was this photograph first published before 1923? Who says that? Who took the photo? No source on file. 141.196.206.101 21:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- If the fresco is considered 2D, then by Commons policies, it falls under {{PD-old-100}}. If the fresco is not considered 2D, then there's a big problem... AnonMoos (talk) 23:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- It appears the original uploader uses a different en:wiki handle these days, pinging Prioryman for possible comment. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- it's on a wall, by definition the fresco is 2D. --Fæ (talk) 19:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: 2D = PD-art-100. --JuTa 20:17, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [8]. Yann (talk) 08:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)