Biography assessment rating comment

edit

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 19:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


June 2007

edit

I've added ISBNs for all the books. My sources were amazon.com, isfdb.org and my own collection. Please check my work.

For some of the older books, I could not get ISBNs for the first editions. In particular, the ISBNs for the three Riddle-Master books are for the Futura paperbacks, which were the original British editions.

Between Amazon and the ISFDB, I found 5 (five) omnibus editions of the Riddle-Master trilogy, all with different names. I've listed them all; we probably should delete some or most of them.

The Moon and the Face is a sequel to Moon-Flash; I've moved them to a new subsubsection called the "Kyreol duology". Solstice Wood is set against the same background as Winter Rose, but generations later; I left both under "Other works".

Since lots of the titles were redlinks for books which probably would fail Wikipedia:Notability (books), I 'delinkified' all but the award-winners.

I wonder if we really need to list all those short stories. Maybe we should only list the ones including in "Year's Best" collections?

Cheers, CWC 12:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

List

edit

This article is primarily composed of a long list with many lists of books embedded into it. The article certainly needs more than this, and as Wikipedia discourages lists of this nature (see WP:LIST) this needs to be changed, at least so that the bibliography is not the major portion of the article. --Shruti14 t c s 23:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You have a good point. I started adding more bio information, but I think we need a better source than the one I provided. Also, CWC suggested above that perhaps not all the short stories need to be mentioned... Forestgarden (talk) 22:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patricia A. McKillip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Anyone familiar with her books care to add them to this list?

edit

Types of mythological or fantastic beings in contemporary fiction is a page of, well, fantasy works (movie, TV, written, whatever) and the assorted mythological and/or fantastic critters they contain. At least some of McKillip's books would probably qualify. Anyone care to add them? Tamtrible (talk) 10:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patricia A. McKillip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why does THE THROME OF THE ERRIL OF SHERRILL not have its own article?

edit

Why does THE THROME OF THE ERRIL OF SHERRILL not have its own article? It is equally worthy as other books of hers. Someone who specializes in such will hopefully get onto it! 2604:2000:F64D:FC00:DB9:AE0:582B:C756 (talk) 04:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Done. See The Throme of the Erril of Sherill (there's only one R in the last word). BPK (talk) 17:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply