Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive487

User:Alhitmi123 reported by User:HistoryofIran (Result: Blocked 24h)

Page: Abu Tahir al-Jannabi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Alhitmi123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [1]
2. [2]
3. [3]
4. [4]
5. [5]
6. [6]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [7]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [8]

Comments:

The previous edit warring report was declined due to "an indefinite block very possible and seeming likely" in the ANI thread [9], which I thought as well. However, despite 4 supports for a indef block, the report got auto archived. Now Alhitmi123 is back at edit warring, making up a new lie to remove sourced info. This user is WP:NOTHERE. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

wow all of that because i wanted the readers to have an actual real academic source? I still have faith that the moderators are actually going to make a logical decision. Adding unrelated sources and opinions will just mislead readers into the wrong conclusion. Please double check the citations, and if you have a credible source with an author, you can mention it. I would be the first person to support you in that. Alhitmi123 (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

If you used less time complaining about me on Reddit (and yes, I saw your other posts too, very charming, perhaps use some of that energy into sources) and some actual time looking into the sources you call unreliable, you would easily see that Encyclopedia Iranica is in fact reliable [10] [11]. You have jumped between four different excuses now [12] [13] [14] [15], WP:NOTHERE. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

@Bbb23: I see you declined a prior report due to the AN/I case mentioned above, which was never resolved. In light of the revert warring, I find somewhat disturbing the relative dearth of talk page discussions about content. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

@Anachronist: No, Daniel Case declined it.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Woops. Apologies. You commented there, and somehow my brain registered your comment as the decline. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

@Anachronist: Thanks for blocking them. Unfortunately this has led them to resort to personal attacks once more, once again proving that they are WP:NOTHERE:

• With all my heart, i advise you to walk outside and make some friends 🙏.
• Couple of persian nationalists who spends the largest chunk of their lives editing unsourced narratives that gives them the satisfaction of a false fantasy victory teamed up and trying to pass their narrative.

HistoryofIran (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

• The reported user does have serious WP:CIR and WP:BATTLEGROUND issues. After this report and their above comment, they did it again.[16] --Mann Mann (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined As much as I do not see this ultimately ending well, Alhitmi hasn't edited the page in a couple of days, and this report is about to get archived. Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Alhitmi hasn't edited the page because I had blocked the account for 24 hours. And then forgot to close this case. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Well, maybe that was enough ... Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Memevietnam98 reported by User:Compassionate727 (Result: Blocked indefinitely)

Page: Safety Act (California law) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Memevietnam98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 08:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 10:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 17:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC) on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents "/* User keeps adding copyright violations after being warned */ new section"

Comments:

See also the revisions deleted for copyright violations; this editor has reinserted this copyright violation five or six times in the past three days. Warnings have been given for copyright violations, although not for edit warring per se, and been ignored. Additionally, there is a section at ANI about this editor's behavior, which they have also ignored. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 14:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked indefinitely ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Abdullah Thathal reported by User:Ixudi (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

Page: Sultanate of Multan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Abdullah Thathal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 15:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 14:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC) "/* Origins */"
3. 14:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC) "/* Origins */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 14:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC) "General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Sultanate of Multan."
2. 14:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Sultanate of Multan."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

The user initially edited with an IP (see here: 14:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC) but then logged into their account once that was reverted. They are persistently adding unsourced content and ignoring warnings on talk page. The user also seems to have trouble adding references. They are trying to cite an "Enkay Publishers" but not including any further information. Ixudi (talk) 15:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

• Indefinitely blocked. I've also blocked Special:contributions/151.177.100.0/22 for one week.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

  Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

User:45.73.66.38 reported by User:Bahooka (Result: Declined – malformed report)

Page: D23 (Disney) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 45.73.66.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

IP continues to post incorrectly formatted images and unsourced content over and over. They have been notified on their talk page, and for the unsourced content I even created a topic on the article talk page for them to discuss. The IP refuses to discuss their edits. Bahooka (talk) 14:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

• Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Bbb23 (talk) 14:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks. I (hopefully) completed the form properly and resubmitted.. This IP also does the edit warring over many days rather than just 48 hours. Bahooka (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

