- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 20:33, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Date Ariane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Such a "sensation" that it had next to no hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search and no hits in a tech website search. Article topic lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) No potential redirect targets. – czar 02:37, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 22:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG, unless someone can provide more sources than those present in the article. --The1337gamer (talk) 14:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Software (game) article of unclear notability, lacking siginficant RS coverage. Despite the professional sounding name, The New York Review of Video Games is a student blog. The Vice ref is a brief incidental mention in a larger article on similar games. A search turned up no further significant WP:RS coverage. Dialectric (talk) 06:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.