Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 20th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for racist vandalism on English Wikipedia. Please delete Liz (talk) 03:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image by non-contributor, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It will be replaced by a uncompressed version CCPSupporter (talk) 12:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closed, I will use a speedy delete. CCPSupporter (talk) 12:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted by Túrelio. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright Galeap19 (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-free image, deletion per uploaders request. --Ciell (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no encyclopedic value; moreover, this upload suggests that it is an intentional disparagement Mosbatho (talk) 19:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedily deleted per CSD G3. —RP88 (talk) 21:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake A.S. MUDGALA (talk) 14:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 19:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unused in any wikipedia pages SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep seems good photo of an interview. Deleting this just adds burden on Commons because these aren't deleted in reality, but are hidden from non-admins. Deleted files can only be seen by admins. Deletion wastes admins' precious time, especially if the image is good enough. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unused in any wikipedia pages SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image is fine.  Keep no valid reason for deletion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Immagine originale scattata personalmente in luogo aperto al pubblico.--Lungoleno (talk) 13:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep the deletion request is obviously trolling. --Sailko (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sailko: It is not trolling, as I see the image is not used for almost 2 years so I requested for deletion. This format is the same as Wikipedia. If this format is not the same as Wikipedia, kindly please tell to me at my talk page. Thank you! SeanJ 2007 (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Trovo incomprensibile la motivazione. Nella pagina Oratorio del Redentore (Rovereto) in == Altri progetti == si legge esplicitamente Wikimedia Commons contiene immagini o altri file sull'oratorio del Redentore. Viene previsto che commons possa avere immagini da consultare o vedere anche se non pubblicate direttamente nella voce. Se dobbiamo cancellare TUTTE le pagine non usate in qualche pagina dovremmo cancellarne milioni.--Lungoleno (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
SeanJ 2007 Not being used in a project is not a reason for deleting an image on Commons. Commons is a collection of free licenced images for any use, not just Wikipedia pages uses. Please read Commons:Project scope before you do any other deletion request. --Sailko (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree to Sailko. @SeanJ 2007: , Commons hosts files that can either be used or unused, as long as the image quality is good. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SeanJ 2007: The image is fine, file size is 4,728 × 3,855 pixels which is already more than acceptable. Many images here have resolutions of around 3264px (e.g. File:Lacson Avenue.jpg) or 1024px (e.g. File:NLEx.jpg). These can be retained here for eternity, whether or not these are being used on any Wikipedias. Plus this image has metadata info that guarantees that it is self-photographed photo by Lungoleno. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. There are hundreds of thousands of files in Commons that are not used in any wikipedia. This is not a reason to ask a deletion for its! DenghiùComm (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: speedy kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unused in any wikipedia pages SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete copyright violation: screenshot of a copyrighted news program. COM:SCREENSHOT! JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 12:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. source states "© RTL, Stefan Gregorowius" MBq (talk) 08:00, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have filed a speedy deletion request due to the fact this is obviously a copright violation. The faster the photo is deleted, the better it is. --Mosbatho (talk) 17:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unconstructive usage on enwiki talkpage. Stang 01:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete As far as I'm concerned this isn't legitimately in use. Low quality image, no useful description or filename or categorization from which a reasonable educational use may be discerned or users in need of such an image might find it. 69.174.144.79 15:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rasoul1002095 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, permission from the copyright holder is needed. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure.

Yann (talk) 12:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted - by Regasterios in lack of permission.Jonteemil (talk) 04:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trippy Ja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos.

Smooth O (talk) 14:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image improperly used, usually shown on a non-sense redirect SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep not a valid reason for deletion. If you have some issue on the redirect, fix the redirect being used on an article. Other than that let the redirect stay as it is. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rolo Ink. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As interpretations of copyrighted film characters, afraid these fall under COM:DERIV/COM:FANART and can't be hosted on Commons.

Lord Belbury (talk) 14:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (mostly due to COM:DW - would need permisison from both tattoo artist and the authors of the original photos. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:12, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original source unclear, but this is a widely used your-name-here usericon (eg. https://mobile.twitter.com/MMdawgHS) Lord Belbury (talk) 17:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO Norway. Jonteemil (talk) 19:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 14:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Googlemaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyvio from GoogleMaps; even if not it's a very low resolution map Enyavar (talk) 20:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal picture of user with very few contributions; unused Enyavar (talk) 20:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete F10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubts about "own work"-claim by uploader, as image was prepublished already in 2014 here and here. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. If you are the copyright holder, please contact COM:VRT. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kertadikara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal images not in use.