User:45.73.66.38 reported by User:Bahooka (Result: Blocked from article for a month)

Page: D23 (Disney) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 45.73.66.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 13:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 21:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 14:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC) "Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 00:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC) on Talk:D23 (Disney) "/* Future D23 event */ new section"

Comments:

IP continues to post incorrectly formatted images and unsourced content over and over. They have been notified on their talk page, and for the unsourced content I even created a topic on the article talk page for them to discuss. The IP refuses to discuss their edits. Note: I posted this earlier but did not complete the form properly. Bahooka (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of one month from article. Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

User:188.25.104.45 reported by User:Borgenland (Result: Already blocked for 31 hours)

Page: Voepass Linhas Aéreas Flight 2283 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 188.25.104.45 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [17]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [18]
2. [19]
3. [20]
4. [21]
5. [22]
6. [23]
7. [24]
8. [25]
9. [26]
10. [27]
11. [28]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [29] [30]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [31] [32] [33]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [34] [35] [36] [37]

Comments:
Already blocked  for a period of 31 hours by Cullen328 Daniel Case (talk) 20:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Yonasse (closed)

Page: Flourless chocolate cake (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Page: Ladyfingers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Page: Marron glacé (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Yonasse (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 12:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 1349, 9 September 2024 (UTC) ""

1. 12:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC) ""

1. 12:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC) ""

Comments: This user reversed the content of the articles to the previous version made by socked puppet accounts ans start making baseless accusations (I suspect it's another sock puppet) 79.17.172.126 (talk) 16:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Deferring to the SPI on this, per the last comment there. Daniel Case (talk) 20:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

User:79.17.172.126 (closed)

Page: Poire_à_la_Beaujolaise

User being reported: 79.17.172.126 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) '

Diffs of edit warring:

1. 15:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 15:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC) ""
3. 16:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC) ""

Comments:

IP was blocked last week for edit warring and is edit warring again now that the block is over. This IP seems to be a block evasion of 95.248.34.201 and 87.9.223.167 as they share the same location and were active in the same articles. Yonasse (talk) 16:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Retaliatory report per above; will again defer to the SPI where a checkuser has been requested. Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Ampupu123 reported by User:Solidandrewsister (Result: Partially blocked 2 weeks)

Page:

1. The Hows of Us (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
2. List of highest-grossing Philippine films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
3. List of highest-grossing films in the Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Ampupu123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

1. The Hows of Us - 11:25, 3 September 2024
2. List of highest grossing Philippine films - 09:41, 3 September 2024
3. List of highest-grossing films in the Philippines - 10:05, 3 September 2024

Diffs of the user's reverts:

The Hows of Us

• 10:51, 3 September 2024
• 12:37, 3 September 2024‎
• 09:33, 4 September 2024

List of highest grossing Philippine films

• 10:36, 3 September 2024‎
• 12:30, 3 September 2024‎
• 09:35, 4 September 2024

List of highest-grossing films in the Philippines

• 10:52, 3 September 2024
• 12:34, 3 September 2024
• 09:34, 4 September 2024

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

00:48, 5 September 2024

Comments:

@Ampupu123 has been reverting the edits for The Hows of Us, List of highest-grossing Philippine films, and List of highest-grossing films in the Philippines. They made three consecutive reverts within 24 hours (which is a clear violation of WP:3RR) to the said articles starting on September 3.

According to the parent company of Star Cinema, ABS-CBN, The Hows of Us grossed P1 billion at the box office as of February 2019.[38] It was not only published in their article but also broadcasted on live television.[39]

Despite posting a warning on his Talk page on 00:48, 5 September 2024‎, @Ampupu123 keeps reverting the edits on the said articles. They claimed that "the films Rewind and Hello, Love, Goodbye grossed more than this movie" even though they cannot provide an updated article to support his claim.

