Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Carlos Castillo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure)—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 01:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

José_Carlos_Castillo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSPORT and the league he plays in is not found on WP:FPL TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 12:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to have represented country at international level and be a legitimate top player in Mexican Leagues.http://www.goal.com/en-india/people/guatemala/57257/jos%C3%A9-carlos-castillo/national. Kieranian2001 (talk) 13:10, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As a Guatemalan international, he clearly passes WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1.plays in FPL 2. He is full international, this article just needs improving. Seasider91 (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:NFOOTBALL as the subject has been capped at international level. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:01, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - senior international player; article needs improving to meet GNG, not deleting. Giant Snowman 14:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep – a senior international footballer definitely passes WP:NFOOTY. Needs improving, though. – Kosm1 fent 16:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.