Smooth O (talk) 08:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 05:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lord Belbury as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd batch-flagged a dozen unused selfies from this user as F10 and took this one in the same spirit. The file is not in use anywhere. --Lord Belbury (talk) 00:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete in addition to Lord Belbury's rationale, this looks like a frame grab from a video. Notice the odd crop and the artifacts. It honestly looks like it might have been deinterlaced at some point. Low resolution and no EXIF as well. That's a delete on COM:PRP grounds for me. 69.174.144.79 15:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a great picture, but I only see the CC BY-NC 2.0 license at the image source (flickr), without the purported GFDL, so the currently used {{Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0-dual}} seems to be wrong and there is no suitable free license. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete unless a chain of appropriate licensure can be proven (i.e., it was available under a free license previously, the uploader had obtained the image under such a license, and then uploaded it). I can't tell if it was previously available under a free license, but the dual GFDL/CC-BY-NC-SA seems extremely unlikely for an image that came from Flickr. 69.174.144.79 15:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Also https://web.archive.org/web/20190115070952/https://www.flickr.com/photos/sergiu_bacioiu/8663672412/ from 2019-01-15 shows CC BY-NC 2.0. In addition, look at Special:DeletedContributions/Inritter. --Achim55 (talk) 17:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo used for self-promotion on English Wikipedia Liz (talk) 00:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork per COM:SCOPE - it's out of scope. Personal artwork can be uploaded to Flickr or other free services. Missvain (talk) 00:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing new here compared to COM:PENIS DMacks (talk) 00:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to share this image because I thought it could motivate people who are interested in naturism to embrace it. Germany is certainly the place when it comes to naturism and this photo was taken in a public park - Tiergarten - of Berlin in 2013. Tiergarten is the main park in the city and it's a very good place for newbies to have their first social nudist activity. Since then my world's changed a lot and I recommend others to visit this very nice country and try FKK. Note that the image shows much more than a human genitalia (which is not even in evidence), it shows how one can be happy just by being nude and how nudism is well accepted and open for all in Berlin. Public nudity is forbidden in most cities in the world and I myself will support actions aiming to make nudism in public places legal. Through this image, I'm supporting these actions and showing people it's possible, there are places in the world where nudism is practiced in public areas without any problems then this FKK may be included to their cultures as well. I hope the decision of the admins will not take in consideration race, religion, language etc. We need peace, love and open-minded people in this world. N8kd (talk) 01:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are paintings made in 1977 and 1986. They're tagged with {{PD-UKGov}}, which says it applies to paintings from before 1972, so I don't see how it can apply to these paintings. I thus think that these pictures are non-free, at least until 2028.

bjh21 (talk) 01:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped with ezgif.com GIF maker 191.125.149.44 02:56, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. source [ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14350548/?ref_=fn_tt_tt_1] Vijay Barot (talk) 04:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Galarza Creador (talk) 04:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete While this is a non-timely uploader request (uploaded 9 Jan, requested 20 Jan), I think it's fine to delete. I'd honestly support deleting as it's unclear what's even being depicted or what the educational use of this image would be. 69.174.144.79 15:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Unknown_2021.07.07-06.51.svg Netora (talk) 04:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unused in any wikipedia pages SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep seems excellent image of an automobile. Deleting this just adds burden on Commons because these aren't deleted in reality, but are hidden from non-admins. Deleted files can only be seen by admins. Deletion wastes admins' precious time, especially if the image is good enough. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Believed copyvio and no permission, edited version by uploader from the original file: https://www.instagram.com/p/B3ZQHSXAP6S/ Symphonium264 (talk) 05:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unused in any wikipedia pages SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. See my previous comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TV Patroljf0191 03.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:TV Patroljf0191 11.JPG. It is best to delete redundant images of ordinary roads than images like these. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unused in any wikipedia pages SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. See my previous comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TV Patroljf0191 03.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:TV Patroljf0191 11.JPG. It is best to delete redundant images of ordinary roads than images like these. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in scope. --P 1 9 9   02:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unused in any wikipedia pages SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. See my previous comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TV Patroljf0191 03.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:TV Patroljf0191 11.JPG. It is best to delete redundant images of ordinary roads than images like these. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in scope; interesting photo of TV interview. --P 1 9 9   02:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Believed copyvio and no permission from the file's author. Symphonium264 (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom, suspect image. Marked as own work and with the uploader's (private) Instagram linked, but the description also names the person who created the artwork and we do not know that person to be the same as the uploader. See also my !vote at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vaneshaass.jpg. While we don't have a link to the previously published version here, I think it's likely the same situation. 69.174.144.79 16:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unused in any wikipedia pages SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. See my previous comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TV Patroljf0191 03.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:TV Patroljf0191 11.JPG. It is best to delete redundant images of ordinary roads than images like these. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9   02:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I find this invalid and i uploaded it by mistakenly and i want to delete it permanently MUKU1642002 (talk) 05:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant request. Bencemac (talk) 07:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9   02:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a file that contains nothing educational other than raw text, this file is excluded educational content, and is therefore out of COM:SCOPE. 46.132.188.66 06:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 09:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Usyair (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused logo of questionable notability.

Netora (talk) 06:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete all. Not in use and not likely to enter use. Uploader's promotional draft on the logo subject was rejected, abandoned, and then deleted at enwiki. No indication the uploader is coming back. 69.174.144.79 21:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image improperly used, usually shown on a non-sense redirect SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep not a valid reason for deletion. If you have some issue on the redirect, fix the redirect being used on an article. Other than that let the redirect stay as it is. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:JWilz12345. --P 1 9 9   02:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image improperly used, usually shown on a non-sense redirect SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning towards  Delete not on nominator's rationale, but due to reduced quality. The shot at File:ABS-CBN Broadcasting Center, Barangays of Quezon City, 02.jpg is much better as the sun rays do not cause "against the light" conflict, unlike this in which the building becomes dimmed. COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per User:JWilz12345. --P 1 9 9   02:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image improperly used, usually shown on a non-sense redirect SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep not a valid reason for deletion. If you have some issue on the redirect, fix the redirect being used on an article. Other than that let the redirect stay as it is. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:JWilz12345. --P 1 9 9   02:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image improperly used, usually shown on a non-sense redirect SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep not a valid reason for deletion. If you have some issue on the redirect, fix the redirect being used on an article. Other than that let the redirect stay as it is. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:JWilz12345. --P 1 9 9   02:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my newbie mistake Leomk0403 (talk) 07:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: You can use criterion G7 in the future. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violation: images show a banner tarpaulin with underlying portraits of persons. The portraits are certainly recent; needs COM:VRTS correspondence/s of commercial license permission/s from the photographer/s of the underlying portraits. These images won't benefit from future Philippine freedom of panorama, as the banner is not "otherwise than temporarily situated" (banners here in the Philippines are temporal in nature).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 08:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not really possible to see anything, no educational value in my opinion. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Excluded educational material - raw text Headlock0225 (talk) 10:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Headlock0225 Excuse me, what do you mean "raw text"? What's wrong with the file? What should I do? PC Technology Center (talk) 12:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PC Technology Center Thanks for replying. In order for files to posted on Wikimedia Commons, they must fall withing the project's scope. You can read more about this here COM:OOS - but I will quote a couple of sections for you that are relevant to your question. Your file, in my opinion falls into the category of "excluded educational content". One example is "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. Purely textual material such as plain-text versions of recipes, lists of instructions, poetry, fiction, quotations, dictionary definitions, lesson plans or classroom material, and the like are better hosted elsewhere, for example at Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikiversity or Wikisource."

I hope that helps.

--Headlock0225 (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Headlock0225 Thank you for your reply! I have looked again at Commons:Project scope and see that the file meets the requirements of Scope part 1.
Also, I cannot agree with your opinion that the file falls under Excluded educational content (Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text), because the monograph is intended for the teaching staff and students of higher educational insti-tutions, as well as employees of research institutes and specialists in the food and processing industry. The publication contains text, figures and formulas with tables.
In addition to the standard review, which you can read about on page 2 of the file, this file was reviewed under the system of double-blind review, which you can learn about in the policy of the publisher. Thus, referring to non-educational content is offensive.
Perhaps I am misunderstanding you and you are informing me that the file is not an image, music, or video and therefore should be removed? Perhaps you can tell me which project the file should be uploaded to (wikisource or wikibooks)?
I am asking for your help and tips, as the publisher follows the open access policy and is making every effort to do so. It would not be difficult for me to upload the file to the right resource.
Thank you! PC Technology Center (talk) 10:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am certainly not meaning to offend. I am sure your article, is valid, educational and peer reviewed. I have never stated or implied it was non-educational. Its just that Wikimedia Commons is not its right home. With a few exceptions, Wikimedia Commons is, as you suggest, primarily about images, videos and sound files. I know very little about Wikiversity but that's where I suggest you look. Headlock0225 (talk) 19:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Nanahuatl as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: unused personal image, out of project scope
No SD: Not a recent upload, not a single purpose account. +7day. Wdwd (talk) 10:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faisal Hossain bsl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo

Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Promotional with no educational value; two selfies might fall under CSD criterion F10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:52, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bolivarmom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos.

Smooth O (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shemar8810 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly OOS

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shemar8810 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos.

Smooth O (talk) 14:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private file, not useful as a pdf file. Velma (talk) 16:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no educational value. Velma (talk) 16:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, questionable copyright status — Yerpo Eh? 16:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Not educational content see COM:NOTSOCIAL Headlock0225 (talk) 17:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: see excluded educational content - raw text in COM:SCOPE Headlock0225 (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: see excluded educational content - raw text in COM:SCOPE Headlock0225 (talk) 17:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, unlikely to be used in an article. Liz (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no educational value: out of scope. Uploaded by SPA Ankry (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag for the Henno Empire (revamped Greater Ottoman Empire) Enyavar (talk) 20:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope:Fictional Empire (Super-Ottomans) Enyavar (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fantasy flag for user's personal nation Enyavar (talk) 21:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This flag was originally being used on my sandbox page. However, I have since removed it from usage on the page. Therefore, I do not see why it is still needed on Wikimedia. I am supportive of the deletion. PatriotMapperCDP (talk) 01:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal minecraft-based video game Enyavar (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal minecraft-based video game Enyavar (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal minecraft-based video game Enyavar (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal minecraft-based video game Enyavar (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal minecraft-based video game Enyavar (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/023.JPG PK1913 (talk) 13:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since you're the author, that's not surprising. Or relevant.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Use private unlicensed photos WebmasterRome (talk) 06:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 07:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CUR Taiwan Midleading (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a PDF of a member of the public's resume. Out of COM:SCOPE. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the own work of the uploader, originates at https://www.flaticon.com/free-sticker/love-message_4289410 where the Flaticon licence does not seem entirely compatible with Commons, with statements such as "The content in the Flaticon Content or any derivative work is not used or included (in whole or in part) in a database, archive or in any other media/stock product" in the terms of use. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:44, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This You Tube CH's capture. Not uproder's own work. Gahukuro (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears misattributed to Sidis. Source seems to be the non-reliable site sidis.net which does not list the image. A reliable source has the same photo posted in a bio for John von Neumann [1] Macaddct1984 (talk) 13:56, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per COM:NPOV, DR is not for adjudicating content disputes. You may file a renaming request, and also work to get this image removed from his article on various Wikipedias. --King of ♥ 03:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos uploaded by AdrianJCr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright eligibility is claimed (cc license tag) but unlikely that the uploader is the designer of all that logos. If the uploader is, permission needs to be documented. File:Aagencia.jpg and File:Elespectadorr.jpg and File:Ameeerica.jpg and File:Radiodelplata.jpg and File:Valee.jpg may be {{PD-textlogo}} (contrary to the current license tag).