Furthermore, @Ampupu123 made a false claim that The Hows of Us grossed only ₱788 million at the box office. His source is the 2018 Annual Report with Consolidated Audited Financial Statement of ABS-CBN. However, the financial statement clearly indicated that the reports are only for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2018. Solidandrewsister (talk) 06:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

• Partially blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

User:96.230.85.65 reported by User:Farell37 (Result: Blocked 24h)

Page: Köppen climate classification (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 96.230.85.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of user's reverts:

1. 15:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 15:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC) ""
3. 15:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC) ""
4. 15:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC) ""

Comments: The user @96.230.85.65 has been reverting the edits on the Köppen climate classification. The city limit per country is 3 and I have been making edits to ensure that only 3 cities per country are placed. However, the user's revertions mean that there continue to be more than 3 cities per country in some cases, which does not meet the requirements that are written at the beginning. Farell37 (talk) 15:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Civil9095 reported by User:Avatar317 (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

Page: Modern monetary theory (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Civil9095 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Civil9095 was blocked on 2024-09-04T14:53:42 for edit warring on this same article. They returned and edit alternately as Civil9095 and 98.118.249.192 and have continued this behavior.

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [40]
2. [41]
3. [diff]
4. [diff]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments:

• Indefinitely blocked. I also blocked their IP, Special:contributions/98.118.249.192, for one week.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

[[User:]] reported by User:WorthPoke2 (Result: ECP 10 days)

Page: Lisa Cameron (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Xwv9009 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [42]
2. [43]
3. [44]
4. [45]
5. [46]
6. [47]
7. [48]
8. [49]

Diff of edit warring / 31RR warning: [50]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [51]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [52]

Comments:
There's been consistent issues with BLP material and new editors editing this page. User joined to edit, has contributed, but appears determined to carry on personal attacks in edit notes rather than use talk page. WorthPoke2 (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Untrue, there have been no personal attacks of you, you "demanded" an apology on the talk page citing that I had made personal attacks (which i have not) and have repeatedly undid my edits with similar attacks citing my "poorly written material" "vanity posting" etc. I have made several active contributions on many wikis without reply. You constantly undo edits of long standing and factual material to support and further your political viewpoint. You repeatedly engage in editing of this page negatively, and have previously conducted similar behaviours with a number of other editors that further a nationalist viewpoint and on other pages. You removed sections on the 2024 election result, you removed sections on disability activism and crypto and have been historically engaged in negative attacks on this page.

Examples

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lisa_Cameron&oldid=1245016167 you accuse me of "poorly writing articles"

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lisa_Cameron&oldid=1242789221 if "multiple users" are questioning BLP issues, why are they not on the talk page or engaging in editing the article constructively?

You have also edited a number of Labour/Conservative/Alba pages to further a particular narrative including Ash Regan Paul Sweeney and others.

e.g.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Sweeney&oldid=1211830212 repeated edits of a Labour Party politician from a nationalist perspective

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ash_Regan&oldid=1221382794 similar edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eilidh_Whiteford&oldid=1215523614 adding in details of a complaint against a Labour MP

I have not seen in your edit history any negativity towards Scottish National Party political representatives, only those from a differing political persuasion of which this page is one. Xwv9009 (talk) 20:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Page protected – there appears to be a content dispute on the page. Consider dispute resolution. All edits have been reverted back to a point before both editors began revert-warring. Behavioral issues should be brought up at WP:ANI, and it appears to me that a topic ban on one or both editors may be in order. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I understand if my conduct is to be looked at. I would say that others have [53] [54] flagged this user's edits here as potential BLP issue here. I've attempted to discus material on the talk page. I would say that the other user insisting and multiple times stating my edits are malicious while I am doing all I can to assume good faith does seem to count as a personal attack, as does their statements in edit logs that I "exclusively edit Scottish politician pages" and do so with pro nationalist bias.

Would suggest they have not looked at the edits they are citing, 1) the Paul Sweeney article, like this, is a page where a minor politician's page seems to have becomes massively bloated and I've attempted to trim it down, with IP edits attempting to re-add removed material. It was not editing "from a nationalist perspective" just trimming a 98k character article of a minor politician to 78k. 2) The Eilidh Whiteford page is not me "adding in details of a complaint against a Labour MP" -- I added to a long-standing section on the page pertaining to the complaint, which, if anything, can be read as critical of an SNP figure. 3) The Ash Regan edit cited was not me adding content. I undid an edit [55] deleting a section that had been in the article for months, claiming that it was just "removing language". 4)I have posted a number of things that could be construed as negative/looking bad for SNP politicians -- and claiming otherwise would indicate they've not looked at my edit history.

