Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Squirrel Entertainment
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:10, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Flying Squirrel Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:CORP. I cannot find significant discussion of this company in multiple reliable sources. References provided are mostly directory entries and mentions in the context of discussing the video game in blogs. 65 unique Google results. ... discospinster talk 03:35, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- I've stripped the article to two refs RS-worthy. PCGamer 1, PCGamer 2 are also lying around. I tend to agree though that these are not focused on the developer. --Izno (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete There are references but these only prove the company exists, not that it's notable. WP:CORPDEPTH is not established. Chetsford (talk) 19:08, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.