Saibo (Δ) 02:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I don't really think the uploader has created this amount of Argentine logos. A PD-textlogo would be ok for those cases, obviously uncrediting the uploader as the creator. Fma12 (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not simple enough for PD-textlogo and obviously not own work. JuTa 09:28, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdrianJCr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:AdrianJCr. User blocked indefinitely at eswiki. Questionable if File:Ciudadddddddddd.jpg is in scope of PD-textlogo (or PD-whatever, due to the graphic effects), however unlikely "own work".

Gunnex (talk) 18:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 07:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdrianJCr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdrianJCr (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

And 3 more unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not contain the dutch word 'biedt'. Gam3 (talk) 04:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%9A_%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8E/9_%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8F_2022#%D0%9C503 — здесь автор подтвердил, что он просто отсканировал Barbarian (talk) 08:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, surely not own work, and so lacks essential information. I can't read the Russian page that supposedly shows an admission that it's scanned, but that isn't necessarily a problem. What's more important is that the work is in the public domain or otherwise legitimately freely licensed. I don't have enough evidence to say it's in the public domain, and it does not appear to be legitimately freely licensed. 69.174.144.79 21:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a free image Dgho (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Дозвіл на використання від автора цього зображення надіслано на адресу permissions-ukwikimedia.org. Автор є працівником організації Верховний Суд. Gala Bezsmertna (talk) 12:00, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Andriy.v. --P 1 9 9   14:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permissions, likely uploaded by Category:Sockpuppets of 陳妍安 Midleading (talk) 09:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a free image Dgho (talk) 09:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Дозвіл на використання від автора цього зображення надіслано на адресу permissions-ukwikimedia.org. Автор є працівником організації Верховний Суд. Gala Bezsmertna (talk) 12:00, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • VRTS I have just accepted permission for “File:LIP 8040-Edit-Edit-Edit.jpg” under ticket:2022012010005413. --Andriy.v (talk) 22:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Andriy.v: Дозвіл неправильно оформлений. Раз зображення взято з сайту, потрібно було надіслати дозвіл з електронної адреси, яка вказана на сайті або принаймні пов'язана з сайтом.--Anatoliy (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    EXIF data said that this is a LIPAVSKYI DMYTRO work and this is the same author who sent the ticket. So i don't see the reason to doubt the authorship of this image. Requesting to send a ticket from a mail connected to the source a think is to much. In this way we just put some extra bureaucracy with the only purpouse to scares clients and lose the opportunity to have some free images.--Andriy.v (talk) 00:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Andriy.v. --P 1 9 9   14:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to EXIF, Ondrej Bouska is the author of the photo but uploader user name is Marketapolakova (=Markéta Poláková). Permission needed. Harold (talk) 10:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was asked by the employees of Památník Zámeček to create a page here for this monument and they sent me this photo to add to this post. Marketapolakova (talk) 09:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Marketapolakova: Díky za info. Je ale potřeba, aby autor výslovně a doložitelně uvolnil daný snímek pod svobodnou autorskoprávní licencí. Pro podrobnější informace viz Commons:Licensing/cs. Zjednodušeně řečeno, autor fotky by měl zaslat email s prohlášením (stačí podle vzoru cs:Nápověda:Svolení autora#Uvolnění souborů na Wikimedia Commons) na adresu [email protected]. --Harold (talk) 09:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per VRT ticket. --P 1 9 9   14:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo en mode PNG blanc, apparaît blanc sur fond blanc. A remplacer par un logo sur fond noir. Campels (talk) 10:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   14:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Janeelend (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book covers. Uploader is apparently the subject of File:Jane Elend.jpg and the author of the books. VRT permission needed to verify copyright. Also the book cover art may have a separate copyright by the artist or publisher.

