Talk:1976 Big Thompson River flood/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Tails Wx (talk · contribs) 18:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: OhHaiMark (talk · contribs) 13:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

So far, this fulfills all the criteria.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I'm passing the article. All of the sources are reliable, with even the "In popular culture" section being sourced. There are no grammar mistakes, the article's image is free-use, the article is stable, all the citations support each sentence, and most importantly, it's broad and neutral in its coverage. Have a good day. OhHaiMark (talk) 13:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.