I've edited Scottish political pages because it's something I am informed on, but have striven to uphold NPOV. Other user does stuff like delete details which look bad without explanation [56], and has refused to engage on Talk page. Thanks for the protection, pols for my part here, will look at ANI. WorthPoke2 (talk) 23:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Anachronist

Thank you for the update and action on the page. I apologise for you having to do this, and apologise for my role. However in mitigation.

Im being accused of removing details that are unhelpful to the page which Worthpoke2 is also doing.

In particular

Examples

Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lisa_Cameron&oldid=1245016167 this edit removes a number of items that are notable, including ministerial intervention, which had been on the page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lisa_Cameron&oldid=1244472886 again similar behaviours removing items that have been historically deemed as noteworthy

They also removed "disability activism" "carers champion" "positive campaign" over a number of edits

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lisa_Cameron&oldid=1231179624

There also have been historical edits on the page by the same user removing information that should be deemed as NPOV

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lisa_Cameron&oldid=1227612354

I apologise for any inconvenience caused by my actions Anachronist, and will strive to improve my editing noting your comments as. Apologies again.

Have a good day. Xwv9009 (talk) 11:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

[[User:]] reported by User:Marina0804 (Result: Declined – malformed report)

Page:  
User being reported:

Previous version reverted to: [57]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [58]
2. [59]
3. [60]
4. [61]
5. [62]
6. [63]
7. [64]
8. [65]
9. [66]
10. [67]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments:

• User:Marina0804 is the latest in a long line of new accounts trying to remove sourced material from this article. BusterD (talk) 10:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
• Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Bbb23 (talk) 12:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

User:46.135.15.226 reported by User:Chingiziii (Result: Declined; reporter blocked as a sock)

Page: Karel Komárek (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 73.67.145.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 46.135.15.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 46.135.9.177 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 212.185.66.16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 46.135.7.177 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 46.135.23.187 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 31.30.111.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log):

Previous version reverted to: [68]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [69]
2. [70]
3. [71]
4. [72]
5. [73]
6. [74]
7. [75]
8. [76]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments:

these anonymous IP addresses are making a war of edits on Karel Komárek's page. They are deleting the same information that is confirmed by sources like The Guardian or Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. This vandalism is done as part of the publicity for this Czech businessman. I would like to ask you to look into the situation. Thank you. Chingiziii (talk) 12:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

• Declined, this is a mess.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

• I've blocked the reporter as a sock.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

User:74.196.2.26 reported by User:Czello (Result: Blocked 24h)

Page: All In (2024) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 74.196.2.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Consecutive edits made from 08:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC) to 08:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
   1. 08:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC) ""
   2. 08:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC) ""
2. Consecutive edits made from 08:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC) to 08:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
   1. 08:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC) ""
   2. 08:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC) ""
   3. 08:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC) ""
3. Consecutive edits made from 08:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC) to 08:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
   1. 08:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC) ""
   2. 08:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC) ""
   3. 08:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC) ""
4. 20:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC) ""
5. 07:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 08:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on All In (2024)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Note that 3RR hasn't yet been breached, but as the user has made 3 reverts today (discounting consecutive edits, of which there are many), plus 2 more within the past 48 hours, this is clearly edit warring that isn't stopping.

Edits include altering sourced material, deleting sources, and misrepresting sources. — Czello ^(music) 09:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

User:FerrariFan77 reported by User:Cerebral726 (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

Page: 2024 Formula One World Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: FerrariFan77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 19:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1245227641 by Cerebral726 (talk) - doesn't matter if other articles have used mid season as the title of that section then that is the right way to do it"
2. 15:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "/* Mid season changes */"
3. 14:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "/* In-season changes */ - other articles call it a mid season driver change despite the change happening before round 6 or round 18"
4. 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1245049481 by Marbe166 (talk) - the change didn't happen before or after the season so it is a mid season change."
5. 18:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1245047337 by Marbe166 (talk) it is mid season as it is the middle of a current season"
6. 17:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1244897256 by Marbe166 (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 19:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "Notice: Edit warring softer wording for newcomers (RW 16.1)"
2. 19:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "/* September 2024 */ Reply"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 19:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "/* Mid season changes. */ Reply"

