Template:Did you know nominations/Public image of JB Pritzker

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BorgQueen talk 14:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Public image of JB Pritzker

(Other sources in the article discuss each group more in depth, such as the Chicago Tribune one)
Created by Microplastic Consumer (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Microplastic Consumer (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC).

  • Not a review, but I don't think ALT0 would pass scrutiny as Pritzker being the richest governor in the US is not a fact that is unlikely to change. It will change either when Pritzker is no longer in office, or another governor becomes wealthier. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Also not a review but Alt 1 also appears to be changeable opinion using possibly stereotypes (ie not a sociological or even cultural study or statistical fact). I don't remember the rules for opinion presentation, if any, though. -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 13:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Hooks about opinions usually require some kind of attribution. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
There are essentially hundreds of JB Pritzker fan accounts, some of whom who have received media coverage (See sources linked here and in the article). "Nomadic Warriors for Pritzker" is one of this accounts, and refers to Pritzker as the "Great Khan" Microplastic Consumer (talk) 12:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Maybe something like ALT2 ... that JB Pritzker has been nicknamed the "Great Khan of the Midwest" by supporters? would work then? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Given the dearth of content here and the fact that the parent article is below the threshold of splitting based on word size (<7k), I would support merging this into the parent. Viriditas (talk) 23:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Review: On hold due to merge tag. Viriditas (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

The nominator indicated in the merge discussion that they are open to a merge, which I interpret as at least being okay with the article being merged. With that in mind and the article's days essentially being numbered, I do not think it will survive the merger discussion and thus be featured on DYK. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)