Talk:CSS General Earl Van Dorn
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Hog Farm in topic GA Review
CSS General Earl Van Dorn has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CSS General Earl Van Dorn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:CSS General Earl Van Dorn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 00:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 17:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Images appropriately licensed
- Earwig 16%
- The conversion into warships for the River Defense Fleet vessels adding 1 inch (2.5 cm) of iron plating backed by 4 inches (10 cm) of oak planking Missing word?
- Link 32-pounder gun and tell readers that it was smoothbore muzzle loader
- Proximity alert for the ship's name in the first para of the Plumb Point Bend para. Mix up how you refer to the ship by using pronouns, etc.
- became ungrounded awkward
- Link salvaged
- Substitute barrier for blockade?
Mostly done. I'm still working on turning up a source that repeats the obvious claim that the 32-pounder was smoothbore and muzzle loading; everybody seems to view that as an understood fact. Hog Farm Talk 02:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)