Talk:1990 Serbian general election
Latest comment: 9 days ago by Flibirigit in topic Did you know nomination
 | 1990 Serbian general election is currently a Politics and government good article nominee. Nominated by Vacant0 (talk • contribs) at 12:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: none |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1990 Serbian general election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Flibirigit talk 21:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the 1990 Serbian general election elected only two women to the National Assembly of Serbia? Source: Stokić, Ljubiša B. (1994). Demokratija i osvajanje vlasti: izbori u Srbiji 1990 [Democracy and the conquest of power: the elections in Serbia in 1990] (in Serbian). Belgrade: Zenit. p. 624. ISBN 86-81987-06-2.
- ALT1: ... that in the 1990 Serbian general election the Socialist Party of Serbia won 78% of seats despite only winning 48% of the popular vote? Source: Martinov, Zlatoje (2000). U podnožju demokratskih propileja: Izbori u Srbiji, 1990–2000 [At the pedestal of the democratic propylaea: Elections in Serbia, 1990–2000] (in Serbian). Belgrade: Republika. p. 26. OCLC 50410508.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1978 Gilbertese Chief Minister election
- Comment: The only issue that might pop up in this DYK nomination is the timespan of the expansion. I began expanding the article on 8 July when it was at 22k. Now, on 30 July, the article is at 177k. The article met the 5x criteria on 15 July, when it reached 112k, but was not finished. If this is really strict, I won't have any problems with the DYK being rejected now, considering that the article is up for GAN so I'll re-nominate it for DYK once it passes the GA review sometime in the future.
Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC).
- @Vacant0: Not a review, but have you asked at WP:GARC? Some GANs take several months.--Launchballer 13:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Or over a year... GARC is a good idea, but the article is long and mostly relies on foreign-language sources, so I'll think about it. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are going to want to get this reviewed very quickly, because this isn't eligible at all. At time of nomination, this was 62,005 characters, and it exceeded one fifth of that on the 10th. You're asking for twenty days to be IAR'd. I won't close this as you might get lucky (e.g. Jesu, der du meine Seele, BWV 78) but as it stands, I won't be reviewing this. Also, you should know that 5x is determined by prose size, not byte size - consider installing WP:DYKCHECK.--Launchballer 17:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
at this point, the article has sat waiting for a month for resolution, so I think it's best at this point to close and wait for a GAN to pass. I do hope it does, this article looks to be in good shape :) lots of effort very clearly went into it! Best of luck at GAN, hope to see you back around soon. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 07:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks!
Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 08:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