Comments:

Edit warring, including after warning. Responded with personal attack after finally starting a discussion. Cerebral726 (talk) 19:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

• Indefinitely blocked as a sock. I would have blocked for one week for the edit-warring and the personal attack.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Knowitall369 reported by User:Notwally (Result: Both blocked 48 hours)

Page: Josef Sorett (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Knowitall369 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 23:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1245258633 by Notwally (talk) Gaslighting is not an explanation for your vandalism."
2. 23:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1245258037 by Notwally (talk) Enough. Go back one month and read the whole exhange. Stop vandalizing and stop gaslighting. You've gone too far."
3. 23:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1245257134 by Notwally (talk) Since you have repeatedly vandalized this page, you are fully aware of what's on the Talk page. Read your own excuses for your prior vandalism. Take it to the talk page!"
4. Consecutive edits made from 23:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC) to 23:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
   1. 23:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1245252201 by Notwally (talk) There is an entire talk page section about this content. stop deleting without consensus, see WP:ONUS"
   2. 23:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1245252177 by Notwally (talk) There is an entire talk page section about this content. stop deleting without consensus, see WP:ONUS"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 23:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Josef Sorett."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 23:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC) "/* Texting controversy */ r"

Comments:

Editor has repeatedly reverted my recent changes, with no response to my comment on the talk page and instead repeatedly accusing me of vandalism. – notwally (talk) 23:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

• Both editors blocked – for a period of 48 hours. Bbb23 (talk) 23:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

User:ShmayoAramean reported by User:R0paire-wiki (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

Page: Güngören, Midyat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: ShmayoAramean (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 22:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC) "Restored to neutral. No Assyrianism, only Syriacs and our church."
2. 22:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC) "I made a last small correction. I made the link to our church so we can all be neutral and everyone can can accept it."
3. 18:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC) "We are the villagers from Keferbe. Keferbe has only existed as a village for 800 years. Mor Stefanus was a standalone church without a village around it. Also, these types of villages have no documented books. There is also 0.0% reference to Assyrians so before making such statements, please mention sources in the talk section. If there are none, Syriacs would be another possibility."
4. 14:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 22:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Güngören, Midyat."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Violated WP:3RR while edit warring R0paire-wiki (talk) 22:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

• Indefinitely blocked as a sock.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Someguywhosbored reported by User:PadFoot2008 (Result: Withdrawn by reporter)

Page: Mughal dynasty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Someguywhosbored (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [77]
2. [78]
3. [79]
4. [80]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [81]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [82]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [83]

Comments:

Since I’m the one being reported I guess I’ll give context. Me and padfoot had been discussing on the Mughal dynasty talk page for months now. There was once an RFC on the Mughal empire page which showed that short synthetic dashed labels like “indo-Muslim” have no real place on Wikipedia. Consensus was to remove that term.

Recently there was another RFC in the Mughal dynasty page after padfoot tried adding the term “indianized” to the page. This ended in no consensus. So padfoot tried adding a different term without gaining consensus. Despite the fact that I had repeatedly reminded him that per WP:NOCONSENSUS, previous content is retained until consensus is reached. In fact I explained to him how the ONUS is on him to achieve consensus because he’s the one who’s trying to add disputed content. Despite the fact that this was explained to him multiple times, and not just by me, he still continued to edit war on the Mughal dynasty page. These edits were clearly disruptive and possibly even a case of vandalism. Which is why I removed it.

The most interesting thing is that padfoot had already reverted more than 4 times on the Mughal dynasty page[[84]] [[85]] [[86]] [[87]]. And there was 3 reverts within 24 hours as well. for that I considered dropping my own report. But furthermore, he wasn’t removing any disruptive edits, rather he was pushing his POV even after he was told that he needs consensus for these changes. He had been edit warring on other topics similar to this as well.