MKFI (talk) 10:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

El último es un archivo de Facebook, F1. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.116.35.235 (talk) 00:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and Commons is not for advertising. --P 1 9 9   14:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found here in 2016 - https://www.facebook.com/LeaKorteAutorin/photos/1235580139789174 - uploader claimes to be Korte - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Needs OTRS from photographer, which is unlikely to be the person depicted. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging the cookie-image and possibly the logo-image on the packge are copyrightable. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to add. Feel free to remove it Dgse87 (talk) 10:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this is obviously a recent work of art and thereby still in copyright. Regrettably, Norway has no freedom-of-panorama exception for non-buildings. So, a permission from the sculptor is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the link you provided it seems like non commercial use is ok though or am I misunderstanding it completely? Feel free to delete it if I'm in the wrong here :) Dgse87 (talk) 10:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Problem is, our policy COM:L requires freedom also for commercial use. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then please remove :) Dgse87 (talk) 10:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

нарушение авторского права. Автор умер в 2007 95.31.191.213 11:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: COM:DW; copyrighted per ru:Гурин, Станислав Александрович. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web - no free license I assume, not own work Albinfo (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image shot by Juhani Jarvenpaa according to meta data. I don't assume that this is the real name of User:Kaaruminati and that User:Kaaruminati is a photographer working for the IFF. --Albinfo (talk) 11:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 16:08, 28 January 2022, by Polarlys. --P 1 9 9   15:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: https://news.milli.az/country/66157. No COM:FOP Azerbaijan anyway. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The better version: File:由承德橋向上游方向看基隆河.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 12:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not really better or the same (sky is overexposed in "better version"). --P 1 9 9   15:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Rocktim2019 (talk) 12:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

its not a selfie. its a photo of a musician Sherin Lopez (talk) 13:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not own work. --P 1 9 9   15:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nibulon2021 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no permision, more file taken taken from https://nibulon.com or other site

白猫shiro nekoОбг. 13:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 83.200.36.195 14:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: In use, but source page reads "Tous droits réservés". --Achim55 (talk) 16:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if VOA logo appears on the videos, the source YouTube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAMgOVpQt2Q) has not a free license.

Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:King of Hearts. --P 1 9 9   15:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mit copyright Dirk Lenke (talk) 14:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: No evidence of permission, and unclear whether it meets COM:SCOPE anyway. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of Camille Laurens by Librairie Mollat

[edit]

These screenshot images from YouTube were both uploaded by myself. I believe they should be deleted because the subject has specifically requested the images be deleted. They previously made an anonymous and improper deletion request falsely alleging copyright violation (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Camille Laurens (2019).png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Camille Laurens (2019) - 2.png) The subject has since contacted the YouTube uploader Librarie Mollat, who has also asked for the images to be deleted. The uploader, however, has not changed the YouTube licenses in order to preserve distribution of the video by others. Out of courtesy to both parties, I request for the images to be deleted. Οἶδα (talk) 14:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photos. --P 1 9 9   15:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A lower solution copy of File:Jihlava, brána Matky Boží.JPG with the wrong author. Kcx36 (talk) 15:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

strange color, better version: File:Artur Bodanzky, by Herman Mishkin.jpg Kcx36 (talk) 16:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Winnxxx is not the author of this image. This image was copied from Instragram marcusfernaldig 4th slide https://www.instagram.com/marcusfernaldig/p/CVJD8iaoOZL/?utm_medium=copy_link Stvbastian (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Winnxxx is not the author of this image. This image was copied from Instragram kevin_sanjaya 3rd slide https://www.instagram.com/p/CVJb0S7Kw-y/?utm_medium=copy_link Stvbastian (talk) 16:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's my first time uploading a file to Wikipedia. I'm preparing an article where it needs to be used, mistakenly added under this CC license, I don't know if I can delete it myself. I should have uploaded it under non-free license. 46.53.252.114 21:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the person who uploaded it does not have the permission to upload it Eukoli (talk) 16:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it has a copyright issue Fola Kayode (talk) 19:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the person that uploaded this picture does not have the permission to upload it Eukoli (talk) 16:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it has a copyright issue Fola Kayode (talk) 19:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the daughter of US President James Monroe, despite what the art historians on Tumblr may believe. It is a portrait of Mary Scott Swann by John Vanderlyn at the Maier Museum of Art. I have uploaded a higher quality version directly from the museum's website. Gamaliel (talk) 16:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File id & license fixed. Darwin Ahoy! 23:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: fixed. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from File:Smolyak Mezhduusobica В.Г.Смоляка Междоусобица Тряпицын Яков Иванович.jpg with bad quality, not useful in Wikimedia projects. The source of image is also not correctly stated. Velma (talk) 17:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

плохое качество Original05 (talk) 17:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, and DW. --P 1 9 9   15:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

плохое качество Original05 (talk) 17:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, and DW copyvio. --P 1 9 9   15:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angithi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted screenshots/stills

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as copyright violations. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inaccurate map, the area in the north of Ireland is left grey, in what looks like a mistake. Doesn't seem worth correcting when the map is unused, and better quality maps exist on Commons to the same purpose (eg. File:United Kingdom Base Map.png). Lord Belbury (talk) 18:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liilia Moroz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Главное_здание_завода_Вольта.jpg

Dogad75 (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kauplus ABC-8.jpg and other unfree files

[edit]

Per source each of these individual files is licensed under one of these unfree licenses – BY-NC-SA, BY-NC, BY-ND, BY-NC-ND, or has generic "copyrighted" status (kaitstud autoriõigustega) – that doesn't meet COM:L.

