Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day of Love

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| comment _ 17:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Day of Love

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Day of Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG for the lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Nothing to be found. Was deproded with a nonexistent rationale admitting it fails WP:GNG. The game released in English in 2004 so that reasoning does not hold.Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Masum Reza^📞 12:12, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Masum Reza^📞 12:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Masum Reza^📞 09:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

• Weak Delete The article fails WP:RS. There is no reliable sources that this game exists besides the external links. Fails WP:NPRODUCT as a result. I voted weak as it is a Japan based article and the PROD was contested due to its retro year release. AmericanAir88^(talk) 13:38, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.