Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahdi satri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. as G4 by RHaworth (non-admin closure) GSS (talk|c|em) 17:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs for this article:
Mahdi satri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I checked on the sources and two of them are not supported by the sources or passing mentions. Only two sources are not significant enough. Fails GNG and BIO. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand "two of them are not supported by the sources". Two of what?
How many sources does it require? Have you tried looking for more? 86.20.193.222 (talk) 20:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Per GNG, it requires significant coverage, probably more than two sources. Yes, but caught empty handed for source hunting. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 21:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but, it had four sources when you nominated it, two of which are entirely about him, and the other two have several paragraphs about him. There are further sources available.86.20.193.222 (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.