2001:7D0:81DA:F780:7DFE:81F0:65F4:DE28 18:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tallinn Kalma saun.jpg and other copyrighted/unfree images

[edit]

Uploader has selected cc-by-sa-4.0 license for the following files, but source for none of these mentions given license nor any other free license that would meet COM:L. Per source database entries the copyright status for these files hasn't been determined yet (kasutusõigused määramata). Neither has copyright expired as these files aren't old enough.

--2001:7D0:81DA:F780:7DFE:81F0:65F4:DE28 19:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be above COM:TOO US which is quite high but the list of logos that are above it includes some that are less complex than this one. Jonteemil (talk) 19:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might to be too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. I don't know what is the relevant TOO.

Jonteemil (talk) 19:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potentially subject to abuse. Bobby367 (talk) 20:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor image quality. Bobby367 (talk) 20:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   15:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a real signature. Bobby367 (talk) 14:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Загружено по ошибке Вася292882 (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as a courtesy. --Achim55 (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   15:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atatürk TBMM'de Nutuk'u Okuyor.jpg 𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 20:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Self-described personal theories regarding gravity and other aspects of physics. Falls outside Commons scope - no conceivable COM:EDUSE. Marbletan (talk) 20:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG file uploaded (File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - Π-94.svg) Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 20:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source does not give a free license. Francisco Manuel García is not the author; the source states he merely reported on the design, not that he designed it himself. CentreLeftRight 21:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This screengrab is of such low quality that it fails to accurately depict the subject, and a number of other recent images of her are available in Category:Sarah Jaffe (Journalist), so this one should be deleted. Innisfree987 (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Close this.... NOW! Are you for real? "Such low quality"? Did you even see the image before going through the steps to start this? If you think the image is so low res you have a hard time seeing it, your eyes are the problem, not the image. Please take a trip to the eye doctor immediately... probably several of them HumanxAnthro (talk) 04:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • First, please refrain from personal attacks. Second, I didn’t say low res; there are other ways to be low quality. As I say above, the problem here is that the screenshot is—I’m sorry to be critical—so ill-timed that does not accurately represent the subject. We have other, relatively contemporaneous images that do. Therefore this one should be removed to prevent it being used where an editor may not realize a significantly better image is available. Innisfree987 (talk) 19:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Alternatives available. --P 1 9 9   15:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be above COM:TOO Mexico. Jonteemil (talk) 21:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicidad política CarlosArturoAcosta (talk) 23:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, advertising. --P 1 9 9   15:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. Article deleted on en.wp. P 1 9 9   17:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US for murals. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syariful Msth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One of the authors S.A. Reitsma died in 1958 http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-nb2002061723/ Not public domain in the Netherlands.

Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I did make a mistake in thinking this was published in the Netherlands rather than Indonesia https://www.worldcat.org/title/gedenkboek-der-staatsspoor-en-tramwegen-in-nederlandsch-indie-1875-1925/oclc/66702852, but we still need death date information on a "D. Rühl Jr." Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 09:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hapus Kertadikara (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kertadikara and G7. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hapus Kertadikara (talk) 11:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kertadikara and G7. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hapus Kertadikara (talk) 11:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kertadikara and G7. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hapus Kertadikara (talk) 11:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kertadikara and G7. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hapus Kertadikara (talk) 11:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kertadikara and G7. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hapus Kertadikara (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kertadikara and G7. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Colombia.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of the scope — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use and should be generally in scope. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work but a screengrab from a concert video (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JIoTejHGGw). P 1 9 9   16:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shipulin2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. Unreliable uploader with previous DR's.

P 1 9 9   16:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not seem to be valid. Based on the description, this photo seems not to be a US government work, but rather a photo that a private company submitted as evidence in a court case. Being used as evidence does not make it public domain. —Granger (talk  · contribs) 18:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ursa logos

[edit]

Probably above COM:TOO Germany.

