Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Michael Afable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Michael Afable

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable article as it seems he's simply best known from Akeelah and the Bee and although this could've simply be redirected there, I still question the need for this staying and finally the best my searches found was this, this, this and this. I would've simply PRODded this much like Mollie Molligan which I initiate earlier but given Sean Michael's CAMIE Award, I nominated it instead although that award won't save this article. Pinging interested users who comment at these subjects Rms125a@hotmail.com and Onel5969. SwisterTwister talk 06:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - He's had significant roles in at least 3 films (Akeelah and the Bee, To Save a Life, and Hardflip), to of which are notable by wiki standards, and the third might be. In addition he had a featured, although smaller, role in another notable film, Boogie Town. One Warm Night was a webseries in which he had the leading role. I didn't do a search for WP:GNG, but to me, he barely squeaks by with this resume as meeting WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: without prejudice as TOO SOON. Guest starring roles and filmography are only sections of article with any value, rest is self-promotion and cruft, and those two don't quite support notability yet, IMHO. Quis separabit? 13:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.