Now I think this was vandalism which is why I originally broke the 4th revert rule because I thought it would be fine but I’m willing to revert my own comment if that was a mistake to avoid edit warring. Still despite the fact that I kept telling padfoot to use the talk page and stop adding his preferred edit, he kept doing it. He needs to understand that WP:ONUS is on him because he’s the one who’s adding disputed content. Even when we were discussing this in the talk page, he purposely ignored the fact that WP:ONUS is on him, and wouldn’t respond to this point no matter how many times I brought it up.

I’m not sure if that changes anything. Like I said I’m willing to self revert if what he’s doing is not actually vandalism, but still he was never supposed to be adding the term “indo-Timurids” to the article anyway because he clearly did not gain consensus after two RFCs.

All I’m asking is for him to pay attention to the fact that he needs consensus if he wants to add disputed content. And WP:ONUS is on him. There’s a lot of other factors I haven’t mentioned yet but I think I can stop here for right now. Like I said, I’m willing to self revert, although he should probably do the same as both of us seem to have broken the 4th revert rule (Someguywhosbored (talk) 04:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC))

I've not broken 3RR. The last one is from 7 July. I've no intention to ever break 3RR or edit war. All your reverts were within 24 hours, not "months ago" as you claim. PadFoot (talk) 04:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

I realized that mistake prior to this comment which is why I removed that part of the comment but nonetheless this doesn’t really respond to everything else I mentioned. Also, it seems that you made 3 reverts(including a Manuel revert) within 24 hours which is indeed edit warring.

like I said I’m willing to self revert as long as you are. But my biggest issue is that you took it to this venue when it was clear that you couldn’t gain consensus for your recent changes. You ignored me repeatedly when I told you that per WP:NOCONSENSUS, previous content is retained. You ignored me when I mentioned that WP:ONUS is on you because you’re the one who’s adding the disputed content. You kept ignoring me despite the fact that I told you to use the talk page to hash this issue out. And despite getting on the talk page, you ignored WP:ONUS and WP:NOCONSENSUS. It seems that you purposefully ignored this point despite repeated reminders. Which is why I originally thought that this may have been vandalism. You were supposed to self revert once your addition was disputed. “ The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content” [[88]]

And this isn’t even your first case of edit warring. You edit warred very recently on another page related to the Mughal dynasty which you got a warning for in September 8 2024. User talk:PadFoot2008 Someguywhosbored (talk) 04:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Anyway I can self revert if that resolves this issue. My guess is that padfoots edit will get reverted anyway because he didn’t gain consensus for it. I would like to see what the administrators say first. But I’d also that recommend that padfoot does the same if I do considering he had broken 3RR as well. Also, the issue of the term “Indo-Timurids” should be resolved in the talk page. We shouldn’t be adding disputed content until consensus is reached. In fact we already had an RFC on the Mughal empire page about this, which ruled in favor of removing short synthetic labels that start with “indo” for various reasons. Someguywhosbored (talk) 05:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

The RFC ruled in favour of removing "Indo-Muslim" as a descriptive term for the empire from the lead. PadFoot (talk) 06:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Did you even care to look at the section of my user talk page you linked? There was no edit warring involved at all. PadFoot (talk) 06:25, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

I self reverted my edit to avoid editing warring and at least resolve this issue. But yes you have been edit warring. When you make three reverts in a 24 hour period(your reverts were a few hours separate from each other), your edit warring. I also made that mistake despite the fact that you shouldn’t have been continuously adding this content to due to ONUS and NOCONSENSUS.

And if you’re talking about your previous edit warring case, yes you were edit warring there as well. [[89]]

[[90]]

[[91]]

you made 3 reverts in 24 hours. Which is why you got the edit warring notice on your talk page in September. Ironically, you had actually given an edit warring warning to one of the other users. Furthermore in that exact same discussion, you were reminded of WP:ONUS repeatedly and ignored it despite the fact that you’re not supposed to making further reverts from that point on. The same issue came up in the talk page of the [[92]]. You’ve been reminded repeatedly of the same offense and still keep doing it. That’s incredibly disruptive.