Jonteemil (talk) 19:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Colombia.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Colombia.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Colombia.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Colombia.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken without consent in a semi-public settings. Not used on wiki. The person on the picture asked me if I can help delete this (ugly) picture of her... 213.55.221.43 20:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IMO dispensable, as we have hi-res File:Kaire Holts, 2021. aasta Arvamusfestivalil.jpg which might fit better. --Achim55 (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That image was taken at a public event where Kaire Holts was performing. There is absolutely no legal need of getting any permission whatsoever in that setting. What next? Should we be deleting images of Boris Johnson, that are not used in articles, because his hair is a mess on those images? There is no legal basis for asking it to be deleted. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Kruusamägi. --Rosenzweig τ 21:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is in use and in scope: www.indxx.com Rsensharma (talk) 21:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: now used by existing article en:Indxx. --Rosenzweig τ 11:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It needs to be discussed whether the depicted poster falls under Australia's freedom-of-panorama exception, which seems to be rather sophisticated, or not. In the latter case a permission or deletion is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The poster captures the lack of party branding. Rudd had fallen out with the party at that point. It captures a moment in political history. John Robert McPherson (talk) 10:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as an election poster, it was only temporarily situated in a public place, so Australian FoP does not apply. --Rosenzweig τ 14:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of undescribed software. Under copyright? Drakosh (talk) 11:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I don't see anything copyrightable here, {{PD-ineligible}}. --Rosenzweig τ 14:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal/fantasy flag, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unused in any wikipedia pages SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete for this case, it seems like a personal photo by a sockpuppet, by nature of people in the image. COM:SCOPE issue, FB/Instagram-like scope. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, this is an example of a Filipina news crewwoman at work, how is this out of scope? Just because a person is in a photograph doesn't mean that it's "like the Facebook" or "like Instagram", photographs with professionals doing their work in certain fields are already rare enough here at the Wikimedia Commons, partially because whenever a patroller sees such a picture they yell "out of scope" without looking at th context. Also "for this case, it seems like a personal photo by a sockpuppet, by nature of people in the image." Makes no sense, the title clearly explains that it's a TV patrol and that the woman works for a televised programme, how many such images of televised programme crew from the Philippines are there that would justify this one being "personal". Some photographers like user "Yann" upload photographs of random Indian people of various ethnic groups in their daily lives and many such photographs have been deemed "quality images" and have even decorated the main page. Someone writing about television production or specifically television production in the Philippines can easily use this image as an illustration. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Addendum, "ABS-CBN TV Patrol Jasmin Romero interview of Auxiliary Bishop Most Rev. Bernardino C. Cortez of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Manila on June 8, 2013." Hardly seems like "a personal event", I can see this interview itself being uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a century from now, how such things are produced can (and does) have educational value. Also, an image doesn't need to be used in a Wikipedia to be hosted here, the Wikimedia Commons doesn't exclusively serve Wikipedia's, it is supposed to be a free educational media website for the world. In fact, the woman in this picture is a journalist called Jasmin Romero, so many people who watch television are likely already familiar with her face. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 15:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, poorly formatted user warning. Which sucks, since there is no user warning for generic CSD nominations. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the age of this template and the fact {{QD-notice}} is a commonly accepted syntax for deletion tags, I'd be opposed to outright deletion. I would, however, support either (a) history merge with or a (b) redirect to a comparable, more widely used deletion notice template. Dmehus (talk) 01:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, today this template is only used on a single archived user page, so it seems useless to keep it. --Ellywa (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It needs to be discussed whether the depicted advertisement is covered by Switzerland's freedom-of-panorama exception, as the condition "Permanently situated" is hardly met here. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

For Germany, the Federal Court of Justice has actually decided that ads on buses are covered by German freedom of panorama. For Switzerland, I don't know, COM:FOP Switzerland has nothing about this. So probably
 Delete per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 16:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination kept 3 where the advertisement can be considered PD / de minimis. --Ellywa (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence the illustration is in the public domain in the United States, which is required per COM:PD Hekerui (talk) 12:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why should it not be PD? Published in 1931 in Germany and illustrator died 1951. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:PD "Uploads of non-U.S. works are normally allowed only if the work is either in the public domain or covered by a valid free license in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work." Emphasis not mine. For the US see COM:HIRTLE. Undeletion in 2027. Hekerui (talk) 20:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. Can be undeleted earlier if permission for publication with a free licence is obtained from the heirs per VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size image without EXIF data. Last image of unreliable uploader whose uploads were all deleted as copyvios. P 1 9 9   15:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 18:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). S.A. Reitsma died in 1958, I cannot find any biographical info on D. Ruhl Jr. This book is public domain in the US though. So if we can find evidence Ruhl died before 1972, this file is in the clear. Abzeronow (talk) 16:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is USA really country of origin? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, it isn't. Also for some reason I thought this was an Indian book, rather than a Dutch book so this definitely isn't public domain in the Netherlands which Reitsma lived in. Abzeronow (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it was published in Indonesia which is 50 PMA so if Ruhl died before 1972, this is acceptable for Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The author, Dirk Rühl Jr., still active until 1952 (and there is a missing death date for him). His last contribution is Garuda Pancasila (along with M. Yamin, Hamid II Syarif Alkadrie, and painter Dullah). I have tried to ask Indonesian community to find some references about him but no one respond. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I guess Indonesia is actually 70 PMA, some license tag basically made me think it was 50. COM:INDONESIA. Abzeronow (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say Dirk Rühl Jr. died in 1956. Here is a death certificate (or however you want to call it) for a Dirk Rühl, born in Amsterdam, who died in Haarlem on June 3, 1956 aged 63 years, profession "lector". His parents, both already deceased, are named as Dirk Rühl and Johanna Jansen Vredenburg. So that guy's father was named Dirk Rühl too, which would explain the "Jr." designation. Junior's wife is named as Beatrice Elvire Adeline Dumas. Here you get a list of family records when searching for "Rühl" and the place "Bandoeng". You'll see that there are various records for a "D. Rühl" from 1925 to 1932, and you'll find that a "B.E.A. Dumas" married in Bandoeng on October 15, 1932. If that person turns up when searching for "Rühl", the conclusion is that someone named "Rühl" is a part of that record. So my assumption is that "B.E.A. Dumas" is identical with Beatrice Elvire Adeline Dumas, the wife of the Dirk Rühl who died in 1956 aged 63, and that she married in Bandoeng in 1932, while a D. Rühl is also listed several times in Bandoeng from 1925 to 1932 makes it very likely that this is our guy with the Indonesian connection. Here is a certificate for an earlier marriage of Junior in 1925, also in Haarlem, to Petronella Cornelia Maria van Kasteren. His profession is "koopman" here, that of his father "boekbinder". Oh, and I just found this too, which seems to be his personnel file from a collection named "Ministerie van Koloniën: Stamkaarten Oost-Indische Ambtenaren", which says he was born in Amsterdam on October 25, 1892, plus a bunch of other hand-written notes that are not so easy to read. Wikidata entry for him: d:Q110036968.

