- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 02:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Infinitus wolf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
A non-notable character some nobody on the internet made up. Image is an altered copyvio of a Dragon Ball character. I can't believe this has been around for half a year. Closedmouth (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per CSD A7 and possibly G1. Nakon 05:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A7 isn't for fictional characters, else I would have done that myself. It is pretty nonsensical though. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You can probably call it non-notable web content, though. Zetawoof(ζ) 07:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A7 isn't for fictional characters, else I would have done that myself. It is pretty nonsensical though. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#OR. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFT, it looks like a character someone made for a fanmade DBZ story. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 12:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete since 99.99999% of fanfiction is "published" online, it's almost always covered by the "non-notable web content" facet of A7. Oh, and the fact that it contains a copyvio image (with the author lying about being the copyright holder) is all the more reason to want it gone, quickly. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is non-notable, the article is unreferenced, and is also orphaned. Ohmpandya (Talk) 02:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.