I apologize however for the fact that I wasn’t patient enough to wait until the process would fix itself. Instead I mistakenly edit warred thinking this may have been vandalism and thus fine to revert more than 4 times, but perhaps that was the wrong. I’m not really experienced enough to make that kind of a call in a more complex discussion like this. Which was my mistake. My previous points still do stand. But I’ve reverted my edit in the mean time. Considering you were edit warring as well, I’d recommend you do the same. But that’s up to your discretion, not mine. Someguywhosbored (talk) 06:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

• I am withdrawing my complaint as the editor in concern has self-reverted. PadFoot (talk) 12:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Fenasikerim10 reported by User:HistoryofIran (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

Page: Kalbajar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Fenasikerim10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [93]
2. [94]
3. [95]
4. [96]
5. [97]
6. [98]
7. [99]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [100]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [101]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [102]

Comments:

Last two reverts were done manually without any edit summary. Also, they're not even allowed to edit this article per WP:GS/AA (which they were told [103]). Bonus: WP:NPA/WP:ASPERSIONS/WP:BATTLEGROUND, safe to say WP:NOTHERE:

A childish mentality person reversing that. Labeling as edit war doesn't help. Whoever made this Wikipedia algorithms must be so dumb.

You are obviously not impartial about this subject.... ...You are nothing a disturbing noise..... ...So find yourself a better hobby.

Well, an Iranian defending an Armenian to forge Wikipedia articles. That's funny as hell. Is there anyone outside of this gang with healthy mind to look at this madness?

Anyways, I am asking editors with more rational minds to intervene. Obviously you are not one of them.

• Indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Bbb23! HistoryofIran (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Gamechanger707 reported by User:FromCzech (Result: Blocked from article for a week)

Page: 2024 Kazakhstan Premier League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Gamechanger707 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 14:36, 25 August 2024 – no Edit summary
2. 10:12, 28 August 2024 (as an IP) – no Edit summary
3. 11:52, 28 August 2024 – no Edit summary
4. 12:36, 1 September 2024 – attempt to explain
5. 23:09, 7 September 2024 – no Edit summary
6. 20:08, 14 September 2024 – no Edit summary

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on user's talk page:

1. 12:07, 28 August 2024 – I drew attention to the unfilled Edit summary and potential edit warring
2. 17:41, 1 September 2024 – after filling out the Edit summary for the first time, I tried to spark a discussion
3. 19:39, 3 September 2024 – I tried to discuss again, but again no response
4. 07:31, 8 September 2024 – formal uw-3rr warning, no response. The user basically shows no effort to communicate.

FromCzech (talk) 18:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of one week from the article. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Klaytotpot reported by User:SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (Result: Stale)

Page: DokiDoki! PreCure (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Klaytotpot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 1st revert
2. 2nd revert

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments: Not a 3RR report but a report against an attempted edit war by Klaytotpot against ferret. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 02:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

• Stale Bbb23 (talk) 12:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Divinemomentever reported by User:Joshua Jonathan (Result: Blocked one week)

Page: The Buddha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Divinemomentever (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [104]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

• diff 13 september, 17:16 (WST)
• diff 13 september, 19:09

1. diff 16 september, 09:03, re-insertion of "Indian subcontinent," against consensus
2. diff 16 september, 09:16
3. diff 16 september, 09:28
4. diff 16 september, 11:22
5. diff 16 september, 11:59, after I notified them of the edit-warring notice-board report

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link] Not warned for 3RR, but repeatedly warned for disruptive editing: diff, diff, diff

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:The Buddha#South Asia. Also engaged them at their talkpage User:Divinemomentever#Anti-Indian and Hindupobic propaganda, trying to understand their mindset.

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: diff 16 september, 11:56

Comments:

• Blocked – for a period of one week. Bbb23 (talk) 12:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

User: Khassanu

Islam

Changed - Revision as of 14:23, 15 September 2024

Reverted - Revision as of 16:19, 15 September 2024

Change - Revision as of 17:01, 16 September 2024

Reverted - Revision as of 18:24, 16 September 2024

Change - Revision as of 18:51, 16 September 2024

They have been told that changing something that is in line source cited and has a fully formed/sourced wiki article at the very least needs to start in the talk page. I gave more detailed info on their talk page with a plea for them to go through the proper steps. Their response was to accuse me in their last revision of being the reason the terms disagree with what they think they should say. Warned about edit warring.