So I'd say  Delete and restore in 2027. --Rosenzweig τ 20:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and also  Delete File:Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925.pdf and File:Staatsspoor en Tramwegen in Nederlandsch Indie 1875 - 1925.pdf. That is the whole book (both Indonesian and Dutch language versions), not just the cover like here, and if the author Reitsma died in 1958 (as well as the artist Rühl in 1956), then that book is still copyrighted until the end of 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 20:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My another DR. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In addition to the research of Rosenzweig, several of the publications of Dirk Rühl are associated with Indonesia, per Google books, which was a colony of the Netherlands. After WWII a lot of Dutch people returned to the Netherlands, as the Indonesians fought for their indepedence. The source of this file is this book, written in the local language (not in Dutch), so we can safely assume the Indonesian copyright is applicable to this file. From Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Indonesia it appears that for works of applied art (which this book cover is, imho) “protection lasts for 25 years since the first publication”. As this book dates from 1925, the image can be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 19:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - the two complete books of Rühl/Reitsma. These can be undeleted in 2029, 71 years after the death of Reitsma in 1958. Ellywa (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maoowwuuurunwuuuzhe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos and derivative images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Close derivative of an obviously copyrighted character Dronebogus (talk) 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Fair use is possible on en:wikipedia and some other projects, but not on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 18:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luisedwin2105 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most of these are cleary too complex to be licensed as {{PD-textlogo}}, some might be borderline.

Jonteemil (talk) 21:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Algunas de (ojo, no todas) las imágenes han sido mal etiquetadas con {{PD-textlogo}}, pero todas han sido creadas a través de trabajo propio. Recalco este punto: todas han sido creadas a través de trabajo propio.
Una consulta de borrado por un mal etiquetado es demasiado. Solicité al usuario que las puso en consulta que me permita actualizar el permiso, pero no tuve una respuesta clara.
Añado que todas las imágenes sometidas a consulta fueron creadas a través de trabajo propio a base de símbolos partidarios publicados por el Jurado Nacional de Elecciones.
Ello implica que son imagenes libre emitidas por el gobierno peruano, ya que la organización política ha cedido los derechos de autor. Así, además de constituir trabajo propio, recae en {{PD-PE-insignia}}.
Nuevamente solicito a Jonteemil que me permita actualizar los permisos, bien sea por {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} (ya que todas son trabajo propio) y/o {{PD-PE-insignia}} (ya que todas se basan en publicaciones oficiales del gobierno peruano y, por tanto, libres de derechos de autor).
El link donde pueden encontrar las imágenes base para el trabajo propio es este.
Saludos. --Luisedwin2105 (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Luisedwin2105: Bien, entonces los diseños en sí son de dominio público, ¿correcto?Jonteemil (talk) 22:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Básicamente sí. --Luisedwin2105 (talk) 22:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Cookie: You are one of four admins who speak Spanish natively. Maybe you can confirm these files are covered by {{PD-PE-insignia}}?Jonteemil (talk) 23:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
He solicitado una consulta sobre el tema a Indecopi, ente rector sobre derechos de autor en el Perú. Mientras tanto, recomiendo leer el artículo Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Peru (en inglés), con especial énfasis en esta sección. En resumen, el umbral de originalidad es alto para logotipos y otros diseños simples (véase también {{TOO-Peru}}). Podría servir también para dirigir la discusión sobre el tema. Saludos. --Luisedwin2105 (talk) 03:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Explicit: I see that you too speak Spanish. Maybe you can confirm these files are covered by {{PD-PE-insignia}}?Jonteemil (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: From the Template: PD-PE-insignia it appears it is valid for a state authority of Peru, such as ministry or public organization. A political party is not such a state authority, so this template is not valid for logo’s of political version. As uploader Luisedwin2105 wrote they based these logos on other versions, so they are derivative works and cannot be maintained on basis of “own work”. Both of these arguments lead to my decision to delete the images, regrettably. None of the files is showing a source which tells they are in public domain. Finally, per COM:TOO Peru, only simple designs are allowable on Commons. All logo’s have complex shapes and colors, so they all must be deleted. If a clear statement is received (preferably through the VRT system) of the peruvian copyright association to show the images are in PD, the images perhaps can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 18:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be above COM:TOO Ecuador. Jonteemil (talk) 22:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:TOO Andean Community does not show a complex design as this one is not copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 18:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wish delete File:Dns icon.svg the reason is the author's request (me). Cordially. Manjiro91 (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, apparently not based on any real DNS icon, so probably out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 22:57, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]