RCSCott91 (talk) 19:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

• Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Bbb23 (talk) 19:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

  Thank You.

  RCSCott91 (talk) 23:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

[[User:]] reported by User:RCSCott91 (Result: Declined – malformed report)

Page:  
User being reported:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam&oldid=1244511347 [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [diff]Revision as of 15:06, 12 September 2024
2. [diff]Revision as of 14:23, 15 September 2024
3. [diff]Revision as of 17:01, 16 September 2024
4. [diff]Revision as of 18:51, 16 September 2024

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Khassanu&diff=prev&oldid=1246076361

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]Latest revision as of 23:00, 16 September 2024

Comments:

User does not source and does drastic changes to the content of article without so much as a edit summary. I accidentally reverted another user's edit, USER:StarkReport, who was merely attempting to fix USER:Khassanu unsourced changes. I apologized profusely to USER:StarkReport which can be seen in my talk page.User:Khassanu refuses to use article talk page and doesn't respond in user talk page.RCSCott91 (talk) 23:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

• Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Bbb23 (talk) 23:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

User:142.163.206.14 reported by User:The Kip (Result:1 week)

Page: Daniel Walcott (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 142.163.206.14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: Last stable version, from June

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 17:44, 15 September
2. 18:26, 16 September
3. 10:53, 17 September
4. 13:59, 17 September
5. 14:43, 17 September

The last four specifically are all within the last 24 hours, hence 3RR. The first is from the day prior.

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Here. As per their usual behavior (see comments), they immediately removed the warning.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Has already been tried, repeatedly - see comments section.

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: Here.

Comments:
User is more than likely a sock of an IP blocked last month for disruptive behavior/edit warring/etc - this specific IP was also already reported yesterday at WP:ANI for block evasion, but no action has been taken yet, and they're continuing to actively disrupt articles (as seen in this report). As for attempts to resolve the edit war/discussion/etc, see the original IP's repeatedly-blanked talk page as well as this whole thread, which led to the initial IP's block, and this other ANI report from their first attempt at block evasion - while not specifically dealing with Walcott himself, it does deal with their refusal to accept the consensus of an RM on NHL entry draft titles (part of the Walcott edit war) as well as their edit-warring on other pages. The Kip ^(contribs) 15:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

• Already blocked by Jake Wartenberg.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Synopsis19117 reported by User:ConstantPlancks (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)

Page: Pentaerythritol tetranitrate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Synopsis19117 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [105]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [106] 1st revert after Drmies removed this.
2. [107] 2nd revert
3. [108] 3rd revert
4. [109]

4th revert with comment "lock the page or i will keep reverting" - This user wants to insert Israel-Hezbollah politics in an article about a chemical

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [110]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [111]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [112]

Comments:

This is a chemical article. Politics don't belong. There is a current event that is attracting attention and editors are inserting accounts of it in numerous places. There is no need to edit war about it on this page. ConstantPlancks (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

User:113.211.210.44 reported by User:TDKR Chicago 101 (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)

Page: User talk:TDKR Chicago 101 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) & Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 113.211.210.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [113]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [114] 1st revert (my talk page)
2. [115] 2nd revert (my talk page)
3. [116] 3rd revert (my talk page)
4. [117] 4th revert (my talk page)
5. [118] 5th revert (my talk page)

1. [119] 1st revert (Wiki admin attn)
2. [120] 2nd revert (Wiki admin attn)
3. [121] 3rd revert (Wiki admin attn)
4. [122] 4th revert (Wiki admin attn)

Unregistered IP has been reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Harassment from unregistered user for harasment due to vulgar message he left on my talk page. He appears to be continuously reverting my edits on my talk page and my defense on the Wikipedia Admin Attn page. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

When making the decision to block, keep in mind of the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Harassment from unregistered user with the idea of a longer block given the constant personal attacks and persistent revertings on my talk page. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks (see the ANI thread linked above) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)